Efficacy and Safety of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Cervical Dystonia: ASPEN-1 Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: ASPEN-1 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, duration of response, and safety of 2 doses of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI), a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation in participants with cervical dystonia (CD). METHODS: Adults (aged 18-80 years) with moderate-to-severe CD (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale [TWSTRS] total score ≥20) were enrolled at 60 sites across 9 countries in Europe and North America. Participants were randomized (3:3:1) to single-dose intramuscular DAXI 125U, 250U, or placebo and followed for up to 36 weeks after injection. The primary end point was change from baseline in TWSTRS total score averaged across weeks 4 and 6. Key secondary end points included duration of effect, Clinical and Patient Global Impression of Change (CGIC, PGIC), TWSTRS subscale scores, and safety. Multiplicity-adjusted intent-to-treat hypothesis tests with multiple imputation were performed using ANCOVA and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analyses. RESULTS: Of 444 individuals screened, 301 were randomized to DAXI 125U (n = 125) or 250U (n = 130) or placebo (n = 46). DAXI 125U and 250U significantly improved the mean TWSTRS total score vs placebo (least squares mean [standard error] difference vs placebo: DAXI 125U, -8.5 [1.93], p < 0.0001; DAXI 250U, -6.6 [1.92], p = 0.0006). The median duration of effect (time from treatment until loss of ≥80% of the peak improvement in average TWSTRS total score achieved at weeks 4 and 6) was 24.0 (95% confidence interval 20.3-29.1) weeks with DAXI 125U and 20.3 (16.7-24.0) weeks with DAXI 250U. Significant improvements were also observed with DAXI in CGIC and PGIC responder rates and TWSTRS subscales. Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 29.6% of participants with DAXI 125U, 23.8% with DAXI 250U, and 17.4% with placebo, with injection site pain being the most common overall. The most frequently reported treatment-related TEAEs of interest in DAXI 125U, DAXI 250U, and placebo, respectively, were muscular weakness (4.8%, 2.3%, 0%), musculoskeletal pain (2.4%, 3.1%, 0%), and dysphagia (1.6%, 3.8%, 0%). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that DAXI, at doses of 125U and 250U, is an effective, safe, long-acting, and well-tolerated treatment for CD. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT03608397, submitted July 11, 2018) and EU Clinical Trials Register (ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT identifier 2018-000446-19, submitted September 13, 2018). First participant enrolled on June 11, 2018. Trial registration was performed in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA 801), which stipulates that the responsible party register an applicable clinical trial not later than 21 calendar days after enrolling the first human participant (42 CFR 11.24). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that in adults with moderate-to-severe idiopathic cervical dystonia, DAXI reduces dystonia more effectively than placebo.

Treatment of Upper Facial Lines With DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection: Results From an Open-Label Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous treatment of moderate-to-severe upper facial lines is reflective of real-world clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daxibotulinumtoxinA-lanm for injection (DAXI) for simultaneous treatment of glabellar, forehead, and lateral canthal (LC) lines. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm Phase 2 study, patients (48 enrolled, 94% completed, follow-up 24-36 weeks) received DAXI 40U (glabellar), 32U (forehead), and 48U (LC) lines. Key efficacy endpoints: percentages of patients achieving none/mild wrinkle severity (investigator-rated) for each upper facial line scale at Week 4. RESULTS: At Week 4, most patients achieved none/mild wrinkle severity (investigator-rated): glabellar (96%), forehead (96%), and LC (92%). Median times to loss of none/mild response (investigator- and patient-rated) among all patients were: 24.6 (glabellar), 20.9 (forehead), and 24.9 (LC) weeks; and 25.0, 24.0, and 28.1 weeks, respectively, among Week-4 responders. At Week 4, most patients reported improvements (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale: 96%-98%) and high satisfaction rates (85%-98%). Five patients experienced treatment-related adverse events: injection-site erythema (3 patients/7 events), facial discomfort (2 patients/2 events), and headache (1 patient/1 event). No patients experienced eyebrow or eyelid ptosis. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous treatment of upper facial lines with DAXI was well tolerated and demonstrated high response rates, extended duration, and high patient satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04259086.

