Stabilization of Rapidly Progressive Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Using mTOR Inhibition After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTor) pathway after heart transplantation has been associated with reduced progression of coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV). The application of low-dose mTOR inhibition in the setting of modern immunosuppression, including tacrolimus, remains an area of limited exploration. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who received heart transplantation between January 2009 and January 2019 and had baseline, 1-year and 2-3-year coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Intimal thickness in 5 segments along the left anterior descending artery was compared across imaging time points in patients who were transitioned to low-dose mTOR inhibitor (sirolimus) vs standard treatment with mycophenolate on a background of tacrolimus. Long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes (revascularization, severe CAV, retransplant, and cardiovascular death) were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 216 patients (mean age 51.5 ± 11.9 years, 77.8% men, 80.1% white), 81 individuals (37.5%) were switched to mTOR inhibition. mTOR inhibition was associated with a reduction in intimal thickness by 0.05 mm (95% CI 0.02-0.07; P < 0.001). This reduction was driven by patients who met the criteria for rapidly progressive CAV 1-year post-transplant (0.12 mm; P = 0.016 for interaction). After a median follow-up of 8.6 (IQR 6.6-11) years, 40 patients had major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The use of mTOR inhibitors was not significantly associated with cardiovascular outcomes (P = 0.669). CONCLUSION: Transitioning patients after heart transplantation to an immunosuppression regimen composed of low-dose mTOR inhibition and tacrolimus was associated with a lack of progression of CAV, particularly in those with rapidly progressive CAV at 1 year, but not with long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Patient knowledge and preferences for peripheral artery disease treatment.

BACKGROUND: Shared medical decision making requires patients' understanding of their disease and its treatment options. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a condition for which preference-sensitive treatments are available, but for which little is known about patients' knowledge and treatment preferences as it relates to specific treatment goals. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter registry that involved patients with PAD experiencing claudication, the PORTRAIT Knowledge and Preferences Survey was administered at 1 year. It asks questions about PAD treatment choices, symptom relief options, disease management, and secondary prevention. PAD treatment preferences were also queried, and patients ranked 10 PAD treatment goals (1-10 Likert scale; 10 being most important). RESULTS: Among 281 participants completing the survey (44.8% women, mean age 69.6 ± 9.0 years), 54.1% knew that there was more than one way to treat PAD symptoms and 47.1% were offered more than one treatment option. Most (82.4%) acknowledged that they had to manage their PAD for the rest of their life. 'Avoid loss of toes or legs,' 'decreased risk of heart attack/stroke,' 'long-lasting treatment benefit,' 'living longer,' 'improved quality of life,' and 'doing what the doctor thinks I should do' had mean ratings > 9.0 (SD ranging between 1.21 and 2.00). More variability occurred for 'avoiding surgery.' 'cost of treatment,' 'timeline of pain relief,' and 'return to work' (SD ranging between 2.76 and 3.58). The single most important treatment goal was 'improving quality of life' (31.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Gaps exist in knowledge for patients with PAD who experience claudication, and there is a need for increased efforts to improve support for shared decision-making frameworks for symptomatic PAD.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01419080).

Predictors of Revascularization in Lower-Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the PORTRAIT Study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) guidelines recommend revascularization only for patients with lifestyle-limiting claudication that is refractory to goal-directed medical therapy (class IIA, level of evidence A). However, real-world invasive treatment patterns and predictors of revascularization in patients with symptomatic lower-extremity PAD are still largely unknown. AIM: We aimed to examine rates, patient-level predictors, and site variability of early revascularization in patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms. METHODS: Among patients with new-onset or recent exacerbation of PAD in the 10-center Patient-centered Outcomes Related to TReatment practices in peripheral Arterial disease: Investigating Trajectories (PORTRAIT) study enrolled between June 2011 and September 2015, we classified early revascularization (endovascular or surgical) as procedures being performed within 3 months of presentation. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with early revascularization. Variability across sites was estimated using the median odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Among 797 participants, early revascularization procedures were performed in 224 (28.1%). Rutherford class 3 (vs Rutherford class 1; OR=1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-3.33) and having lesions in both iliofemoral and below-the-knee arterial segments (vs below the knee only; OR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.15-2.67) were associated with a higher odds of revascularization. Longer PAD duration >12 months (vs 1-6 months; OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.77), higher ankle-brachial index scores (per 0.1 unit increase; OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96), and higher Peripheral Artery Questionnaire Summary scores (per 10 unit increase; OR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99) were associated with a lower odds of revascularization. The raw rates for revascularization in different sites ranged from 6.25% to 66.28%, and the median OR was 1.88, 95% CI: 1.38-3.57. CONCLUSIONS: About 1 in 3 patients with symptomatic PAD received early revascularization. A more extensive disease and symptom burden were the main predictors of receiving early revascularization in PAD. There was significant site variability in revascularization patterns, and further studies will better understand the source of this variability and optimal selection criteria for early revascularization. CLINICAL IMPACT: Real world patterns and predictors of early revascularization in peripheral artery disease are not well understood. In this retrospective analysis of the POTRAIT study, about 1 out of 3 patients with PAD symptoms received early revascularization, with significant site variability. A more extensive disease and symptom burden were the main predictors of receiving early revascularization in PAD.

Association of Disease-Specific Health Status With Long-Term Survival in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Background While peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity with mortality remaining high and challenging to predict, accurate understanding of serial PAD-specific health status around the time of diagnosis may prognosticate long-term mortality risk. Methods and Results Patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms enrolled in the PORTRAIT Registry across 10 US sites from 2011 to 2015 were included. Health status was assessed by the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) Summary score at baseline, 3-month, and change from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Kaplan-Meier using 3-month landmark and hierarchical Cox regression models were constructed to assess the association of the PAQ with 5-year all-cause mortality. Of the 711 patients (mean age 68.8±9.6 years, 40.9% female, 72.7% white; mean PAQ 47.5±22.0 and 65.9±25.0 at baseline and 3-month, respectively), 141 (19.8%) died over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. In unadjusted models, baseline (HR, 0.90 per-10-point increment; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97; P=0.008), 3-month (HR [95% CI], 0.87 [0.82-0.93]; P<0.001) and change in PAQ (HR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.85-0.99]; P=0.021) were each associated with mortality. In fully adjusted models including combination of scores, 3-month PAQ was more strongly associated with mortality than either baseline (3-month HR [95% CI], 0.85 [0.78-0.92]; P<0.001; C-statistic, 0.77) or change (3-month HR [95% CI], 0.79 [0.72-0.87]; P<0.001). Conclusions PAD-specific health status is independently associated with 5-year survival in patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms, with the most recent assessment being most prognostic. Future work is needed to better understand how this information can be used proactively to optimize care.

Development and validation of a predictive model for bleeding after peripheral vascular intervention: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Peripheral Vascular Interventions Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a model to predict risk of in-hospital bleeding following endovascular peripheral vascular intervention. BACKGROUND: Peri-procedural bleeding is a common, potentially preventable complication of catheter-based peripheral vascular procedures and is associated with increased mortality. We used the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Peripheral Vascular Interventions (PVI) Registry to develop a novel risk-prediction model to identify patients who may derive the greatest benefit from application of strategies to prevent bleeding. METHODS: We examined all patients undergoing lower extremity PVI at 76 NCDR PVI hospitals from 2014 to 2017. Patients with acute limb ischemia (n = 1600) were excluded. Major bleeding was defined as overt bleeding with a hemoglobin (Hb) drop of ≥ 3 g/dl, any Hb decline of ≥ 4 g/dl, or a blood transfusion in patients with pre-procedure Hb ≥ 8 g/dl. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a risk model to predict major bleeding. Model validation was performed using 1000 bootstrapped replicates of the population after sampling with replacement. RESULTS: Among 25,382 eligible patients, 1017 (4.0%) developed major bleeding. Predictors of bleeding included age, female sex, critical limb ischemia, non-femoral access, prior heart failure, and pre-procedure hemoglobin. The model demonstrated good discrimination (optimism corrected c-statistic = 0.67), calibration (corrected slope = 0.98, intercept of -0.04) and range of predicted risk (1%-18%). CONCLUSIONS: Post-procedural PVI bleeding risk can be predicted based upon pre- and peri-procedural patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to determine whether this model can be utilized to improve procedural safety through developing and targeting bleeding avoidance strategies.

Establishing Thresholds for Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Peripheral Artery Disease Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Understanding minimum clinically important differences (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes is essential in interpreting the magnitude of changes in these measures. No MCID from patients' perspectives has ever been published for peripheral artery disease-specific health status assessment tools. The Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) is a commonly used, validated peripheral artery disease-specific health status instrument for which we sought to prospectively establish its MCID from patients' perspectives. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting to vascular clinics with new or worsened claudication in the US cohort of the PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry who completed baseline and follow-up PAQ assessments along with the Global Assessment of Functioning scale were included. Mean change in PAQ summary scores from 3- to 6-month follow-up was calculated according to Global Assessment of Functioning category. MCID was defined as the mean difference in scores between those with small improvement or deterioration and those with no change. Multivariable linear regression was used to provide an MCID estimate after adjusting for patients' 3-month PAQ score. Of the 483 patients who completed the Global Assessment of Functioning score at 6 months and who had available 3- and 6-month PAQ assessments, the mean age was 69 years, 42% were female, and 71% were White. The MCIDs for PAQ summary scale improvement and worsening were 8.7 (2.9-14.5) and -11.0 (-18.6 to -3.3), respectively. After multivariable adjustment, these were 8.9 (3.0-14.8) and -11.2 (-18.2 to -4.2), respectively. There was no significant interaction between treatment (invasive versus noninvasive) and Global Assessment of Functioning response (P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with new or worsened claudication, a 10-point change in PAQ summary score represents an MCID. This estimate needs external validation and may inform the interpretation of PAQ scores when used as outcomes in clinical trials or in routine clinical care. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01419080.

Acute Kidney Injury Following In-Patient Lower Extremity Vascular Intervention: From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The authors analyzed data from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) PVI Registry and defined acute kidney injury (AKI) as increased creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dl or 50%, or a new requirement for dialysis after PVI. BACKGROUND: AKI is an important and potentially modifiable complication of peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). The incidence, predictors, and outcomes of AKI after PVI are incompletely characterized. METHODS: A hierarchical logistic regression risk model using pre-procedural characteristics associated with AKI was developed, followed by bootstrap validation. The model was validated with data submitted after model creation. An integer scoring system was developed to predict AKI after PVI. RESULTS: Among 10,006 procedures, the average age of patients was 69 years, 58% were male, and 52% had diabetes. AKI occurred in 737 (7.4%) and was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (7.1% vs. 0.7%). Reduced glomerular filtration rate, hypertension, diabetes, prior heart failure, critical or acute limb ischemia, and pre-procedural hemoglobin were independently associated with AKI. The model to predict AKI showed good discrimination (optimism corrected c-statistic = 0.68) and calibration (corrected slope = 0.97, intercept of -0.07). The integer point system could be incorporated into a useful clinical tool because it discriminates risk for AKI with scores ≤4 and ≥12 corresponding to the lower and upper 20% of risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is not rare after PVI and is associated with in-hospital mortality. The NCDR PVI AKI risk model, including the integer scoring system, may prospectively estimate AKI risk and aid in deployment of strategies designed to reduce risk of AKI after PVI.

Treatment decisions for patients with peripheral artery disease and symptoms of claudication: Development process and alpha testing of the SHOW-ME PAD decision aid.

