Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 35(4): 442-8, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20196066

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the performance of a variety of biometry formulae for estimated fetal weight (EFW) in the management of severely growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler at a single perinatal institution. METHODS: Forty-three pregnancies were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: chromosomally/ structurally normal fetus; complete ultrasound biometry at < or = 7 days from delivery; EFW < 10(th) centile; absent/reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical arteries; and delivery at < 32 + 6 weeks. EFW accuracy and precision were compared among nine formulae utilizing combinations of head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-six (60.5%) fetuses showed asymmetric growth (HC/AC ratio > 95(th) centile). Analysis of the systematic and random errors associated with each formula showed that the birth weight of asymmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by the Hadlock equation that utilized BPD and AC measurements only. The birth weight of symmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by EFW derived from Hadlock equations that utilized > or = three biometry measurements, including FL. Incorporation of FL into Hadlock formulae led to significant underestimation of birth weight in the fetuses with asymmetric growth (mean percentage error +/- SD: EFW(FL-AC), -13.3 +/- 9.8%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), -10.8 +/- 9.8%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), -11.8 +/- 9.3%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), -11.7 +/- 9.5%; P < 0.001). The same equations were accurate in fetuses with symmetric growth (EFW(FL-AC), 3.1 +/- 10.0%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), 1.0 +/- 8.9%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), 0.3 +/- 8.7%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), 0.4 +/- 15.5%). Use of the best performing equation (Hadlock 3), which does not include FL, to estimate weight in asymmetrically-grown fetuses over 28 weeks' gestation, would have reduced the proportion of those with an underestimation of fetal weight of > 100 g from nine (50.0%) to three (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Biometry methods that exclude FL should be considered in asymmetric intrauterine growth restriction associated with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms.


Assuntos
Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Peso Fetal , Artérias Umbilicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Biometria , Feminino , Fêmur/embriologia , Fêmur/fisiologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Artérias Umbilicais/anormalidades , Artérias Umbilicais/embriologia
4.
Nurs Times ; 71(50): suppl:121-4, 1975 Dec 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1196987
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA