Evaluation of automated pediatric sleep stage classification using U-Sleep: a convolutional neural network.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: U-Sleep is a publicly available automated sleep stager, but has not been independently validated using pediatric data. We aimed to a) test the hypothesis that U-Sleep performance is equivalent to trained humans, using a concordance dataset of 50 pediatric polysomnogram excerpts scored by multiple trained scorers, and b) identify clinical and demographic characteristics that impact U-Sleep accuracy, using a clinical dataset of 3114 polysomnograms from a tertiary center. METHODS: Agreement between U-Sleep and 'gold' 30-second epoch sleep staging was determined across both datasets. Utilizing the concordance dataset, the hypothesis of equivalence between human scorers and U-Sleep was tested using a Wilcoxon two one-sided test (TOST). Multivariable regression and generalized additive modelling were used on the clinical dataset to estimate the effects of age, comorbidities and polysomnographic findings on U-Sleep performance. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) Cohen's kappa agreement of U-Sleep and individual trained humans relative to "gold" scoring for 5-stage sleep staging in the concordance dataset were similar, kappa=0.79 (0.19) vs 0.78 (0.13) respectively, and satisfied statistical equivalence (TOST p < 0.01). Median (interquartile range) kappa agreement between U-Sleep 2.0 and clinical sleep-staging was kappa=0.69 (0.22). Modelling indicated lower performance for children < 2 years, those with medical comorbidities possibly altering sleep electroencephalography (kappa reduction=0.07-0.15) and those with decreased sleep efficiency or sleep-disordered breathing (kappa reduction=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: While U-Sleep algorithms showed statistically equivalent performance to trained scorers, accuracy was lower in children < 2 years and those with sleep-disordered breathing or comorbidities affecting electroencephalography. U-Sleep is suitable for pediatric clinical utilization provided automated staging is followed by expert clinician review.

The impact of study type and sleep measurement on oxygen desaturation index calculation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The oxygen desaturation index (ODI) is an important measure of sleep-disordered breathing during polysomnography (PSG); however, the AASM Manual (V3) does not specify whether to include oxygen desaturations occurring during wake epochs. Additionally, an ODI obtained from PSG can differ from an ODI using home sleep apnea tests (HSATs) that do not measure sleep, hampering diagnostic and treatment decision reliability. This study aimed to (1) compare an ODI that included all desaturations with an ODI that excluded desaturations occurring during wake epochs in PSG and (2) compare ODIs obtained from PSG with HSAT. METHODS: 100 consecutive PSGs for investigation of obstructive sleep apnea were compared. ODIs were calculated including all desaturations (ODIall) and by excluding desaturations entirely during wake epochs (ODIsleep). Additionally, we compared ODIall with an ODI calculated using monitoring time as the denominator (ODIHSAT). RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) 3% ODI for ODIall was 22.8 (13.1, 44.1) events/h and ODIsleep was 17.6 (11.5, 35.2) events/h (median difference: -3.9 events/h [-8.2, -0.9]; 21.0% [8.7%, 33.2%]). This discrepancy was larger with increasing ODI and decreasing sleep efficiency. The ODIHSAT was 17.4 (11.3, 35.2) events/h and the median reduction in ODIHSAT vs ODIall was -4.5 (-10.9, -2.0) events/h (21.6%; 11.1%, 33.8). CONCLUSIONS: ODI was significantly reduced when desaturations in wake epochs were excluded, and when ODI was based on monitoring time rather than sleep time, with the potential for underestimation of disease severity. Results suggest that ODI can differ substantially depending on the calculation and study type used, and that there is a need for standardization to ensure consistent diagnosis and treatment outcomes. CITATION: Whenn CB, Wilson DL, Ruehland WR, Churchward TJ, Worsnop C, Tolson J. The impact of study type and sleep measurement on oxygen desaturation index calculation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(5):709-717.

Prevalence of central sleep apnea in people with tetraplegic spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis of research and clinical data.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Over 80% of people with tetraplegia have sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), but whether this is predominantly obstructive or central is unclear. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of central sleep apnea (CSA) in tetraplegia and the contributions of central, obstructive, and hypopnea respiratory events to SDB summary indices in tetraplegia. METHODS: Research and clinical data from 606 individuals with tetraplegia and full overnight polysomnography were collated. The proportions of different respiratory event types were calculated; overall and for mild, moderate, and severe disease. The prevalence of Predominant CSA (Central Apnea Index [CAI] ≥ 5 and more central than obstructive apneas) and Any CSA (CAI ≥ 5) was estimated. Prevalence of sleep-related hypoventilation (SRH) was estimated in a clinical sub-cohort. RESULTS: Respiratory events were primarily hypopneas (71%), followed by obstructive (23%), central (4%), and mixed apneas (2%). As severity increased, the relative contribution of hypopneas and central apneas decreased, while that of obstructive apneas increased. The prevalence of Predominant CSA and Any CSA were 4.3% (26/606) and 8.4% (51/606) respectively. Being male, on opiates and having a high tetraplegic spinal cord injury were associated with CSA. SRH was identified in 26% (26/113) of the clinical sub-cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to characterize SDB in tetraplegia. It provides strong evidence that obstructive sleep apnea is the predominant SDB type; 9-18 times more prevalent than CSA. The prevalence of CSA was estimated to be 4%-8%, significantly lower than previously reported.

ERS technical standards for using type III devices (limited channel studies) in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing in adults and children.

For more than three decades, type III devices have been used in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing in supervised as well as unsupervised settings. They have satisfactory positive and negative predictive values for detecting obstructive and central sleep apnoea in populations with moderately high pre-test probability of symptoms associated with these events. However, standardisation of commercially available type III devices has never been undertaken and the technical specifications can vary widely. None have been subjected to the same rigorous processes as most other diagnostic modalities in the medical field. Although type III devices do not include acquisition of electroencephalographic signals overnight, the minimum number of physical sensors required to allow for respiratory event scoring using standards outlined by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine remains debatable. This technical standard summarises data on type III studies published since 2007 from multiple perspectives in both adult and paediatric sleep practice. Most importantly, it aims to provide a framework for considering current type III device limitations in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing while raising research- and practice-related questions aimed at improving our use of these devices in the present and future.

Portable evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A systematic review.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a significant healthcare burden affecting approximately one billion people worldwide. The prevalence of OSA is rising with the ongoing obesity epidemic, a key risk factor for its development. While in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA, it has significant drawbacks that prevent widespread use. Portable devices with different levels of monitoring are available to allow remote assessment for OSA. To better inform clinical practice and research, this comprehensive systematic review evaluated diagnostic performances, study cost and patients' experience of different levels of portable sleep studies (type 2, 3, and 4), as well as wearable devices and non-contact systems, in adults. Despite varying study designs and devices used, portable diagnostic tests are found to be sufficient for initial screening of patients at risk of OSA. Future studies are needed to evaluate cost effectiveness with the incorporation of portable diagnostic tests into the diagnostic pathway for OSA, as well as their application in patients with chronic respiratory diseases and other comorbidities that may affect test performance.

External proficiency testing improves inter-scorer reliability of polysomnography scoring.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether or not polysomnography (PSG) inter-scorer reliability (ISR) across sleep centres could be improved by external proficiency testing (EPT), or by EPT combined with method alignment training. METHODS: Experienced scorers form 15 sleep centres were randomised to the following: (1) a control group, (2) a group that received a self-directed intervention of EPT reports (EPTPassive) or (3) a group that received an active intervention of method alignment training and EPT reports (EPTActive). Respiratory, arousal and sleep scoring ISR from sixteen PSG fragments were compared between groups across time. RESULTS: Among 30 scorers, there were no ISR changes in controls between baseline (BL) and 6 months (6 m). Both EPT groups showed ISR improvement from BL to 6 m for respiratory, arousal and sleep scoring (p < 0.05). Respiratory scoring back-transformed mean (95CI) proportion of specific agreement (PSA) for the EPTPassive group improved from 0.78 (0.72-0.84) to 0.80 (0.74-0.86) and for the EPTActive group from 0.80 (0.74-0.85) to 0.82 (0.76-0.88). Arousal scoring PSA for the EPTPassive group improved from 0.72 (0.66-0.77) to 0.74 (0.69-0.79) and for the EPTActive group from 0.71 (0.65-0.76) to 0.77 (0.72-0.82). Sleep scoring kappa for the EPTPassive group improved from 0.64 (0.58-0.69) to 0.73 (0.68-0.77) and for the EPTActive group from = 0.75 (0.71-0.80) to 0.80 (0.76-0.85). Overall, poorer performers achieved greater improvement. CONCLUSION: External proficiency testing produced modest, statistically significant PSG inter-scorer reliability improvements among experienced scorers across sleep centres, with potential to improve clinical management of individual patients and increase research study statistical power.

