Assessing the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report scores to predict continuous employment in mood disorder patients.

Objective: Depression significantly impacts the job performance and attendance of workers, leading to increased absenteeism. Predicting occupational engagement for individuals with depression is of paramount importance. This study aims to determine the cut-off score which predicts continuous employment for patients with mood disorders using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report (QIDS-SR). Methods: In a prospective observational trial conducted in Tokyo, 111 outpatients diagnosed with either major depressive disorder or bipolar depression were enrolled. Their employment statuses of these participants were tracked over a six-month period after their QIDS-SR scores were recorded. Based on their employment trajectories, participants were categorized into either continuous or non-continuous employment groups. Binary logistic regression was applied to examine the relationship between the QIDS-SR scores and employment outcomes, with adjustments for age, gender, and psychiatric diagnoses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to identify the optimal QIDS-SR cut-off values for predicting continuous employment. Findings: Binary logistic regression demonstrated that a lower score on the QIDS-SR was linked to an elevated likelihood of continuous employment (adjusted odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.26, p=0.001). The optimal cut-off point, determined by the Youden Index, was 10/11, showcasing a 63% sensitivity and 71% specificity. Conclusion: The results emphasize the potential of the QIDS-SR as a prognostic instrument for predicting employment outcomes among individuals with depressive disorders. These findings further underscore the importance of managing depressive symptoms to mild or lower intensities to ensure ongoing employment.

Treatment strategy for insomnia disorder: Japanese expert consensus.

Purpose: There is a lack of evidence regarding answers for clinical questions about treating insomnia disorder. This study aimed to answer the following clinical questions: (1) how to use each hypnotic and non-pharmacological treatment differently depending on clinical situations and (2) how to reduce or stop benzodiazepine hypnotics using alternative pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Methods: Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on 10 clinical questions about insomnia disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "disagree" to 9 = "agree"). The responses of 196 experts were collected, and the answers were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations. Results: The primary pharmacological treatment, lemborexant (7.3 ± 2.0), was categorized as a first-line recommendation for sleep initiation insomnia, and lemborexant (7.3 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.8 ± 1.8) were categorized as the first-line recommendations for sleep maintenance insomnia. Regarding non-pharmacological treatments for primary treatment, sleep hygiene education was categorized as the first-line recommendation for both sleep initiation (8.4 ± 1.1) and maintenance insomnia (8.1 ± 1.5), while multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia was categorized as the second-line treatment for both sleep initiation (5.6 ± 2.3) and maintenance insomnia (5.7 ± 2.4). When reducing or discontinuing benzodiazepine hypnotics by switching to other medications, lemborexant (7.5 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.9 ± 1.9) were categorized as first-line recommendations. Conclusion: Expert consensus indicates that orexin receptor antagonists and sleep hygiene education are recommended as first-line treatments in most clinical situations to treat insomnia disorder.

Management of unspecified anxiety disorder: Expert consensus.

AIMS: Treatment guidelines with respect to unspecified anxiety disorder have not been published. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus among field experts on the management of unspecified anxiety disorder. METHODS: Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on eight clinical questions concerning unspecified anxiety disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "disagree" to 9 = "agree"). According to the responses from 119 experts, the choices were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations. RESULTS: Benzodiazepine anxiolytic use was not categorized as a first-line recommendation for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder, whereas multiple nonpharmacological treatment strategies, including coping strategies (7.9 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (7.9 ± 1.4), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), and relaxation techniques (7.4 ± 1.8), were categorized as first-line recommendations. Various treatment strategies were categorized as first-line recommendations when a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug did not improve anxiety symptoms, that is, differential diagnosis (8.2 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (8.0 ± 1.5), coping strategies (7.8 ± 1.5), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), relaxation techniques (7.2 ± 1.9), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (7.0 ± 1.8). These strategies were also highly endorsed when tapering the dosage of or discontinuing benzodiazepine anxiolytic drugs. There was no first-line recommendation regarding excusable reasons for continuing benzodiazepine anxiolytics. CONCLUSIONS: The field experts recommend that benzodiazepine anxiolytics should not be used as a first-line option for patients with unspecified anxiety disorder. Instead, several nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRIs were endorsed for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder and as alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics.

Predicting relapse from the time to remission during the acute treatment of depression: A re-analysis of the STAR*D data.

BACKGROUND: Predicting relapse during maintenance treatment for depression is challenging. The objective of this analysis was to investigate the association between the time taken to achieve remission in the acute phase, and the subsequent relapse rate or time to relapse using the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression dataset. METHOD: Data of 1296 outpatients with nonpsychotic depression who entered a 12-month naturalistic follow-up period after achieving remission with citalopram for up to 14 weeks were analyzed. One-way analysis of variance and the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test were performed to compare the relapse rates and days to relapse during the follow-up period among those who achieved remission at weeks 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 14. Remission and relapse were defined as scores of ≤5 and ≥11, respectively, on the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and Self-Report. RESULTS: The relapse rates were significantly different among those who achieved remission each week (F(5, 1087) = 4.995, p < 0.001). The lowest and highest relapse rates were observed in those who achieved remission at weeks 4 (25.7 %) and 12 (42.4 %), respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.006). There was also a significant negative trend between the weeks taken to achieve remission and the days to relapse (z = -6.13, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with depression who show a faster response to antidepressant treatment are more likely to maintain remission in the long term. This finding suggests that, to prevent relapse, close attention should be paid to patients who require a relatively long time to achieve remission.

Predictors of response to pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders: A combined post hoc analysis of four clinical trial data.

OBJECTIVE: The prediction of response to pharmacotherapy has not been sufficiently explored in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders, which was addressed in this study. METHODS: Data from four double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (sertraline and fluvoxamine for anxiety disorders, risperidone for autistic disorder, and fluoxetine for major depressive disorder) in children and adolescents funded by the National Institute of Mental Health were used. The response was defined as a score of 1 or 2 on the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I) at the endpoint. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations between response status and the following variables: sex, diagnosis, treatment allocation, and CGI-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score at baseline. Moreover, the presence of early improvement (a score of ≤3 in the CGI-I) at Week 1 was added to the independent variables in an additional binary logistic regression analysis, using the data from two studies. RESULTS: A total of 599 patients were included in the analysis. In the binary logistic regression analysis, active drug use (odds ratio [OR] = 8.64, P < 0.001) and female sex (OR = 1.89, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with treatment response. In the second binary logistic regression, the presence of early improvement in the CGI-I (OR = 3.47, P = 0.009), as well as active drug use (OR = 15.05, P < 0.001) and female sex (OR = 2.87, P = 0.016), were associated with subsequent responses. CONCLUSION: Allocation to active drugs, female sex, and early improvement may predict treatment response to pharmacotherapy among children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders.

Use of Staging Models for Treatment-Resistant Depression Is Not Helpful in Predicting Nonresponse to Acute Intravenous Ketamine Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Some staging models for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been developed in the attempt to predict treatment outcome, in particular with electroconvulsive therapy. However, these models have not been tested in predicting clinical outcome of ketamine treatment. We assessed the relationship between patients' classification with different TRD staging models and subsequent nonresponse to acute intravenous ketamine treatment. METHODS: A sample of 120 patients with TRD who received acute ketamine treatment from October 2018 to November 2020 were included. Intravenous ketamine was administered twice weekly for 3 weeks as acute treatment. Generalized linear models were fitted to examine if staging classification at baseline could predict percent change in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR16) scale. Potential confounders such as age, sex, and primary diagnosis were included in the models. Other generalized linear models were also fitted with the Bonferroni correction to investigate if other clinical variables of potential relevance could predict percent change in the QIDS-SR16. RESULTS: No TRD staging model proved accurate in predicting depressive improvement after acute ketamine treatment. Clinical variables such as age (F = 6.68, P = 0.01) and history of neuromodulation therapy (F = 5.12, P = 0.03) were negatively associated with subsequent percent improvement in the QIDS-SR16 with acute ketamine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of acute intravenous ketamine treatment was similar in subjects with higher and lower level of treatment resistance, using definitions based on different TRD staging models. Further exploration of ketamine treatment predictors such as age and neuromodulation therapy is warranted.

