Failure in all steps of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance process is frequent in daily practice.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Failures at any step in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance process can result in HCC diagnostic delays and associated worse prognosis. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of surveillance failure and its associated risk factors in patients with HCC in Argentina, considering three steps: 1) recognition of at-risk patients, 2) implementation of HCC surveillance, 3) success of HCC surveillance. METHODS: We performed a multi-center cross-sectional study of patients at-risk for HCC in Argentina seen between10.01.2018 and 10.30.2019. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify correlates of surveillance failure. RESULTS: Of 301 included patients, the majority were male (74.8%) with a mean age of 64 years old. At the time of HCC diagnosis, 75 (25%) patients were unaware of their diagnosis of chronic liver disease, and only 130 (43%) patients were under HCC surveillance. Receipt of HCC surveillance was significantly associated with follow-up by a hepatologist. Of 119 patients with complete surveillance, surveillance failure occurred in 30 (25%) patients. Surveillance failure was significantly associated with alpha fetoprotein ≥20 ng/mL (OR 4.0, CI 95% 1.43-11.55). CONCLUSIONS: HCC surveillance failure was frequent in all the evaluated steps. These data should help guide strategies to improve the implementation and results of HCC surveillance in our country.

Trends in liver transplantation for hepatitis C in a country with reduced access to direct-acting antiviral agents.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Access to effective HCV treatment is inequitable globally. We aimed to analyze whether the introduction of effective HCV treatment caused an impact in LT trends in a middle-income country. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of all adult patients who were listed/received a LT in Argentina for HCV, alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), or autoimmune hepatitis/primary biliary cirrhosis (AIH/PBC) from 2007 to 2017. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to identify changes in the cumulative incidence rates in waiting list (WL) registration, WL mortality, and LT. RESULTS: Liver transplantation WL for HCV increased significantly between 2007 and 2014, with an annual percentage change (APC) +7.8%, P = .01, followed by a downward slope from 2014 to 2017 with an APC -9.8%, P = .1. There were no significant changes in WL mortality. LT trends remained stable. LT for HCV without MELD exception points for HCC decreased (APC -6.6%, P = .01), whereas LT for HCV with HCC exception points increased (APC +11.1, P = .01) during the study period. CONCLUSION: Waiting list and LT for HCV without HCC decreased, whereas LT for HCV and HCC increased; this may be related to selective antiviral treatment access for patients with advanced fibrosis.

Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir ± ribavirin is safe and effective in HCV-infected patients in a real-life cohort from Latin America.

Information about the use of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir ± ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r/DSV ± RBV) in real-clinical practice in Latin America is scarce. We aimed to confirm safety and effectiveness of OBV/PTV/r/DSV ± RBV therapy in real-world setting. We analyzed a cohort of patients with genotype 1 infection treated with OBV/PTV/r/DSV ± RBV. Data on demographics, clinical features, safety, and virological response were retrospectively collected from 21 centers in Latin America. A total of 96 patients received OBV/PTV/r/DSV, associated with RBV in 68% of the cases. Most were genotype 1b (80%), 56 (58%) had cirrhosis, and 45 (47%) failed prior HCV treatment. Adverse events occurred in 62% of patients. The most common adverse events were pruritus (21%), hyperbilirubinemia (17%), and asthenia (17%). Five patients discontinued therapy prematurely due to hepatic decompensation, three of them were Child-Pugh B at baseline and one patient died due to multi-organ failure. Follow up HCV-RNA 12 weeks after completion of therapy was evaluated in all the patients and sustained virologic response rate was 97%. No virologic breakthrough was detected. Our study confirms that OBV/PTV/r/DSV treatment is highly effective in patients with chronic HCV without cirrhosis or with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis in non-European populations. Adverse events were often mild and rarely led to treatment discontinuation except for patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis or with previous history of hepatic decompensation. These results can support the development of public strategies to expand the access of OBV/PTV/r + DSV and other DAAs combinations in order to reduce the burden of HCV infection in our region.

Consensus, Dilemmas, and Challenges in Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Latin America.

