[Implementation of fast-track measures in colorectal resections : A survey among members of the DGAI]. / Umsetzung anästhesiologischer Fast-Track-Maßnahmen bei kolorektalen Resektionen : Eine Umfrage unter Mitgliedern der DGAI.

PURPOSE: The fast-track (FT) concept is a multimodal, interdisciplinary approach to perioperative patient care intended to reduce postoperative complications. Despite good evidence implementation seems to need improvement, whereby almost all studies focused on the implementation of surgical modules regardless of the interdisciplinary aspect. Adherence to the anesthesiological measures (prehabilitation, premedication, volume and temperature management, pain therapy), on the other hand, has been insufficiently studied. To assess the status quo a survey on the implementation of anesthesiological FT measures was conducted among members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) to analyze where potential for improvement exists. METHODS: Using the SurveyMonkey® online survey tool, 28 questions regarding perioperative anesthesiological care of colorectal surgery patients were sent to DGAI members in order to analyze adherence to FT measures. RESULTS: While some of the FT measures (temperature management, PONV prophylaxis) are already routinely used, there is a divergence between current recommendations and clinical implementation for other components. In addition to premedication, interdisciplinary measures (prehabilitation) and measures that affect multiple interfaces (operating theatre, recovery room, ward), such as volume management or perioperative pain management, are particularly affected. CONCLUSION: The anesthesiological recommendations of the FT concept are only partially implemented in Germany. This particularly affects the interdisciplinary components as well as measures at the operating theatre, recovery room and ward interfaces. The establishment of an interdisciplinary FT team and interdisciplinary development of SOPs can optimize adherence, which in turn improves the short-term and long-term outcome of patients.

[Sepsis-associated encephalopathy : A nationwide survey on diagnostic procedures and neuromonitoring in German intensive care units]. / Sepsis-assoziierte Enzephalopathie : Eine bundesweite Umfrage zu Verfahren der Diagnostik und des Neuromonitorings auf deutschen Intensivstationen.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is one of the most frequent causes of neurocognitive impairment in intensive care patients. It is associated with increased hospital mortality and poor long-term neurocognitive outcome. To date there are no evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostics and neuromonitoring of SAE. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the current clinical practice of diagnostics and neuromonitoring of SAE on intensive care units (ICU) in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on available literature focusing on SAE, a questionnaire consisting of 26 items was designed and forwarded to 438 members of the Scientific Working Group for Intensive Care Medicine (WAKI) and the Scientific Working Group for Neuroanesthesia (WAKNA) as an online survey. RESULTS: The total participation rate in the survey was 12.6% (55/438). A standardized diagnostic procedure of SAE was reported by 21.8% (12/55) of the participants. The majority of participants preferred delirium screening tools (50/55; 90.9%) and the clinical examination (49/55; 89.1%) to detect SAE. Brain imaging (26/55; 47.3%), laboratory/biomarker determination (15/55; 27.3%), electrophysiological techniques (14/55; 25.5%) and cerebrospinal fluid examination (12/55; 21.8%) are less frequently performed. The follow-up examination of SAE is most frequently performed by a clinical examination (45/55; 81.8%). Neuromonitoring techniques, such as continuous electroencephalography (31/55; 56.4%), transcranial doppler sonography (31/55; 56.4%) and near-infrared spectroscopy (18/55, 32.7%) are not frequently used. We observed statistically significant differences between the theoretically attributed importance and clinical practice. The great majority of respondents (48/55; 87.3%) endorse the development of guidelines containing recommendations for diagnostics and neuromonitoring in SAE. DISCUSSION: This explorative survey demonstrated a great heterogeneity in diagnostics and neuromonitoring of SAE in German ICUs. Uniform concepts have not yet been established but are desired by the majority of study participants. Innovative biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury in blood and cerebrospinal fluid as well as electrophysiological and brain imaging techniques could provide valuable prognostic information on the neurocognitive outcome of patients and would thus be a useful addition to the clinical assessment of ICU patients with SAE.

[Neurophysiological monitoring during surgical procedures]. / Neurophysiologisches Monitoring bei operativen Eingriffen.

The application of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is gaining more and more importance in daily clinical practice. The use of IONM allows the localization of neural structures and to control functioning of the peripheral and central nervous systems in anesthetized patients. This enables surgeons to identify and to protect neural structures and cerebral areas. The use of IONM also enables anesthesiologists to adjust anesthesia and cardiopulmonary therapy to the individual needs of the patient. Thereby, it may be possible to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and the incidence of postoperative cognitive deficits. To exploit the full potential anesthesiologists and surgeons must be able to use the methods of IONM safely and understand the results; therefore, basic knowledge of the technology, options and limitations of IONM is necessary. It is also important to be aware of the influence of anesthetics on the methods of IONM. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is the anesthetic method of choice, because it has only minimal influence on IONM methods. It is important to avoid bolus injections of hypnotics to achieve stable blood concentrations. Long- acting neuromuscular blocking agents should be avoided, because they disturb the signals of electromyography and motor-evoked potentials. By using IONM anesthesiologists and surgeons can identify changes in the function of the peripheral and central nervous system prior to irreversible damage.