Endoscopic view of the vertebra during laser balloon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Key Clinical Message: Left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter. Laser balloon ablation is effective because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy. Abstract: When performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency, left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter because of the movement of the ablation point. Laser balloon ablation is effective for the achievement of durable PVI in cases with such anatomical characteristics because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy.

Long-Term Impact of Additional Ablation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results From EARNEST-PVI Trial.

Background An optimal strategy for left atrial ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been determined. Methods and Results We conducted an extended follow-up of the multicenter randomized controlled EARNEST-PVI (Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which compared 12-month rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF between patients randomized to a PVI-alone strategy (n=248) or PVI-plus strategy (n=248; PVI followed by left atrial additional ablation, including linear ablation or ablation targeting areas with complex fractionated electrograms). The present study extended the follow-up period to 3 years after enrollment. Outcomes were compared not only between randomly allocated groups but also between on-treatment groups categorized by actually created ablation lesions. Recurrence rate of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was lower in the randomly allocated to PVI-plus group than the PVI-alone group (29.0% versus 37.5%, P=0.036). On-treatment analysis revealed that patients with PVI+linear ablation (n=205) demonstrated a lower AF/AT recurrence rate than those with PVI only (26.3% versus 37.8%, P=0.007). In contrast, patients with PVI+complex fractionated electrograms ablation (n=37) had an AF/AT recurrence rate comparable to that of patients with PVI only (40.5% versus 37.8%, P=0.76). At second ablation in 126 patients with AF/AT recurrence, ATs excluding common atrial flutter were more frequent in patients with PVI+linear ablation than in those with PVI only (32.6% versus 5.7%, P<0.0001). Conclusions Left atrial ablation in addition to PVI was efficacious during 3-year follow-up. Linear ablation was superior to other ablation strategies but may increase iatrogenic ATs. Registration URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm; Unique identifier: UMIN000019449.

Early vascular healing of ultra-thin strut polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome: USUI-ACS study.

Ultra-thin strut polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (UPF-SES) have two novel characteristics, ultra-thin strut and polymer-free coating, which have the potential to achieve early re-endotherialization. However, a little is known whether early vascular healing of UPF-SES can be achieved in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the vascular healing after an implantation of UPF-SES in patients with ACS using optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 3 months after the stent implantation. From September 2020 and January 2021, a total of 31 consecutive patients presenting with ACS who underwent OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 3 month follow-up OCT examination were enrolled in the USUI-ACS study. The endpoints of this study were neointimal strut coverage, malapposition, and mean neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness at 3 month follow-up. Over a mean follow-up of 91 days after the initial PCI, the follow-up OCT was examined. The median percentage of covered struts was 98.4% and malapposed struts 0%, and the mean NIH thickness was 80 µm. UPF-SES exhibited an excellent early vascular healing at 3 months in patients with ACS.

Heart Rate Decrease After Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Predicts Decompensated Heart Failure After the Procedure.

Background: Decompensated heart failure (DHF) can complicate catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the association between heart rate and DHF in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation. Methods and Results: In all, 1,004 consecutive patients who underwent initial ablation for AF (mean [±SD] age 68±10 years; 34% female; persistent AF n=513 [51%]) were enrolled in the study. Heart rate was assessed before and after ablation. DHF was defined as heart failure requiring medical therapy within 2 days after the procedure. The incidence of DHF was 2% (22 of 1,004 patients). Patients with DHF had a higher prevalence of a history of symptomatic heart failure (11/22 [50%] vs. 160/982 [16%]; P<0.0001) and a greater degree of heart rate decrease after the procedure (-21±29 vs. 2±21 beats/min; P=0.001) than those without DHF. On multivariate analysis, heart rate decrease was a significant independent predictor of DHF (hazard ratio 0.8; 95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9; P=0.004; 10 beats/min-increment). Conclusions: In patients undergoing AF ablation, a decrease in heart rate after the procedure was an independent predictor of DHF.

Safety, efficacy, and cost-performance of a simplified cryoballoon ablation procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The search for a less invasive and lower cost cryoballoon-based strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has resulted in a simplified procedure that may be suitable for cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Here, we compared procedural characteristics and outcomes between conventional CBA and simple CBA. METHODS: We enrolled 628 consecutive patients who underwent initial CBA for AF (age, 69 ± 12 years; female, 263 (42%); paroxysmal AF, 576 (92%); CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.7 ± 1.6 points). Simple CBA was characterized by the minimal procedure required to isolate pulmonary veins, including the following: (1) CBA was performed without guidance from a 3-D mapping system; (2) a coronary sinus electrode and esophageal temperature probe were not used; (3) a waiting period after pulmonary vein isolation was not set; and AF induction by isoproterenol and atrial burst stimuli were not performed. RESULTS: Simple CBA was performed in 240 (38%) patients. Procedural time (49 ± 18 versus 85 ± 27 min, p < 0.01) was shorter, and total procedural costs (20,699 ± 8,091 versus 30,350 ± 11,647 US dollars, p < 0.01) were lower with simple CBA than conventional CBA. Freedom from AF recurrence during the 12-month study period (79.8% versus 78.4%, p = 0.52) and complication rate (8.8% versus 13.1%, p = 0.09) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional CBA, simple CBA reduced procedural time and procedural costs while providing comparable outcomes.