Hepatotoxicity and tuberculosis treatment outcomes in chronic liver disease.

Background: The treatment of tuberculosis (TB) is known to cause liver injury, however, there is limited data to guide optimal treatment for patients with chronic liver disease. Methods: We undertook a retrospective case series of patients with chronic liver disease and TB disease. The primary objective was to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in patients with cirrhosis versus those with chronic hepatitis. Additionally, we sought to compare TB treatment outcomes, type and duration of therapy, and incidence of adverse events. Results: We included 56 patients (chronic hepatitis 40; cirrhosis 16). There were 33 patients (58.9%) who experienced DILI requiring treatment modification, with no significant difference between groups (65% versus 43.8%, p = 0.23). Patients with chronic hepatitis were more likely to receive treatment with standard first-line intensive phase therapy that included a combination of rifampin (RIF), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide (80.8% versus 19.2%, p = 0.03) and any regimen than included isoniazid (92.5% versus 68.8%, p = 0.04). The risk of DILI was higher when more hepatotoxic TB medications were used. Overall treatment success in this cohort was low (55.4%), with no significant difference between groups (62.5% versus 37.5%, p = 0.14). Most patients with treatment success (97%) were able to tolerate a rifamycin. Conclusions: The risk of DILI is high, especially with the use of isoniazid, in patients with TB and chronic liver disease. This risk can be effectively mitigated with no difference in treatment outcomes in the presence of cirrhosis.

Historique: Il est bien connu que le traitement de la tuberculose (TB) provoque des lésions hépatiques, mais les données sont limitées pour orienter le traitement des patients atteints d'une hépatopathie chronique. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont étudié une série rétrospective de cas de patients atteints d'une hépathopathie chronique et d'une TB. Ils s'étaient donné comme objectif primaire de déterminer s'il y avait une différence entre l'incidence de lésion hépatique d'origine médicamenteuse (LHOM) chez les patients atteints d'une cirrhose et ceux atteints d'une hépatite chronique. De plus, ils ont comparé les résultats des traitements de la TB, le type et la durée du traitement et l'incidence d'événements indésirables. Résultats: Les chercheurs ont inclus 56 patients (hépatite chronique : 40; cirrhose : 16). De ce nombre, 33 (58,9 %) avaient présenté une LHOM ayant suscité une modification au traitement, sans différence notable entre les groupes : 65 % par rapport à 43,8 %, p = 0,23. Les patients atteints d'hépatite chronique étaient plus susceptibles de recevoir un traitement intensif standard en première ligne qui incluait une combinaison de rifampine (RIF), d'isoniazide et de pyrazinamide (80,8 % par rapport à 19,2 %, p = 0,03) ou une posologie qui comprenait de l'isoniazide (92,5 % par rapport à 68,8 %, p = 0,04). Le risque de LHOM était plus élevé lors de l'utilisation de médicaments contre la TB plus hépatotoxiques. La réussite globale du traitement était faible au sein de cette cohorte (55,4 %) et n'entraînait pas de différence significative entre les groupes (62,5 % par rapport à 37,5 %, p = 0,14). La plupart des patients dont le traitement était efficace (97 %) toléraient la rifamycine. Conclusions: Le risque de LHOM est élevé chez les patients atteints de TB et d'hépatopathie chronique, particulièrement lors de l'utilisation d'isoniazide. En présence de cirrhose, il est possible de l'atténuer avec efficacité sans modifier l'issue du traitement.

Costs of Tuberculosis at 3 Treatment Centers, Canada, 2010-2016.

We estimated costs of managing different forms of tuberculosis (TB) across Canada by conducting a retrospective chart review and cost assessment of patients treated for TB infection, drug-susceptible TB (DS TB), isoniazid-resistant TB, or multidrug-resistant TB (MDR TB) at 3 treatment centers. We included 90 patients each with TB infection and DS TB, 71 with isoniazid-resistant TB, and 62 with MDR TB. Median per-patient costs for TB infection (in 2020 Canadian dollars) were $804 (interquartile range [IQR] $587-$1,205), for DS TB $12,148 (IQR $4,388-$24,842), for isoniazid-resistant TB $19,319 (IQR $7,117-$41,318), and for MDR TB $119,014 (IQR $80,642-$164,015). Compared with costs for managing DS TB, costs were 11.1 (95% CI 9.1-14.3) times lower for TB infection, 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.1) times higher for isoniazid-resistant TB, and 8.1 (95% CI 6.1-10.6) times higher for MDR TB. Broadened TB infection treatment could avert high costs associated with managing TB disease.

