Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(3): 793-800, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007371

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of kinematic and clinical outcomes of a large patient cohort with knee osteoarthritis from before surgery (V1) to 3 months (V2) and 1 year (V3) after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The patients were evaluated at each visit (118 patients at V1, 93 patients at V2, and 79 patients at V3) during a clinical gait analysis and were compared with a matched control group of healthy adults (CG). The kinematic parameters, the Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), quality of life, and patient satisfaction were assessed. Gait velocity and knee range of motion (ROM) as well as clinical parameters were compared at each visit with CG was based on the unpaired samples t-test. To determine changes in the data at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery in the patient groups, repeated-measure analysis of variance was conducted (P < .05). Pearson correlation was used to examine relationships between clinical and biomechanical outcomes. RESULTS: One year after TKA (V3) compared to V1 and V2, the ROM of the operated knee during gait was significantly improved (V1: 44.2 ± 8.8° vs V3: 47.5 ± 7.1°, P < .001, and V2: 42.2 ± 9.3° vs V3: 47.5 ± 7.1°, P = .001), as was the gait velocity (V1: 1.0 ± 0.2 and V2: 1.1 ± 0.2 m/s vs V3: 1.3 ± 0.2 m/s, P < .001). The WOMAC and knee pain were significantly better 1 year after TKA. No strong relationships have been found between clinical parameters and knee kinematics. CONCLUSION: This study showed that 1 year after TKA, patients exhibited improved gait velocity and ROM and experienced a significant decrease in the level of pain and an increased clinical score (although different from CG).


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Articulação do Joelho/fisiologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Idoso , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Marcha , Humanos , Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26237712

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinical parameters are sufficient using, a multilinear regression model, to reproduce the sagittal plane joint angles (hip, knee, and ankle) in cerebral palsy gait. A total of 154 patients were included. The two legs were considered (308 observations). Thirty-six clinical parameters were used as regressors (range of motion, muscle strength, and spasticity of the lower). From the clinical gait analysis, the joint angles of the sagittal plane were selected. Results showed that clinical parameter does not provide sufficient information to recover joint angles and/or that the multilinear regression model is not an appropriate solution.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Marcha/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Tornozelo/fisiologia , Articulação do Tornozelo , Paralisia Cerebral/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Quadril/fisiologia , Humanos , Joelho/fisiologia , Articulação do Joelho , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Modelos Teóricos , Espasticidade Muscular/diagnóstico , Espasticidade Muscular/terapia , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA