The effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1/insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 administration on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in recreational athletes.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggested that recombinant human IGF-1 (rhIGF-1) administration affects carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in healthy people and in people with diabetes. This study aimed to determine the effects of rhIGF-1/rhIGF binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3) administration on glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism in healthy recreational athletes. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 administration study at Southampton General Hospital, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 56 recreational athletes (30 men, 26 women). METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive placebo, low-dose rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 (30 mg/day) or high-dose rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 (60 mg/day) for 28 days. The following variables were measured before and immediately after the treatment period: fasting lipids, glucose, insulin, C-peptide and glycated haemoglobin. The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) was used to estimate insulin sensitivity and indirect calorimetry to assess substrate oxidation rates. The general linear model approach was used to compare treatment group changes with the placebo group. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo group, there was a significant reduction in fasting triglycerides in participants treated with high-dose rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 (p = .030), but not in the low-dose group (p = .390). In women, but not in men, there were significant increases in total cholesterol (p = .003), HDL cholesterol (p = .001) and LDL cholesterol (p = .008). These lipid changes were associated with reduced fasting insulin (p = .010), C-peptide (p = .001) and HOMA-IR (p = .018) in women and reduced C-peptide (p = .046) in men. CONCLUSIONS: rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 administration for 28 days reduced insulin concentration, improved insulin sensitivity and had significant effects on lipid profile including decreased fasting triglycerides.

A correction to the age-adjustment of the GH-2000 score used in the detection of growth hormone misuse.

OBJECTIVE: The GH-2000 biomarker test has been introduced by the World Anti-Doping Agency as a method of detecting growth hormone misuse in professional sport. The test involves the measurement insulin-like growth factor-I and the amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (P-III-NP) which increase in a dose-dependent manner in response to GH. These measurements are combined in sex specific formulae that include an age adjustment. The original age adjustment overcorrects the effect of age in male athletes and could potentially place older men at a disadvantage. The purpose of this note is to investigate the performance of a previously suggested correction term in two new and larger data sets. RESULTS: The GH-2000 score was calculated for 7307 samples obtained from 15 accredited WADA laboratories in 2017 and 3916 samples measured at Drug Control Centre, King's College London, UK between 2013 and 2017. The GH-2000 scores were investigated for positive age effects using standard regression modelling. As previously, all analyses confirmed a positive age effect. Applying the earlier suggested correction term of 0.032 × age showed a significant over-correction leading to a negative association of the GH-2000 score with age. We now suggest a smaller age correction of 0.020 × age, which corresponds to the smallest effect found in the earlier studies.

Why do endocrine profiles in elite athletes differ between sports?

BACKGROUND: Endocrine profiles have been measured on blood samples obtained immediately post-competition from 693 elite athletes from 15 Olympic Sports competing at National or International level; four were subsequently excluded leaving 689 for the current analysis. METHODS: Body composition was measured by bioimpedance in a sub-set of 234 (146 men and 88 women) and from these data a regression model was constructed that enabled 'estimated' lean body mass and fat mass to be calculated on all athletes. One way ANOVA was used to assess the differences in body composition and endocrine profiles between the sports and binary logistical regression to ascertain the characteristic of a given sport compared to the others. RESULTS: The results confirmed many suppositions such as basketball players being tall, weightlifters short and cross-country skiers light. The hormone profiles were more surprising with remarkably low testosterone and free T3 (tri-iodothyronine) in male powerlifters and high oestradiol, SHBG (sex hormone binding globulin) and prolactin in male track and field athletes. Low testosterone concentrations were seen 25.4% of male elite competitors in 12 of the 15 sports and high testosterone concentrations in 4.8% of female elite athletes in 3 of the 8 sports tested. Interpretation of the results is more difficult; some of the differences between sports are at least partially due to differences in age of the athletes but the apparent differences between sports remain significant after adjusting for age. The prevalence of 'hyperandrogenism' (as defined by the IAAF (International Association of Athletics Federations) and IOC (International Olympic Committee)) amongst this cohort of 231 elite female athletes was the highest so far recorded and the very high prevalence of 'hypoandrogenism' in elite male athletes a new finding. CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear whether the differences in hormone profiles between sports is a reason why they become elite athletes in that sport or is a consequence of the arduous processes involved. For components of body composition we know that most have a major genetic component and this may well be true for endocrine profiles.

Novel markers to detect recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I)/rhIGF binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3) misuse in athletes.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is abused by elite athletes for its metabolic and anabolic effects. We have previously shown that it is possible to detect IGF-I misuse by measuring serum IGF-I and procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide (P-III-NP) but a pilot study suggested measuring IGF-II, IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and acid-labile subunit (ALS) may improve the detection of IGF-I administration. The aim of the study was to assess this in a randomized controlled trial. Twenty-six female and 30 male recreational athletes were randomized to 28 days' treatment with placebo or recombinant human (rh)IGF-I/rhIGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) complex (30 mg/day or 60 mg/day), followed by 56 days' washout. IGF-II, IGFBP-2 and ALS (women only) were measured using commercial immunoassays. IGFBP-2 increased and IGF-II decreased in response to both low and high dose rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 in both women and men while ALS decreased in women in response to high dose rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3. Two days after discontinuing treatment, significant differences remained between the three treatment groups in IGFBP-2 and IGF-II, but not ALS. Thereafter there were no significant differences between the three treatment groups in any of the markers. Combining IGF-I with IGF-II and/or IGFBP-2 improved the performance of the test to detect rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration in both women and men. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Statistical methodology for age-adjustment of the GH-2000 score detecting growth hormone misuse.

BACKGROUND: The GH-2000 score has been developed as a powerful and unique technique for the detection of growth hormone misuse by sportsmen and women. The score depends upon the measurement of two growth hormone (GH) sensitive markers, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (P-III-NP). With the collection and establishment of an increasingly large database it has become apparent that the score shows a positive age effect in the male athlete population, which could potentially place older male athletes at a disadvantage. METHODS: We have used results from residual analysis of the general linear model to show that the residual of the GH-2000 score when regressed on the mean-age centred age is an appropriate way to proceed to correct this bias. As six GH-2000 scores are possible depending on the assays used for determining IGF-I and P-III-NP, methodology had to be explored for including six different age effects into a unique residual. Meta-analytic techniques have been utilized to find a summary age effect. RESULTS: The age-adjusted GH-2000 score, a form of residual, has similar mean and variance as the original GH-2000 score and, hence, the developed decision limits show negligible change when compared to the decision limits based on the original score. We also show that any further scale-transformation will not change the adjusted score. Hence the suggested adjustment is optimal for the given data. The summary age effect is homogeneous across the six scores, and so the generic adjustment of the GH-2000 score formula is justified. CONCLUSIONS: A final revised GH-2000 score formula is provided which is independent of the age of the athlete under consideration.

The Effects of Recombinant Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I/Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Administration on Body Composition and Physical Fitness in Recreational Athletes.

CONTEXT: IGF-I is thought to mediate many of the anabolic actions of GH, and there are anecdotal reports that IGF-I is misused by elite athletes. There is no published evidence regarding the effects of IGF-I administration on athletic performance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of IGF-I administration on body composition and physical fitness in recreational athletes. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled recombinant human (rh) IGF-I/rhIGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 administration study at Southampton General Hospital (Southampton, United Kingdom). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six recreational athletes (30 men, 26 women) participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive placebo, low-dose rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 (30 mg/d), or high dose rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 (60 mg/d) for 28 days. Body composition (assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) and cardiorespiratory fitness (assessed by incremental treadmill test) were measured before and immediately after treatment. Within-individual changes after treatment were analyzed using paired t tests. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in body fat mass or lean body mass in women or men after the administration of the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex. There was a significant increase in maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) after treatment. When women and men and low- and high-dose treatment groups were combined, mean VO2 max increased by approximately 7% (P = .001). No significant change in VO2 max was observed in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration for 28 days improves aerobic performance in recreational athletes, but there are no effects on body composition.

The development of decision limits for the GH-2000 detection methodology using additional insulin-like growth factor-I and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen assays.

The GH-2000 and GH-2004 projects have developed a method for detecting GH misuse based on measuring insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (P-III-NP). The objectives were to analyze more samples from elite athletes to improve the reliability of the decision limit estimates, to evaluate whether the existing decision limits needed revision, and to validate further non-radioisotopic assays for these markers. The study included 998 male and 931 female elite athletes. Blood samples were collected according to World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) guidelines at various sporting events including the 2011 International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) World Athletics Championships in Daegu, South Korea. IGF-I was measured by the Immunotech A15729 IGF-I IRMA, the Immunodiagnostic Systems iSYS IGF-I assay and a recently developed mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. P-III-NP was measured by the Cisbio RIA-gnost P-III-P, Orion UniQ™ PIIINP RIA and Siemens ADVIA Centaur P-III-NP assays. The GH-2000 score decision limits were developed using existing statistical techniques. Decision limits were determined using a specificity of 99.99% and an allowance for uncertainty because of the finite sample size. The revised Immunotech IGF-I - Orion P-III-NP assay combination decision limit did not change significantly following the addition of the new samples. The new decision limits are applied to currently available non-radioisotopic assays to measure IGF-I and P-III-NP in elite athletes, which should allow wider flexibility to implement the GH-2000 marker test for GH misuse while providing some resilience against manufacturer withdrawal or change of assays.

Biochemical markers of insulin-like growth factor-I misuse in athletes: the response of serum IGF-I, procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide, and the GH-2000 score to the administration of rhIGF-I/rhIGF binding protein-3 complex.

CONTEXT: The GH-2000 and GH-2004 research groups developed a method for detecting GH misuse in athletes based on the measurement of serum IGF-I and procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide (P-III-NP). There are reports that IGF-I is also misused by athletes, but currently there is no internationally recognized test designed to detect recombinant human IGF-I misuse. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the response of serum IGF-I, P-III-NP, and the GH-2000 score to recombinant human (rh) IGF-I/rhIGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) administration in recreational athletes. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration study at Southampton General Hospital (Southampton, United Kingdom). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six recreational athletes (26 women, 30 men) participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to treatment with low-dose (30 mg/d) or high-dose (60 mg/d) rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex or placebo for 28 days. Blood was collected throughout the drug administration and washout periods. Serum IGF-I and P-III-NP were measured using commercial immunoassays and GH-2000 scores were calculated. RESULTS: IGF-I, P-III-NP, and the GH-2000 score rose in response to both low- and high-dose rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration. The relative maximum response of IGF-I (approximately 4-fold increase in women and men) was greater than that of P-III-NP (40%-50% increase in women, 35%-50% increase in men). The GH-2000 formulae, which incorporate IGF-I and P-III-NP results, detected up to 61% of women and 80% of men in the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 groups but, using IGF-I concentrations alone, the sensitivity increased to 94% in both women and men during the administration period. CONCLUSIONS: The rise in P-III-NP after rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration is small compared with that after rhGH administration. Although rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration can be detected using the GH-2000 score method, a test based on serum IGF-I alone provides better sensitivity.

Biochemical markers of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I)/rhIGF binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3) misuse in athletes.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is reportedly misused by elite athletes, either alone or with growth hormone (GH). The GH-2000 and GH-2004 research groups previously developed a method for detecting GH misuse based on the GH-sensitive markers IGF-I and procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide (P-III-NP). Both markers increase in response to rhIGF-I/rhIGF binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3) administration in recreational athletes. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the effect of rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration on other serum markers of the GH-IGF axis and on other bone and collagen markers. Twenty-six female and 30 male recreational athletes were randomized to 28 days' treatment with placebo or rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex, followed by 56 days' washout. GH-IGF axis markers (IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, acid-labile subunit (ALS) and IGF-II) and bone and collagen markers (procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP), type I collagen cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide (ICTP) and osteocalcin) were measured using commercial immunoassays. In women in the high dose treatment group, mean IGF-II decreased by 53% (P=0.0028) on Day 21. Mean IGFBP-2 increased by 119% (P=0.0039) and mean ALS decreased by 40% (P=0.0022) on Day 21. There were no significant changes in IGFBP-3, osteocalcin, ICTP or PICP. In men in the high dose group, mean IGF-II decreased by 51% on Day 21 (P<0.0001). Mean IGFBP-2 increased by 125% on Day 21 (P=0.0003). There were no significant changes in IGFBP-3, ALS, osteocalcin, ICTP or PICP. Serum IGFBP-2 and IGF-II may be useful markers of rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 administration in both women and men while ALS may also be a useful marker in women; these markers are now undergoing further evaluation.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) misuse in athletes and potential methods for detection.

To athletes, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is an attractive performance-enhancing drug, particularly as an alternative to growth hormone (GH) because IGF-I mediates many of the anabolic actions of GH. IGF-I has beneficial effects on muscle protein synthesis and glycogen storage that could enhance performance in several sporting disciplines. Recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) is used in clinical practice, but a variety of IGF-I compounds and IGF-I analogues are also advertised on the internet and many have been available on the black market for several years. Although methods for detecting GH misuse are now well established and there have been several cases in which athletes have tested positive for GH, no test is yet in place for detecting IGF-I misuse. The GH-2004 research group has been investigating methods for detection of IGF-I misuse and a test is being developed on the basis of the principles of the successful GH-2000 marker method, in which markers from the IGF axis and markers of collagen and bone turnover are used to detect GH misuse. Commercial immunoassays for these markers have been validated for anti-doping purposes but new methods, including IGF-I measurement by use of mass spectrometry, should improve the performance of the tests and help in the detection of athletes who are doping with these peptide hormones.

The effects of a freeze-thaw cycle and pre-analytical storage temperature on the stability of insulin-like growth factor-I and pro-collagen type III N-terminal propeptide concentrations: Implications for the detection of growth hormone misuse in athletes.

A method based on two serum biomarkers - insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and pro-collagen type III N-terminal propeptide (P-III-NP) - has been devised to detect growth hormone (GH) misuse. The aims of this study were to determine the stability of IGF-I and P-III-NP concentrations in serum stored at -20°C and to establish the effects of one freeze-thaw cycle. Blood was collected from 20 healthy volunteers. Serum aliquots were analyzed after storage for one day at 4°C and one day, one week, five weeks, and three months at -20°C. IGF-I and P-III-NP results were combined to calculate a GH-2000 discriminant function score for each volunteer. Inter-assay precision was determined by analysing one quality control sample at each time-point. A single freeze-thaw cycle, storage of serum at 4°C for one day and at -20°C for up to three months had no significant effect on IGF-I or P-III-NP concentration. Intra-sample variability for IGF-I was 6.8% (Immunotech assay) and 12.9% (DSL assay). Intra-sample variability for P-III-NP was 10.9% (Cisbio assay) and 13.7% (Orion assay). When IGF-I and P-III-NP results were combined, intra-sample variability of the GH-2000 score expressed as a standard deviation varied between 0.31 and 0.50 depending on the assay combination used. Variability in IGF-I and P--III-NP results of stored samples is largely determined by the characteristics of the assays. A single freeze-thaw cycle, storage of serum at 4°C for one day or at -20°C for up to 3 months does not result in a significant change in GH-2000 score.

The development of decision limits for the implementation of the GH-2000 detection methodology using current commercial insulin-like growth factor-I and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen assays.

BACKGROUND: The GH-2000 project developed a method for detecting GH misuse based on the measurement of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (P-III-NP). The objective of this study was to develop decision limits for the GH-2000 score to detect GH misuse in elite athletes using two currently available commercial assays for each analyte. SUBJECTS: 404 male (mean age 23.9 yrs, range 12-37 yrs) and 94 female elite athletes (mean age 24.5 yrs, range 18-34 yrs) participated. Blood samples were collected according to World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) guidelines at various sporting events including 238 samples collected as part of the UK Anti-Doping Testing Programme. Laboratory analysis: IGF-I was measured by Siemens Immulite IGF-I assay and Immunotech A15729 IGF-I IRMA. P-III-NP was measured by RIA-gnost P-III-P and the UniQ™ PIIINP RIA. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The GH-2000 score decision limits were developed through the analysis of the elite athlete samples. RESULTS: For males and females separately, the distributions of GH-2000 scores were consistent with Normal distributions. Using a specificity of 99.99% new decision limits were determined which included an allowance for uncertainty associated with calculations based on a finite sample size. One outlier was identified with results incompatible with normal physiology and tested positive with the current isoform GH test. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed decision limits using currently available commercial assays to measure IGF-I and P-III-NP in elite athletes. This should allow the introduction of a test for GH misuse based on the measurement of these GH sensitive biomarkers.

Growth hormone doping: a review.

The use of growth hormone (GH) as a performance enhancing substance was first promoted in lay publications, long before scientists fully acknowledged its benefits. It is thought athletes currently use GH to enhance their athletic performance and to accelerate the healing of sporting injuries. Over recent years, a number of high profile athletes have admitted to using GH. To date, there is only limited and weak evidence for its beneficial effects on performance. Nevertheless the "hype" around its effectiveness and the lack of a foolproof detection methodology that will detect its abuse longer than 24 hours after the last injection has encouraged its widespread use. This article reviews the current evidence of the ergogenic effects of GH along with the risks associated with its use. The review also examines methodologies, both currently available and in development for detecting its abuse.

The GH-2004 project: the response of IGF1 and type III pro-collagen to the administration of exogenous GH in non-Caucasian amateur athletes.