Low-dose amikacin in the treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB).

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends intravenous amikacin for the treatment of MDR-TB at a dose of 15 mg/kg. However, higher doses are associated with significant toxicity. METHODS: Patients with MDR-TB treated at our institution receive amikacin at 8-10 mg/kg, with dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MDR-TB who received amikacin between 2010 and 2016. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in the study. The median starting dose of amikacin was 8.9 mg/kg (IQR 8, 10), and target therapeutic drug levels were achieved at a median of 12 days (IQR 5, 26). The median duration of amikacin treatment was 7.2 months (IQR 5.7, 8), and median time to sputum culture conversion was 1 month (IQR 1,2). Six patients (12.2%) experienced hearing loss based on formal audiometry testing (95% CI 4.6-24.8%); 22.2% had subjective hearing loss (95% CI 11.2-37.1%) and 31.9% subjective tinnitus (95% CI 19.1-47.1%). Ten patients (23%) had a significant rise in serum creatinine (95% CI 11.8-38.6%), but only 5 patients had a GFR < 60 at treatment completion. 84% of patients had a successful treatment outcome (95% CI 84-99%). CONCLUSIONS: Low dose amikacin is associated with relatively low rates of aminoglycoside-related adverse events. We hypothesize that low-dose amikacin can be used as a safe and effective treatment for MDR-TB in situations where an adequate regimen cannot be constructed with Group A and B drugs, and where careful monitoring for adverse events is feasible.

An Optimal Diagnostic Strategy for Tuberculosis in Hospitalized HIV-Infected Patients Using GeneXpert MTB/RIF and Alere Determine TB LAM Ag.

The diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in HIV-infected patients is challenging. Both a urinary lipoarabinomannan (LAM) test (Alere TB LAM) and GeneXpert-MTB/RIF (Xpert) are useful for the diagnosis of TB. However, how to optimally integrate Xpert and LAM tests into clinical practice algorithms remain unclear. We performed a post hoc analysis of 561 HIV-infected sputum-expectorating patients (median CD4 count of 130 cells/ml) from a previously published randomized controlled trial evaluating the LAM test in hospitalized HIV-infected patients with suspected TB. We evaluated 5 different diagnostic strategies using sputum culture as a reference standard (Xpert alone, LAM alone, sequential Xpert followed by LAM and vice versa [LAM in Xpert-negative patients and Xpert in LAM-negative patients], and both tests concurrently [LAM + Xpert]). A cost-consequence analysis was performed. Strategy-specific sensitivity and specificity, using culture as a reference, were similar with the Xpert-only and sequential and concurrent strategies. However, when any positive TB-specific test was used as a reference, the incremental yield of LAM over Xpert was 29.6% (45/152) and that of Xpert over LAM was 75% (84/11). The incremental yield of LAM increased with decreasing CD4 count. The costs per TB case diagnosed were similar for the sequential and concurrent strategies ($1,617 to $1,626). In sputum-expectorating hospitalized patients with advanced HIV and access to both tests, concurrent testing with Xpert and LAM may be the best strategy for diagnosing TB. These data inform clinical practice in settings where TB and HIV are endemic.

Management of drug-resistant tuberculosis in special sub-populations including those with HIV co-infection, pregnancy, diabetes, organ-specific dysfunction, and in the critically ill.

Tuberculosis remains a major problem globally, and is the leading cause of death from an infectious agent. Drug-resistant tuberculosis threatens to marginalise the substantial gains that have recently been made in the fight against tuberculosis. Drug-resistant TB has significant associated morbidity and a high mortality, with only half of all multidrug-resistant TB patients achieving a successful treatment outcome. Patients with drug-resistant TB in resource-poor settings are now gaining access to newer and repurposed anti-tuberculosis drugs such as bedaquiline, delamanid and linezolid. However, with ever increasing rates of co-morbidity, there is little guidance on how to manage complex patients with drug-resistant TB. We address that knowledge gap, and outline principles underpinning the management of drug-resistant TB in special situations including HIV co-infection, pregnancy, renal disease, liver disease, diabetes, and in the critically ill.

Diagnosing tuberculosis in hospitalized HIV-infected individuals who cannot produce sputum: is urine lipoarabinomannan testing the answer?