Novel Antidepressants in the Pipeline (Phase II and III): A Systematic Review of the US Clinical Trials Registry.

INTRODUCTION: There is an imminent need for faster-acting and more effective antidepressants beyond the monoaminergic hypothesis. METHODS: We systematically searched the US Clinical Trials registry for antidepressant compounds with completed phase II and III trials. Compounds that demonstrated significant superiority over placebo in the primary outcome measure in the latest phase of phase II and III trials were identified. The collateral information was gathered via a PubMed search and press releases. RESULTS: Nine compounds were identified. AXS-05 (a combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion) and ansofaxine hydrochloride showed a positive result over placebo in a phase III study for major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression. MIJ821, nitrous oxide, psilocybin, ayahuasca, facial injection of botulinum toxin A, prasterone, and casopitant demonstrated at least one positive result in phase II trials. Ayahuasca showed a greater response rate than placebo at week one, indicating the rapid antidepressant effect. DISCUSSION: These new compounds with novel mechanisms of action are expected to provide a greater variety of treatment options for depression if preliminary positive results are confirmed.

A Patient With Electroconvulsive Therapy-resistant Major Depressive Disorder With a Full Response to Heated Yoga: A Case Report.

Depression remains difficult to treat as a result of less than optimal efficacy and troublesome side effects of antidepressants. The authors present the case of a patient with treatment-resistant depression with melancholic features who had previously been unresponsive to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) plus an antidepressant regimen but whose condition fully remitted with the addition of a standardized form of heated hatha yoga (HY; Bikram yoga) practiced in a room heated to 105°F. The patient was a 28-year-old woman who underwent 8 weeks of HY as part of a randomized controlled trial of HY for depression while continuing her antidepressant treatment. The patient was asked to attend a minimum of 2 weekly, 90-minute HY classes. After 8 weeks (12 classes in total), the patient no longer met the criteria for a major depressive episode with melancholic features, per Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) criteria. Her depressive symptoms had improved dramatically, with Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D28) scores decreasing from 28 at baseline to 3, and from 28 at baseline to 4, respectively, indicating remission. This patient's ECT-resistant depression remitted with the addition of HY to her antidepressant regimen. Because of her youth and athleticism, this patient was likely well suited to this rigorous form of yoga. Further research is needed to explore HY as a potential intervention for treatment-resistant depression.

Mentalizing imagery therapy for depressed family dementia caregivers: Feasibility, clinical outcomes and brain connectivity changes.

BACKGROUND: Family dementia caregivers experience high rates of depression and anxiety that often go untreated due to time demands. We aimed to determine the feasibility of a brief, 4-week Mentalizing Imagery Therapy intervention, which couples mindfulness with guided imagery practices aimed at bolstering mentalizing capacity, to reduce caregiver psychological symptoms and to explore potential impact on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex connectivity. METHODS: Twenty-four family dementia caregivers with moderate depression symptoms (a score of 10 in Patient Health Questionnaire-9) were assigned to either group Mentalizing Imagery Therapy (MIT, n = 12) or a waitlist augmented by optional relaxation exercises (n = 12). Participants completed questionnaires to measure depression and anxiety at baseline and followup, and those eligible also underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) brain imaging at these time points. RESULTS: Eleven of 12 caregivers assigned to MIT completed the intervention and attended weekly groups 98% of the time. MIT home practice logs indicated average practice of 5 ± 2 sessions per week for 23 ± 8 min per session. All participants in waitlist completed the post-assessment. MIT participants exhibited significantly greater improvement than waitlist on self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms (p<.05) after 4 weeks. Neuroimaging results revealed increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex connectivity with a putative emotion regulation network in the MIT group (p = .05) but not in waitlist (p = 1.0). LIMITATIONS: Sample size limitations necessitate validation of findings in larger, randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-week group MIT program was feasible for caregivers, with high levels of participation in weekly group meetings and home practice exercises.