We reviewed the history, volume, outcomes, uniqueness, and challenges of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Latin America. We used the data from the Latin American and Caribbean Transplant Society, local transplant societies, and opinions from local transplant experts. There are more than 160 active liver transplant teams in Latin America, but only 30 centers have used LDLT in the past 2 years. In 2014, 226 LDLTs were done in the region (8.5% of liver transplant activities). Living donor liver transplantation is mainly restricted to pediatric patients. Adult-to-adult LDLT activities decreased after the implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease score and a concomitant increase on the rate of deceased donors per million population. Posttransplant outcome analysis is not mandatory, transparent or regulated in most countries. More experienced teams have outcomes comparable to international expert centers, but donor and recipient morbidity might be underreported. Latin America lags behind in terms of the number of adult LDLT and the rate of living donor utilization in comparison with other continents with similar donation rates. Local alliances and collaborations with major transplant centers in the developed world will contribute to the development of LDLT in Latin America.

Donor selection criteria for liver transplantation in Argentina: are current standards too rigorous?

Organ shortage is the major limitation for the growth of deceased donor liver transplant worldwide. One strategy to ameliorate this problem is to maximize the liver utilization rate. To assess predictors of liver utilization in Argentina. The national database was used to analyze transplant activity in 2010. Donor, recipient, and transplant variables were evaluated as predictors of graft utilization of number of rejected donor offers before grafting and with the occurrence of primary nonfunction (PNF) or early post-transplant mortality (EM). Of the 582 deceased donors, 293 (50.3%) were recovered for liver transplant. Variables associated with the nonrecovery of the liver were age ≥46 years, umbilical perimeter ≥92 cm, organ procurement outside Gran Buenos Aires, AST ≥42 U/l and ALT ≥29 U/l. The median number of rejected offers before grafting was 4, and in 71 patients (25%), there were ≥13. The only independent predictor for the occurrence of PNF (3.4%) or EM (5.2%) was the recipient's emergency status. During 2010 in Argentina, the liver was recovered in only half of donors. The low incidence of PNF and EM and the characteristics of the nonrecovered liver donors suggest that organ acceptance criteria should be less rigorous.

[Indications and timing of liver transplantation]. / Indicaciones y oportunidad del trasplante hepático.

Liver transplantation (OLT) is indicated in patients with severe and irreversible acute or chronic liver disease without alternative therapy and in the absence of contraindications. Indications for OLT can be grouped in four categories, namely cirrhosis, fulminant hepatitis, malignant hepatic tumors and liver-based genetic defects that trigger damage of other organs. Patients with cirrhosis should be referred for OLT after the onset of any of the major complications or coagulopathy. Early referral is crucial in fulminant hepatitis due to the high mortality with medical therapy and the unpredictable nature of this condition. Ideal timing for OLT is the moment in the natural history of the disease when the expected survival of patients on the waiting list is higher with than without OLT. Recent data suggest that maximal benefit of OLT is obtained in patients with a MELD score >15. However, in some cases with no imminent risk of death, OLT is indicated to improve quality of life or to prevent contraindications such as progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. At present, there is a marked disproportion between the number of donors available and the growing number of patients listed worldwide, which in turn has resulted in prolongation of the time-interval to OLT and waitlist mortality. The rationale of allocation systems utilizing the MELD score is to prioritize on the waiting list patients with severe liver dysfunction ("the sickest first") and those with hepatocellular carcinoma who may loose the benefits of OLT when waitlist time exceeds eight months.

Indicaciones y oportunidad del trasplante hepático / Indications and timing of liver transplantation

El trasplante hepático (TH) está indicado en pacientes con enfermedades hepáticas agudas o crónicas severas e irreversibles para las cuales no exista un tratamiento alternativo y en ausencia de contraindicaciones. Las indicaciones de TH pueden ser agrupadas en cuatro categorías: cirrosis hepática, hepatitis fulminante, tumores hepáticos y defectos genéticos de origen hepático que producen daño en otros órganos. Deben ser derivados para TH los pacientes con cirrosis que desarrollen cualquier complicación mayor o coagulopatía. La derivación precoz es "la clave del éxito" en la hepatitis fulminante por el alto riesgo de muerte y por tener una evolución mayormente impredecible. La oportunidad del TH es el momento en la historia natural de la hepatopatía cuando la sobrevida esperada es mayor con TH que en lista de espera. Estudios recientes han sugerido que el máximo beneficio del TH se obtiene en pacientes con MELD >15. Sin embargo, en algunos casos sin riesgo de muerte inminente, el objetivo del TH es mejorar la calidad de vida o prevenir contraindicaciones como la progresión del hepatocarcinoma cuando el tiempo de espera excede los 8 meses. Actualmente existe una marcada desproporción entre el número de donantes disponibles y el número creciente de potenciales receptores, lo que ha determinado un incremento progresivo del tiempo y mortalidad en lista. La racionalidad de distribuir los órganos en base al score de MELD es otorgar prioridad en la lista a los candidatos más enfermos y a aquellos que no pueden esperar como los pacientes con hepatocarcinoma.

Liver transplantation (OLT) is indicated in patients with severe and irreversible acute or chronic liver disease without alternative therapy and in the absence of contraindications. Indications for OLT can be grouped in four categories, namely cirrhosis, fulminant hepatitis, malignant hepatic tumors and liver-based genetic defects that trigger damage of other organs. Patients with cirrhosis should be referred for OLT after the onset of any of the major complications or coagulopathy. Early referral is crucial in fulminant hepatitis due to the high mortality with medical therapy and the unpredictable nature of this condition. Ideal timing for OLT is the moment in the natural history of the disease when the expected survival of patients on the waiting list is higher with than without OLT. Recent data suggest that maximal benefit of OLT is obtained in patients with a MELD score >15. However, in some cases with no imminent risk of death, OLT is indicated to improve quality of life or to prevent contraindications such as progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. At present, there is a marked disproportion between the number of donors available and the growing number of patients listed worldwide, which in turn has resulted in prolongation of the time-interval to OLT and waitlist mortality. The rationale of allocation systems utilizing the MELD score is to prioritize on the waiting list patients with severe liver dysfunction ("the sickest first") and those with hepatocellular carcinoma who may loose the benefits of OLT when waitlist time exceeds eight months.

MELD is superior to King's college and Clichy's criteria to assess prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure.

Assessment of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is essential for the need and appropriate timing of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study we investigated the prognostic efficacy of King's College criteria, Clichy's criteria, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) in 120 consecutive patients with FHF. Survival with medical therapy (18%), death without OLT (15%), and receipt of a liver transplant were similar in adults (n = 64) and children (n = 56). MELD scores were significantly higher in patients who died compared to those who survived without OLT, both in adults (38 +/- 7 vs. 26 +/- 7, P = 0.0003) and children (39 +/- 7 vs. 23 +/- 6, P = 0.0004). Using logistic regression analysis in this cohort of patients, concordance statistics were significantly higher for MELD (0.95) and PELD (0.99) when compared to King's College (0.74) and Clichy's criteria (0.68). When data was analyzed in a Cox model including patients receiving transplants and censoring the time from admission, the concordance statistic for MELD (0.77) and PELD (0.79) remained significantly higher than that of King's College criteria but not higher than that of Clichy's criteria. In conclusion, this study is the first to show that MELD and PELD are superior to King's College and Clichy's criteria to assess prognosis in FHF. However, because data was generated from a single center and included a rather low number of patients who survived or died without OLT, further confirmation of our findings is required.

Early and frequent histological recurrence of Crohn's disease in small intestinal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of Crohn's disease in small intestinal allografts, although rarely described, can cause serious morbidity and jeopardize graft survival among transplant recipients with Crohn's disease. However, systematic studies to determine the frequency, predictors, and clinical implications of recurrent Crohn's disease have not been reported METHODS: We analyzed our transplant program's experience with small intestinal allografts in patients with Crohn's disease based on retrospective review of clinical and pathological records and corresponding pathology slides. RESULTS: Of 67 patients undergoing 70 transplantations between 1998 and 2004, six adults (three males, three females; mean age 48.1 years) had Crohn's disease complicated by short gut syndrome and total parenteral nutrition failure. Four survivors surveyed endoscopically for a mean 29 (range, 20-40) months and underwent a mean 37 endoscopic examinations with biopsies (range, 31-44) while on maintenance immunosuppression. Despite absence of any endoscopic or clinical manifestations of Crohn's disease throughout this period, two patients had granulomatous enteritis characteristic of Crohn's disease in multiple biopsies, one patient in 8/44 examinations (18%) ranging from 34 days to 20 months postoperatively and the other in 6/32 examinations (19%) ranging from 20 days to 22 months postoperatively. No comparable changes occurred in 57 other patients without Crohn's disease followed endoscopically under the same protocol CONCLUSIONS: Histological recurrence of Crohn's disease may occur in small intestinal allografts despite the absence of endoscopic and clinical disease manifestations. Such recurrences are probably not rare, may occur as early as 3 weeks after transplantation, and do not necessarily portend early clinical recurrence or mandate aggressive therapy to prevent allograft loss.