Impact of smoking status and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on pulmonary complications post lung cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with an increased risk of post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) following lung cancer resection. It remains unclear whether smoking cessation reduces this risk. METHODS: Retrospective review of a large, prospectively collected database of over 1000 consecutive resections for lung cancer in a quaternary lung cancer centre over a 23-year period. RESULTS: One thousand and thirteen patients underwent curative-intent lobectomy or pneumonectomy between 1995 and 2018. Three hundred and sixty-two patients (36%) were ex-smokers, 314 (31%) were current smokers and 111 (11%) were never smokers. A pre-operative diagnosis of COPD was present in 57% of current smokers, 57% of ex-smokers and 20% of never smokers. Just over 25% of patients experienced a PPC. PPCs were more frequent in current smokers compared to never smokers (27% vs 17%, p = 0.036), however, no difference was seen between current and ex-smokers (p = 0.412) or between never and ex-smokers (p = 0.113). Those with a diagnosis of COPD, independent of smoking status, had a higher frequency of both PPCs (65% vs 35%, p<0.01) and overall complications (60% vs 40%, p<0.01) as well as a longer length of hospital stay (10 vs 9 days, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Smoking and COPD are both associated with a higher rate of PPCs post lung cancer resection. COPD, independent of smoking status, is also associated with an increased overall post-operative complication rate and length of hospital stay. An emphasis on COPD treatment optimisation, rather than smoking cessation in isolation, may help improve post-operative outcomes.

Exclusion of EEG-based arousals in wake epochs of polysomnography leads to underestimation of the arousal index.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is an internal contradiction in current American Academy of Sleep Medicine standards for arousal index (AI) calculation in polysomnography: Arousals in sleep and wake epochs are counted, but only sleep time is used in the denominator. This study aimed to investigate the impact of including arousals scored in wake epochs on the AI. METHODS: We compared AIs including (AIinc) vs excluding (AIexc) awake-epoch arousals from 100 consecutive polysomnograms conducted for investigation of possible obstructive sleep apnea. To determine the AI that most closely approximated "truth," AIinc and AIexc were compared to an AI calculated from continuous sleep analysis (AIcont) in a 20-polysomnogram subgroup of patients. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) increase in AIinc was 5.2 events/h (3.5-8.1) vs AIexc (AIinc = 28.0 events/h [18.4-38.9] vs AIexc = 22.9 events/ h [13.1-31.3]), equating to an increase of 25.3% (15.6-40.8). As the AI increased, the difference increased (P < .001), with decreasing sleep efficiency and an increasing apnea-hypopnea index as the strongest predictors of the difference between AIexc and AIinc. The absolute AIexc-AIcont difference (7.7 events/h [5.1-13.6]) was significantly greater than the AIinc-AIcont difference (1.2 events/h [0.6-5.7]; z = -3.099; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: There was a notable increase in AI when we included wake-epoch arousals, particularly in patients with more severe obstructive sleep apnea or reduced sleep efficiency. However, the AI including wake-epoch arousals best matched the "true" continuous sleep-scoring AI. Our study informs clinical and research practice, highlights epoch scoring pitfalls, and supports the current American Academy of Sleep Medicine standard arousal reporting approach for future standards. CITATION: Wilson DL, Tolson J, Churchward TJ, Melehan K, O'Donoghue FJ, Ruehland WR. Exclusion of EEG-based arousals in wake epochs of polysomnography leads to underestimation of the arousal index. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(5):1385-1393.

Effects of adopting the Global Lung Function Initiative 2017 reference equations on the interpretation of carbon monoxide transfer factor.

The recently published Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) carbon monoxide transfer factor (T LCO) reference equations provide an opportunity to adopt a current, all-age, widely applicable reference set. The aim of this study was to document the effect of changing to GLI from commonly utilised reference equations on the interpretation of T LCO results.33 863 T LCO results (48% female, 88% Caucasian, n=930 aged <18 years) from clinical pulmonary function laboratories within three Australian teaching hospitals were analysed. The lower limit of normal (LLN) and proportion of patients with a T LCO below this value were calculated using GLI and other commonly used reference equations.The average T LCO LLN for GLI was similar or lower than the other equations, with the largest difference seen for Crapo equations (median: -1.25, IQR: -1.64, -0.86 mmol·min-1·kPa-1). These differences resulted in altered rates of reduced T LCO for GLI particularly for adults (+1.9% versus Miller to -27.6% versus Crapo), more so than for children (-0.8% versus Kim to -14.2% versus Cotes). For adults, the highest raw agreement for GLI was with Miller equations (94.7%), while for children it was with Kim equations (98.1%). Results were reclassified from abnormal to normal more frequently for younger adults, and for adult females, particularly when moving from Roca to GLI equations (30% of females versus 16% of males).The adoption of GLI T LCO reference equations in adults will result in altered interpretation depending on the equations previously used and to a greater extent in adult females. The effect on interpretation in children is less significant.