Validation of brief screening measures for depression and anxiety in young people with substance use disorders.

BACKGROUND: It is critical to promptly identify and monitor mood and anxiety symptoms in young people with SUD. The primary aim of this study was to conduct a psychometric validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) for depression and anxiety screening in young people seeking outpatient treatment for SUD. Our secondary aim was to compare the performance of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 to their briefer two-item versions (PHQ-2 and GAD-2) in terms of detecting probable mood and anxiety disorders. METHOD: Data were extracted from the electronic health records of patients (ages 14 to 26) who received a diagnostic evaluation following clinical implementation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 at a hospital-based outpatient SUD treatment program (N=121, average age 19.1 ± 3.1 years). RESULTS: The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 showed excellent internal consistency. A PHQ-9 cut score of 7 or 8 (PHQ-2 cut score: 2) and GAD-7 cut score of 6 (GAD-2 cut score: 2) had the best balance of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive power in these data. These measures also showed good convergent and acceptable discriminant validity. LIMITATIONS: The sample was predominantly White and non-Hispanic, and a validated (semi-)structured diagnostic interview was not used to establish mood and anxiety disorder diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are reliable and potentially clinically useful screening tools for depression and anxiety in young people with SUD, and that the two-item versions may have similar clinical utility as the full measures.

Pharmacological Treatment of Schizophrenia: Japanese Expert Consensus.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional treatment guidelines of schizophrenia do not necessarily provide solutions on clinically important issues. METHODS: A total of 141 certified psychiatrists of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology evaluated treatment options regarding 19 clinically relevant situations in the treatment of schizophrenia with a 9-point scale (1="disagree" and 9="agree"). RESULTS: First-line antipsychotics varied depending on predominant symptoms: risperidone (mean±standard deviation score, 7.9±1.4), olanzapine (7.5±1.6), and aripiprazole (6.9±1.9) were more likely selected for positive symptoms; aripiprazole (7.6±1.6) for negative symptoms; aripiprazole (7.3±1.9), olanzapine (7.2±1.9), and quetiapine (6.9±1.9) for depression and anxiety; and olanzapine (7.9±1.5) and risperidone (7.5±1.5) for excitement and aggression. While only aripiprazole was categorized as a first-line treatment for relapse prevention (7.6±1.0) in patients without noticeable symptoms, aripiprazole (8.0±1.6) and brexpiprazole (6.9±2.3) were categorized as such for social integration. First-line treatments in patients who are vulnerable to extrapyramidal symptoms include quetiapine (7.5±2.0) and aripiprazole (6.9±2.1). DISCUSSION: These clinical recommendations represent the expert consensus on the use of a particular antipsychotic medication for a particular situation, filling a current gap in the literature.

Long-term outcome in outpatients with depression treated with acute and maintenance intravenous ketamine: A retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term outcomes of repeated ketamine infusions for depression. We conducted a retrospective chart review to investigate outcomes of maintenance intravenous ketamine treatment at Massachusetts General Hospital. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who started intravenous ketamine from October 2018 to November 2019 were examined. Symptom severity was evaluated with the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report scale (QIDS-SR16) at every visit prior to administration. The initial ketamine dose was usually 0.5 mg/kg infused over 40 min. Intravenous ketamine was administered twice-weekly for three weeks in an induction phase, followed by maintenance with a variable administration schedule and dose. Response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in total QIDS-SR16 score from baseline. RESULTS: Forty (47.1%) of the 85 patients who started treatment discontinued during or right after the induction phase; 3 (3.5%) were still on induction at the time of this report, and 42 (49.4%) transitioned to maintenance after completing induction. Among these patients, 14 (16.5%) discontinued during maintenance and 28 (32.9%) continued on maintenance. The mean ketamine dosage during maintenance was 0.91±0.28 mg/kg. Fifteen out of 82 patients (18.3%) responded to induction treatment and 6 (7.3%) remained in responder status at the time of data analysis during maintenance. Three patients discontinued ketamine due to side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the apparently low response rate in QIDS-SR16 scores and considerable out-of-pocket costs, almost half of real-world outpatients with TRD decided to continue with maintenance ketamine treatment due to perceived significant improvement.

Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a consensus guideline by certified experts of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology on the psychopharmacological treatment for bipolar disorders I and II (BP-I and BP-II), in order to fill the gap in the literature and provide more concrete guidance for challenging and controversial real-world situations. METHODS: Experts were asked to assess treatment options regarding 19 clinical situations of bipolar disorder with a nine-point Likert scale (one = "disagree" and nine = "agree"). According to the responses from 119 experts, the options were categorized into the first-, second-, and third-line treatments. RESULTS: For the treatment of BP-I, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first-line treatment for manic episodes (mean ± standard deviation score, 7.0 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.1 ± 2.0), and the maintenance phase (7.8 ± 1.8). Combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was endorsed for manic episodes (7.7 ± 1.7), depressive episodes with (7.1 ± 2.0) and without mixed features (6.9 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (6.9 ± 2.1). Similarly, in BP-II, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first-line treatment for hypomanic episodes (7.3 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.0 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (7.3 ± 2.3), while combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was recommended for hypomanic episodes (6.9 ± 2.4).No antipsychotic monotherapy or antidepressant treatment was categorized as a first-line treatment for any type of episode. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations reflect the current evidence and represent the experts' consensus on using lithium for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Clinicians should consider the effectiveness and adverse effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Pharmacological management of depression: Japanese expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant issues in the real-world treatment of depression have not always been captured by conventional treatment guidelines. METHODS: Certified psychiatrists of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology were asked to evaluate treatment options regarding 23 clinical situations in the treatment of depression using a 9-point Likert scale (1="disagree" and 9="agree"). According to the responses of 114 experts, the options were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line treatments. RESULTS: First-line antidepressants varied depending on predominant symptoms: escitalopram (mean ± standard deviation score, 7.8 ± 1.7) and sertraline (7.3 ± 1.7) were likely selected for anxiety; duloxetine (7.6 ± 1.9) and venlafaxine (7.2 ± 2.1) for loss of interest; mirtazapine for insomnia (8.2 ± 1.6), loss of appetite (7.9 ± 1.9), agitation and severe irritation (7.4 ± 2.0), and suicidal ideation (7.5 ± 1.9). While first-line treatment was switched to either an SNRI (7.7 ± 1.9) or mirtazapine (7.4 ± 2.0) in the case of non-response to an SSRI, switching to mirtazapine (7.1 ± 2.2) was recommended in the case of non-response to an SNRI, and vice versa (switching to an SNRI (7.0 ± 2.0) in the case of non-response to mirtazapine). Augmentation with aripiprazole was considered the first-line treatment for partial response to an SSRI (7.1 ± 2.3) or SNRI (7.0 ± 2.5). LIMITATIONS: The evidence level of expert consensus is considered low. All included experts were Japanese. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations made by experts in the field are useful and can supplement guidelines and informed decision making in real-world clinical practice. We suggest that pharmacological strategies for depression be flexible and that each patient's situational needs as well as the pharmacotherapeutic profile of medications be considered.

Predicting relapse with residual symptoms in schizophrenia: A secondary analysis of the PROACTIVE trial.

