Binding requirements for latent transforming growth factor Beta2 activation.

Although the mechanism for activation of latent TGFß1 and TGFß3 is understood to involve the binding of the TGFß propeptide (LAP) to both an integrin and an insoluble substrate, the activation of latent TGFß2 has been unclear because the TGFß2 LAP does not have the classical integrin binding sequence found in the other two TGFß isoform LAPs. To assess the potential requirement for covalent linkage with a matrix or cell surface protein for the activation of latent TGFß2, we generated mice in which the TGFß2 Cys residue predicted to be involved in binding was mutated to Ser (Tgfb2C24S). We reasoned that, if covalent interaction with a second molecule is required for latent TGFß2 activation, mutant mice should display a Tgfb2 null (Tgfb2-/-)-like phenotype. Tgfb2C24S mice closely phenocopy Tgfb2-/- mice with death in utero between E18 and P1 and with congenital heart and kidney defects similar to those described for Tgfb2-/- mice. The mutant latent TGFß2 is secreted at levels similar to WT, yet TGFß signaling monitored as nuclear pSmad2 is suppressed. We conclude that, like latent TGFß1, latent TGFß2 activation requires binding to an immobilized matrix or plasma membrane molecule.

TGFß-2 haploinsufficiency causes early death in mice with Marfan syndrome.

To assess the contribution of individual TGF-ß isoforms to aortopathy in Marfan syndrome (MFS), we quantified the survival and phenotypes of mice with a combined fibrillin1 (the gene defective in MFS) hypomorphic mutation and a TGF-ß1, 2, or 3 heterozygous null mutation. The loss of TGF-ß2, and only TGF-ß2, resulted in 80% of the double mutant animals dying earlier, by postnatal day 20, than MFS only mice. Death was not from thoracic aortic rupture, as observed in MFS mice, but was associated with hyperplastic aortic valve leaflets, aortic regurgitation, enlarged aortic root, increased heart weight, and impaired lung alveolar septation. Thus, there appears to be a relationship between loss of fibrillin1 and TGF-ß2 in the postnatal development of the heart, aorta and lungs.

Notch signalling: multifaceted role in development and disease.

Notch pathway is an evolutionarily conserved signalling system that operates to influence an astonishing array of cell fate decisions in different developmental contexts. Notch signalling plays important roles in many developmental processes, making it difficult to name a tissue or a developing organ that does not depend on Notch function at one stage or another. Thus, dysregulation of Notch signalling is associated with many developmental defects and various pathological conditions, including cancer. Although many recent advances have been made to reveal different aspects of the Notch signalling mechanism and its intricate regulation, there are still many unanswered questions related to how the Notch signalling pathway functions in so many developmental events. The same pathway can be deployed in numerous cellular contexts to play varied and critical roles in an organism's development and this is only possible because of the complex regulatory mechanisms of the pathway. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanism and regulation of the Notch signalling pathway along with its multifaceted functions in different aspects of development and disease.

Latent transforming growth factor ß binding protein 3 controls adipogenesis.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGFß) is released from cells as part of a trimeric latent complex consisting of TGFß, the TGFß propeptides, and either a latent TGFß binding protein (LTBP) or glycoprotein-A repetitions predominant (GARP) protein. LTBP1 and 3 modulate latent TGFß function with respect to secretion, matrix localization, and activation and, therefore, are vital for the proper function of the cytokine in a number of tissues. TGFß modulates stem cell differentiation into adipocytes (adipogenesis), but the potential role of LTBPs in this process has not been studied. We observed that 72 h post adipogenesis initiation Ltbp1, 2, and 4 expression levels decrease by 74-84%, whereas Ltbp3 expression levels remain constant during adipogenesis. We found that LTBP3 silencing in C3H/10T1/2 cells reduced adipogenesis, as measured by the percentage of cells with lipid vesicles and the expression of the transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). Lentiviral mediated expression of an Ltbp3 mRNA resistant to siRNA targeting rescued the phenotype, validating siRNA specificity. Knockdown (KD) of Ltbp3 expression in 3T3-L1, M2, and primary bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) indicated a similar requirement for Ltbp3. Epididymal and inguinal white adipose tissue fat pad weights of Ltbp3-/- mice were reduced by 62% and 57%, respectively, compared to wild-type mice. Inhibition of adipogenic differentiation upon LTBP3 loss is mediated by TGFß, as TGFß neutralizing antibody and TGFß receptor I kinase blockade rescue the LTBP3 KD phenotype. These results indicate that LTBP3 has a TGFß-dependent function in adipogenesis both in vitro and possibly in vivo. SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding the control of mesenchymal stem cell fate is crucial for the potential use of these cells for regenerative medicine.

Somatic Clonal Analyses Using FLP/FRT and MARCM System to Understand Notch Signaling Mechanism and Its Regulation.

Notch signaling regulates an array of developmental decisions and has been implicated in a multitude of diseases, including cancer over the past a few decades. The simplicity and versatility of the Notch pathway in Drosophila make it an ardent system to study Notch biology, its regulation, and functions. In this chapter, we highlight the use of two powerful techniques, namely, FLP/FRT and MARCM in the study of Notch signaling. These mosaic analysis techniques are powerful tools to analyze gene functions in different biological processes. The section briefly explains the principle and the protocols with suitable examples.

The role of LTBPs in TGF beta signaling.

The purpose of this review is to discuss the transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) binding proteins (LTBP) with respect to their participation in the activity of TGFB. We first describe pertinent aspects of the biology and cell function of the LTBPs. We then summarize the physiological consequences of LTBP loss in humans and mice. Finally, we consider a number of outstanding questions relating to LTBP function.

Impact of Detergents on Membrane Protein Complex Isolation.

Detergents play an essential role during the isolation of membrane protein complexes. Inappropriate use of detergents may affect the native fold of the membrane proteins, their binding to antibodies, or their interaction with partner proteins. Here we used cadherin-11 (Cad11) as an example to examine the impact of detergents on membrane protein complex isolation. We found that mAb 1A5 could immunoprecipitate Cad11 when membranes were solubilized by dodecyl maltoside (DDM) but not by octylglucoside, suggesting that octylglucoside interferes with Cad11-mAb 1A5 interaction. Furthermore, we compared the effects of Brij-35, Triton X-100, cholate, CHAPSO, Zwittergent 3-12, Deoxy BIG CHAP, and digitonin on Cad11 solubilization and immunoprecipitation. We found that all detergents except Brij-35 could solubilize Cad11 from the membrane. Upon immunoprecipitation, we found that ß-catenin, a known cadherin-interacting protein, was present in Cad11 immune complex among the detergents tested except Brij-35. However, the association of p120 catenin with Cad11 varied depending on the detergents used. Using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) to determine the relative levels of proteins in Cad11 immune complexes, we found that DDM and Triton X-100 were more efficient than cholate in solubilization and immunoprecipitation of Cad11 and resulted in the identification of both canonical and new candidate Cad11-interacting proteins.

Kinase active Misshapen regulates Notch signaling in Drosophila melanogaster.

Notch signaling pathway represents a principal cellular communication system that plays a pivotal role during development of metazoans. Drosophila misshapen (msn) encodes a protein kinase, which is related to the budding yeast Ste20p (sterile 20 protein) kinase. In a genetic screen, using candidate gene approach to identify novel kinases involved in Notch signaling, we identified msn as a novel regulator of Notch signaling. Data presented here suggest that overexpression of kinase active form of Msn exhibits phenotypes similar to Notch loss-of-function condition and msn genetically interacts with components of Notch signaling pathway. Kinase active form of Msn associates with Notch receptor and regulate its signaling activity. We further show that kinase active Misshapen leads to accumulation of membrane-tethered form of Notch. Moreover, activated Msn also depletes Armadillo and DE-Cadherin from adherens junctions. Thus, this study provides a yet unknown mode of regulation of Notch signaling by Misshapen.

Chip physically interacts with Notch and their stoichiometry is critical for Notch function in wing development and cell proliferation in Drosophila.

BACKGROUND: Notch signaling plays a fundamental role both in metazoan cell fate determination and in the establishment of distinct developmental cell lineages. In a yeast two-hybrid screen, we identified Chip as a binding partner of Notch. Thus, we investigated the functional significance of Notch and Chip interactions. METHODS: Co-immunoprecipitation and GST pull-down experiments confirmed the physical interaction between Notch and Chip. Immunostaining revealed that Chip and Notch-intracellular domain (Notch-ICD) co-localized in cell nuclei. Loss-of-function and gain-of-function analyses of Chip were carried out using FLP/FRT and GAL4-UAS systems, respectively. Immunostaining and real-time PCR were performed to analyze the role of Chip on Notch-induced cell proliferation. RESULTS: Here, we report transcriptional cofactor Chip as a novel binding partner of Notch. Chip and Notch also showed strong genetic interactions, and Chip mutant clones in the dorsal compartment induced ectopic wing margins by ectopic expression of Notch and its targets, Wg and Cut. Our analyses revealed that stoichiometry of Notch and Chip is critical at the dorso-ventral (DV) boundary for wing margin formation. In addition, overexpression of Chip can rescue Notch-induced cell proliferation in larval imaginal discs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Notch function in the DV boundary area is presumably dependent on Notch-Chip heterodimer formation. In addition, overexpression of Chip can rescue Notch-induced cell proliferation, presumably through titration of overexpressed Notch-ICD by excess Chip molecules. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present study reveals that Chip is a novel interacting partner of Notch and it plays a major role in Notch-induced DV margin formation and cell proliferation.

TRAF6 is a novel regulator of Notch signaling in Drosophila melanogaster.

Notch signaling pathway unravels a fundamental cellular communication system that plays an elemental role in development. It is evident from different studies that the outcome of Notch signaling depends on signal strength, timing, cell type, and cellular context. Since Notch signaling affects a spectrum of cellular activity at various developmental stages by reorganizing itself in more than one way to produce different intensities in the signaling output, it is important to understand the context dependent complexity of Notch signaling and different routes of its regulation. We identified, TRAF6 (Drosophila homolog of mammalian TRAF6) as an interacting partner of Notch intracellular domain (Notch-ICD). TRAF6 genetically interacts with Notch pathway components in trans-heterozygous combinations. Immunocytochemical analysis shows that TRAF6 co-localizes with Notch in Drosophila third instar larval tissues. Our genetic interaction data suggests that the loss-of-function of TRAF6 leads to the rescue of previously identified Kurtz-Deltex mediated wing notching phenotype and enhances Notch protein survival. Co-expression of TRAF6 and Deltex results in depletion of Notch in the larval wing discs and down-regulates Notch targets, Wingless and Cut. Taken together, our results suggest that TRAF6 may function as a negative regulator of Notch signaling.

The Drosophila importin-α3 is required for nuclear import of notch in vivo and it displays synergistic effects with notch receptor on cell proliferation.

The Notch signaling pathway controls diverse cell-fate specification events throughout development. The versatility of this pathway to influence different aspects of development comes from its multiple levels of regulation. Upon ligand-induced Notch activation, the Notch intracellular domain (Notch-ICD) is released from the membrane and translocates to the nucleus, where it transduces Notch signals by regulating the transcription of downstream target genes. But the exact mechanism of translocation of Notch-ICD into the nucleus is not clear. Here, we implicate Importin-α3 (also known as karyopherin-α3) in the nuclear translocation of Notch-ICD in Drosophila. Our present analyses reveal that Importin-α3 can directly bind to Notch-ICD and loss of Importin-α3 function results in cytoplasmic accumulation of the Notch receptor. Using MARCM (Mosaic Analysis with a Repressible Cell Marker) technique, we demonstrate that Importin-α3 is required for nuclear localization of Notch-ICD. These results reveal that the nuclear transport of Notch-ICD is mediated by the canonical Importin-α3/Importin-ß transport pathway. In addition, co-expression of both Notch-ICD and Importin-α3 displays synergistic effects on cell proliferation. Taken together, our results suggest that Importin-α3 mediated nuclear import of Notch-ICD may play important role in regulation of Notch signaling.