Genioglossus muscle responses to resistive loads in severe OSA patients and healthy control subjects.

This study aimed to determine whether there is impairment of genioglossus neuromuscular responses to small negative pressure respiratory stimuli, close to the conscious detection threshold, in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We compared genioglossus electromyogram (EMGgg) responses to midinspiratory resistive loads of varying intensity (≈1.2-6.2 cmH2O·L-1·s), delivered via a nasal mask, between 16 severe OSA and 17 control participants while the subjects were awake and in a seated upright position. We examined the relationship between stimulus intensity and peak EMGgg amplitude in a 200-ms poststimulus window and hypothesized that OSA patients would have an increased activation threshold and reduced sensitivity in the relationship between EMGgg activation and stimulus intensity. There was no significant difference between control and OSA participants in the threshold (P = 0.545) or the sensitivity (P = 0.482) of the EMGgg amplitude vs. stimulus intensity relationship, where change in epiglottic pressure relative to background epiglottic pressure represented stimulus intensity. These results do not support the hypothesis that deficits in neuromuscular response to negative upper airway pressure exist in OSA during wakefulness; however, the results are likely influenced by a counterintuitive and novel genioglossus muscle suppression response observed in a significant proportion of both OSA and healthy control participants. This suppression response may relate to the inhibition seen in inspiratory muscles such as the diaphragm in response to sudden-onset negative pressure, and its presence provides new insight into the upper airway neuromuscular response to the collapsing force of negative pressure.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study used a novel midinspiratory resistive load stimulus to study upper airway neuromuscular responses to negative pressure during wakefulness in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although no differences were found between OSA and healthy groups, the study uncovered a novel and unexpected suppression of neuromuscular activity in a large proportion of both OSA and healthy participants. The unusual response provides new insight into the upper airway neuromuscular response to the collapsing force of negative pressure.

Apnoea and hypopnoea scoring for people with spinal cord injury: new thresholds for sleep disordered breathing diagnosis and severity classification.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of respiratory event rule-set changes on the apnoea hypopnoea index, and diagnostic and severity thresholds in people with acute and chronic spinal cord injury. SETTING: Eleven acute spinal cord injury inpatient hospitals across Australia, New Zealand, Canada and England; community dwelling chronic spinal cord injury patients in their own homes. METHODS: Polysomnography of people with acute (n = 24) and chronic (n = 78) tetraplegia were reanalysed from 1999 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) respiratory scoring, to 2007 AASM 'alternative' and 2012 AASM respectively. Equivalent cut points for published 1999 AASM sleep disordered breathing severity ranges were calculated using receiver operator curves, and results presented alongside analyses from the able-bodied. RESULTS: In people with tetraplegia, shift from 1999 AASM to 2007 AASM 'alternative' resulted in a 22% lower apnoea hypopnoea index, and to 2012 AASM a 17% lower index. In people with tetraplegia, equivalent cut-points for 1999 AASM severities of 5,15 and 30 were calculated at 2.4, 8.1 and 16.3 for 2007 AASM 'alternative' and 3.2, 10.0 and 21.2 for 2012 AASM. CONCLUSION: Interpreting research, prevalence and clinical polysomnography results conducted over different periods requires knowledge of the relationship between different rule-sets, and appropriate thresholds for diagnosis of disease. SPONSORSHIP: This project was proudly supported by the Traffic Accident Commission (Program grant) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (PhD stipend 616605).

Evidence against a subcortical gate preventing conscious detection of respiratory load stimuli.

