A computed tomography study investigating the effects of botulinum toxin injections prior to complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin A (BTA) affects the lateral abdominal wall (LAW) musculature, abdominal- and hernia dimensions, and muscle structure on computed tomography (CT) in patients scheduled for complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively registered patients who received bilateral intramuscular BTA injections into all three muscles of the LAW. Only patients for which a CT was available before and 3-6 weeks after BTA treatment prior to surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were analyzed. Median hernia width in all patients decreased with 0.4 cm (IQR - 2.1;0.6) (p = 0.023). Median intra-abdominal transverse diameter increased with 0.9 cm (IQR - 0.2;3.3) (p = 0.001) and the intra-abdominal anterior-posterior diameter decreased with 0.5 cm (IQR - 1.3;0.5) (p = 0.017), making the abdomen more oval. Median LAW muscle length increased with 0.9 cm (IQR 0.0;2.4) per side (p < 0.001), muscle thickness decreased with 0.5 cm (IQR - 0.8;- 0.2) (- 25.0%) per side (p < 0.001), and muscle mass decreased with 3.9 cm2 (IQR - 6.4;-1.5) (- 15.8%) per side (p < 0.001). Median HU of the psoas muscles (density) increased with 4.8 HU (IQR 0.4;9.7) (10.3%) per side (p < 0.001). Effects of BTA were more pronounced in patients with a loss of domain (LoD) ≥ 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The main effect of BTA injections is elongation and thinning of the LAW muscles, more than a decrease in hernia width. Concomitantly, the abdomen becomes more oval. An increase of psoas muscles density is seen, associated with offloading of the LAW muscles. Patients with large LoD have a proportionally higher effect of BTA.

Spinal anesthesia in the percutaneous fixation of fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Introduction: The number of geriatric patients with a pelvic ring fracture is rising and minimal invasive fixation techniques are increasingly popular. The patient characteristics of these fragile patients are similar to those of patients with a proximal femur fracture. In the field of proximal femur fracture surgery spinal anesthesia is a very commonly used anesthetic technique in this more fragile patient population. Methods: All patients were treated between January 2022 and May 2022 in the Amsterdam UMC location AMC in The Netherlands. The operations were performed by a surgeon who specialized in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery in a hybrid operating theatre. All patient in this case series received spinal anesthesia using 2-2.5 ml glucosated bupivacaine 5 mg/ml. Results: We describe, for the first time, four cases of percutaneous pelvic ring fracture fixation using spinal anesthesia. There were no perioperative or direct postoperative complications. Patients quickly regained the ability to mobilize, reported little pain complaints, and could be safely discharged to either a rehabilitation center or home. Conclusion: We believe spinal anesthesia could be a safe alternative to general anesthesia for the percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring injuries in a selected group of frail elderly patients. A proper assessment should determine whether or not spinal anesthesia is an option in pelvic fracture fixation, taking patient preference, the advice of the anesthetist, the choice of operative technique, and fracture pattern into consideration.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of technical aspects and clinical outcomes of botulinum toxin prior to abdominal wall reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To systematically review technical aspects and treatment regimens of botulinum toxin A (BTA) injections in the lateral abdominal wall musculature. We also investigated the effect of BTA on abdominal muscle- and hernia dimensions, and clinical outcome. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for studies that investigate the injection of BTA in the lateral abdominal wall muscles. Study characteristics, BTA treatment regimens, surgical procedures, and clinical outcomes are presented descriptively. The effect of BTA on muscle- and hernia dimensions is analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses, and exclusively for studies that investigate ventral incisional hernia patients. RESULTS: We identified 23 studies, comprising 995 patients. Generally, either 500 units of Dysport® or 200-300 units of Botox® are injected at 3-5 locations bilaterally in all three muscles of the lateral abdominal wall, about 4 weeks prior to surgery. No major procedural complications are reported. Meta-analyses show that BTA provides significant elongation of the lateral abdominal wall of 3.2 cm per side (95% CI 2.0-4.3, I2 = 0%, p < 0.001); 6.3 cm total elongation, and a significant but heterogeneous decrease in transverse hernia width (95% CI 0.2-6.8, I2 = 94%, p = 0.04). Furthermore, meta-analysis shows that BTA pretreatment in ventral hernia patients significantly increases the fascial closure rate [RR 1.08 (95% CI 1.02-1.16, I2 = 0%, p = 0.02)]. CONCLUSION: The injection technique and treatment regimens of botulinum toxin A as well as patient selection require standardization. Bilateral pretreatment in hernia patients significantly elongates the lateral abdominal wall muscles, making fascial closure during surgical hernia repair more likely. STUDY REGISTRATION: A review protocol for this meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020198246).

Management of the patient with diabetic peripheral neuropathy presenting for peripheral regional anesthesia: a European survey and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a frequent complication of longstanding diabetes mellitus. There is no evidence-based consensus whether neuropathic patients undergoing peripheral regional anesthesia are at increased risk of neurologic damage. It is unknown whether these controversial results have been incorporated into clinical practice. We conducted a survey to test the hypothesis that the majority of respondents would consider DPN a potential risk factor for nerve damage in regional anesthesia, and would adapt their technique when performing regional anesthesia. In parallel, we sought to summarize the current knowledge-base regarding regional anesthesia and DPN. METHODS: We therefore performed 1) a literature search to review current literature and 2) an online computer-based survey among members of the European Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 19% (584 responders/3107 invitations). About a quarter of participants would avoid regional anesthesia in patients with diabetic neuropathy, and 59% of respondents would counsel patients with diabetic neuropathy about increased risk of regional anesthesia. When techniques were modified, most participants would decrease or omit epinephrine, while fewer respondents would decrease dose of local anesthetic or perform other adjustments. More than 80% agreed with the statement that nerve blocks could be performed safely in diabetic neuropathic patients. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we report the results of the first survey analyzing attitudes and standards of care among European anesthesiologists with regards to regional anesthesia in DPN. While literature is divided on the question whether pre-existing diabetic neuropathy is a risk factor for new neurological deficit after regional anesthesia, most of the responders of this survey take measures to reduce risks, counsel patients on a possible greater risk of neurologic complications, but only a minority of responders would avoid peripheral regional anesthesia altogether.