Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Pharmaceut Med ; 38(3): 217-224, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555545

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following marketing authorization in Japan, for almost all new drugs or new indications, postmarketing studies (PMS) are a regulatory requirement. These PMS focus on accrual of a defined number of cases with data being collected for a predetermined period after approval to confirm efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and quality in the Japanese population. In contrast to other regions where PMS are only required to address a specific scientific uncertainty, in Japan, PMS are often required regardless of any specific scientific uncertainty, and therefore, their scientific value is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the contribution to the understanding of benefit/risk of PMS conducted by Pfizer in Japan over 2000-2020 for Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) reexamination. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all Pfizer Japan postmarketing studies (PMS) during 2000-2020 was performed. Available Pfizer clinical study reports (CSRs) and PMDA reexamination reports (RERs) were reviewed for key safety findings. The primary analysis was conducted on the subset of PMS that had both an English CSR and a discussion of that PMS in the relevant RER issued by the PMDA, which was subsequently translated into English by a professional translation vendor. Reexamination outcome is included in each RER and served to demonstrate the impact of the study of the benefit/risk profile of the drug. RESULTS: A total of 79 PMS for 43 different drug products across therapy areas enrolled a total of 98,035 patients. The 79 PMS comprised 34 general drug use investigation (GDUI) studies and 45 special investigation (SI) studies. The primary analysis involved 37 PMS with a CSR and RER available in English (40,470 patients); all of which were observational in design. For 31 of 37 PMS, the RER concluded the overall adverse drug reaction (ADR) rate in the PMS was nominally lower than in the phase 3 program. Unlabeled ADRs were reported in 28 of 37 PMS; however, no new safety concerns requiring regulatory action arose from any PMS. The PMDA did not require additional risk minimization measures for any of the 43 drug products studied in any of the 79 PMS assessed. Japan PMS data were consistent with prior global data with no evidence of clinically meaningful differences in safety in Japanese patients. In all cases, the reexamination outcome was category 1 ("usefulness is confirmed"). CONCLUSIONS: The reexamination process did not result in regulatory changes for any of the examined drugs. The Japan new-drug application (J-NDA) review and approval process, including implementation of the initial Japan product label, assures acceptable benefit/risk at the time of approval such that mandatory GDUI or SI studies for all products should be reconsidered. In the case of genuine scientific uncertainty to the extent that the benefit/risk of the product is not clear, a PMS is warranted.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Japão , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto
2.
Cancer Med ; 4(6): 887-96, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25756473

RESUMO

An apparent causal association between crizotinib treatment and renal cyst development emerged during clinical trials in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Serious adverse event (SAE) reports of renal cysts from a safety database of 1375 patients from four clinical trials were reviewed. A blinded, retrospective, independent radiologic review (IRR) was performed using scans from patients on study for ≥ 6 months in three clinical trials; risk factors for renal cyst development were assessed. Among 17 patients with renal cysts reported as SAEs, evidence of invasion into adjacent structures was noted in seven patients, with no evidence of malignancy found. These patients generally did not require dose reductions, none required permanent crizotinib discontinuation due to this AE, and most continued treatment with clinical benefit. In the blinded IRR, among 255 crizotinib-treated patients, 22%, 3%, and 2% had preexisting simple cysts, complex cysts, or both, respectively. At the 6-month tumor assessment, 9% of all patients had acquired new cysts, and 2% of patients with preexisting cysts had developed new cysts and enlargements (>50%) of preexisting simple cysts. Asians appeared to have an increased risk of developing new cysts on treatment; Koreans in particular had 5.18 times higher odds of developing cysts than non-Asians (95% confidence interval, 1.51-17.78; P = 0.05). Crizotinib treatment appears to be associated with an increased risk of development and progression of renal cysts in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. While close monitoring is recommended, dosing modification was not generally necessary, allowing patients to remain on crizotinib treatment.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Renais Císticas/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Crizotinibe , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 15(11): 763-74, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16823890

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to quantify rates of adverse events in a high-risk multi-morbid population of institutionalized patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among nursing home residents diagnosed with AD and psychosis during January 1998 to October 1999. Using the Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Medicare inpatient claims (ICD-9 codes), 7728 nursing home residents aged 55-95 years with AD and psychosis were identified for study. Potential adverse events of interest were identified from the MDS and Medicare inpatient claims (ICD-9 codes). We estimated the incidence rate (IR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each adverse event during a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Of the 7728 residents studied, nearly 30% were considered 'dependent' by the activities of daily living (ADL) score and approximately 15% exhibited severe cognitive impairment at baseline. At least 90% had comorbid psychiatric disorders. The most common adverse event was accidental injury, occurring at a rate of 97.7 per 100 person-years (95%CI = 94.7-100.7). Other common adverse events were death (IR = 44.6/100 person-years; 95%CI = 42.9-46.4), infection (IR = 41.8/100 person-years; 95%CI = 39.7-43.8), pain (IR = 43.5/100 person-years; 95%CI = 41.2-45.9), anorexia (41.3/100 person-years; 95%CI = 39.1-43.6), and weight change (IR = 40.2/100 person-years; 95%CI = 38.7-41.7). CONCLUSIONS: This information on the occurrence of adverse outcomes among nursing home patients with AD and psychosis provides useful context for any safety event observed among patients treated for psychosis.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/complicações , Casas de Saúde , Transtornos Psicóticos/complicações , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Comorbidade , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Avaliação Geriátrica , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Schizophr Res ; 61(2-3): 123-36, 2003 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12729864

RESUMO

Aripiprazole is a novel antipsychotic with a unique mechanism of action. Presented here is a pooled analysis of safety and tolerability data from all completed short-term, placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia from the aripiprazole clinical development program. Data were analyzed from five 4- to 6-week double-blind multicenter studies of patients hospitalized with acute relapse of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder randomized to aripiprazole (n=932), placebo (n=416), or haloperidol (n=201). Daily aripiprazole doses ranged from 2 to 30 mg. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reports, EPS scales, ECGs, weight, and prolactin, glucose and cholesterol levels. Aripiprazole was well tolerated, with similar AE incidence rates to placebo, and lower rates than haloperidol for akathisia, extrapyramidal syndrome and somnolence. Objective EPS assessments demonstrated no significant differences between aripiprazole and placebo on Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) scores, no dose-dependent effects on Barnes Akathisia scores, and significant reductions in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores from baseline vs. placebo (p

Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Doença Aguda/psicologia , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Aripiprazol , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Haloperidol/efeitos adversos , Haloperidol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Quinolonas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico
5.
Convuls Ther ; 8(2): 141-143, 1992.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11941161

RESUMO

We describe the safe and effective use of the combination of clozapine and ECT in a patient with schizophrenia who had lost responsiveness to clozapine alone. We suggest further investigation to define the role of combined clozapine-ECT treatment in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA