Targeted next-generation sequencing panel to investigate antiplatelet adverse reactions in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting.

Antiplatelet therapy, the gold standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is one of the therapeutic approaches most associated with the development of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Although numerous studies have shown that pharmacological intervention based on a limited number of high-evidence variants (primarily CYP2C19*2 and *3) can reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), ADRs still occur at variable rates (10.1 % in our case) despite personalized therapy. This study aimed to identify novel genetic variants associated with the endpoint of MACEs 12 months after PCI by designing and analyzing a targeted gene panel. We sequenced 244 ACS-PCI-stent patients (109 with event and 135 without event) and 99 controls without structural cardiovascular disease and performed an association analysis to search for unexpected genetic variants. No single nucleotide polymorphisms reached genomic significance after correction, but three novel variants, including ABCA1 (rs2472434), KLB (rs17618244), and ZNF335 (rs3827066), may play a role in MACEs in ACS patients. These genetic variants are involved in regulating high-density lipoprotein levels and cholesterol deposition, and as they are regulatory variants, they may affect the expression of nearby lipid metabolism-related genes. Our findings suggest new targets (both at the gene and pathway levels) that may increase susceptibility to MACEs, but further research is needed to clarify the role and impact of the identified variants before these findings can be incorporated into the therapeutic decision-making process.

Clinical impact of remote heart failure management using the multiparameter ICD HeartLogic alert.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The multiparametric implantable cardioverter-defibrillator HeartLogic index has proven to be a sensitive and timely predictor of impending heart failure (HF) decompensation. We evaluated the impact of a standardized follow-up protocol implemented by nursing staff and based on remote management of alerts. METHODS: The algorithm was activated in HF patients at 19 Spanish centers. Transmitted data were analyzed remotely, and patients were contacted by telephone if alerts were issued. Clinical actions were implemented remotely or through outpatient visits. The primary endpoint consisted of HF hospitalizations or death. Secondary endpoints were HF outpatient visits. We compared the 12-month periods before and after the adoption of the protocol. RESULTS: We analyzed 392 patients (aged 69±10 years, 76% male, 50% ischemic cardiomyopathy) with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (20%) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (80%). The primary endpoint occurred 151 times in 86 (22%) patients during the 12 months before the adoption of the protocol, and 69 times in 45 (11%) patients (P<.001) during the 12 months after its adoption. The mean number of hospitalizations per patient was 0.39±0.89 pre- and 0.18±0.57 postadoption (P<.001). There were 185 outpatient visits for HF in 96 (24%) patients before adoption and 64 in 48 (12%) patients after adoption (P<.001). The mean number of visits per patient was 0.47±1.11 pre- and 0.16±0.51 postadoption (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized follow-up protocol based on remote management of HeartLogic alerts enabled effective remote management of HF patients. After its adoption, we observed a significant reduction in HF hospitalizations and outpatient visits.

Pharmacogenetic polymorphisms affecting bisoprolol response.

ß-blockers are commonly prescribed to treat multiple cardiovascular (CV) diseases, but, frequently, adverse drug reactions and intolerance limit their use in clinical practice. Interindividual variability in response to ß-blockers may be explained by genetic differences. In fact, pharmacogenetic interactions for some of these drugs have been widely studied, such as metoprolol. But studies that explore genetic variants affecting bisoprolol response are inconclusive, limited or confusing because of mixed results with other ß-Blockers, different genetic polymorphisms observed, endpoint studied etc. Because of this, we performed a systematic review in order to find relevant genetic variants affecting bisoprolol response. We have found genetic polymorphism in several genes, but most of the studies focused in ADRB variants. The ADRB1 Arg389Gly (rs1801253) was the most studied genetic polymorphism and it seems to influence the response to bisoprolol, although studies are inconclusive. Even, we performed a meta-analysis about its influence on systolic/diastolic blood pressure in patients treated with bisoprolol, but this did not show statistically significant results. In conclusion, many genetic polymorphisms have been assessed about their influence on patients´ response to bisoprolol and the ADRB1 Arg389Gly (rs1801253) seems the most relevant genetic polymorphism in this regard but results have not been confirmed with a meta-analysis. Our results support the need of further studies about the impact of genetic variants on bisoprolol response, considering different genetic polymorphisms and conducting single and multiple SNPs analysis, including other clinical parameters related to bisoprolol response in a multivariate study.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in Whom the Diagnosis is not Confirmed.

Patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in whom the diagnosis is not confirmed are poorly characterized. In a contemporary registry of consecutive patients hospitalized with suspected ACS as the primary diagnosis, we assessed characteristics on admission and in-hospital and 6-month mortality of patients discharged with other diagnoses and compared this subgroup with true ACS patients. Of 2557 patients included, 9.0% were discharged with a non-ACS diagnosis such as nonspecific chest pain, myopericarditis, stress cardiomyopathy, hemodynamic disturbances, heart failure, myocardial, pulmonary or valvular disease, or others. Compared with true ACS patients, those with other diagnoses were younger, more often female, and had less cardiovascular risk factors. Both groups had comparable rates of nonchest pain presentation and similar hemodynamic characteristics on admission. Non-ACS patients presented less often with Q waves or with ST-segment or T-wave changes and had a lower Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score than true ACS patients. In-hospital (4.3 vs 4.0%, respectively, p = 0.834) and 6-month (5.4 vs 8.0%, respectively, p = 0.163) mortality rates were comparable in both groups. However, if patients in the non-ACS group were divided into subgroups with nonspecific chest pain (6.2% of total) or other diagnoses (2.8% of total), major differences in in-hospital (0.0 vs 13.9%, respectively, p < 0.001) and 6-month (0.7 vs 15.7%, respectively, p < 0.001) mortality rates would become apparent and remain after multivariable adjustment. In conclusion, in a non-negligible proportion of patients hospitalized with suspected ACS, this diagnosis is not confirmed. Prognosis of these patients follows a bimodal pattern, being excellent in those with nonspecific chest pain but worse than that of true ACS patients in the rest. Efforts are necessary to ensure prompt identification and early risk stratification of these patients allowing appropriate management decisions.

Aortitis as a Rare Cause of Aortic Aneurysm and Valve Regurgitation: Is Repair Precluded?

Aortitis is an infrequent cause of aortic root dilatation and aortic valve regurgitation. Valve-sparing procedures have been proposed, but there is not clear evidence of which is the treatment of choice. We report the case of a 38-year-old pregnant lady with a diagnosis of idiopathic aortitis associated with aortic root aneurysm and severe aortic valve regurgitation.

The study protocol for a non-randomized controlled clinical trial using a genotype-guided strategy in a dataset of patients who undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent.

This article contains data related to the research article entitled "Results of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent" (J. Sánchez-Ramos, C.L. Dávila-Fajardo, P. Toledo Frías, X. Díaz Villamarín, L.J. Martínez-González, S. Martínez Huertas, F. Burillo Gómez, J. Caballero Borrego, A. Bautista Pavés, M.C. Marín Guzmán, J.A. Ramirez Hernández, C. Correa Vilches, J. Cabeza Barrera, 2016) (1). This data article reports, for the first time, about the non-randomized clinical trial protocol that check if CYP2C19/ABCB1 genotype-guided strategy in which the choice of antiplatelet therapy is based on the genetic test, reduces the rates of cardiovascular events and bleeding compared to a non-tailored strategy in patients undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent. The data included in this article are: design and setting of the study, study population, inclusion and exclusion criteria, definition of the intervention, objectives, variables (baseline characteristics and during the follow-up), study procedures, collection and treatment of the biological sample, genotyping, withdrawal criteria, sample size, statistic analysis, ethical aspects, information sheet and consent form. The authors confirm that this study has been registered in Eudra CT (Eudra CT: 2016-001294-33).

Results of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients who undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel has provided beneficial effects in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention. Different polymorphisms have been associated with differences in clopidogrel response. The aim of this study was to check if CYP2C19/ABCB1-genotype-guided strategy reduces the rates of cardiovascular events and bleeding. METHODS: This experimental study included patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent. The prospective genotype-guided strategy (intervention group) was compared against a retrospective non-tailored strategy (control group). Primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome or stroke during 12months after intervention. Secondary endpoint was to compare the efficacy of the different antiplatelet therapies used in genotyping conditions. RESULTS: The study included 719 patients undergone stent, more than 86% with acute coronary syndrome. The primary endpoint occurred in 32 patients (10.1%) in the genotyping group and in 59 patients (14.1%) in the control group (HR 0.63, 95% CI (0.41-0.97), p =0.037). There was no difference in The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeding criteria between the two groups (4.1% vs. 4.7%, HR=0.80, 95% CI (0.39-1.63), p=0.55). In intervention group, there was no difference in the rate of events in patients treated with clopidogrel versus patients treated with other antiplatelet treatments (9.1% vs 11.5% p=0.44), or bleeding (3.7% vs 4.6%, p=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: The genotype-guided strategy could reduce the rates of composite of cardiovascular events and bleeding during 12months after percutaneous coronary intervention compared to a non-genotype-guide strategy.

Genetic polymorphisms influence on the response to clopidogrel in peripheral artery disease patients following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

AIM: To study the association of ABCB1 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms and the clopidogrel response in Spanish peripheral artery disease patients following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and to perform a meta-analysis. MATERIALS & METHODS: 72 patients were recruited and 122 patients included in the meta-analysis. We evaluated the effect of ABCB1 3435 C>T, CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 and primary end point (restenosis/occlusion of the treated lesions) during 12 months after PTA. RESULTS: CYP2C19*2 and/or ABCB1 TT patients were associated with primary end point (OR: 5.00; 95% CI: 1.75-14.27). The meta-analysis confirmed the association of CYP2C19*2 and new atherothrombotic ischemic events (OR: 5.40; 95% CI: 2.30-12.70). CONCLUSION: The CYP2C19 and ABCB1 polymorphisms could be genetic markers of cardiovascular events in peripheral artery disease patients following PTA treated with clopidogrel.

Influence of the HER2 Ile655Val polymorphism on trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in HER2-positive breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The HER2 655 A>G genetic variant has recently been associated with trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in HER2 breast cancer patients. Considering previous results, the aim of our study was to validate the role of this polymorphism as a predictor of the cardiac toxicity of trastuzumab in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Our study population was composed of 78 HER2 breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab. The HER2 655 A>G (rs1136201) genetic variant was genotyped using TaqMan allelic discrimination technology. Patients were classified on the basis of the occurrence of cardiotoxic events or the absence of cardiotoxic events during 1 year after the first infusion. RESULTS: The HER2 655 A>G polymorphism was significantly associated with cardiotoxicity: AG versus AA [P=0.012, odds ratio (OR)=5.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-18.36], AG+GG versus AA (P=0.01, OR=5.72, 95% CI 1.50-21.76), AG versus AA+GG (P=0.005, OR=7.17, 95% CI 1.82-28.29). A meta-analysis combining these data with the results from previous studies confirmed this association. CONCLUSION: Our results support the role of the HER2 655 A>G polymorphism as a genetic marker of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.