Addition of serum sodium into the MELD score predicts waiting list mortality better than MELD alone.

In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of serum sodium and hyponatremia (< or =130 mEq/L) in 262 cirrhotic patients consecutively listed, 19 of which died (7%), 175 survived (67%), and 68 underwent liver transplantation (26%) during 3 months of follow-up. Hyponatremia was present in 63% of patients who died, compared to 13% of those who survived (P < .001), whereas the proportion with elevated creatinine (> or =1.4 mg/dL) was low and similar in both groups (10.5 vs. 3%). Prevalence of hyponatremia was higher than that of elevated serum creatinine across all model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) categories. Using logistic regression, hyponatremia and serum sodium were significant predictors of mortality with concordance statistics (c-statistics) .753 for hyponatremia, .784 for sodium, .894 for MELD, .905 for MELD plus hyponatremia (P = .006 vs. MELD alone), and .908 for MELD plus serum sodium (P = .026 vs. MELD alone). Risk of death across all MELD scores was higher for patients with hyponatremia than without hyponatremia. Cox regression considering data within 6 months of follow-up yielded qualitatively similar results, with hyponatremia being a significant predictor of greater mortality risk with an odds ratio of 2.65 (P = .015). Each increase of 1 mEq/L of serum sodium level was associated with a decreased odds ratio of .95 (P = .048). Our results indicate that hyponatremia appears to be an earlier and more sensitive marker than serum creatinine to detect renal impairment and / or circulatory dysfunction in patients with advanced cirrhosis. In conclusion, addition of serum sodium to MELD identified a subgroup of patients with poor outcome in a more efficient way than MELD alone and significantly increased the efficacy of the score to predict waitlist mortality.

How common is delayed cyclosporine absorption following liver transplantation?

The mean time to peak absorption of cyclosporine (CsA) in liver transplant patients is approximately 2 hours, but in some patients the peak occurs later. The goal of this study was, therefore, to investigate the incidence of delayed absorption in 27 de novo liver transplant recipients receiving CsA > or =10 mg/kg/day (C(2) monitoring) and in 15 maintenance patients. Patients were categorized as 'normal' absorbers (C(2) exceeding C(4) and C(6)) or 'delayed' absorbers (C(4) or C(6) exceeding C(2)), and as 'good' (>800 ng/mL at C(0), C(2), C(4), or C(6)) or 'poor' absorbers (C(0), C(2), C(4) and C(6) <800 ng/mL) on the day of study. Among de novo patients, 15 (56%) had 'normal' CsA absorption and 12 (44%) 'delayed' absorption. Good CsA absorption occurred in 16 patients (59%) and poor absorption in 11 (41%). The proportion of poor absorbers was similar in patients with normal (6/15, 40%) or delayed (5/12, 42%) absorption. Among the 12 delayed absorbers, 11 had peak CsA concentration at C(4). Mean C(0) level was significantly higher in delayed absorbers (282 +/- 96 ng/mL) than in normal absorbers (185 +/- 88 ng/mL; P = .01). Delayed absorbers reverted to normal absorption (C(2) > C(4)) after a median of 6 days from the day of study, and no cases of delayed absorption were found among maintenance patients. In conclusion, almost 50% of the patients had delayed CsA absorption early posttransplant; around half of these exhibited normal CsA exposure. Measurement of C(4) in addition to C(2) differentiates effectively between delayed and poor absorbers of CsA such that over- or underimmunosuppression can be avoided.