Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection After Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BackgroundNeutropenia is a common complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Filgrastim may be used to treat neutropenia in LTRs, but its consequences on acute cellular rejection (ACR) remain controversial. Objective: The purpose was to examine the association between filgrastim and incidence of ACR 6 months after filgrastim administration in LTRs. Secondary outcomes included burden of ACR, infections, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and survival. Methods: This was a matched cohort study of patients transplanted between January 2010 and October 2019. LTRs who received filgrastim for neutropenia were compared to a cohort who did not. LTRs were matched on transplant indication, sex, age, and time post-transplant and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the likelihood of ACR. Results: 212 patients were included in the analysis (106 in each group). 50 patients (47.2%) in the filgrastim group experienced ACR compared to 37 patients (34.9%) in the no filgrastim group (P = .070). In multivariable analysis, filgrastim use was not associated with ACR at 6 months (OR 1.409, 95% CI 0.772-2.571). Time to first ACR was shorter (P = .049) and 6-month ACR score was higher in the filgrastim group (.49 vs .33, P = .047). LTRs in the filgrastim group had higher incidence of bacterial pneumonia and 1-year mortality. Conclusions: Although not associated with increased likelihood of ACR at 6 months, our study found that filgrastim is associated with increased ACR burden and decreased time to ACR. This study can help inform clinicians of ACR risk after filgrastim use in LTRs.

Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin for Treatment of Corticosteroid Refractory Acute Cellular Rejection After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major cause of death after the first year posttransplant, with acute cellular rejection (ACR) being a major risk factor for CLAD. We evaluated the use of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) for corticosteroid refractory ACR in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 112 adult lung transplant recipients who received rATG for refractory ACR after lung transplantation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ACR on follow-up transbronchial biopsy. Secondary endpoints included freedom from ACR within 1 y post-rATG, CLAD progression at 1 y post-rATG, and all-cause mortality at 1 y post-rATG. RESULTS: A complete resolution of ACR was observed in 60.2% of patients, an improvement but not complete resolution in 22.1%, and no response on follow-up biopsy in 17.8%. Mean A grade 1 y post-rATG was 0.51 in complete responders, 1.01 in partial responders, and 2.19 in nonresponders ( P < 0.001). Complete responders had significantly less new or worsening CLAD at 1 y than partial responders (17% versus 40%; P = 0.02). All-cause mortality rate was 14.9% in complete responders, 40% in partial responders, and 30% in nonresponders ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: rATG appears to be an effective treatment of refractory ACR in lung transplant recipients. Failure to respond to rATG carries an increased risk of early CLAD and death.

Induction Strategies in Lung Transplantation: Alemtuzumab vs. Basiliximab a Single-Center Experience.

Background: Induction therapy is used in about 80% of lung transplant centers and is increasing globally. Currently, there are no standards or guidelines for the use of induction therapy. At our institution, we have two induction strategies, basiliximab, and alemtuzumab. The goal of this manuscript is to share our experience and practice since this is an area of controversy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 807 lung transplants performed at our institution between 2011 and 2020. Indications for the use of the basiliximab protocol were as follows: patients over the age of 70 years, history of cancer, hepatitis C virus or human immunodeficiency virus infection history, and cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus (donor positive/ recipient negative). In the absence of these clinical factors, the alemtuzumab protocol was used. Results: 453 patients underwent alemtuzumab induction and 354 patients underwent basiliximab. There were significant differences in delayed chest closure (24.7% alemtuzumab vs 31.4% basiliximab, p = 0.037), grade 3 primary graft dysfunction observed within 72 hours (19.9% alemtuzumab vs 29.9% basiliximab, p = 0.002), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (8.8% alemtuzumab vs 14.7% basiliximab, p = 0.009), acute cellular rejection in first year (39.1% alemtuzumab vs 53.4% basiliximab, p < 0.001). The overall survival rate of the patients with alemtuzumab induction was significantly higher than those of the patients with basiliximab induction (5 years survival rate: 64.1% alemtuzumab vs 52.3%, basiliximab, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed lower 5-year survival for basiliximab induction (HR = 1.41, p = 0.02), recipient cytomegalovirus positive (HR = 1.49, p = 0.01), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (HR = 2.20, p < 0.001), and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (HR = 2.27, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this single center retrospective review, there was a significant difference in survival rates between induction strategies. This outcome may be attributable to differences in recipient characteristics between the groups. However, the Alemtuzumab group experienced less episodes of acute cellular rejection within the first year.

Achievement of clinical isavuconazole blood concentrations in transplant recipients with isavuconazonium sulphate capsules administered via enteral feeding tube.

BACKGROUND: Isavuconazole is a triazole antifungal available in IV and capsule formulation. Prescribing information states that capsules should not be chewed, crushed, dissolved or opened because the drug was not studied in this manner. However, considering the pharmacokinetics of the capsules, we theorized opening and sprinkling the contents into an enteral feeding tube (EFT) would result in adequate absorption and systemic concentrations of isavuconazole. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients receiving isavuconazonium sulphate capsules via EFT would achieve clinical blood concentrations of isavuconazole. METHODS: Nineteen solid organ and HCT recipients receiving isavuconazole via EFT for prevention or treatment of invasive fungal infection (IFI) were prospectively identified at four academic medical centres in the USA. Patients were included in this evaluation if they received isavuconazole via EFT for at least 5 days and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was performed. RESULTS: TDM was performed after a median of 7 days (range 6-17) following EFT administration and 15 days (range 7-174) of isavuconazole therapy overall. Median isavuconazole concentration was 1.8 µg/mL (range 0.3-5.2). Median isavuconazole concentrations in patients with or without prior IV administration were 1.8 µg/mL (range 0.3-5.2) and 2.2 µg/mL (range 0.8-3.6; P = 0.896), respectively. Concentrations achieved with the EFT route were similar to or greater than the corresponding concentrations via the IV route in six patients who had TDM performed during both routes of administration. CONCLUSIONS: It is reasonable to consider opening isavuconazonium sulphate capsules and administering the contents enterally for prevention and treatment of IFI.

Low vitamin D exposure is associated with higher risk of infection in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D is a steroid hormone with multiple vital roles within the immune system. Various studies evaluated the influence of vitamin D on infections postrenal transplantation and found contrasting results. This study aimed to assess the relationship between vitamin D status and the incidence of infection in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult renal transplant recipients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2005 and 2012. Patients were grouped as vitamin D sufficient (≥30 ng/mL) or deficient (<30 ng/mL) based on total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. The association between vitamin D levels collected at any point post-transplantation and incidence of infection within ±90 days of the vitamin D levels were assessed using logistic and Poisson's regression models. RESULTS: Vitamin D sufficiency at any point post-transplantation was significantly associated with a 66% lower odds (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P<.001) and 43% lower rate of infections (incident rate ratio (IRR): 0.57; 95% CI: 0.46-0.71; P<.001) within ±90 days of the vitamin D level. Baseline vitamin D level was also associated with lower incidence and risk for infections within the first year post-transplantation. CONCLUSION: Adequate levels of vitamin D in kidney transplant recipients are associated with lower infection risk in the first year and at any time post-transplantation.