The Penrod score: a prognostic instrument to balance an increasing geriatric fracture caseload with diminishing health care resources?

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric hip fracture patients are a highly heterogeneous collective, what distinctly aggravates the best possible treatment. Consequently, it is becoming more important to identify selection criteria that can distinguish those patients who can benefit the most from treatment in a geriatric fracture center. In our pilot study, we assessed the 2007 published Penrod score for its utility as a useful selection tool by prospectively comparing our own patient's outcome with the Penrod study. METHODS: 77 patients treated for geriatric hip fracture were preoperatively classified according to the Penrod score. Patients were divided into three clusters by age (1: <75 years, 2: 75-84 years, 3: ≥85 years). Clusters 2 and 3 were then classified according to their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's) and cognitive status (presence or absence of dementia). In 51 out of these 77 patients, the ability to perform ADLs could be assessed 6 months postoperatively and was compared with the Penrod scores. RESULTS: 58 % of cluster 1 patients were able to perform 4 ADLs independently 6 months postoperatively (52.9 % Penrod study). In clusters 2A and 3A, 48 and 50 %, respectively, were able to perform 4 ADLs independently, compared with 40.6 and 31.5 % (Penrod collective). 22 % of our patients in 2B performed all ADLs independently (3.6 % Penrod) and 25 % in cluster 3B (9.4 % Penrod). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results support the prognostic value of the Penrod score in the treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients. With the help of the Penrod score, it may be possible to identify patients, who are expected to significantly profit from an intensified treatment in a geriatric fracture center (clusters 2B, 3A, and 3B). By utilizing this score, improved outcomes and simultaneously a more effective utilization of valuable health care resources could be achieved.

Displaced trochanteric fragments lead to poor functional outcome in pertrochanteric fractures treated by cephalomedullary nails.

BACKGROUND: The importance of the greater trochanter and its attached abductor muscles for physiological gait is well accepted. However the influence of a displaced greater trochanter fracture after a pertrochanteric fracture is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine if there is an association between the greater trochanter position and the level of patient mobility following internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-three consecutive elderly patients with a median age of 85 (interquartile range [IQR] 79-91) years, who were treated for pertrochanteric fractures at a level I trauma centre, were recruited. AO 31 A3.1 and A3.2 fracture types were excluded from the statistical analysis. Patient mobility was prospectively assessed before the fracture and one year following fracture treatment using the Parker mobility score. In a multivariable analysis, the influence of a displaced greater trochanter on patient mobility at one-year follow-up was assessed. The analysis was adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, AO fracture classification, varus-/valgus malposition of the neck-shaft fragments, and Parker mobility score before fracture. RESULTS: Post-operative X-rays were available in 125 patients, out of which 66 (53%) patients were identified with a displaced or migrated greater trochanter. One year mortality rate was 22% (n=27). In the 82 patients who had functional assessment one year post-operatively, the median Parker mobility score before fracture and at one-year follow-up was 7 (IQR 4-9) and 7 (IQR 3-9) in patients without, and 7 (IQR 4-9) and 3 (IQR 2-5) in patients with a displaced greater trochanter. In multivariable analysis, a displaced greater trochanter was significantly associated with a lower Parker mobility score (-1.74, 95% confidence interval -2.37, -1.12, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Greater trochanter displacement following internal fixation of extracapsular hip fractures with a cephalomedullary nail is associated with a poor functional outcome. Greater attention to achieve adequate reduction and stabilisation of this fragment during internal fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures should be aimed for despite the inability of current cephalomedullary implants to do so. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III prognostic and epidemiological study.