Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Health Aff Sch ; 2(1): qxad094, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756396

RESUMO

Health care performance metrics are offered predominantly in terms of outcomes, processes, or structural components of health care delivery. However, measurement is limited by variability in data sources, definitions, and workarounds. The American College of Surgeons has recently developed a new type of performance metric known as a "programmatic measure". These metrics align structures, processes, and outcomes to better coordinate quality measurement with support of frontline care teams. In this multifaceted way, these measures differ from current "single" measures such as targeting surgical site infection. The thematic focus of these measures and alignment of structure-resource components to support processes and outcomes also sets these measures apart from contemporary composite measures. Importantly, structural elements of these measures reflect minimum resources required for patient care, addressing staffing and resource barriers felt by local institutions in addressing numerous existing quality metrics. These metrics will streamline quality reporting to improve care navigation for patients. Clinicians will find more appropriately aligned goals and responsibilities, resulting in increased teamwork and communication. These measures are designed to address the current burdens of overabundant metrics, priority misalignment, and low resources in a patient-centric fashion to better align health care quality and measurement.

2.
Ann Surg ; 271(3): 475-483, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30188401

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the association of patient-reported experiences (PREs) and risk-adjusted surgical outcomes among group practices. BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services required large group practices to submit PREs data for successful participation in the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems for PQRS survey. Whether these PREs data correlate with perioperative outcomes remains ill defined. METHODS: Operations between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016 in the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry were merged with 2015 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems for PQRS survey data. Hierarchical logistic models were constructed to estimate associations between 7 subscales and 1 composite score of PREs and 30-day morbidity, unplanned readmission, and unplanned reoperation, separately, while adjusting for patient- and procedure mix. RESULTS: Among 328 group practices identified, patients reported their experiences with clinician communication the highest (mean ±â€Šstandard deviation, 82.66 ±â€Š3.10), and with attention to medication cost the lowest (25.96 ±â€Š5.14). The mean composite score was 61.08 (±6.66). On multivariable analyses, better PREs scores regarding medication cost, between-visit communication, and the composite score of experience were each associated with 4% decreased odds of morbidity [odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-0.99], readmission (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99), and reoperation (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99), respectively. In sensitivity analyses, better between-visit communication remained significantly associated with fewer readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: In these data, patients' report of better between-visit communication was associated with fewer readmissions. More sensitive, surgery-specific PRE assessments may reveal additional unique insights for improving the quality of surgical care.


Assuntos
Prática de Grupo , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Honorários Farmacêuticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sistema de Registros , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco Ajustado , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Bull Am Coll Surg ; 99(2): 27-33, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24564018

RESUMO

An overview of provisions in the Medicare physician fee schedule final rule and changes in CPT coding that will affect physician reimbursement in 2014. Key elements of the final rule for the fee schedule center on the potential reduction in payment due to the conversion factor update, payment for in-office procedures, PQRS reporting options, public reporting via CMS' Physician Compare website, and the value-based payment modifier. Fundamental changes in CPT coding affect consultation codes, drainage of skin and subcutaneous structures, complex repair, skin flaps and grafts, breast biopsies and imaging, and other surgery-related codes.


Assuntos
Current Procedural Terminology , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços , Cirurgia Geral/economia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA