Clinical assessment of scannographic markers for sarcopenia in lung transplant candidates.

INTRODUCTION: The selection of patients for lung transplantation is difficult. An aspect of the patient's general condition and frailty can be assessed by measuring the surface area of certain muscles on CT. Indeed, sarcopenia, assessed by measuring the area of psoas muscles on scannographic sections has already been shown to be associated with poor outcomes in lung transplant and other major surgeries and could thus be helpful to evaluate candidates to lung transplant. However, it is not routinely performed by radiologists. As a pilot study, we compared the reliability of computerized tomography scan assessment for sarcopenia by clinicians with that of radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study in which preoperative abdominal CT scans of lung transplant patients from 2014 to 2018 were analysed to assess sarcopenia by measuring the surface areas (mm2) of the psoas, paraspinal muscles at the L4 vertebra and diaphragm pillars at the celiac trunk bilaterally. The surfaces were blindly assessed by clinicians and radiologists and the intraclass correlation coefficients between the two measurements were estimated by a generalized linear model using SAS 9.4 software. RESULTS: We performed a double reading of 200 scans. The clinicians 'measurements were comparable to those of the radiologists for the psoas and paraspinal muscles but not for the diaphragm pillars. CONCLUSION: CT measurement of psoas and paraspinal muscle areas by clinicians appears reliable and feasible in routine practice and could be used in the evaluation of lung transplant candidates.

Staple Line Intrathoracic Migration After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Correlation between Symptoms, CT Three-Dimensional Stomach Analysis, and 24-h pH Monitoring.

PURPOSE: Migration of the staple line is the definition of sliding hiatus hernia in sleeve gastrectomy patients. The main aim was to determine the frequency and measurement of intrathoracic staple line migration and its correlation with GERD symptoms and pH monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective clinical trial including all patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy more than 1 year previously. All the patients underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging, and migration of the proximal end of the suture above the level of the hiatus was measured in mm. All the patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were assessed using the GERD impact scale (GIS), and wireless 24-h esophageal pH and symptom association monitoring (SAP) were carried out. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative staple line migration was performed. RESULTS: Between March 2018 and December 2018, 194 patients were evaluated (mean age 45.1 ± 11.2 years; 161 females); 88/194 (45.4%) presented an average intrathoracic migration of 16.2 ± 6.9 mm. Thirty-eight of 194 (19.5%) patients presented symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. There was a significant relationship between staple line intrathoracic migration and postsleeve GERD symptomatology (p = 0.0004, OR = 4.25 [1.92-9.39]). However, there was no significant correlation between positive 24-h pH monitoring and intrathoracic migration of the staple line (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: A migration greater than 17 mm was strongly correlated with postsleeve GERD symptoms but not with positive 24-h pH monitoring.

Diagnosis and staging of cardiac masses: additional value of CMR with 18F-FDG-PET compared to CMR with CECT.

PURPOSE: Characterization of malignant cardiac masses is usually performed with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and staging with whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). In this study, our objective was to evaluate the role of 18Fluor-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) with CMR for both characterization and staging of cardiac masses. METHODS: Patients with cardiac masses who underwent CMR, CECT, and 18F-FDG-PET were retrospectively identified. For the characterization of cardiac masses, we calculated the respective performances of CMR alone, 18F-FDG-PET alone, and the combination of 18F-FDG-PET and CMR. For staging, we compared head-to-head the respective performances of 18F-FDG-PET and CECT. Histology served as gold standard for malignancy, and response to anticoagulation for thrombus. RESULTS: In a total of 28 patients (median age 60.5 years, 60.7% women), CMR accurately distinguished malignant from benign masses with sensitivity (Se) of 86.7%, specificity (Sp) of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.7%, and accuracy of 92.9%. 18F-FDG-PET demonstrated 93.3% Se, 84.6% Sp, 87.5% PPV, 91.7% NPV, and 89.3% accuracy. Combining CMR with 18F-FDG-PET allowed to benefit from the high sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET (92.9%) and the excellent specificity of CMR (100%) for malignant diseases. For staging, 18F-FDG-PET outperformed CECT on per-patient (66.7% vs 55.6% correct diagnosis, respectively), per-organ (10 vs 7 organs, respectively), and per-lesion basis (> 29 vs > 25 lesions, respectively). CONCLUSION: Combining 18F-FDG-PET with CMR improved the characterization of cardiac masses compared to each modality alone. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET was better than CECT for staging. This study suggests that the combination of CMR and 18F-FDG-PET is the most effective for the characterization of cardiac masses and the staging of these lesions.

Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: To assess interobserver agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19. METHODS: From 16 to 24 March 2020, 241 consecutive patients addressed to hospital for COVID-19 suspicion had both chest CT and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Eight observers (2 thoracic and 2 general senior radiologists, 2 junior radiologists, and 2 emergency physicians) retrospectively categorized each CT into one out of 4 categories (evocative, compatible for COVID-19 pneumonia, not evocative, and normal). Observer agreement for categorization between all readers and pairs of readers with similar experience was evaluated with the Kappa coefficient. The results of a consensus categorization were correlated to RT-PCR. RESULTS: Observer agreement across the 4 categories was good between all readers (κ value 0.61 95% CI 0.60-0.63) and moderate to good between pairs of readers (0.54-0.75). It was very good (κ 0.81 95% CI 0.79-0.83), fair (κ 0.32 95% CI 0.29-0.34), moderate (κ 0.56 95% CI 0.54-0.58), and moderate (0.58 95% CI 0.56-0.61) for the categories evocative, compatible, not evocative, and normal, respectively. RT-PCR was positive in 97%, 50%, 31%, and 11% of cases in the respective categories. Observer agreement was lower (p < 0.001) and RT-PCR positive cases less frequently categorized evocative in the presence of an underlying pulmonary disease (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement for chest CT reporting using categorization of findings is good in patients suspected of COVID-19. Among patients considered for hospitalization in an epidemic context, CT categorized evocative is highly predictive of COVID-19, whereas the predictive value of CT decreases between the categories compatible and not evocative. KEY POINTS: • In patients suspected of COVID-19, interobserver agreement for chest CT reporting into categories is good, and very good to categorize CT "evocative." • Chest CT can participate in estimating the likelihood of COVID-19 in patients presenting to hospital during the outbreak, CT categorized "evocative" being highly predictive of the disease whereas almost a third of patients with CT "not evocative" had a positive RT-PCR in our study. • Observer agreement is lower and CTs of positive RT-PCR cases less frequently "evocative" in presence of an underlying pulmonary disease.