CONTEXT: The GH-2000 team proposed a method based on IGF1 and type III pro-collagen (P-III-P) to detect exogenously administered GH. As previous studies involved predominantly white European athletes, it is important to assess whether the response of these markers to recombinant human GH (rhGH) differs with ethnicity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the response of serum IGF1 and P-III-P and GH-2000 score to rhGH in non-Caucasian amateur athletes. DESIGN: Double-blind placebo-controlled rhGH administration study. SETTING: Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Southampton General Hospital. SUBJECTS: The study included 31 male and 14 female amateur athletes of different ethnicities. Intervention The subjects were assigned to treatment with placebo or 0.1 IU/kg per day (low dose) or 0.2 IU/kg per day (high dose) rhGH for 28 days. Blood was collected weekly during treatment and on days 35, 42 and 84 during the washout period. Serum IGF1 and P-III-P were measured, and GH-2000 score was calculated. RESULTS: IGF1, P-III-P and GH-2000 score rose in response to both low- and high-dose GH in both men and women. When compared with the Caucasian volunteers of the previous GH-2000 study, mean baseline and placebo-treated P-III-P and GH-2000 score were lower in GH-2004 men and women. Post-GH, however, peak IGF1 or P-III-P did not differ between studies but the peak GH-2000 score was lower in GH-2004 men. There was no difference between studies in the maximal change in IGF1, P-III-P and GH-2000 score in response to GH in either gender. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support a significant ethnic effect on the peak or maximal response to rhGH.

Serum insulin-like growth factor-I and pro-collagen type III N-terminal peptide in adolescent elite athletes: implications for the detection of growth hormone abuse in sport.

CONTEXT: A method based on two GH-dependent markers, IGF-I and pro-collagen type III N-terminal peptide (P-III-P), has been devised to detect exogenously administered GH. Because previous studies on the detection of GH abuse involved predominantly adult athletes, the method must be validated in adolescent athletes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine serum IGF-I and P-III-P concentrations in elite adolescent athletes and to determine whether the method developed in adults is appropriate to detect GH abuse in this population. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study at national sporting organization training events. SUBJECTS: A total of 157 (85 males, 72 females) elite athletes between 12 and 20 yr of age participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Serum IGF-I and P-III-P were each measured by two commercially available immunoassays. GH-2000 discriminant function scores were calculated. RESULTS: Both IGF-I and P-III-P rose to a peak during adolescence, which was earlier in girls than in boys. All GH-2000 scores lay below the proposed cutoff limit of 3.7 (although some scores were close to this value), indicating that none of these athletes would be accused of GH doping if the GH-2000 discriminant formulae were used. The results between the two immunoassays for IGF-I and P-III-P were closely aligned. CONCLUSIONS: The GH-2000 score rises in early adolescence, reaches a peak in athletes aged 13-16 yr, and then falls. We have found no evidence that the proposed GH-2000 score developed in adults would lead to an unacceptable rate of false-positive results in adolescent athletes, but caution may be required around the time of peak growth velocity.

The use of growth hormone (GH)-dependent markers in the detection of GH abuse in sport: Physiological intra-individual variation of IGF-I, type 3 pro-collagen (P-III-P) and the GH-2000 detection score.

BACKGROUND: Growth Hormone is abused by athletes for its lipolytic and anabolic properties. Its use is prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency. The GH-2000 project developed a methodology to detect its abuse using the concentrations of two GH-dependent biomarkers, IGF-I and type 3 procollagen (P-III-P). The sensitivity of this method may be improved by considering intra-individual variability. AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the intra-individual variability of IGF-I, P-III-P and the GH-2000 score. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: IGF-I, P-III-P and GH-2000 score were evaluated in four longitudinal studies involving 303 elite and 78 amateur athletes. Samples were collected over a period of up to 12 months from a total of 238 men and 143 women aged between 17 and 53 years (mean 24.2). RESULTS: The four studies showed good agreement with no apparent difference in within-individual variation between amateur and elite athletes. The intra-individual variability for IGF-I ranged between 14-16% while the variability for P-III-P was 7-18%. No athlete tested positive for growth hormone during any of the studies. The overall mean intra-individual variability of the GH-2000 score was less than 0.6 units in all studies. CONCLUSIONS: The high stability of marker levels suggests that concentrations are largely genetically determined. Adopting a test based on the concept of an athlete's 'passport' or 'profiling' would take advantage of this and most likely increase the sensitivity of the test. These data also provide strong evidence that a positive test result for GH abuse would not occur as a result of chance variability.