Differences between substance-induced psychotic disorders and non-substance-induced psychotic disorders and diagnostic stability. / Diferencias y estabilidad diagnóstica entre trastornos psicóticos inducidos por sustancias y trastornos psicóticos no inducidos.

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the comorbidity between psychotic disorders and substance use, one of them being the capacity of some to induce psychotic symptoms, although the transition from psychotic episodes induced by substances to schizophrenia has been less studied. In this study, differential variables between patients with induced and non-induced psychosis are determined, and the evolution and change of diagnosis of those induced to schizophrenia in the follow-up is analyzed. This is an observational case-control study with 238 patients admitted to the acute care unit for psychotic episodes between December 2003 and September 2011. The group of non-substance-induced psychotic disorders (NSIPD) included 127 patients, with 111 in the substance-induced (SIPD) group, according to the International Classification of Diseases. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, personal and family history, substance use, diagnostic stability and progression were compared. The NSIPD group showed higher scores in severity and in negative symptoms and more family history of psychosis. The SIPD group presented more personal history of personality disorder and family history of addictions and more positive symptoms At 6 years of follow-up, 40.9% of ISDP changed to a diagnosis of schizophrenia, presenting more family history of psychotic disorders and worse progression with more visits to the emergency department and readmissions, than subjects who maintained diagnostic stability. Therefore, special attention should be paid to this group of patients because of the potential severity and the increased risk of developing a chronic psychotic disorder.

Se han propuesto distintas hipótesis para explicar la comorbilidad entre trastornos psicóticos y por consumo de sustancias, siendo una de ellas la capacidad de algunas de inducir cuadros psicóticos, aunque la transición de episodios psicóticos inducidos por sustancias a esquizofrenia ha sido menos estudiada. En este trabajo se determinan variables diferenciales entre individuos con psicosis inducidas y no inducidas, y se analiza la evolución y el cambio de diagnóstico de las inducidas a esquizofrenia en el seguimiento. Es un estudio observacional de casos y controles con 238 pacientes ingresados en la unidad de agudos de un Hospital General de Madrid (España) por episodios psicóticos entre diciembre de 2003 y septiembre de 2011. Se incluyeron 127 en el grupo de trastornos psicóticos no inducidos por sustancias (TPNIS) y 111 en el de inducidos por sustancias (TPIS), según la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades. Se compararon características sociodemográficas, clínicas, antecedentes personales y familiares, de consumo de sustancias, estabilidad diagnóstica y evolución. El grupo de TPNIS presentó mayores puntuaciones en gravedad y sintomatología negativa mientras que el de TPIS tuvo más antecedentes personales de trastorno de personalidad y familiares de adicciones, y más sintomatología positiva. A los seis años un 40,9% de TPIS cambió a diagnóstico de esquizofrenia, presentando más antecedentes familiares de trastornos psicóticos y de adicciones, y una peor evolución con más visitas a urgencias y reingresos que los sujetos con estabilidad diagnóstica. Por tanto, habrá que prestar especial atención a este grupo de sujetos por su potencial gravedad y por el mayor riesgo de desarrollar un trastorno psicótico crónico.

Cannabinoid receptor type 2 gene is associated with comorbidity of schizophrenia and cannabis dependence and fatty acid amide hydrolase gene is associated with cannabis dependence in the Spanish population. / El gen del receptor cannabinoide tipo 2 se asocia con la comorbilidad entre esquizofrenia y dependencia de cannabis y el gen de la enzima amidohidrolasa de ácidos grasos se asocia con la dependencia de cannabis en población española.

The endocannabinoid system has been associated with various psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia or addictive disorders. Recent studies have found that some polymorphisms in the cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CNR2), cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CNR1) and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) genes could play an important role as risk factors in the etiology of these diseases. We analysed different cannabinoid gene polimorphisms from non-substance using patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (n = 379), schizophrenic patients with cannabis use disorders (n = 124), cannabis users who did not have psychoses (n = 71), and 316 controls from various Spanish hospitals and health centres. We found a statistical association between polymorphisms rs35761398 and rs12744386 in the CNR2 gene and comorbidity of schizophrenia and cannabis dependence, as well as an association between loss of heterozygosity (overdominance) for polymorphism rs324420 in the FAAH gene and cannabis dependence in a Spanish population sample. The rs35761398 and rs12744386 polymorphisms in the CNR2 gene are genetic risk factors for schizophrenia in cannabis-dependent subjects. Loss of heterozygosity for polymorphism rs324420 in the FAAH gene is a genetic risk factor for cannabis dependence in this population.

El sistema cannabinoide se ha asociado con varios trastornos psiquiátricos como la esquizofrenia y las adicciones. Diversos estudios han observado que algunos polimorfismos del receptor cannabinoide tipo 2 (CNR2), del receptor cannabinoide tipo 1 (CNR1) y del gen de la enzima amido hidrolasa de ácidos grasos (FAAH) pueden ser factores de riesgo de estos trastornos. Hemos analizado diversos polimorfismos del sistema cannabinoide en pacientes diagnosticados de esquizofrenia sin trastorno por uso de sustancias (n = 379), esquizofrenia con trastorno por uso de cannabis (n = 124), dependientes de cannabis sin psicosis asociada (n = 71) y un grupo de control (316) procedentes de diversos hospitales y centros de asistencia sanitaria españoles. Hemos encontrado una asociación entre los polimorfismos rs35761398 y rs12744386 del CNR2 con la presencia de esquizofrenia y trastorno por uso de cannabis comórbido y una pérdida de heterocigosidad en el polimorfismo rs324420 del gen FAAH con la dependencia de cannabis en población española. Los polimorfismos rs35761398 y rs12744386 en CNR2 son factores de riesgo para esquizofrenia en sujetos dependientes de cannabis. La pérdida de heterocigosidad en el polimorfismo rs324420 en el gen FAAH es un factor de riesgo para la dependencia de cannabis.

Cannabis-induced psychosis: clinical characteristics and its differentiation from schizophrenia with and without cannabis use. / Psicosis inducida por cannabis: características clínicas y su diferenciación con la esquizofrenia con y sin consumo de cannabis asociado.

Cannabis use is considered an established risk factor for psychosis development. Differentiating between cannabis-induced disorders and schizophrenia is useful for prognostic and therapeutic purposes. Three inpatients groups were differentiated: cannabis-induced psychosis (CIP) (n = 69; mean age = 27.4, SD = 6.5; 82.6% males), schizophrenia with cannabis abuse or dependence (SZ + CB) (n = 57; mean age = 31.9, SD = 10.1; 94.7% males) and schizophrenia without cannabis abuse or dependence (SZ) (n = 181; mean age = 41.8, SD = 13.3; 54.1% males). The Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM-IV) scale was used to differentiate induced psychosis. The CIP group presented lower mean scores on the negative PANSS subscale (M = 12.9, SD = 5.9; F = 32.24, p < 0.001), fewer auditory hallucinations (60.3%; X² = 6.60, p = 0.037) and greater presence of mania (26.1% vs. 12.3%; X² = 32.58, p < 0.001) than the SZ + CB group. There were few clinical differences between patients with schizophrenia, regardless of previous cannabis use. The age of first admission due to psychosis was lower in both psychotic inpatients groups with cannabis use (M = 26.1, SD = 6.4 in CIP and M = 25.3, SD = 6.2 in SZ + CB; X² = 20.02, p < 0,001). A clinical pattern characteristic of cannabis-induced psychosis was not observed, but the precipitating role of cannabis in the appearance of psychotic symptoms was demonstrated, given the lower age of first admission due to psychosis in cannabis user groups.

El consumo de cannabis se considera un factor de riesgo establecido para el desarrollo de psicosis. Diferenciar los trastornos inducidos por cannabis de la esquizofrenia resulta útil desde el punto de vista pronóstico y terapéutico. Se diferenciaron tres grupos de pacientes hospitalizados: psicosis inducida por cannabis (PIC) (n = 69; Media de edad = 27,4, DE = 6,5; 82,6 % varones), esquizofrenia con abuso o dependencia de cannabis (EZ + CB) (n = 57; Media de edad = 31,9, DE = 10,1; 94,7% varones) y esquizofrenia sin abuso o dependencia de cannabis (EZ) (n = 181; Media de edad = 41,8, DE = 13,3; 54,1% varones). Se utilizó la escala Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM-IV) para la diferenciación de cuadros inducidos. El grupo PIC presentó puntaciones inferiores en la subescala PANSS negativa (M = 12,9, DE = 5,9; F = 32,24; p < 0,001), menos alucinaciones auditivas (60,3%; X²  = 6,60; p = 0,037) y mayor presencia de manía (26,1% vs. 12,3%; X² = 32,58; p < 0,001) en comparación con el grupo EZ + CB. Hubo pocas diferencias clínicas entre los pacientes con esquizofrenia, independientemente del consumo de cannabis. La edad del primer ingreso por psicosis fue menor en ambos grupos de psicóticos consumidores (M = 26,1, DE = 6,4 en PIC y M = 25,3, DE = 6,2 en EZ + CB; X² = 20,02; p < 0,001). No se observó un patrón clínico característico de las psicosis inducidas por cannabis, aunque sí se demostró el papel precipitante del cannabis en la aparición de psicosis, dada la menor edad de ingreso en los consumidores.

[Evolution of psychopathological alterations in patients with morbid obesity after bariatric surgery]. / Evolución de alteraciones psicopatológicas en pacientes con obesidad mórbida tras cirugía bariátrica.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to know the prevalence of the psychopathological alterations among patients with morbid obesity (MO) candidates for bariatric surgery in our centre, to analyze its predictive value on the surgical outcome and to study the evolution after weight stabilization was achieved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty five patients of the University Hospital Foundation Alcorcón (122 women) candidates for bariatric surgery (108 finally operated) were included in the study. A clinical interview was carried and several scales of psychopathology were applied before and after surgery: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Maudsley Obsessive-compulsive Interview (MOCI), Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI), Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), Bulimic Investigation Test Edinburg (BITE), and Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). A comparison of means between the initial and final scores of the psychometric tests and a logistic regression analysis to identify the predictive variables of positive evolution after surgery (defined as percentage of lost overweight> 50% and final IMC <35) were performed. RESULTS: An improvement in the scores of BDI, BAI and in the subscales of EDI, Impulse to the thinness (EDI-DT) and corporal Dissatisfaction (EDI-BD) was observed. The differences were not significant for the rest of the psychometric tests. The multivariate analysis identified 3 predictive factors for postsurgical evolution: BDI (OR 0.91, IC95% 0.82-1.02), BIS (OR 1.08, IC 95% 1.0-1.16) y EDI-DT (OR 1.18, IC 95% 1.0-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the scales of depression, anxiety, impulse to thinness and corporal dissatisfaction improved in patients with MO after bariatric surgery. Some baseline psychometric variables may predict a favourable postsurgical evolution of these patients.