Flavoured and nicotine-containing e-liquids impair homeostatic properties of an alveolar-capillary cell model.

Most people consider that electronic cigarettes are safer than tobacco and are marketed as quit-smoking products. The e-liquid, which usually contains propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG) in different ratios, nicotine and a wide variety of flavours, is heated by a coil and the aerosol droplets are primarily delivered to the alveolar area where nicotine and other molecules cross the alveolar-capillary barrier (ACB). However, e-cigarettes effects on the ACB are not yet established. In our study, a well-characterised in vitro model of the ACB was exposed to PG and VG and to five flavoured e-liquids with and without nicotine. The vehicles, due to their hypertonic properties, modulated the ACB integrity by modifying occludin expression. Below a 10% concentration, the vehicles did not trigger oxidative stress or cell death. Different results were observed between flavoured e-liquids: while red fruits and mint-eucalyptus disrupted ACB integrity, triggered oxidative stress and cell death, blond tobacco had no worse effect compared to the vehicles. However, the addition of nicotine in the latter e-liquid increased oxidative stress and cell death compared to the vehicles. Finally, mint-eucalyptus e-liquid increased some inflammation markers. Our results revealed that e-liquids alter ACB homeostasis, depending on flavour and nicotine presence.

Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability: Is 5-Hydroxytryptamine Receptor Type 4 a Game Changer?

Serotonin affects many functions in the body, both in the central nervous system (CNS) and the periphery. However, its effect on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in separating these two worlds has been scarcely investigated. The aim of this work was to characterize the serotonin receptor 5-HT4 in the hCMEC/D3 cell line, in the rat and the human BBB. We also examined the effect of prucalopride, a 5-HT4 receptor agonist, on the permeability of the hCMEC/D3 in an in vitro model of BBB. We then confirmed our observations by in vivo experiments. In this work, we show that the 5-HT4 receptor is expressed by hCMEC/D3 cells and in the capillaries of rat and human brains. Prucalopride increases the BBB permeability by downregulating the expression of the tight junction protein, occludin. This effect is prevented by GR113808, a 5-HT4 receptor antagonist, and is mediated by the Src/ERK1/2 signaling pathway. The canonical G-protein-dependent pathway does not appear to be involved in this phenomenon. Finally, the administration of prucalopride increases the diffusion of Evans blue in the rat brain parenchyma, which is synonymous with BBB permeabilization. All these data indicate that the 5-HT4 receptor contributes to the regulation of BBB permeability.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema: not always a class effect? A case report and short narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Bradykinin-mediated angioedema is a rare but potentially fatal adverse event. Angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is generally attributed to an inhibition of bradykinin degradation following ACE inhibition. Clinical studies on ACE inhibitors mainly focus on their efficacy. Few examine their potential to generate undesirable adverse effects, particularly with regard to angioedema. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report here a case of angioedema occurring after ramipril initiation in a patient chronically treated with quinapril. Angioedema subsided spontaneously after ramipril discontinuation and quinapril reintroduction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical case suggests that despite similar pharmacodynamic properties, quinapril and ramipril do not have the same potential to generate angioedema. To explain this difference, we suggest a potentiation of the effect of bradykinin at the B2 receptor level by ramipril, which does not occur with quinapril. Consequently, angioedema may not always be a class effect of ACE inhibitors.

Sirolimus Pharmacokinetics Variability Points to the Relevance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Pediatric Oncology.

Sirolimus is widely used in transplantation, where its therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is well established. Evidence of a crucial role for sirolimus in the PI3K/AkT/mTor pathway has stimulated interest in its involvement in neoplasia, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antineoplastic agents. However, in cancer, there is no consensus on sirolimus TDM. In the RAPIRI phase I trial, the combination sirolimus + irinotecan was evaluated as a new treatment for refractory pediatric cancers. Blood sampling at first sirolimus intake (D1) and at steady state (D8), followed by LC/MS2 analysis, was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model (Monolix® software). A mono-compartmental model with first-order absorption and elimination best fit the data. The only covariate retained for the final model was "body surface area" (D1 and D8). The model also demonstrated that 1.5 mg/m2 would be the recommended sirolimus dose for further studies and that steady-state TDM is necessary to adjust the dosing regimen in atypical profiles (36.4% of the population). No correlation was found between sirolimus trough concentrations and efficacy and/or observed toxicities. The study reveals the relevance of sirolimus TDM in pediatric oncology as it is needed in organ transplantation.

Optimizing Hydroxyurea Treatment for Sickle Cell Disease Patients: The Pharmacokinetic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyurea (HU) is a FDA- and EMA-approved drug that earned an important place in the treatment of patients with severe sickle cell anemia (SCA) by showing its efficacy in many studies. This medication is still underused due to fears of physicians and families and must be optimized. METHODS: We analyzed our population and identified HU pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in order to adapt treatment in the future. Working with a pediatric population, we searched for the most indicative sampling time to reduce the number of samples needed. RESULTS: Nine children treated by HU for severe SCA were included for this PK study. HU quantification was made using a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method. Biological parameters (of effectiveness and compliance) and clinical data were collected. None of the nine children reached the therapeutic target defined by Dong et al. as an area under the curve (AUC) = 115 h.mg/L; four patients were suspected to be non-compliant. Only two patients had an HbF over 20%. The 2 h sample was predictive of the medication exposure (r2 = 0.887). CONCLUSIONS: It is urgent to be more efficient in the treatment of SCA, and pharmacokinetics can be an important asset in SCA patients.