RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Paravalvular leakage (PVL) and conduction disorders that require permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remain clinically relevant challenges after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Computed tomography-based simulations may predict the risk of significant PVL and PPI. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of preprocedural computer simulation with FEops HEARTguide™ to predict >trace PVL and PPI after TAVI with the self-expanding supra-annular ACURATE Neo2 transcatheter heart valve. METHODS: Prospective multicenter observational study that included consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with an ACURATE Neo2 valve. Computer simulations were performed before the TAVI procedure as part of the preprocedural planning. Follow-up period for PPI and PVL was 30 days. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included (median age 81 years (25th-75th percentile 77-84.5)). New left bundle branch block occurred in five patients (7.7%) and PPI in two patients (3%). Contact pressure index (CPI) was similar for patients with vs without new conduction disorders. Patients with PPI had numerically higher CPI than those without PPI (median CPI 20.0% (25th-75th percentile 15.0-25.0) vs. 13.0% (25th-75th percentile 5.5-18), p = 0.27). More than trace PVL occurred in 30%. Median PVL was significantly lower in patients with none-trace PVL (3.2 mL/s [25th-75th percentile 2.2-5.0]), compared to mild PVL (5.2 mL/s [25th-75th percentile 3.2-10.3]) and moderate PVL (12.6 mL/s [25th-75th percentile 3.9-21.3])(p = 0.036). A simulated PVL-cutoff of 9.65 mL/s identified patients with >trace PVL (AUC 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.85), sensitivity 42%, specificity 95%). CONCLUSION: In our study FEops HEARTguide™ simulations identified patients at risk for >trace PVL with ACURATE Neo2 TAVI but not for PPI.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Uncorrected severe mitral regurgitation (MR) due to posterior prolapse leads to left ventricular dilatation. At this stage, mitral valve repair becomes mandatory to avoid permanent myocardial injury. However, which technique among neochoardae implantation and leaflet resection provides the best results in this scenario remains unknown. METHODS: We selected 332 patients with left ventricular dilatation and severe degenerative MR due to posterior leaflet (PL) prolapse who underwent neochoardae implantation (85 patients) or PL resection (247 patients) at our institution between 2008 and 2020. A propensity score matching analysis was carried on to decrease the differences at baseline. RESULTS: Matching yielded 85 neochordae implantations and 85 PL resections. At 10 years, freedom from cardiac death and freedom from mitral valve reoperation were 92.6 ± 6.1% vs 97.8 ± 2.1% and 97.7 ± 2.2% vs 95 ± 3% in the neochordae group and in the PL resection group, respectively. The MR ≥2+ recurrence rate was 23.9 ± 10% in the neochordae group and 20.8 ± 5.8% in the PL resection group (P = 0.834) at 10 years. At the last follow-up, the neochordae group showed a higher reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (44 vs 48 mm; P = 0.001) and a better ejection fraction (60% vs 55%; P < 0.001) compared to PL resection group. CONCLUSIONS: In this subgroup of patients, both neochordae implantation and leaflet resection provide excellent durability of the repair in the long term. Neochordae implantation might have a better effect on dilated left ventricle.