Comparative performance of gated perfusion SPECT wall thickening, delayed thallium uptake, and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT in detecting myocardial viability.

To evaluate the comparative abilities of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) wall thickening, delayed thallium-201 (Tl-201) SPECT, and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) SPECT in detecting myocardial viability, 23 patients with previous myocardial infarction and clinically suspected viability were studied. Each patient had at least 1 extensive fixed perfusion defect on rest/stress technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT. A total of 41 major vascular territories had fixed defects. The mean (+/- 1 SD) left ventricular ejection fraction determined from gated perfusion SPECT was 26% +/- 11%. Wall thickening was assessed in a semiquantitative fashion by the regional increase in myocardial intensity during systole and was considered normal when a > or = 20% increase was observed. Tl-201 SPECT was acquired 4 hours after resting tracer injection was administered. Viability was considered present when regional defect Tl-201 count density, determined by quantitative analysis, was > 20% greater than that on the resting sestamibi scan. FDG SPECT was performed independently with a 10 mCi F-18 FDG dose after oral glucose loading was performed. A camera equipped with ultrahigh energy collimation was used. Quantitative criteria for viability were the same as for Tl-201. In the 23 patients viability within the fixed sestamibi defects was manifest by preserved wall thickening in 8 patients, delayed Tl-201 uptake in 10 patients, and FDG uptake in 18 patients. Nine major vascular territories with fixed defects were judged viable by wall thickening, 11 by Tl-201 SPECT, and 24 by FDG SPECT (P = .0009). We conclude that FDG SPECT demonstrates more evidence of myocardial viability than either gated sestamibi wall thickening or delayed Tl-201 SPECT.

Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi and Tl-201 gated perfusion SPECT.

BACKGROUND: To determine the interpretability of gated thallium-201 perfusion SPECT compared with that performed by use of technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI), 33 patients with prior myocardial infarction were studied. Patients received 22 to 30 mCi (814 to 1110 MBq) MIBI at peak stress, and a 15-minute gated SPECT acquisition was begun 30 to 40 minutes thereafter. On a subsequent day gated Tl-201 SPECT was acquired for 15 minutes, 4 hours after a resting 3.5 mCi (130 MBq) injection. SPECT was performed over a 180-degree arc by use of a 90-degree angled 2-detector camera. RESULTS: Gated studies were interpreted independently by 4 experienced physicians. Study quality was graded (0 = uninterpretable to 4 = excellent). Wall motion (0 = normal to 2 = akinetic/dyskinetic) and wall thickening (0 = normal to 2 = absent) were graded for each of 10 segments viewed in orthogonal planes. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated by use of software thus far validated only for MIBI. The average count density of mid-ventricular end-diastolic short axis tomograms with sestamibi was 3.47 times greater than with thallium. Mean study quality was 3.4 for MIBI and 1.8 for thallium (P < 10(-6)). No gated MIBI SPECTs, but 2 gated thallium studies (6%) were judged uninterpretable. Among interpretable scans, interobserver agreement (Kendall statistic) in assessing wall motion was 0.73 for MIBI and 0.66 for thallium (P = .01). For assessing wall thickening, the Kendall statistic was 0.73 for MIBI and 0.69 for thallium (P = .05). Correlation (r) of LVEFs was 0.91, SEE = 6.4. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that gated thallium SPECT is inferior to MIBI because of much poorer image quality and somewhat poorer interobserver agreement among experienced physicians. However, LVEF can be determined reliably from gated thallium SPECT.

Image enhancement of severely hypoperfused myocardia for computation of tomographic ejection fraction.

