Lumbar scoliosis and stenosis: What outcomes for which treatment? Analysis of three surgical techniques in 154 patients with minimum two-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicentric study. OBJECTIVE: This study goal was to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lumbar stenosis and scoliosis (LSS) patients, treated with lumbar decompression (LD), short fusion and decompression (SF) or long fusion with deformity correction (LF). HYPOTHESIS: Procedures without correction lead to poorer long-term outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients with two-year minimum follow-up, older than 50, with lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle>15°), and symptomatic lumbar stenosis were included. Age, gender, Lumbar and Radicular Visual Analog Scale, ODI, SF12 and SRS30 were collected. Main and adjacent curves Cobb angles, C7 coronal tilt (C7CT), spinopelvic parameters, and spino-sacral angle (SSA) were measured preoperatively, at one and two years. Patients were sorted into surgery type groups. RESULTS: In total, 154 patients were included, with respectively 18, 58 and 78 patients in LD, SF and LF groups. Mean age was 69, 85% were women. Clinical scores improved in each group at one year, but only LF group exhibited persistent improvement at 2years. A significant fractional Cobb angle increase was noted in the SF group at 2years (from 12±11° to 18±14°). C7CT significantly increased in the LD group at 2years (from 2.5±1.3° to 5.1±3.5°). LF group presented the highest complication rate (45%, 19% for SF and 0% for LD). The overall revision rate was 14% in SF group and 30% in LF group. CONCLUSION: LSS is a complex pathology requiring custom-made surgical treatment. LD, SF and LF allow satisfactory clinical outcome, with a better and more sustained clinical improvement for LF despite higher complication and revision rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Segmental Lordosis Gain Is a Prognostic Radiological Factor of Good Functional Outcome After the Implantation of a Single-Level Prosthesis or a Hybrid Construct for Lumbar Disc Degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To identify radiological factors and functional outcomes associated with good results after implantation of a single lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct (anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lumbar disc prosthesis) in the setting of painful degenerative lumbar discopathy. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective 10-year study included 92 patients ˃18 years old with chronic low back pain evolving for at least 1 year. The patients had degenerative disc disease and had failed conservative treatment and underwent lumbar arthroplasty. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Functional evaluation was based on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numerical rating scale. Radiological analysis was based on lumbar x-rays and magnetic resonance imaging parameters. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to the reduction in ODI score (>15 points or <15 points), and statistical analysis was done in both groups to find predictive radiological factors for a satisfactory functional outcome. RESULTS: Clinically, 60 patients (65.2%) had a satisfactory functional result and 32 patients (34.8%) had a poor outcome according to ODI score. Radiographically, gain in segmental lordosis was statistically associated with good functional outcomes (8.9° for ODI decrease >15 vs. 3.2° for ODI decrease <15). CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that gain in segmental lordosis is associated with a satisfactory functional outcome after a single-level lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct. Our study demonstrates that segmental lordosis gain may represent a significative useful positive predictor factor of patient outcome.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fracture in the elderly.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes associated with anatomic healing of the greater tuberosity in patients treated for proximal humerus fractures with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Our hypothesis was that anatomic healing of the greater tuberosity leads to less complications and better functional outcomes. METHODS: RESULTS: Patients from the GT+ group presented better functional outcomes than the GT- group in all evaluated outcomes. Mean constant score was 61 ± 14 versus 56 ± 15, and the subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 77 ± 14 versus 64 ± 21 (p < 0.001). Forward elevation was 128° ± 28° versus 107° ± 30° and external rotation was 23° ± 17° versus 14° ± 17° (p < 0.001). Twenty patients presented with at least one prosthetic dislocation (7 GT+ vs 13 GT-) while nine patients were revised for humeral loosening (1 GT+ vs 8 GT-). The use of a fracture specific humeral stem was associated with a higher rate of greater tuberosity healing. CONCLUSIONS: Non-anatomic healing of the greater tuberosity was associated with a higher dislocation and humeral loosening rate. Anatomic healing of the greater tuberosity lead to better functional outcomes, less humeral-sided complications, and fewer re-operations.

Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy rods provide similar coronal and sagittal correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Cobalt-chrome (CoCr) and the titanium alloy TA6V (Ti) are the materials most widely used for spinal instrumentations in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The objective of this work was to compare the effectiveness of CoCr and Ti rods in terms of coronal and sagittal correction by pedicle screw constructs in patients with AIS. HYPOTHESIS: Correction is similar with CoCr and Ti rods in patients with AIS. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective single surgeon study was conducted in patients with AIS managed using pedicle screw posterior spinal fusion with high implant density and reduction by postero-medial translation. Follow-up was more than 2 years in all patients. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether the rods used were made of CoCr (n=30) or Ti (n=33). The groups were identical for age, Risser classification, follow-up duration, type of curve, and implant density. Coronal and sagittal parameters on standing full-spine radiographs were analysed using graphics software before surgery then 1 month after surgery and at last follow-up. Quantitative data were compared by applying Student's t test. RESULTS: The percentage of main curve correction at last follow-up was the same in the two groups (76%/75%) (p=0.7). Gains in thoracic kyphosis (12°/13°) and lumbar lordosis (8°/10°) were not significantly different between groups. At last follow-up, 3 patients had proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 in the CoCr group and 2 in the Ti group (p=0.6). CONCLUSION: For posterior spinal fusion to treat AIS, with a high density of pedicle screws, correction by translation, and 6 mm rods, CoCr rods and Ti rods produce the same amount of coronal and sagittal correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, comparative retrospective study with no control group.