From oocytes to a live birth: Are we improving the biological efficiency?

OBJECTIVE(S): The objectives of our study were to investigate the live birth rate (LBR) per oocyte retrieved during in vitro fertilization, in patients who had used all their embryos and to extrapolate the LBR in patients with remaining frozen embryos by calculating the expected LBR from these embryos. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single academically affiliated fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from January 2014 to December 2020. Data on the number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos obtained and transferred (at cleavage or blastocyst-stage), use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and number of live births were obtained. The expected LBR was estimated in patients with remaining frozen embryos according to nationally reported Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology LBR data. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate per oocyte retrieved. RESULT(S): A total of 12,717 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent a total of 20,677 oocyte retrievals which yielded a total of 248,004 oocytes and 57,268 embryos (fresh and frozen). In patients who had fully utilized all their embryos the LBR per oocyte was 2.82% (ranging from 11.3% aged <35 years to 1.2% aged >42 years). Stratification of the population based on PGT-A utilization yielded similar results (with PGT-A: 2.88% and without PGT-A: 2.79%). When stratified by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology age groups, the addition of PGT-A in patients aged 35-37 and 38-40 years yielded higher LBR per oocyte compared with patients who did not add PGT-A (P<.05). In patients with remaining frozen embryos who had added PGT-A, the projected LBR per oocyte was 8.34%. Use of PGT-A in patients aged <35 and 35-37 years decreased LBR per oocyte (P<.001 and P=.03, respectively) but improved LBR per oocyte in patients aged 38-40 and 41-42 years (P=.006 and P=.005, respectively). Poisson regression analysis demonstrated an age threshold of 38.5, below which PGT-A lowers LBR per oocyte compared with no PGT-A. CONCLUSION(S): Despite clinical and scientific advances in Assisted Reproductive Technology, with the current protocols of ovarian stimulation, the LBR per oocyte remains low reflecting a biological barrier that has yet to be overcome. Overall, the addition of PGT-A did not demonstrate improved outcomes.

The p190 RhoGAPs, ARHGAP35, and ARHGAP5 are implicated in GnRH neuronal development: Evidence from patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, zebrafish, and in vitro GAP activity assay.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to identify novel genes for idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). METHODS: A cohort of 1387 probands with IHH underwent exome sequencing and de novo, familial, and cohort-wide investigations. Functional studies were performed on 2 p190 Rho GTPase-activating proteins (p190 RhoGAP), ARHGAP35 and ARHGAP5, which involved in vivo modeling in larval zebrafish and an in vitro p190A-GAP activity assay. RESULTS: Rare protein-truncating variants (PTVs; n = 5) and missense variants in the RhoGAP domain (n = 7) in ARHGAP35 were identified in IHH cases (rare variant enrichment: PTV [unadjusted P = 3.1E-06] and missense [adjusted P = 4.9E-03] vs controls). Zebrafish modeling using gnrh3:egfp phenotype assessment showed that mutant larvae with deficient arhgap35a, the predominant ARHGAP35 paralog in the zebrafish brain, display decreased GnRH3-GFP+ neuronal area, a readout for IHH. In vitro GAP activity studies showed that 1 rare missense variant [ARHGAP35 p.(Arg1284Trp)] had decreased GAP activity. Rare PTVs (n = 2) also were discovered in ARHGAP5, a paralog of ARHGAP35; however, arhgap5 zebrafish mutants did not display significant GnRH3-GFP+ abnormalities. CONCLUSION: This study identified ARHGAP35 as a new autosomal dominant genetic driver for IHH and ARHGAP5 as a candidate gene for IHH. These observations suggest a novel role for the p190 RhoGAP proteins in GnRH neuronal development and integrity.

Lower fetal fraction in clinical cell-free DNA screening results is associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if fetal fraction (FF) reported on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening is a marker for adverse obstetric outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records from a cohort of women with singleton pregnancies who had cfDNA screening. We evaluated if reported FF could predict the following pregnancy complications: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), fetal growth restriction, preterm delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus, or a composite maternal morbidity, defined as the presence of at least one of these outcomes. RESULTS: Receiver operating curve analysis was performed on FF from 534 women to define the FF that differentiated a low FF group (<10%; N = 259) and a high FF group (≥10%; N = 275). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were more common for women in the low FF group (32.0% vs. 11.6% and p < 0.001), who had a two-fold odds of developing HDP (p = 0.006). Composite maternal morbidity was also more common for women in the low FF group (51.4% vs. 30.2% and p < 0.001), who had a 1.7-fold odds of developing any of the adverse obstetrical outcomes (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: We found that low FF on cfDNA screening is associated with an increased risk of HDP. Fetal fraction reported that cfDNA screening reports have potential as a predictive marker for the development of HDP and adverse outcomes.

The current and future impact of genome-wide sequencing on fetal precision medicine.

Next-generation sequencing and other genomic technologies are transforming prenatal and reproductive screening and testing for fetal genetic disorders at an unprecedented pace. Original approaches of screening and testing for fetal genetic and genomic disorders were focused on a few more prevalent conditions that were easily diagnosable with pre-genomic era diagnostic tools. First, chromosomal microarray analysis and then next-generation sequencing brought technology capable of more detailed genomic evaluation to prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis. This has facilitated parallel introduction of a variety of new tests on maternal blood samples, including expanded carrier screening and cell-free DNA-based non-invasive screening for fetal aneuploidy, selected copy number variants, and single-gene disorders. Genomic tests on fetal DNA samples, obtained primarily through amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, include chromosomal microarray analysis and gene panel and exome sequencing. All these form the diagnostic pillar of the emerging field of fetal precision medicine, but their implementation is associated with ethical, counseling and healthcare resource utilization challenges. We discuss where in the reproductive and prenatal care continuum these exciting new technologies are integrated, along with associated challenges. We propose areas of priority for research to gain the data in support of their responsible implementation into clinical reproductive and prenatal care.