Validation of static and dynamic radiostereometric analysis of the knee joint using bone models from CT data.

OBJECTIVES: Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA) using implanted markers is considered the most accurate system for the evaluation of prosthesis migration. By using CT bone models instead of markers, combined with a dynamic RSA system, a non-invasive measurement of joint movement is enabled. This method is more accurate than current 3D skin marker-based tracking systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the CT model method for measuring knee joint kinematics in static and dynamic RSA using the marker method as the benchmark. METHODS: Bone models were created from CT scans, and tantalum beads were implanted into the tibia and femur of eight human cadaver knees. Each specimen was secured in a fixture, static and dynamic stereoradiographs were recorded, and the bone models and marker models were fitted to the stereoradiographs. RESULTS: Results showed a mean difference between the two methods in all six degrees of freedom for static RSA to be within -0.10 mm/° and 0.08 mm/° with a 95% limit of agreement (LoA) ranging from ± 0.49 to 1.26. Dynamic RSA had a slightly larger range in mean difference of -0.23 mm/° to 0.16 mm/° with LoA ranging from ± 0.75 to 1.50. CONCLUSIONS: In a laboratory-controlled setting, the CT model method combined with dynamic RSA may be an alternative to previous marker-based methods for kinematic analyses.Cite this article: K. Stentz-Olesen, E. T. Nielsen, S. De Raedt, P. B. Jørgensen, O. G. Sørensen, B. L. Kaptein, M. S. Andersen, M. Stilling. Validation of static and dynamic radiostereometric analysis of the knee joint using bone models from CT data. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:376-384. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.66.BJR-2016-0113.R3.

Bone mineral density of the trapezium in osteoarthritic trapeziometacarpal joints.

The aim of this study was to test the precision and reliability of measurements of the bone mineral density (BMD) of the trapezium in patients with osteoarthritic trapeziometacarpal joints using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans and to assess whether there is an acceptable correlation between the BMD of the trapezium and that of the distal radius, for which normative data exist. We included 66 patients (52 women, 14 men) diagnosed with Eaton-Glickel stage II-IV osteoarthritis and a mean age of 59 years (range 40-77) in a prospective study. We found good intra- and inter-observer agreement of BMD measurements. Reliability was also good in repeated measurements. There was an indication of an increase in BMD with progression in the Eaton-Glickel stage. There was only a moderate correlation between the BMD of the trapezium and that of the radius.

Computed tomography improves intra-observer reliability, but not the inter-observer reliability of the Eaton-Glickel classification.

This study aimed to evaluate whether computed tomography improves the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Eaton-Glickel classification of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. The osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint was evaluated with conventional radiographs and computed tomography by two hand surgeons, two registrars and one radiologist in 50 hands of 43 patients (12 male and 31 female) who had a median age of 60 years (46-80). Using plain radiographs, we found a mean intra-observer reliability of 0.54 (0.51-0.74), and the intra-observer reliability was improved to 0.76 (0.64-0.86) using computed tomography. Using plain radiographs, the mean inter-observer reliability was poor at 0.17 (0.04-0.51) and did not improve using computed tomography with a mean inter-observer reliability of 0.22 (0.02-0.38). In particular, the agreement in the distinction between Eaton-Glickel stage III and IV and the evaluation of the degenerative changes in the scaphotrapezio joint was low using computed tomography-scans. The detection of bone cysts on computed tomography was more precise than on plain radiographs.

Serial dilation reduces graft slippage compared to extraction drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.

PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that serial dilation of the tibial tunnel could provide a stronger anchorage of the graft-fixation-device complex compared to traditional extraction drilling. METHODS: Forty patients (22 men and 18 women) undergoing ACL reconstruction were randomized to either extraction drilling (group ED) or compaction by serial dilation (group SD) of the tibial tunnel. Tantalum beads were placed in the tibia, femur, and in the hamstring graft. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was performed postoperatively and again after 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Migration of graft in the bone tunnels as well as knee laxity was assessed using RSA and a TELOS stress device. RESULTS: Six patients (three men and three women) were excluded during follow-up, which resulted in 17 patients in group ED [median age 30 years (range 20-50)] and 17 patients in group SD [median age 32 years (range 20-49)]. The mean migration of the graft in the tibial bone canal after 3 months was 1.3 (SD 0.6) mm in group ED and 0.8 (SD 0.5) mm in group SD (P = 0.02). The overall knee laxity after 3 months was 13.0 (SD 4.0) mm in group ED and 10.9 (SD 3.1) mm in group SD. CONCLUSION: This study found less slippage of the hamstring graft in the tibial bone canal in the serial dilated group compared to the extraction drilling group. The clinical relevance of the difference is unknown. No difference in stress radiographic knee laxity was found between the two groups.

The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Several devices for measuring knee laxity following anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction exist, but the precision of the methods has never been optimal. Therefore, a new standardized protocol (NSP) was made, aiming at ensuring a reliable positioning of the Telos Stress Device (TSD) which theoretically could result in precise knee laxity measurements when using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in combination with TSD. METHOD: The TSD was applied to the knee of 30 healthy persons, using both the NSP and the official company instructions. The position of the stress arms of the TSD was marked following each measurement. The reliability of each protocol was calculated as the difference in length between the first and second markings. The NSP for the TSD was then used in a clinical study. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction. Double measurements of knee laxity by RSA were performed at a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Using the NSP for TSD positioning, the prediction interval at the marking sites ranged from ±0.4 to ±1.1 mm. Following the company instructions, the prediction interval ranged from ±0.8 to ±3.9 mm depending on marking site. Thus, the precision of positioning the stress arms of the TSD was improved at all marking sites using the NSP compared with the original company protocol. The double measurements of the knee laxity in the clinical study resulted in a mean difference of 0.0 mm and a prediction interval of ±5.2 mm. CONCLUSION: Even though the NSP improved the positioning of the TSD on patients' extremities, the combination of NSP-TSD and RSA was not able to provide acceptable knee laxity measurements in a clinical setting compared with published precision data for other devices on the market. Therefore, the Telos Stress Device is not recommendable for use in knee laxity measurements following ACL reconstruction.

Serial dilation versus extraction drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

The hamstring tendon graft has become increasingly popular in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because of low donor-site morbidity. However, the tibial fixation is considered difficult, mainly because of low tibial mineral bone density. Therefore, we tested whether preparation of the tibial tunnel with compaction by serial dilation provided a stronger anchorage of the graft-fixation-device complex than does traditional extraction drilling of the tibial tunnel. In 20 bovine tibiae, the bone tunnels were created with either extraction drilling (group 1) or compaction by serial dilation (group 2). Twenty bovine digital extensor tendons were fixated in the bone tunnel with an Intrafix tibial fastener. The graft-fixation-device complexes were mounted in a hydraulic test machine. The fixation strength was evaluated after cyclic loading. The difference between the serial dilation group and the extraction drilling group ranged from a mean slippage of 0 mm at 70-220 N, to a mean slippage of 0.1 mm at 70-520 N. We found no significant difference in slippage of the graft-fixation-device complex after 1,600 cycles. This study failed to show a significant difference between compaction by serial dilation and extraction drilling of the tibia bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.