SMASH-U classification: a tool for aetiology-oriented management of patients with acute haemorrhagic stroke.

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is responsible for disproportionately high morbidity and mortality rates. The most used ICH classification system is based on the anatomical site. We used SMASH-U, an aetiological based classification system for ICH by predefined criteria: structural vascular lesions (S), medication (M), amyloid angiopathy (A), systemic disease (S), hypertension (H), or undetermined (U). We aimed to correlate SMASH-U classification of our patients to the intra-hospital mortality rates. We performed a single centre retrospective study at the Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia (Italy) including consecutive patients between January 2009 and July 2017 assigned with 431 ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases-9). We classified the included patients using SMASH-U criteria, and we analysed the association between SMASH-U aetiology and ICH risk factors to the outcome defined as intra-hospital mortality, using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The higher intra-hospital mortality rate was detected in the systemic disease (36.1%), medication (31.5%), and undetermined (29.4%) groups. At multivariable analysis, medication and systemic disease groups resulted associated with the outcome (odds ratio 3.47; 95% CI 1.15-10.46; P = 0.02 and 3.64; 95% CI 1.47-9.01; P = 0.005, respectively). Furthermore, age and high NIHSS at admission resulted significantly associated with intra-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.01; 95% CI 1-1.03; P = 0.04 and 1.12; 95% CI 1.03-1.22; P = 0.008, respectively). In our retrospective study, the aetiology-oriented classification system SMASH-U showed to be potentially predictive of intra-hospital mortality of acute haemorrhagic stroke patients and it may support clinicians in the acute ICH management.

Estimated GFR reporting is not sufficient to allow detection of chronic kidney disease in an Italian regional hospital.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an emerging worldwide problem. The lack of attention paid to kidney disease is well known and has been described in previous publications. However, little is known about the magnitude of the problem in highly specialized hospitals where serum creatinine values are used to estimate GFR values. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional evaluation of hospitalized adult patients who were admitted to the medical or surgical department of Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital in 2007. Information regarding admissions was derived from a database. Our goal was to assess the prevalence of CKD (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and detection of CKD using diagnostic codes (Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]). To reduce the impact of acute renal failure on the study, the last eGFR obtained during hospitalization was the value used for analysis, and intensive care and nephrology unit admissions were excluded. We also excluded patients who had ICD-9-CM codes for renal replacement therapy, acute renal failure, and contrast administration listed as discharge diagnoses. RESULTS: Of the 18,412 patients included in the study, 4,748 (25.8%) had reduced eGFRs, falling into the category of Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) stage 3 (or higher) CKD. However, the diagnosis of CKD was only reported in 19% of these patients (904/4,748). It is therefore evident that there was a "gray area" corresponding to stage 3 CKD (eGFR 30-59 ml/min), in which most CKD diagnoses are missed. The ICD-9 code sensitivity for detecting CKD was significantly higher in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (26.8%, 22.2%, and 23.7%, respectively) than in subjects without diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease (p < 0.001), but these values are low when the widely described relationship between such comorbidities and CKD is considered. CONCLUSION: Although CKD was common in this patient population at a large inpatient regional hospital, the low rates of CKD detection emphasize the primary role nephrologists must play in continued medical education, and the need for ongoing efforts to train physicians (particularly primary care providers) regarding eGFR interpretation and systematic screening for CKD in high-risk patients (i.e., the elderly, diabetics, hypertensives, and patients with CV disease).