Risk factors for reoperation of inflatable penile prosthesis among an ethnically diverse urban population in a high-volume center.

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is a surgical treatment for erectile dysfunction refractory to medical therapy or for those who desire permanent treatment. Complications like mechanical failure and infection may necessitate reoperation, and patients with certain risk factors remain predisposed to reoperation. We retrospectively analyzed 530 patients undergoing primary IPP implantation at a large, urban, multiethnic hospital with a high volume of IPP implantations. Primary outcomes were reoperation due to any reason and reoperation due to infection. Patient characteristics and intraoperative factors were compared between those requiring reoperation and those not requiring reoperation. Overall, 12.1% of patients underwent reoperation, primarily due to infection, with a median time to reoperation of 4 months. Analysis revealed an increased likelihood of reoperation with Peyronie's disease (OR = 2.47), hemoglobin A1c over 8 (OR = 2.25), active smoking (OR = 2.75), and estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥ 25cc (OR = 2.45). A decreased likelihood of reoperation was observed when Arista™ powder was used intraoperatively (OR = 0.38). Reoperation specifically due to infection was associated with an infrapubic approach (OR = 2.56) and hypertension (OR = 9.12). Our findings confirm smoking and diabetes as risk factors for reoperation, while also providing insights into factors like estimated blood loss and Arista™ powder use. However, long-term survival rates were limited by loss to follow-up. (Clinical trial registration N/A).

Long-Term Water Vapor Thermal Therapy Outcomes Across a Broad Range of Prostate Volumes.

INTRODUCTION: Water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) is a minimally invasive therapy designed to treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Long-term outcomes with large (>80 cc) and small (<30 cc) prostate volumes (PVs) remain limited. We report 48-month outcomes for a multiethnic cohort of WVTT-treated men, stratified by PV. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, patients were stratified by PV: < 30 cc, 30 to 80 cc, or > 80 cc. Outcome measures, including International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, International Index of Erectile Function, medication usage, and adverse events, were analyzed at baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, and/or 48-month follow-up. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two patients met inclusion; 35 (13.9%) had PVs < 30 cc, 196 (77.8%) had PVs 30 to 80 cc, and 21 (8.3%) had PVs > 80 cc. Most patients were Asian (33.7%) or non-Hispanic Black (29.4%). International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life improved in all cohorts from baseline at all follow-ups (all P < .05), with no differences between cohorts. International Index of Erectile Function-Orgasmic Function and -Erectile Function domains improved in 30 to 80 cc patients at 48 months. Alpha blocker and/or 5-alpha reductase inhibitor usage decreased at all follow-ups in < 30 cc and 30 to 80 cc patients and remained durable to only 6 months for > 80 cc patients. No significant differences in adverse events or reoperation rates were observed between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests WVTT to be efficacious, durable, and safe in managing lower urinary tract symptoms across PVs, although PV > 80 cc patients may require benign prostatic hyperplasia medication at long-term follow-up. Further research is desired to clarify WVTT's role regarding sexual function and in treating men with larger PVs.

Pudendal nerve block decreases narcotic requirements and time spent in post-anesthesia care units in patients undergoing primary inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Efforts to minimize narcotic usage following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation are vital, considering the current opioid epidemic in the United States. We aimed to determine whether pudendal nerve block (PNB) utilization in a multiethnic population undergoing primary IPP implantation can decrease rates of post-operative opiate usage. A single-institution, retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent primary IPP implantation between December 2015 and June 2022. PNB usage and intra- and post-operative outcomes were analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression. 449 patients were included, with 373 (83.1%) in the PNB group. Median time (minutes) spent in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (1499 [119-198] vs. 235 [169-322], p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the PNB group. There were no significant differences in intra-operative and PACU morphine milligram equivalents or post-operative safety outcomes between groups. However, fewer patients in the PNB group called for pain medications post-operatively (10.2% vs 19.7%, p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly decreased operative time (B -6.23; 95%CI -11.28, -1.17; p = 0.016) and decreased time in recovery (B: -81.62; 95%CI: -106.49, -56.76, p < 0.001) in the PNB group. PNB decreases post-operative opioid analgesic requirements and time spent in PACU in patients undergoing a primary IPP implantation and thus may represent an attractive, non-opioid adjunct.

Real-world four-year functional and surgical outcomes of Rezum therapy in younger versus elderly men.

BACKGROUND: Management of urinary symptoms in elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is complex given challenges with medications and invasive surgeries. Rezum, a minimally invasive water vapor therapy, is an emerging alternative. We compare real-world Rezum outcomes between young and elderly patients over 4 years. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a multiethnic population treated with Rezum at a single center between 2017-2019. Patients were stratified into young (<65 years) or elderly (≥65 years) cohorts. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), decisional regret scores, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and/or 48-months. Descriptive statistics were compared using t-tests, Chi-squared, or Mann-Whitney U tests. Changes in outcomes were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, stratified by age. RESULTS: 256 patients - 146 (57%) young and 110 (43%) elderly - were included. The majority were Asian (33.2%) or non-Hispanic Black (28.9%). Significant improvements were observed in the combined cohort at 4-years in IPSS, QoL, and Qmax when compared to baseline (all p < 0.05). Between the age cohorts, there were no significant differences in IPSS, QoL, or Qmax at any follow-up. Within both cohorts, significant improvements in IPSS and QoL were found from baseline to all follow-ups. In the young cohort, Qmax was significantly improved from baseline to all follow-ups while in the elderly cohort, this was observed only at the 3-month follow-up. No significant differences in AEs or regret was found between cohorts. There was no significant difference in 4-year surgical retreatment rates between cohorts (elderly 4.0% vs young 4.4%, p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in IPSS, QoL, or AEs between elderly and younger men over 4 years following Rezum, suggesting comparable benefits and risks. Future research is warranted to clarify the impact of Rezum on Qmax in elderly men.