Respiratory related evoked potentials (RREP) were used to examine respiratory stimulus gating. RREPs produced by consciously detected vs. undetected loads, near the detection threshold, were compared. Participants (n = 17) were instrumented with EEG and a nasal mask connected to a loading manifold, which presented a range of mid-inspiratory resistive loads, plus a control, in a random block design. Participants were cued prior to the stimulus and signalled detection by a button press. There were statistically significant differences in peak-to-peak amplitude of the P1 RREP peak for detected (mean ± SD; 3.86 ± 1.45 µV; P = 0.020) and undetected loads (3.67 ± 1.27 µV; P = 0.002) vs. control (2.36 ± 0.81 µV), although baseline-to-peak differences were not significantly different. In contrast peak-to-peak P3 amplitude was significantly greater for detected (5.91 ± 1.54 µV; P < 0.001) but not undetected loads (3.33 ± 0.98 µV; P = 0.189) vs. control (3.69 ± 1.46 µV), with the same pattern observed for baseline-to-peak measurements. The P1 peak, thought to reflect arrival of somatosensory information, appeared to be present in response to both detected and undetected loads, but the later P3 peak, was present for detected loads only. This suggests that for sub-threshold loads sensory information may reach the cortex, arguing against a sub-cortical gating process.

Diagnostic accuracy of a two-stage model for detecting obstructive sleep apnoea in chronic tetraplegia.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold-standard diagnostic test for OSA, however PSG is expensive and frequently inaccessible, especially in SCI. A two-stage model, incorporating a questionnaire followed by oximetry, has been found to accurately detect moderate to severe OSA (MS-OSA) in a non-disabled primary care population. This study investigated the accuracy of the two-stage model in chronic tetraplegia using both the original model and a modified version for tetraplegia. METHODS: An existing data set of 78 people with tetraplegia was used to modify the original two-stage model. Multivariable analysis identified significant risk factors for inclusion in a new tetraplegia-specific questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses of the questionnaires and oximetry established thresholds for diagnosing MS-OSA. The accuracy of both models in diagnosing MS-OSA was prospectively evaluated in 100 participants with chronic tetraplegia across four international SCI units. RESULTS: Injury completeness, sleepiness, self-reported snoring and apnoeas were included in the modified questionnaire, which was highly predictive of MS-OSA (ROC area under the curve 0.87 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.95)). The 3% oxygen desaturation index was also highly predictive (0.93 (0.87-0.98)). The two-stage model with modified questionnaire had a sensitivity and specificity of 83% (66-93) and 88% (75-94) in the development group, and 77% (65-87) and 81% (68-90) in the validation group. Similar results were demonstrated with the original model. CONCLUSION: Implementation of this simple alternative to full PSG could substantially increase the detection of OSA in patients with tetraplegia and improve access to treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Results, ACTRN12615000896572 (The Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry) and pre-results, NCT02176928 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Genioglossus reflex responses to negative upper airway pressure are altered in people with tetraplegia and obstructive sleep apnoea.

KEY POINTS: Protective reflexes in the throat area (upper airway) are crucial for breathing. Impairment of these reflexes can cause breathing problems during sleep such as obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). OSA is very common in people with spinal cord injury for unknown reasons. This study shows major changes in protective reflexes that serve to keep the upper airway open in response to suction pressures in people with tetraplegia and OSA. These results help us understand why OSA is so common in people with tetraplegia and provide new insight into how protective upper airway reflexes work more broadly. ABSTRACT: More than 60% of people with tetraplegia have obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, the specific causes are unknown. Genioglossus, the largest upper-airway dilator muscle, is important in maintaining upper-airway patency. Impaired genioglossus muscle function following spinal cord injury may contribute to OSA. This study aimed to determine if genioglossus reflex responses to negative upper-airway pressure are altered in people with OSA and tetraplegia compared to non-neurologically impaired able-bodied individuals with OSA. Genioglossus reflex responses measured via intramuscular electrodes to ∼60 brief (250 ms) pulses of negative upper-airway pressure (∼-15 cmH2 O at the mask) were compared between 13 participants (2 females) with tetraplegia plus OSA and 9 able-bodied controls (2 females) matched for age and OSA severity. The initial short-latency excitatory reflex response was absent in 6/13 people with tetraplegia and 1/9 controls. Genioglossus reflex inhibition in the absence of excitation was observed in three people with tetraplegia and none of the controls. When the excitatory response was present, it was significantly delayed in the tetraplegia group compared to able-bodied controls: excitation onset latency (mean ± SD) was 32 ± 16 vs. 18 ± 9 ms, P = 0.045; peak excitation latency was 48 ± 17 vs. 33 ± 8 ms, P = 0.038. However, when present, amplitude of the excitation response was not different between groups, 195 ± 26 vs. 219 ± 98% at baseline, P = 0.55. There are major differences in genioglossus reflex morphology and timing in response to rapid changes in airway pressure in people with tetraplegia and OSA. Altered genioglossus function may contribute to the increased risk of OSA in people with tetraplegia. The precise mechanisms mediating these differences are unknown.

Sensory detection of threshold intensity resistive loads in severe obstructive sleep apnoea.

Respiratory related evoked potentials (RREPs) were used to investigate whether sensory detection of small mid-inspiratory resistive loads (≈1.2-6.2 cmH2OL-1s), delivered during wakefulness, was impaired in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). It was reasoned that impaired detection of minor airway patency challenge may lead to difficult-to-remedy further collapse. There was a significant reduction in OSA (n=16) vs. control (n=17) participants in the slope of the relationship between the P1 RREP component amplitude, which reflects arrival of somatosensory information at the cortex, and stimulus intensity, expressed as change in epiglottic pressure (mean [95% confidence intervals]: -0.50 [-0.97, -0.03] vs. -1.78 [-2.54, -1.02]; P=0.004), suggesting a reduction in sensitivity to small respiratory loads. However there was no significant difference in sensitivity after background Pepi was taken into account (P=0.268). Additionally, there were no significant group differences in the threshold of the P1 amplitude/stimulus intensity relationship, or in the P1 latency. These results indicate a reduced sensitivity to detection of small upper airway negative pressure stimuli in OSA related to a reduction in mechanoreceptor activation (likely related to increased airway resistance in OSA vs. controls; P=0.002) rather than defective mechanosensory function.

Nasal Resistance Is Elevated in People with Tetraplegia and Is Reduced by Topical Sympathomimetic Administration.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in individuals with tetraplegia and associated with adverse health outcomes. The causes of the high prevalence of OSA in this population are unknown, but it is important to understand as standard treatments are poorly tolerated in tetraplegia. Nasal congestion is common in tetraplegia, possibly because of unopposed parasympathetic activity. Further, nasal obstruction can induce OSA in healthy individuals. We therefore aimed to compare nasal resistance before and after topical administration of a sympathomimetic between 10 individuals with tetraplegia (T) and 9 able-bodied (AB) controls matched for OSA severity, gender, and age. METHODS: Nasal, pharyngeal, and total upper airway resistance were calculated before and every 2 minutes following delivery of ≈0.05 mL of 0.5% atomized phenylephrine to the nostrils and pharyngeal airway. The surface tension of the upper airway lining liquid was also assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, individuals with tetraplegia had elevated nasal resistance (T = 7.0 ± 1.9, AB = 3.0 ± 0.6 cm H2O/L/s), that rapidly fell after phenylephrine (T = 2.3 ± 0.4, p = 0.03 at 2 min) whereas the able-bodied did not change (AB = 2.5 ± 0.5 cm H2O/L/s, p = 0.06 at 2 min). Pharyngeal resistance was non-significantly higher in individuals with tetraplegia than controls at baseline (T = 2.6 ± 0.9, AB = 1.2 ± 0.4 cm H2O/L/s) and was not altered by phenylephrine in either group. The surface tension of the upper airway lining liquid did not differ between groups (T = 64.3 ± 1.0, AB = 62.7 ± 0.6 mN/m). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the unopposed parasympathetic activity in tetraplegia increases nasal resistance, potentially contributing to the high occurrence of OSA in this population.

Polysomnography using abbreviated signal montages: impact on sleep and cortical arousal scoring.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of using two abbreviated signal montages on the accuracy, precision and inter-scorer reliability of polysomnography (PSG) sleep and arousal scoring, compared to a standard reference montage, in a cohort of patients investigated for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). One abbreviated montage incorporated two signals dedicated to sleep and arousal scoring, and the other incorporated a single signal. METHODS: Four scorers from two laboratories each scored 15 PSGS four times in random order: once using each abbreviated montage and twice using the reference montage. RESULTS: Use of the two-signal montage resulted in small changes in the distribution of sleep stages, a reduction in the arousal index and resultant reductions in sleep and arousal scoring agreement. For the one-signal montage, although similar magnitude sleep stage distribution changes were observed, there were larger reductions in the arousal index, and sleep and arousal scoring accuracy. Additionally, using the one-signal montage, there were statistically significant reductions in the precision of summary statistics including total sleep time (TST) and the amount of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep scored, and reductions in the inter-scorer reliability of REM sleep and arousal scoring. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that abbreviated signal montages may result in underestimation of the arousal index and, depending on the montage, poorer precision in TST and REM sleep scoring, with potential consequences for apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) measures and OSA diagnosis. The results highlight the importance of careful evaluation of PSG results when using portable devices that have restricted signals, and they offer guidance for future PSG and portable monitoring standards.