UNLABELLED: Ejection fractions computed from 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion gated tomograms have demonstrated a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility. Although automated algorithms appear to provide reasonable endocardial outlines for patients over a broad spectrum of cardiac diseases, in cases of severe hypoperfusion, it is necessary to manually adjust contrast and brightness to judge whether borders are correct or must be altered. METHODS: Midventricular horizontal and vertical long axis gated tomograms were generated for 116 studies chosen on the basis of extensive, severe myocardial perfusion defects. Automated software transformed cinematic tomograms into images demonstrating uniform appearance of the myocardium throughout the cardiac cycle. Transformed images were introduced to edge detection algorithms for subsequent calculation of ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis demonstrated excellent intraobserver reproducibility for ejection fractions (r = 0.95) and volumes (r = 0.98). There was also good agreement of ejection fractions (r = 0.86) and volumes (r = 0.94) with values derived from an expert's manual drawings. In a subgroup of 22 patients, automated ejection fractions from transformed images demonstrated better agreement with independent first-pass values (r = 0.90) than did manual measurements derived from original data (r = 0.85). CONCLUSION: Image enhancement algorithms succeeded in providing accurate, reproducible gated SPECT ejection fractions in the most difficult class of patients exhibiting severe hypoperfusion.

Simultaneous biplane first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography using a scintillation camera with two perpendicular detectors.

UNLABELLED: Generally performed in a single anterior or right anterior oblique (RAO) view, first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography (RNA) is limited due to its inability to evaluate septal and posterior wall motion. METHODS: Thirty-five patients undergoing stress/rest sestamibi SPECT (22 mCi/22 mCi 2-day protocol) underwent biplane RNA at the time of resting injection. The stress SPECT images (acquired with the patient at rest) were ECG-gated to evaluate resting regional myocardial wall thickening. By this means wall motion assessed by RNA was compared to the presence of a resting SPECT perfusion defect accompanied by a localized decrease in wall thickening. RESULTS: In 16 patients in whom both resting perfusion and wall thickening were normal one demonstrated apical hypokinesis by RNA in the RAO view. In the other 29 patients, a total of 58 resting segmental perfusion defects with abnormal wall thickening were present (12 anterior, 13 inferior, 14 apical, 11 septal and 8 posterolateral). Wall motion abnormalities were detected in all these patients and in 57/58 segments (98%) by biplane RNA. Septal and posterolateral wall motion abnormalities were detected in only the LAO RNA study. In three patients, wall motion abnormalities were detected by LAO imaging only. Of the remaining 87 normally perfused segments in these 29 patients, RNA wall motion was normal in 85. Two posterolateral segments demonstrated apparent hypokinesis, probably due to left atrial overlap in the LAO projection. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous biplane RNA accurately detects wall motion abnormalities frequently missed by single-plane RAO imaging.

First-pass ventricular ejection fraction using a single-crystal nuclear camera.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the reliability of ejection fractions obtained from first-pass radionuclide ventriculography with a large field-of-view tomographic single-crystal gamma camera. METHODS: A SPECT camera had its electronics redesigned to improve counting efficiency and was equipped with an experimental ultra-high sensitivity collimator. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured in 28 patients by 30 degrees RAO first-pass imaging and by "best septal view" LAO planar equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography on a conventional small field of view Anger camera. For 28 other patients, first-pass ejection fractions were compared to multicrystal gamma camera values. Visual analysis was performed to judge clinical acceptability of first-pass images for identification of wall-motion abnormalities. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis of first-pass against equilibrium ejection fraction demonstrated good correlation (r = 0.92; slope = 0.90; intercept = 3.8; s.e.e. = 6.4%). First-pass ejection fraction values also correlated linearly with multicrystal camera values for the left ventricle (r = 0.94; slope = 1.05; intercept = 1.3; s.e.e. = 5.3%). For a subgroup of 19 patients, single-crystal camera right ventricle ejection fraction demonstrated good correlation with multicrystal camera values (r = 0.82; slope = 1.15; intercept = 1.3; s.e.e. = 6.1%). Interobserver variability correlated as r = 0.99 for LVEF ejection fraction and r = 0.92 for RVEF. Chi-square analysis of single-crystal first-pass image visual scores versus those from the gated equilibrium acquisitions showed close agreement (p < 10(-8)). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated camera/collimator system measured left and right ventricular ejection fraction accurately. Lung frame correction and dual regions were superior to paraventricular background correction and a fixed end-diastolic region.