BACKGROUND: Up to one third of HIV-infected individuals with suspected TB are sputum-scarce. The Alere Determine™ TB LAM Ag lateral flow strip test can be used to diagnose TB in HIV-infected patients with advanced immunosuppression. However, how urine LAM testing should be incorporated into testing algorithms and in the context of specific patient sub-groups remains unclear. METHODS: This study represents a post hoc sub-group analysis of data from a randomized multi-center parent study. The study population consisted of hospitalized HIV-infected patients with suspected TB who were unable to produce sputum and who underwent urine LAM testing. The diagnostic utility of urine LAM for TB in this group was compared to the performance of urine LAM in patients who did produce a sputum sample in the parent study. RESULTS: There were a total of 187 and 2341 patients in the sputum-scarce and sputum-producing cohorts, respectively. 80 of the sputum-scarce patients underwent testing with urine LAM. In comparison to those who did produce sputum, sputum-scarce patients had a younger age, a lower Karnofsky performance score, and a lower weight and BMI at admission. A greater proportion of sputum-scarce patients were urine LAM positive, compared to those who were able to produce sputum (31% vs. 21%, p = 0.04). A higher proportion of sputum-scarce patients died within 8 weeks of admission (32% vs. 24%, p = 0.013). We inferred that 19% of HIV-infected sputum-scarce patients suspected of TB were diagnosed with tuberculosis by urine LAM testing, with an estimated positive predictive value of 63% (95% CI 43-82%). CONCLUSIONS: Urine LAM testing can effectively identify tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients who are at a higher risk of mortality yet are unable to generate a sputum sample for diagnostic testing. Our findings support the use of urine LAM testing in sputum-scarce hospitalized HIV-infected patients, and its incorporation into diagnostic algorithms for this patient population.

The impact of tunneled pleural catheters on the quality of life of patients with malignant pleural effusions.

BACKGROUND: Tunneled pleural catheters (TPC) are used in the management of malignant pleural effusions (MPE), but the impact of this palliative procedure on patient quality of life (QoL) has not been well described. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the impact of TPCs on symptoms and QoL of patients with recurrent MPE. METHODS: Patients with recurrent MPE completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 QoL questionnaires at baseline, 2 and 14 weeks; FACIT-TS-G© treatment satisfaction surveys were completed at 14 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were recruited. Thirty-seven patients (37/82, 45%) died prior to their 14-week follow-up appointment. Significant improvements in dyspnea at 2 weeks were demonstrated with both dyspnea scores (LC13 baseline score 64.1, 2-week score 43.7, mean change -20.4, n = 56, p < 0.001; C30 baseline score 78.9, 2-week score 46.6, mean change -32.4, n = 68, p < 0.001), as well as with the MRC score (baseline median score 4, 2-week score 3, n = 70, p < 0.001). Global health status/QoL was also significantly improved at 2 weeks (baseline score 34.1, 2-week score 46.3, mean change 12.3, n = 68, p < 0.001). Improvements in cough, fatigue and all functional scales were noted at 2 weeks. The improvements in dyspnea and global health status/QoL were maintained to 14 weeks in surviving subjects and there was further improvement in the MRC score at 14 weeks. Patients who completed the FACIT-TS-G survey demonstrated overall satisfaction with TPC treatment. CONCLUSIONS: TPCs are associated with a significant improvement in global health status, QoL and dyspnea at the 2-week time point in patients with recurrent MPE.

Endobronchial ultrasound knowledge, implementation, and perceived barriers after attendance at a dedicated hands-on course.

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a relatively new technology in the field of pulmonary medicine. To determine EBUS knowledge, current clinical utilization, and perceived barriers to EBUS implementation, we surveyed physicians who had previously attended a 2-day hands-on EBUS course in our center. Our survey response rate was 51%. Overall, we found that more than one-third of course participants were currently performing linear EBUS and that over half had access to EBUS for their patients through another physician in their center. EBUS knowledge was excellent and many physicians used EBUS in their current clinical setting in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and lung cancer. Reported barriers to EBUS implementation included the high cost of equipment (73%), high per procedure cost (23%), inadequate support staff (32%), and limitations regarding use of sedation and anesthesia (18%). Only 14% cited lack of adequate training as a barrier to EBUS implementation, and none believed that low patient volumes for EBUS was a barrier to its implementation. It seems that participation in an EBUS course is useful in helping physicians incorporate EBUS in their practice, but barriers remain, some of which may not be modifiable through such activities.