Effectiveness of Updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB and BA.2.86/JN.1 Lineage Hospitalization and a Comparison of Clinical Severity - IVY Network, 26 Hospitals, October 18, 2023-March 9, 2024.

Background: Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and severity of SARS-CoV-2 variants can inform public health risk assessments and decisions about vaccine composition. BA.2.86 and its descendants, including JN.1 (referred to collectively as "JN lineages"), emerged in late 2023 and exhibited substantial genomic divergence from co-circulating XBB lineages. Methods: We analyzed patients hospitalized with COVID-19-like illness at 26 hospitals in 20 U.S. states admitted October 18, 2023-March 9, 2024. Using a test-negative, case-control design, we estimated the effectiveness of an updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 vaccine dose against sequence-confirmed XBB and JN lineage hospitalization using logistic regression. Odds of severe outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or death, were compared for JN versus XBB lineage hospitalizations using logistic regression. Results: 585 case-patients with XBB lineages, 397 case-patients with JN lineages, and 4,580 control-patients were included. VE in the first 7-89 days after receipt of an updated dose was 54.2% (95% CI = 36.1%-67.1%) against XBB lineage hospitalization and 32.7% (95% CI = 1.9%-53.8%) against JN lineage hospitalization. Odds of ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.80; 95% CI = 0.46-1.38) and IMV or death (aOR 0.69; 95% CI = 0.34-1.40) were not significantly different among JN compared to XBB lineage hospitalizations. Conclusions: Updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccination provided protection against both XBB and JN lineage hospitalization, but protection against the latter may be attenuated by immune escape. Clinical severity of JN lineage hospitalizations was not higher relative to XBB lineage hospitalizations.

Early Endophthalmitis Rates and Risk Factors After Corneal Transplant Surgeries in Medicare Beneficiaries From 2016 to 2019.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to determine rates of early postkeratoplasty endophthalmitis and identify sociodemographic and medical risk factors in the Medicare population. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, patients aged 65 years and older undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK), endothelial keratoplasty (EK), and anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) from 2016 to 2019 among 100% Medicare Fee-or-Service database were included. Rates of early endophthalmitis within 42 days of keratoplasty were determined using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision-Clinical Modification diagnostic codes. Patient and physician characteristics were compared using x2 tests, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with endophthalmitis. RESULTS: The overall early endophthalmitis rate after keratoplasty was 0.39% (n = 216/54,822) with a median time to diagnosis of 14 (interquartile range: 5-25) days. Rates by keratoplasty types were 1.31% for cataract surgery combined with PK, 1.13% for PK, and 0.22% for EK. On multivariable analysis, the odds of endophthalmitis were higher for PK [odds ratio (OR): 5.46, 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.98-7.49] and ALK (OR: 5.45, 95% CI, 2.59-11.49) relative to EK. Patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3 had higher odds of endophthalmitis (OR: 1.82; 95% CI, 1.28-2.58) relative to patients with a CCI of 0. Practices located in the Midwest (OR: 0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.96), West (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.93), and Northeast (OR: 0.59 95% CI, 0.35-0.99) had lower odds of reporting endophthalmitis when compared to the South. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing PK and ALK and those with a CCI ≥3 had higher odds of endophthalmitis relative to EK and patients without comorbidities, respectively. Practices in the West, Midwest, and Northeast had lower odds of endophthalmitis relative to the South.

Use and Cost of Sustained-Release Corticosteroids for Cataract Surgery Under the Medicare Pass-Through Program.

Importance: Sustained-release corticosteroids offer the potential of improved compliance and greater patient convenience for anti-inflammatory treatment after cataract surgery. However, they are substantially more expensive than postoperative corticosteroid eye drops, which have historically been standard care. Objective: To examine the use and cost of sustained-release corticosteroids in patients with Medicare who underwent cataract surgery in the US during the temporary pass-through reimbursement program period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study examined Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims from beneficiaries with at least 12 continuous months of Medicare enrollment who underwent at least 1 cataract surgery from March 2019 through December 2021. Patients younger than 65 years, those with missing demographic information, those who had more than 1 cataract surgery on each eye, and those who received more than 1 corticosteroid on the day of surgery were excluded. Cataract surgeries with concurrent use of dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% or dexamethasone ophthalmic insert were identified. Information on surgeon demographic characteristics and costs of surgery and drugs were extracted. Data were analyzed from June 15 to December 4, 2022. Exposure: Use of dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% or dexamethasone ophthalmic insert during cataract surgery. Main Outcome Measures: Utilization rate and cost of dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% and dexamethasone ophthalmic insert among Medicare FFS beneficiaries who underwent cataract surgery. Results: A total of 4 252 532 cataract surgeries in Medicare FFS beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 74.8 [5.8] years; 1 730 811 male [40.7%] and 2 521 721 female [59.3%]) were performed by 12 284 ophthalmologists (8876 male [72.3%], 2877 female [23.4%], and 531 sex unknown [4.3%]). In all, 34 627 beneficiaries (0.8%) received dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% and 73 430 (1.7%) received a dexamethasone ophthalmic insert; the use of both drugs increased over the study period. The mean (SD) Medicare allowed charges for dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% and dexamethasone ophthalmic insert were $531.47 ($141.52) and $538.49 ($63.79), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite offering the potential of improved compliance and greater patient convenience, findings of this study suggest that sustained-release corticosteroid use during cataract surgery was low and associated with cost increases to the health care system vs conventional postoperative eye drops. As these new products must be priced high enough to qualify for the Medicare pass-through program, unreasonable cost may have been a deterrent to their use, suggesting that the current Medicare reimbursement rules may not be appropriate for sustained-release postoperative corticosteroids in cataract surgery.

Predictors of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship for international medical graduates: a San Francisco match analysis.

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of international medical graduates (IMGs) applying for ophthalmology fellowship match. METHODS: Design Case control study. Setting San Francisco Fellowship Match data between 2010 and 2017. Participants IMGs applying for ophthalmology fellowships. Main outcome(s) and measure(s) Applicant characteristics for IMGs were stratified by their match outcome and compared using Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney U test. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the effect of applicant characteristics on their match outcomes. RESULTS: 22.62% (785/3471) of the fellowship match applicants were IMGs of which 35.92% (n = 282) matched. This rate was 58% lower than the 86.4% match rate for US-MG (p < 0.001). Factors associated with higher odds of matching among IMGs were graduating from a US residency (Odds Ratio (OR):2.330; 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.433-3.789), higher USMLE Step 3 score (OR:1.019; 95% CI: 1.006-1.032), applying to more programs (OR:1.035; 95% CI: 1.017-1.053), ranking more programs (OR:1.200; 95% CI: 1.096-1.313) and having a higher percentage of programs ranked (OR:1.021; 95% CI: 1.014-1.028). CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship match rates for IMGs were significantly lower than for US-MGs. IMGs graduating from an ophthalmology residency in the US, scoring higher Step 3 scores, distributing more applications, and ranking more programs had increased odds of matching. This information may assist IMG fellowship applicants and their mentors when they consider pursuing an ophthalmology fellowship program in the US.