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) face a range of treatment options to improve survival and quality of life. An evidence-based shared decision-making tool (brochure, website, and recorded patient vignettes) for patients with new or worsening claudication symptoms was created using mixed methods and following the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria. We reviewed literature and collected qualitative input from patients (n = 28) and clinicians (n = 34) to identify decisional needs, barriers, outcomes, knowledge, and preferences related to claudication treatment, along with input on implementation logistics from 59 patients and 27 clinicians. A prototype decision aid was developed and tested through a survey administered to 20 patients with PAD and 23 clinicians. Patients identified invasive treatment options (endovascular or surgical revascularization), non-invasive treatments (supervised exercise therapy, claudication medications), and combinations of these as key decisions. A total of 65% of clinicians thought the brochure would be useful for medical decision-making, an additional 30% with suggested improvements. For patients, those percentages were 75% and 25%, respectively. For the website, 76.5% of clinicians and 85.7% of patients thought it would be useful; an additional 17.6% of clinicians and 14.3% of patients thought it would be useful, with improvements. Suggestions were incorporated in the final version. The first prototype was well-received among patients and clinicians. The next step is to implement the tool in a PAD specialty care setting to evaluate its impact on patient knowledge, engagement, and decisional quality. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03190382.

Influence of Donor Transmitted and Rapidly Progressive Coronary Vascular Disease on Long-Term Outcomes After Heart Transplantation: A Contemporary Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Donor-transmitted atherosclerosis (DTA) and rapidly progressive cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) at 1 year are intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived measures shown to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the setting of early generation immunosuppressive agents. Given the paucity of data on the prognostic value of IVUS-derived measurements in the current era, we sought to explore their association with adverse outcomes after heart transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent heart transplantation at our center between January 2009 and June 2016 with baseline and 1-year IVUS. Five IVUS sections were prospectively analyzed for intimal thickness and lumen area. DTA was defined as maximum intimal thickness of 0.5 mm or greater at baseline, and rapidly progressive CAV as an increase in maximum intimal thickness by 0.5 mm or more at 1 year. Our primary analysis assessed the relationship of IVUS and other clinical data on a composite outcome: coronary intervention, CAV stage 2 or 3 (defined by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2010 nomenclature), or cardiovascular death. Among 249 patients (mean age 51.0 ± 12.2 years and 74.3% male) included in the analysis, DTA was detected in 118 patients (51.4%). Over a median follow-up of 6.1 years (interquartile range 4.2-8.0 years), 45 patients met the primary end point (23 percutaneous coronary intervention, 11 CAV 2 or 3, and 11 cardiovascular deaths as first event). DTA and rapidly progressive CAV were not associated with the primary end point, all-cause mortality, or retransplantation. In an additional analysis including post-transplant events, incident rejection was strongly associated with poor outcomes, although cytomegalovirus infection was not. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort, IVUS-derived DTA and rapidly progressive CAV were not associated with medium- to long-term adverse events after heart transplantation.

Cilostazol and peripheral artery disease-specific health status in ambulatory patients with symptomatic PAD.

BACKGROUND: Improvement of symptoms and functional status is one of the main peripheral artery disease (PAD) treatment goals but pharmacological options are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the use of cilostazol and its association with patient-reported health status quantified by the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ). METHODS: Initiation of cilostazol therapy was assessed in 567 patients in the US cohort of PORTRAIT between June 2011 and December 2015. Patients with heart failure history, on cilostazol prior to enrollment, with no baseline or follow-up PAQ scores were excluded. Health status over time was quantified using linear mixed models adjusting for baseline PAQ scores and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 567 cilostazol-naïve patients, 65 (11%) were started on cilostazol. Mean age was 68.5 ± 9.6 years, 43% were female and 71.1% white. There was no significant difference in the mean PAQ score changes from baseline to 12 months between the cilostazol and non-cilostazol group, with difference of 3.8 [CI (-2.6, 10.1), p = .24] for summary scores, 1.6 [CI (-5.5, 8.6), p = .66] for quality of life, 3.6 [CI (-4.3, 11.6), p = .37] for symptoms, 6.2 [CI (-3.1, 15.5), p = .19] for physical limitation and 3.2 [CI (-3.9, 10.2), p = .38] for social limitation scores. CONCLUSIONS: We found a low rate of cilostazol use and while there was no significant association between cilostazol initiation and subsequent health status, the ability to define small differences in health status was limited due to the small sample size.

Appropriate Use Criteria and Health Status Outcomes Following Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the OPEN-CTO Registry.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Appropriate Use Criteria were designed to aid clinical decision-making, yet their association with health status outcomes after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed 769 patients with baseline and 1-year health status data after chronic total occlusion PCI. Procedures were categorized as appropriate, may be appropriate, or rarely appropriate. Mean changes in patient-reported health status, assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), were compared across appropriate use criteria categories from baseline to 1 year. Change in SAQ summary score was stratified as little to no benefit (≤10 points), intermediate (10-19 points), large (20-29 points), and very large (≥30 points). RESULTS: The appropriate use criteria indication was appropriate in 573 patients (74.5%), may be appropriate in 191 (24.8%), and rarely appropriate in 5 (0.7%). Patients in the appropriate group reported greater improvement in SAQ summary scores (27.3±21.3 points) at 1 year compared with the may be appropriate (22.5±20.9; P=0.01). A similar pattern was noted for SAQ angina frequency (mean change 24.0±27.2 versus 18.7±25.6; P=0.02). The appropriate group had the highest proportion of very large improvements in SAQ summary scores (44.5% versus 33.3%; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing chronic total occlusion PCI, the rate of rarely appropriate PCI was low. The rate of appropriate PCI was high and was associated with the greatest health status improvement at 1 year. A substantial proportion of patients in the may be appropriate group experienced meaningful health status benefits as well.

Adherence to Guideline-Recommended Therapy-Including Supervised Exercise Therapy Referral-Across Peripheral Artery Disease Specialty Clinics: Insights From the International PORTRAIT Registry.

Background Underuse of guideline-recommended therapy in peripheral artery disease (PAD) in administrative and procedural databases has been described, but reports on medically managed patients and referral to supervised exercise therapy (SET) in PAD are lacking. We aimed to document the use of PAD guideline-recommended therapy, including SET in patients with PAD symptoms consulting a specialty clinic across 3 countries. Methods and Results The 16-center PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry enrolled 1275 patients with new or an exacerbation of PAD symptoms (2011-2015). We prospectively documented antiplatelet medications, statins, smoking cessation counseling and/or therapy, and referral to SET: "2 quality measures" referred to the use of both statin and antiplatelet medications; "4 quality measures" to receiving all 4 measures. Median odds ratios were calculated to quantify treatment variation across sites. A total of 89% patients were on antiplatelets, 83% on statins, and 23% had been referred to SET. Of 455 current smokers, 342 (72%) patients received smoking cessation therapy/counseling. Overall, 77.2% of patients received "2 quality measures" and 19.7% "4 quality measures." The median odds ratio for 2 quality measures was 2.13 (95% CI, 1.61-3.56; P<0.001) and for 4 quality measures was 5.43 (95% CI, 2.84-17.91; P<0.001). Variability in adherence was not explained by country, except for referral to SET. The odds for SET referral in The Netherlands (70% referral rate) was nearly 100 times greater than in US sites (2% referral rate). Conclusions Not all patients who have undergone a PAD workup at a specialty care facility are treated with evidence-based care, especially so for SET.

Bleeding Complications in Lower-Extremity Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Insights From the NCDR PVI Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess periprocedural bleeding complications in lower-extremity peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the incidence, predictors, or outcomes of periprocedural bleeding after lower-extremity PVI. METHODS: The study examined patients undergoing PVI at 76 hospitals in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry PVI registry from 2014 to 2016. Post-PVI major bleeding was defined as any overt bleeding with a hemoglobin (Hb) drop of ≥3 g/dl, any Hb decline of ≥4 g/dl, or blood transfusion in patients with pre-procedure Hb >8 g/dl within 72 h of their procedure. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with post-PVI bleeding. The study also examined adjusted in-hospital mortality among patients with or without major bleeding complications. RESULTS: Among 18,289 PVI procedures, major bleeding occurred in 744 (4.10%). Patient characteristics independently associated with bleeding included age, female sex, heart failure, pre-procedural hemoglobin <12 g/dl, nonelective PVI, and critical limb ischemia on presentation. Procedural characteristics associated with bleeding included nonfemoral vascular access, use of thrombolytic therapy, PVI of the aortoiliac segment, and multilesion interventions, whereas use of closure devices was associated with less bleeding. All-cause in-hospital mortality was higher in patients who experienced bleeding than in those who did not (6.60% vs. 0.30%; p < 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio: 10.9; 95% confidence interval: 6.9 to 17.0). CONCLUSIONS: Major bleeding occurred in 4.10% of lower-extremity PVI procedures and was associated with several patient and procedural characteristics, as well as in-hospital mortality. These insights can be incorporated into strategies to reduce periprocedural bleeding after PVI.

Guideline-directed statin intensification in patients with new or worsening symptoms of peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines recommend patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) be treated with a moderate to high-intensity statin. The extent to which patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms are offered guideline therapy is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: There is significant variability in rate of guideline-directed statin intensification across clinical practices. METHODS: In the PORTRAIT registry, patterns of statin therapy were assessed in 1144 patients at 16 PAD specialty clinics between June 2011 and December 2015 before and after an evaluation for new or worsening claudication symptoms. We documented whether patients were treated with a guideline statin as well as the incidence of statin intensification. Statin intensification was defined as transitioning from no statin or low-intensity statin to moderate or high-intensity statin treatment. Patient factors associated with intensification were examined. Site and provider-level variation in intensification was summarized using an adjusted median odds ratio (aMOR). RESULTS: Among 1144 patients, 810 (70.8%) were initially on guideline therapy compared to 334 (29.2%) that were not. In the latter, 103 (30.8%) received intensification following evaluation. Patients with typical symptoms displayed greater odds of intensification (OR 3.74; 95% CI: 1.23-11.41) while older patients had lower odds of intensification (OR 0.60/decade; 95% CI: 0.41-0.88). Site variability for statin intensification was observed across sites (aMOR = 3.15; 95% CI 1.22-9.60, [P = 0.02]) but not providers (aMOR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.00-3.90, [P = 0.14]). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients evaluated at a PAD specialty clinic for new or worsening claudication symptoms arrived on guideline statin therapy. Only 31% not receiving appropriate therapy underwent statin intensification. These findings highlight an important opportunity to optimize medical therapy for patients with PAD.

Long-term clinical and quality of life outcomes after stenting of femoropopliteal artery stenosis: 3-year results from the STROLL study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and health status outcomes of patients undergoing superficial femoral artery (SFA) revascularization using the Shape Memory Alloy Recoverable Technology (S.M.A.R.T.®) nitinol self-expanding stent through 3 years of follow-up. BACKGROUND: Limited long-term data are available describing the durability of benefits after femoropopliteal revascularization. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, core-lab adjudicated study, 250 subjects with de novo or restenotic femoropopliteal arterial lesions were treated with the S.M.A.R.T.® stent. The primary endpoint of target vessel patency, a composite of ultrasound-assessed patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), was evaluated through 3 years. Secondary endpoints included stent fracture and health status. Health status was measured using generic and disease-specific instruments, including the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ). RESULTS: At 3-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimated target vessel patency was 72.7%, freedom from clinically driven TLR was 78.5%, and the incidence of stent fracture was 3.6%. The PAQ summary score was markedly impaired at baseline (mean 37.3 ± 19.6 points) and improved substantially at 1 month (mean change from baseline of 31.4 points, 95% CI: 28.5-34.3; P < 0.001). Disease-specific health status benefits assessed by the PAQ were largely preserved through 3 years of follow-up (mean change from baseline, 28.0 points, 95% CI: 24.3-31.7; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing revascularization for moderately complex SFA disease, use of the self-expanding S.M.A.R.T® stent was associated with a high rate of target vessel patency through 3 years and led to substantial and sustained health status benefits.

Randomized Comparison of a CrossBoss First Versus Standard Wire Escalation Strategy for Crossing Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: The CrossBoss First Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The authors performed a multicenter, randomized-controlled, clinical trial comparing upfront use of the CrossBoss catheter versus antegrade wire escalation for antegrade crossing of coronary chronic total occlusions. BACKGROUND: There is equipoise about the optimal initial strategy for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. METHODS: The primary endpoints were the time required to cross the chronic total occlusion or abort the procedure and the frequency of procedural major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time required to cross and total fluoroscopy time, total air kerma radiation dose, total contrast volume, and equipment use. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, 246 patients were randomized to the CrossBoss catheter (n = 122) or wire escalation (n = 124) at 11 U.S. centers. The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the study groups were similar. Technical and procedural success were 87.8% and 84.1%, respectively, and were similar in the 2 groups. Crossing time was similar: 56 min (interquartile range: 33 to 93 min) in the CrossBoss group and 66 min (interquartile range: 36 to 105 min) in the wire escalation group (p = 0.323), as was as the incidence of procedural major adverse cardiovascular events (3.28% vs. 4.03%; p = 1.000). There were no significant differences in the secondary study endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with wire escalation, upfront use of the CrossBoss catheter for antegrade crossing of coronary chronic total occlusions was associated with similar crossing time, similar success and complication rates, and similar equipment use and cost.

Patient Versus Physician Variation in Use of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The prevalence of radial access for transradial catheterization remains low in the United States, occurring in only 28% of cases in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI. It is unknown whether the low adoption rate has been influenced by patient characteristics or is more operator dependent. In a 10-center study, we compared clinical and demographic characteristics among 323 radial and 1,506 femoral access percutaneous coronary intervention (PCIs) performed by 65 interventionists capable of radial PCI. We created a hierarchical logistic regression model to identify operator and patient characteristics associated with radial PCI and the median rate ratio to quantify the variation across operators. A subset was interviewed to assess health literacy and preferences in shared medical decision making. Radial access was used in 17.7% of patients. Patient factors associated with lower rate of radial PCI were previous PCI (33.4% vs 41.4%, p = 0.008), history of coronary artery bypass graft (8.4% vs 23.0%, p <0.001), and chronic total occlusion PCI (10.2% vs 17.9%, p <0.001). Operator characteristics associated with lower rate of radial PCI are being older, being longer in practice, lower number of publications, and Southern practice location. The range of radial use across operators was 1% to 99% and the median rate ratio was 1.97. Patients with radial access had lower health literacy, as assessed by the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine Revised (REALM) score (6.6 ± 2.6 vs 7.1 ± 2.0, p = 0.03) but did not differ in their preferences for shared decision making. In conclusion, our study demonstrates a high degree of variability of radial access for PCI among different operators, with few differences in patient characteristics, suggesting that improvement efforts should focus on operators.

Costs Associated With Access Site and Same-Day Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Evaluation of the Current Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Care Pathways in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the independent impact of various care pathways, including those involving transradial intervention (TRI) and same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), on hospital costs. BACKGROUND: PCI is associated with costs of $10 billion annually. Alternative payment models for PCI are being implemented, but few data exist on strategies to reduce costs. Various PCI care pathways, including TRI and SDD, exist, but their association with costs and outcomes is unknown. METHODS: In total, 279,987 PCI patients eligible for SDD in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry linked to Medicare claims files were analyzed. Hospital costs in 2014 U.S. dollars were estimated using cost-to-charge ratios. Propensity scores for TRI and SDD, with propensity adjustment via inverse probability weighting, was performed. RESULTS: Of the 279,987 PCI procedures, TRI was used in 9.0% (13.5% of which were SDD), and SDD was used in 5.3% of cases (23.1% of which were TRI). TRI (vs. transfemoral intervention) was associated with lower adjusted costs of $916 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $778 to $1,035), as was SDD ($3,502; 95% CI: $3,486 to $3,902). The adjusted cost associated with TRI and SDD was $13,389 (95% CI: $13,161 to $13,607), while the cost associated with transfemoral intervention and non-same-day discharge was $17,076 (95% CI: $16,999 to $17,147), a difference of $3,689 (95% CI: $3,486 to $3,902; p < 0.0001). Shifting current practice from transfemoral intervention non-same-day discharge to TRI SDD by 30% could potentially save a hospital performing 1,000 PCIs each year $1 million and the country $300 million annually. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries, TRI with SDD was independently associated with fewer complications and lower in-hospital costs. These findings have important implications for changing the current PCI care pathways to improve outcomes and reduce costs.

Training the next generation of invasive cardiologists: Feasibility of implementing a trans-radial access program at an academic hospital.

BACKGROUND: Slow adoption of trans-radial access (TRA) for left heart catheterization (LHC) in the U.S. may be related to concerns about procedural complexity and a steep learning curve. However, TRA acceptance among novice operators remains poorly characterized. METHODS: We initiated a 1-year TRA learning period among lower-risk outpatients, followed by a "radial-first" policy for all LHC patients beginning year 2. By year 3, all fellows prospectively collected diagnostic LHC data as part of a quality improvement study. TRA procedural characteristics were compared with patients undergoing trans-femoral access for the 3months prior to the TRA program, and trends over time were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 7/2009 and 6/2012, we identified 960 patients undergoing LHC via TRA by 23 rotating cardiology fellows supervised by 5 interventional cardiologists. When evaluated against the 160 trans-femoral comparator patients, TRA patients had lower procedural success through the initial access site (88% vs. 99%, p<0.001) and longer fluoroscopy times (9.5 [5.8-15.9] vs. 6.5 [3.1-12.7] min, p<0.001), with similar contrast volumes and fewer catheters used. Despite tackling more complex patients during years 2-3, there were improvements in fluoroscopy times, catheter utilization, contrast volumes, and procedural success rates over time (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The dedicated adoption of TRA by an academic catheterization laboratory demonstrated improvements in efficiency and resource utilization over a relatively short period of time. Additional exposure to TRA during training may help facilitate acceptance of this approach among the next generation of invasive cardiologists. SHORT SUMMARY (FOR ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS): When initiating a trans-radial access program for cardiac catheterization at an academic training hospital, procedural success rates were lower and fluoroscopy times were higher than traditional trans-femoral access. Nonetheless, other procedural variables were similar between the 2 approaches, and improvements over time were consistent with the learning curves reported among experienced cardiologists in prior studies. Exposure to trans-radial access during training may help facilitate acceptance of this approach among the next generation of invasive cardiologists.

Association between health status and long-term mortality after percutaneous revascularization of peripheral artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association of health status change and long-term survival among patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). BACKGROUND: Early gains in health status after successful endovascular therapy (EVT) for symptomatic PAD can be maintained up to 1 year. Whether such health status improvements are associated with long-term survival benefits is unknown. METHODS: Between February 2001 and August 2004, 258 patients with symptomatic PAD treated with EVT participated in a prospective study evaluating baseline and 1 year health status using the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (range 0-100, higher scores = better). All-cause mortality was assessed for all patients at a median of 9.4 years following EVT. RESULTS: The mean age at enrollment was 68 ± 11 years; 61% were male, 97% were Caucasian, and 38% had diabetes. Patients with a clinically meaningful health status improvement (≥8 points) 1 year after their index procedure (79%) were identified as responders. Responders had a significantly better 10 year survival compared with nonresponders (60% vs 38%, p = 0.025). Responder status was associated with a survival advantage that persisted in risk-adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio for long-term mortality, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45-0.97]; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing EVT, improvement of PAD-specific health status at 1 year follow-up was associated with improved long-term survival. Whether additional treatment for patients with poor response to EVT could improve long-term survival warrants further investigation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.