INTRODUCTION: Little attention has been paid to the contribution of individual residual symptom to predict relapse in patients with schizophrenia receiving oral or long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. METHOD: We used the data from the Preventing Relapse on Oral Antipsychotics Compared to Injectables - Evaluating Efficacy (PROACTIVE) study, in which 305 outpatients with schizophrenia were randomly allocated to either biweekly LAI-risperidone (LAI-R) or daily oral second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) and assessed for up to 30 months. Baseline individual symptoms that could predict subsequent relapse were identified, using a Cox proportional hazards model. Moreover, among those who relapsed during the study (n = 73), individual symptoms were compared between baseline and biweekly ratings 8 to 2 weeks before relapse, using the linear mixed model. RESULTS: A greater score in grandiosity at baseline was significantly associated with subsequent relapse (adjusted HR = 1.24, p = 0.006). When the two treatment groups were separately analyzed, more severe grandiosity (adjusted HR = 1.43, p = 0.003) and less severe hallucinatory behavior (adjusted HR = 0.70, p = 0.013) at baseline were significantly associated with relapse in the oral SGA group, but none was identified in the LAI-R group. Emotional withdrawal was significantly worse 8 and 2 weeks before relapse compared to the baseline (p = 0.032 and p = 0.043, respectively). DISCUSSION: More severe grandiosity and less hallucination may have led to more frequent relapses in patients with schizophrenia receiving oral antipsychotics, which was not a case in those receiving LAI-R. The exploratory analysis indicates an increase in emotional withdrawal before relapse may be a useful marker for earlier interventions to possibly avert relapse.

Dose increase of S-Adenosyl-Methionine and escitalopram in a randomized clinical trial for major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) for major depressive disorder (MDD) remains unclear. The objective of this analysis was to address whether a dose increase provided further improvement in cases of insufficient response using data from an existing randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with MDD who failed to respond to SAMe 1,600 mg/day, escitalopram 10 mg/day, or placebo for 6 weeks were treated with doubled doses of the allocated treatments for the following 6 weeks. Changes in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated, and Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events-Specific Inquiry were compared between the lower and higher dose treatments in each treatment group and among the higher dose treatments of SAMe, escitalopram, and placebo. RESULTS: Various depression severity scores decreased significantly for all three treatment arms during the higher dose treatment. No within-group and between-group differences were found in any of the efficacy measures when comparing the doses and treatments. There was a significant difference in reported abdominal discomfort among patients receiving the higher dose of SAMe (31.3%), compared to escitalopram (8.7%) and placebo (3.8%) (χ2=7.32, p = 0.026). LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small. The study duration for dose increase was relatively short. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MDD failing to respond to 1,600 mg/day of SAMe may improve after increasing the dose to 3,200 mg/day, but we cannot rule out the contribution of a placebo effect and time-related improvement. The risk of abdominal discomfort may be increased with higher doses of SAMe.

Longer-term open-label study of adjunctive riluzole in treatment-resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: While riluzole has been investigated for the treatment of depression, little is known about its longer-term efficacy and optimal treatment duration in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The objective of this study is to characterize the longer-term outcome of adjunctive riluzole therapy for TRD in an open-label extension of an 8-week acute treatment trial. METHODS: The data from 66 patients with TRD who received adjunctive riluzole in a 12-week open-label extension phase were analyzed. Response rates (⩾50% reduction in the Mongomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score), relapse rates (a MADRS score of ⩾22 in patients who had previously achieved response), and adverse events were examined in patients who had achieved response at the end of the acute phase and those who had not. RESULTS: Among acute phase responders, the maintained response rate was 66.7% (8/12) and the relapse rate was 8.3% (1/12). In acute phase non-responders, the response rate was 24.1% (13/54). The most commonly reported adverse event was fatigue (9.1%). Three cases were considered serious adverse events; vomiting (n = 1), shortness of breath (n = 1), and aborted suicide attempt (n = 1). LIMITATIONS: This longer-term study was open-label and uncontrolled. The sample size was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Longer-term adjunctive riluzole appears relatively well tolerated and beneficial for maintaining previous response. Additionally, approximately one fourth of patients who did not respond to 8-week antidepressant treatment might respond if treated with riluzole for 12 weeks. Those findings warrant further investigation because adjunctive riluzole could represent an option for treatment of depression when standard antidepressants have failed.