Efficacy and Safety of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines by Age and Race: Subgroup Analysis of the SAKURA Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation approved for the treatment of glabellar lines. The efficacy, safety, and extended duration of response of DAXI 40 U for glabellar lines were demonstrated in 2 Phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies (SAKURA 1 and 2) and a Phase 3 open-label trial (SAKURA 3). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the first DAXI 40 U treatment received in SAKURA 1, 2, or 3 across age and race subgroups. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe glabellar lines (Investigator Global Assessment-Frown Wrinkle Severity [IGA-FWS] and Patient FWS [PFWS] scales) were evaluated for glabellar line severity for ≤36 weeks after the first DAXI treatment. Efficacy and safety were analyzed by age (18-45, >45-55, and >55 years) and race (Asian, Black and African American, and White). RESULTS: Overall, 2785 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The proportion of patients achieving none or mild glabellar line severity at maximum frown (IGA-FWS) after DAXI treatment was high in all age and race subgroups (>96% at Week 4). Glabellar line severity of none or mild by composite IGA-FWS and PFWS rating was maintained for a median of 24.0 weeks in all age subgroups, and for 27.0, 25.3, and 24.0 weeks in the Asian, Black and African American, and White subgroups, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the overall study population, DAXI 40 U demonstrated a high response rate and duration of effect of ≥24 weeks across all age and race subgroups.

Overview of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection: A Novel Formulation of Botulinum Toxin Type A.

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) products are widely used for therapeutic and aesthetic indications, but there is a need for longer-lasting treatments that maintain symptom relief between injections and reduce the frequency of re-treatment. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel BoNTA product containing highly purified 150-kDa core neurotoxin and is the first to be formulated with a proprietary stabilizing excipient peptide (RTP004) instead of human serum albumin. The positively charged RTP004 has been shown to enhance binding of the neurotoxin to neuronal surfaces, which may enhance the likelihood of neurotoxin internalization. DAXI produces robust, extended efficacy across both aesthetic and therapeutic indications. In an extensive glabellar lines clinical program, DAXI showed a high degree of efficacy, a consistent median time to loss of none or mild glabellar line severity of 24 weeks, and median time until return to baseline of up to 28 weeks. In adults with cervical dystonia, DAXI at 125 U and 250 U significantly improved Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total scores, with a median duration of efficacy of 24 and 20 weeks, respectively, which compares favorably with the 12-14 weeks' duration reported for approved BoNTA products. Overall, DAXI was well tolerated, and the consistent extended duration of effect suggests that DAXI has the potential to improve the management of both aesthetic and therapeutic conditions.

Botulinum toxin is used to block the nerve signals that cause muscles to contract. Products containing botulinum toxin are commonly given by injection to treat muscle spasms (such as cervical dystonia, a painful condition where the neck muscles contract involuntarily) and for cosmetic treatment of frown lines. However, the effects of the currently approved botulinum toxin products typically wear off about 3­4 months after injection and so the injections must be repeated regularly. A new product called DAXI (DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection) has been developed. In this product, the botulinum toxin is formulated with a unique protein (called RTP004) that has been designed to help deliver the botulinum toxin to the nerve cells. Research suggests that the RTP004 protein in DAXI adheres the botulinum toxin to the nerves close to the injection site, potentially making its effect last longer. To date, DAXI has been studied in over 3800 patients. The studies have shown that DAXI is effective for treating neck spasms (cervical dystonia) and for reducing the appearance of frown lines. Importantly, the effects of DAXI lasted up to 6 months, which is longer than seen with other botulinum toxin products. The side effects seen with DAXI are consistent in nature and frequency with those seen with other botulinum toxin products. These findings suggest that DAXI can improve both medical and cosmetic treatments due to its longer-lasting effect.

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Efficacy Results From SAKURA 3, a Large, Open-Label, Phase 3 Safety Study.

BACKGROUND: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is botulinum toxin Type A formulated with a novel peptide excipient. Two pivotal, single-treatment, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated efficacy and safety for moderate or severe glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate DAXI in a large, open-label, repeat-treatment study. METHODS: Subjects (n = 2,691) were enrolled from the preceding pivotal trials or de novo and received 40U DAXI. Those who received repeat treatments could be retreated when they returned to baseline on the Investigator Global Assessment-Frown Wrinkle Severity (IGA-FWS) and Patient FWS (PFWS) scales at/after 12 weeks and up to 36 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: High (>96%) response rates (none or mild severity) on the IGA-FWS scale were seen after each of the 3 treatments, with peak response between Weeks 2 to 4. At Week 24, ≥32% had a response of none or mild severity. Peak response rates of ≥92% were observed at Weeks 2 to 4 on the PFWS scale. The median duration for return to moderate or severe severity was 24 weeks. The safety profile was favorable and consistent with previous trials. CONCLUSION: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection efficacy was highly consistent across treatment cycles. These results confirm the previously observed efficacy rates and duration of response.

A Large, Open-Label, Phase 3 Safety Study of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Glabellar Lines: A Focus on Safety From the SAKURA 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: SAKURA 3 was a Phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose safety study of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI); a component of the largest Phase 3 clinical development program of an aesthetic neuromodulator in glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of DAXI (40U) up to 3 treatments for moderate or severe glabellar lines. METHODS: Eligible subjects rolled over from the placebo-controlled trials (n = 477) or were de novo (n = 2,214) and received 1 to 3 treatments over a maximum of 84 weeks. Safety and efficacy were evaluated at least every 4 weeks up to Week 36 (Treatments 1 and 2) and Week 12 (Treatment 3). Select subjects could be retreated after Week 12 if glabellar lines returned to baseline. RESULTS: Safety results are reported for 2,691 subjects, of which 882 received a second treatment and 568 a third. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17.8% of subjects, which were generally mild and resolved. No serious AEs were treatment-related. Eyelid ptosis occurred in 0.9% of treatments. Adverse events were consistent across treatments and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: The safety of DAXI in this large open-label safety study confirms the findings from the pivotal Phase 3 trials, providing reassurance in its overall safety profile.

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Results from Each of Two Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2).

BACKGROUND: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation in clinical development. A phase 2 dose-ranging study identified an optimal dose and demonstrated efficacy with a median duration of 24 weeks. METHODS: In two phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2), subjects with moderate or severe glabellar lines at maximum frown were assigned randomly to receive placebo or 40 U of DAXI. Glabellar lines were evaluated at least every 4 weeks for at least 24 weeks until severity returned to baseline (≤36 weeks). RESULTS: Overall, 609 subjects were enrolled (DAXI, n = 405; placebo, n = 204). DAXI was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving the primary efficacy outcome (≥2-point improvement in glabellar line severity at maximum frown at week 4 according to both investigator and subject ratings): 73.6 percent versus 0.0 percent (SAKURA 1), and 74.0 percent versus 1.0 percent (SAKURA 2) (both p < 0.0001). Composite investigator and subject ratings of maximum frown after DAXI treatment showed that glabellar line severity of none or mild was maintained for a median of 24.0 weeks (SAKURA 1) and 23.9 weeks (SAKURA 2), and glabellar line severity did not return to baseline levels for a median of 27.7 and 26.0 weeks, respectively. DAXI was generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse events related to DAXI treatment being headache (SAKURA 1, 7.0 percent; SAKURA 2, 5.9 percent) and injection-site pain (5.0 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Results from both studies were highly consistent. DAXI may offer a prolonged duration of response (median, ≥24 weeks) and is generally well tolerated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: Pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2).

BACKGROUND: DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A in clinical development. Phase 2 data have shown it offers a more prolonged duration of response than onabotulinumtoxinA. OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate the efficacy, duration of response, and safety of 40 U DAXI compared with placebo in the treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS: Two identical, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies were performed (NCT03014622 and NCT03014635 on www.clinicaltrials.gov). Participants with moderate or severe glabellar lines were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 40 U DAXI or placebo into the corrugator/procerus muscles. Glabellar line severity was assessed by investigators and participants for up to 36 weeks (≥24 weeks). RESULTS: Among 609 participants enrolled (405 DAXI, 204 placebo), 92% completed. DAXI was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing glabellar line severity and maintained none or mild glabellar line severity for a median of 24.0 weeks. It was also generally well tolerated-treatment-related adverse effects were most commonly headache (6.4% vs 2.0%) and injection site pain (3.7% vs 3.9%). LIMITATIONS: The study population was predominantly female and white and received only a single treatment. CONCLUSIONS: DAXI offers a prolonged duration of response for glabellar line reduction and is well tolerated.

Injectable DaxibotulinumtoxinA in Cervical Dystonia: A Phase 2 Dose-Escalation Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA (an investigational botulinum toxin, RT002) may offer a more prolonged duration of response-and therefore less frequent dosing-than onabotulinumtoxinA. OBJECTIVES: To perform a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study to assess the efficacy and safety of daxibotulinumtoxinA in cervical dystonia. METHODS: Subjects with moderate-to-severe isolated cervical dystonia were enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive a single open-label, intramuscular dose of injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA of up to 200 U (n = 12), 200-300 U (n = 12), or 300-450 U (n = 13; https://clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02706795). RESULTS: Overall, 33/37 enrollees completed the trial. DaxibotulinumtoxinA was associated with mean reductions in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score of 16.8 (38%) at week 4, 21.3 (50%) at week 6, and 12.8 (30%) at week 24. The proportion of subjects who were responders (achieved ≥ 20% reduction in TWSTRS-Total score) was 94% at week 6 and 68% at week 24. The median duration of response (time until > 20% of the improvement in TWSTRS-Total score achieved at week 4 was no longer retained or re-treatment was needed) was 25.3 weeks (95% CI, 20.14-26.14 weeks). There were no serious adverse events and there was no apparent dose-related increase in the incidence of adverse events. The most common treatment-related adverse events were dysphagia (14%) and injection site erythema (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary assessments suggest that injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA at doses up to 450 U is well tolerated and may offer prolonged efficacy in the treatment of cervical dystonia. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients are now warranted.

Injectable DaxibotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Double-Blind, Multicenter Comparison With OnabotulinumtoxinA and Placebo.

BACKGROUND: Injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA (RT002) is an investigational botulinum toxin Type A in clinical development. It is formulated with a proprietary peptide and offers the potential of a longer acting neurotoxin therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy, and duration of response of daxibotulinumtoxinA with onabotulinumtoxinA and placebo [www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02303002]. METHODS: In this Phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, parallel-group, double-blind, multicenter study, subjects with moderate or severe glabellar lines at maximum frown were randomly assigned to 20U, 40U, or 60U daxibotulinumtoxinA, 20U onabotulinumtoxinA, or placebo. Glabellar line severity was evaluated by investigators and subjects at least every 4 weeks, for at least 24 weeks. RESULTS: Overall, 268 subjects enrolled. Statistical and clinical superiority were observed for 40U and 60U daxibotulinumtoxinA over 20U onabotulinumtoxinA for a range of efficacy outcomes despite the study not being powered to detect statistically significant differences between these active treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The 40U dose of daxibotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated (e.g., absence of ptosis) and had the most favorable risk: benefit profile. Compared with 20U onabotulinumtoxinA, it exhibited a significantly greater response rate and a significantly longer duration of response (median of 24 weeks vs 19 weeks; p = .030).

Comparing Injectable DaxibotulinumtoxinA and OnabotulinumtoxinA in Moderate and Severe Glabellar Lines: Additional Analyses From a Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA (RT002) is an investigational botulinum toxin Type A. Published Phase 2 data show that, compared with 20U onabotulinumtoxinA, 40U daxibotulinumtoxinA is associated with a significantly greater response rate and significantly longer duration of response (median 24 weeks), and appears generally safe and well tolerated (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02303002). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether these efficacy and safety findings are influenced by baseline glabellar line severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the Phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, parallel-group, double-blind, multicenter study, subjects with moderate or severe glabellar lines at maximum frown were randomly assigned to 20U, 40U, or 60U daxibotulinumtoxinA, 20U onabotulinumtoxinA, or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated by investigators for ≥24 weeks. RESULTS: Data from the per protocol population (n = 191) stratified by baseline glabellar line severity (125 moderate, 66 severe) suggest that the clinical advantage of 40U daxibotulinumtoxinA over 20U onabotulinumtoxinA is maintained for a range of efficacy outcomes regardless of whether glabellar lines are moderate or severe at baseline. Statistical evaluations were not completed due to the limited size of each subgroup. CONCLUSION: 40U daxibotulinumtoxinA appears to offer a clinical efficacy advantage over 20U onabotulinumtoxinA in both moderate and severe glabellar lines-with a greater advantage observed in severe glabellar lines.

Ocular Angiogenesis: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Other Factors.

Systematic study of the mechanisms underlying pathological ocular neovascularization has yielded a wealth of knowledge about pro- and anti-angiogenic factors that modulate diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The evidence implicating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in particular has led to the development of a number of approved anti-VEGF therapies. Additional proangiogenic targets that have emerged as potential mediators of ocular neovascularization include hypoxia-inducible factor-1, angiopoietin-2, platelet-derived growth factor-B and components of the alternative complement pathway. As for VEGF, knowledge of these factors has led to a product pipeline of many more novel agents that are in various stages of clinical development in the setting of ocular neovascularization. These agents are represented by a range of drug classes and, in addition to novel small- and large-molecule VEGF inhibitors, include gene therapies, small interfering RNA agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In addition, combination therapy is beginning to emerge as a strategy to improve the efficacy of individual therapies. Thus, a variety of agents, whether administered alone or as adjunctive therapy with agents targeting VEGF, offer the promise of expanding the range of treatments for ocular neovascular diseases.

Pharmacokinetics of ranibizumab after intravitreal administration in patients with retinal vein occlusion or diabetic macular edema.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the systemic pharmacokinetics of ranibizumab after intravitreal administration in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: A population approach of nonlinear mixed-effect pharmacokinetics modeling based on serum concentrations of ranibizumab measured at various times after intravitreal administration. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with RVO (n = 441) and DME (n = 435) from 4 large, randomized, phase 3 clinical trials of monthly ranibizumab intravitreal administration. METHODS: A 1-compartment pharmacokinetics model with first-order absorption and elimination rate constants previously developed in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was fitted separately to RVO and DME data. Population pharmacokinetic parameters and interindividual variability were estimated for each model. Baseline covariates were evaluated for potential effects on systemic pharmacokinetics. Model performance was validated using general diagnostic plots and a visual predictive check. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ranibizumab disposition was determined in RVO and DME patients and compared with that previously seen in AMD patients. RESULTS: The AMD pharmacokinetics model correctly predicted the measured serum ranibizumab concentration data for RVO and DME patients. Most observed data points were within the simulated 90% confidence interval, indicating that systemic ranibizumab concentrations were comparable among AMD, RVO, and DME patients. No disease-related covariates were identified by the population pharmacokinetics analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The systemic pharmacokinetics of ranibizumab were similar among patients with AMD, RVO, or DME. Disease-related differences and patient demographics, measured in this study, did not lead to variability in ocular elimination or in systemic exposure of ranibizumab after intravitreal administration. In all disease processes tested, ranibizumab exits the eye slowly and then is eliminated rapidly from the circulation, thus minimizing systemic exposure.

Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 24-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly or as needed (pro re nata [PRN]) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). DESIGN: Twenty-four-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active treatment-controlled phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 1098) ≥ 50 years of age with treatment-naïve subfoveal wet AMD. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg monthly or PRN after 3 monthly loading doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at month 12. Key secondary end points included mean change in BCVA from baseline at month 24, proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in BCVA, mean number of ranibizumab injections, and mean change in central foveal thickness from baseline over time by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ocular and systemic safety events also were evaluated through month 24. RESULTS: At month 24, the mean change from baseline in BCVA was (letters) +9.1 (0.5 mg monthly), +7.9 (0.5 mg PRN), +8.0 (2.0 mg monthly), and +7.6 (2.0 mg PRN). The change in mean BCVA from month 12 to 24 was (letters) -1.0, -0.3, -1.2, and -1.0, respectively. The proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline in BCVA at month 24 was 34.5%, 33.1%, 37.6%, and 34.8%, respectively. The mean number of ranibizumab injections through month 24 was 21.4, 13.3, 21.6, and 11.2, respectively; 5.6 and 4.3 mean injections were required in year 2 in the 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg PRN groups, respectively. The average treatment interval in the 0.5 mg PRN group was 9.9 weeks after 3 monthly loading doses, and 93% of these patients did not require monthly dosing. Ocular and systemic safety profiles over 2 years were similar among all 4 treatment groups and were consistent with previous ranibizumab trials in AMD. CONCLUSIONS: At month 24, mean BCVA improvements were clinically meaningful and similar among all 4 ranibizumab treatment groups. The 0.5 mg PRN group achieved a mean gain of 7.9 letters at month 24 with an average of 13.3 injections (5.6 injections in year 2). No new safety events were identified over 24 months.

Collateral vessel presence in branch and central retinal vein occlusions and their impact on visual acuity and anatomical gains: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of collateral vessel formation and to determine their impact on best-corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness in patients with branch or central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO, CRVO) receiving 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab, or sham. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion who received 6 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg), or sham, followed by 6 months of as-needed treatment. Collateral vessel presence, change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity, and change from baseline central foveal thickness were assessed at baseline and months 3, 6, 9, and 12. RESULTS: At month 12, 19.6% of BRVO patients receiving sham/0.5 mg and 16.7% receiving ranibizumab (0.3 mg and 0.5 mg pooled) manifested collaterals at the disk, whereas 48.2% and 47.2% displayed collaterals within the retina, respectively. In CRVO patients, 57.9% and 59.2% of all groups manifested collaterals on the disk, respectively, whereas 12.1% and 15.1% displayed collaterals within the retina. Mean best-corrected visual acuity gain in ranibizumab-treated BRVO and CRVO patients was similar, irrespective of collaterals within the retina ( BRVO: P > 0.05; CRVO: P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The location of collaterals differed between retinal vein occlusion subtypes and ranibizumab treatment did not affect collateral vessel incidence. The presence of collaterals did not seem to impact best-corrected visual acuity gains at month 12 in both BRVO and CRVO patients receiving ranibizumab, whereas generally greater central foveal thickness reductions were observed with presence of collaterals in BRVO patients.

Neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor slows progression of retinal nonperfusion in patients with diabetic macular edema.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of suppression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by monthly injection of ranibizumab on posterior retinal nonperfusion (RNP) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Unplanned retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2 randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred sixty-six patients with DME. METHODS: An independent reading center measured the area of RNP on fluorescein angiograms obtained in the phase 3 RISE and RIDE trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of patients with no posterior RNP. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with no posterior RNP decreased in the sham group between baseline and month 24, but remained relatively stable in the 2 ranibizumab groups. After month 24, the sham group crossed over to receive monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg, and the differences between the sham and ranibizumab groups were reduced. The percentage of patients who showed an increase in posterior RNP from baseline increased over time in all 3 groups, but at a faster rate in the sham group, resulting in statistically significant differences at every time point between months 3 (9.6% vs. 18.5%; P = 0.016) and 24 (16.1% vs. 37.6%; P<0.0001) for ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus sham and from months 6 (12.3% vs. 23.0%; P = 0.013) through 24 (15.0% vs. 37.6%; P<0.0001) for ranibizumab 0.3 mg. Initiation of ranibizumab in the sham group at month 24 was followed by reduction in the percentage of patients with an increase in posterior RNP from baseline at months 30 and 36, whereas the 2 ranibizumab groups continued their gradual rise. CONCLUSIONS: Just as high VEGF levels contribute to progression of retinal nonperfusion in retinal vein occlusion, the same is true in patients with DME, suggesting that regardless of the underlying disease process, high levels of VEGF can cause closure of retinal vessels. However, our data also suggest that VEGF-induced worsening of retinal perfusion in DME is superimposed on another cause of more gradually worsening perfusion, possibly glucotoxicity. Thus, monthly injections of ranibizumab can slow, but not completely prevent, retinal capillary closure in patients with DME.

Intraocular pressure in eyes receiving monthly ranibizumab in 2 pivotal age-related macular degeneration clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To characterize preinjection intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes receiving monthly ranibizumab versus sham or verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of IOP data from 2 phase 3 clinical trials, the Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular AMD (MARINA) and the Anti-VEGF Antibody for the Treatment of Predominantly Classic Choroidal Neovascularization in AMD (ANCHOR) trial. PARTICIPANTS: All safety-evaluable patients who received 1 or more injections of sham or PDT or of ranibizumab and had 1 or more postbaseline IOP measurements recorded for the study eye. METHODS: Preinjection IOP measurements for study eyes (n = 1125) and fellow eyes in MARINA and ANCHOR at baseline and at each monthly visit through month 24 were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: End points evaluated were maximum preinjection IOP during the 24-month treatment period; any occurrence of absolute preinjection IOP of 21 mmHg or more, 25 mmHg or more, or 30 mmHg or more; any occurrence of IOP increase of 6 mmHg or more, 8 mmHg or more, or 10 mmHg or more from baseline; any combination of IOP increase of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more from baseline with concurrent absolute preinjection IOP of 21 mmHg or more or 25 mmHg or more; glaucoma-related adverse events; new glaucoma medications used for 45 days or more; and glaucoma filtration or laser surgeries. RESULTS: Across treatment groups, 60.1% to 70.9% of study eyes had a maximum preinjection IOP of less than 21 mmHg. Comparing ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus sham or PTD treatment, respectively: 39.9% versus 29.1% and 10.9% versus 5.1% had maximum preinjection IOPs of 21 mmHg or more or 25 mmHg or more, respectively; 44.1% versus 29.9% and 24.2% versus 13.6% had IOP increases from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, respectively; 26.1% versus 13.6% and 16.8% versus 9.0% had 1 or more IOP increase from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, respectively, with a concurrent IOP of 21 mmHg or more; 9.6% versus 3.7% and 7.5% versus 2.4% had 1 or more IOP increase from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, respectively, with a concurrent IOP of 25 mmHg or more. No differences were observed in fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Most ranibizumab-treated eyes did not experience sustained preinjection IOP of 21 mmHg or more (>2 consecutive visits) over 24 months. When evaluating the combined IOP end point, more ranibizumab-treated eyes had 1 or more IOP increase from baseline of 6 mmHg or more or 8 mmHg or more, with concurrent highest IOPs of 21 mmHg or more and 25 mmHg or more versus sham or PDT. Intraocular pressure should be monitored in eyes receiving ranibizumab.

Reading speed improvements in retinal vein occlusion after ranibizumab treatment.

IMPORTANCE: Treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with ranibizumab has been shown to improve visual acuity compared with macular laser or observation. It is important to determine whether these visual acuity improvements translate into measurable improvements in visual function. OBJECTIVE: To examine the benefit of ranibizumab (Lucentis) on measured reading speed, a direct performance assessment, through 6 months in eyes of patients with macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN Two multicenter, double-masked, phase 3 trials in which participants with macular edema after branch RVO or central RVO were randomized 1:1:1 to monthly sham, ranibizumab, 0.3 mg, or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, for 6 months. SETTING: Community- and academic-based ophthalmology practices specializing in retinal diseases. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred eighty-nine eyes of 789 participants who were at least aged 18 years with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in the branch vein occlusion (BRAVO) and central vein occlusion (CRUISE) trials. INTERVENTIONS: Eyes were randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 groups for monthly injections for 6 months: sham (132 in BRAVO and 130 in CRUISE), intravitreal ranibizumab, 0.3 mg (134 in BRAVO and 132 in CRUISE), and intravitreal ranibizumab, 0.5 mg (131 in BRAVO and 130 in CRUISE). Patients were able to receive macular laser after 3 months if they met prespecified criteria. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reading speed in the study eye was measured with enlarged text (letter size equivalent to approximately 20/1500 at the test distance) at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months. The number of correctly read words per minute (wpm) was reported. The reading speed test requires a sixth-grade reading level and does not account for literacy or cognitive state. RESULTS In patients with branch RVO, the mean gain for the 0.5-mg group was 31.3 wpm compared with 15.0 wpm in sham-treated eyes (difference, 16.3 wpm; P = .007) at 6 months. In patients with central RVO, the mean gain for the 0.5-mg group was 20.5 wpm compared with 8.1 wpm in sham-treated eyes (difference, 12.4 wpm; P = .01) at 6 months. A gain of 15 or more letters of best-corrected visual acuity letter score corresponded to an increase in reading speed of 12.3 wpm and 15.8 wpm in patients with branch and central RVO, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results suggest that patients with macular edema after RVO treated monthly with ranibizumab are more likely to have improvements in reading speed of the affected eyes through 6 months compared with sham treatment. These results demonstrate the relevance of the treatment benefit to functional visual gain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00486018 and NCT00485836.