RESUMO
AIMS: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is characterized by the accumulation of transthyretin (TTR) protein in the myocardium. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a descriptive summary of the clinical trials and observational studies that evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of various agents used in ATTR-CM, with a goal of identifying the contemporary gaps in literature and to reveal future research opportunities. METHODS AND RESULTS: The search was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search using several databases for observational and clinical trials investigating the treatment modalities for ATTR-CM was undertaken. We extracted data including study characteristics, primary endpoints, and adverse events from each study. A total of 19 studies were included in our scoping review. 8 were clinical trials and 11 were observational analyses. The drugs evaluated included tafamadis, acoramidis, revusiran, TUDCA and doxycycline, diflusinil, inotersan, eplontersen, and patisiran. Tafamidis has shown to be efficacious in the management of ATTR-CM, particularly when initiated at earlier stages. RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotide drugs have shown promising impacts on quality of life. Additionally, this review identified gaps in the literature, particularly among long-term outcomes, comparative effectiveness, and the translation of research into economic contexts. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple pharmacological options are potential disease-modifying therapies for ATTR-CM. However, many gaps exist in the understanding of these various drug therapies, warranting further research. The future directions for management of ATTR-CM are promising in regard to improving prognostic implications.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pomalidomide (Pom) has demonstrated synergistic antiproliferative activity in combination regimens as a result of its distinct anticancer, antiangiogenic, and immunomodulatory effects. This review aimed to compare outcome measures of different Pom regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified a total of 1374 studies. Thirty-five studies assessing 4623 subjects met the inclusion criteria: phase 2/3 trial, ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, and clearly documented efficacy outcomes like overall response rate (ORR), overall survival, and progression-free survival. Statistical analyses for meta-analysis was performed by CMA version 3 and Cochrane Q statistics (P < .05 considered significant, I2 index for heterogeneity). A random effects model was used if there was significant heterogeneity (P ≥ .05 over I2 ≥ 50%). RESULTS: Pooled analysis showed ORR 47.1% across all Pom-based (2- and 3-drug) regimens. Stratified analysis for efficacy outcomes (pooled ORR [%] and mean progression-free survival [months]) are reported. With doublet regimen, Pom with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex) was the most common regimen (35.7%, 6.1 months), and overall survival was 14.37 months. With triplet regimens, pooled ORR was 61.9% (I2 = 87.3%). These included bortezomib + Pom + LoDex (83.5%, 15.7 months), carfilzomib-Pom + LoDex (77.1%, 15.3 months), Pom + LoDex-bendamustine (74.2%), Pom-dexamethasone-daratumumab (64.5%), Pom + LoDex-cyclophosphamide (59.4%, 9.5 months), and Pom + LoDex-doxorubicin (32%). Leading adverse events were myelosuppression, with mean incidences of grade 3 or higher neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia of 47.6%, 26.5%, and 20.8%, respectively. Mean incidence of grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events were infections 29.1%, pneumonia 13.8%, and fatigue 10%. CONCLUSION: Three-drug Pom regimens yielded double the response rates compared to Pom + LoDex (pooled ORR, 61.9% vs. 35.7%), with bortezomib + Pom + LoDex and carfilzomib-Pom + LoDex demonstrating better outcomes than other regimens.