Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(1): 38, 2023 Dec 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110572

RESUMO

AIM: Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is the most frequent side effect in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with curative radiotherapy (RT). A standardized strategy for preventing and treating RIOM has not been defined. Aim of this study was to perform a real-life survey on RIOM management among Italian RT centers. METHODS: A 40-question survey was administered to 25 radiation oncologists working in 25 different RT centers across Italy. RESULTS: A total of 1554 HNC patients have been treated in the participating centers in 2021, the majority (median across the centers 91%) with curative intent. Median treatment time was 41 days, with a mean percentage of interruption due to toxicity of 14.5%. Eighty percent of responders provide written oral cavity hygiene recommendations. Regarding RIOM prevention, sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and hyaluronic acid-based mouthwashes were the most frequent topic agents used. Regarding RIOM treatment, 14 (56%) centers relied on literature evidence, while internal guidelines were available in 13 centers (44%). Grade (G)1 mucositis is mostly treated with sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and steroids, while hyaluronic acid-based agents, local anesthetics, and benzydamine were the most used in mucositis G2/G3. Steroids, painkillers, and anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequent systemic agents used independently from the RIOM severity. CONCLUSION: Great variety of strategies exist among Italian centers in RIOM management for HNC patients. Whether different strategies could impact patients' compliance and overall treatment time of the radiation course is still unclear and needs further investigation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Mucosite , Lesões por Radiação , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Estomatite , Humanos , Mucosite/tratamento farmacológico , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Bicarbonato de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Estomatite/etiologia , Estomatite/prevenção & controle , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroides
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(2)2022 Jan 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35053456

RESUMO

In breast cancer, the use of a boost to the tumor bed can improve local control. The aim of this research is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the boost with intra-operative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and postoperative whole breast irradiation (WBI). The present retrospective multicenter large data were collected between January 2011 and March 2018 in 8 Italian Radiation Oncology Departments. Acute and late toxicity, objective (obj) and subjective (subj) cosmetic outcomes, in-field local control (LC), out-field LC, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Overall, 797 patients were enrolled. IOERT-boost was performed in all patients during surgery, followed by WBI. Acute toxicity (≥G2) occurred in 179 patients (22.46%); one patient developed surgical wound infection (G3). No patients reported late toxicity ≥ G2. Obj-cosmetic result was excellent in 45%, good in 35%, fair in 20% and poor in 0% of cases. Subj-cosmetic result was excellent in 10%, good in 20%, fair in 69% and poor in 0.3% of cases. Median follow-up was 57 months (range 12-109 months). At 5 years, in-field LC was 99.2% (95% CI: 98-99.7); out-field LC 98.9% (95% CI: 97.4-99.6); DFS 96.2% (95% CI: 94.2-97.6); OS 98.6% (95% CI: 97.2-99.3). In conclusion, IOERT-boost appears to be safe, providing excellent local control for early-stage breast cancer. The safety and long-term efficacy should encourage use of this treatment, with the potential to reduce local recurrence.

3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(8): 2046-2052, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757649

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The endpoint of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and SCRT with delayed surgery (SCRT-DS) on a selected subgroup of frail patients with locally advanced middle/low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2018, a total of 128 frail patients with locally advanced middle-low rectal adenocarcinoma underwent SCRT and subsequent restaging for eventual delayed surgery. Rates of complete pathological response, down-staging, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: 128 patients completed 5 × 5 Gy pelvic radiotherapy. 69 of these were unfit for surgery; 59 underwent surgery 8 weeks (average time: 61 days) after radiotherapy. Downstaging of T occurred in 64% and down-staging of N in 50%. The median overall survival (OS) of SCRT alone was 19.5 months. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 5-year OS was 48%, 22%, 14% and 0% respectively. In the surgical group, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and median OS were, respectively, 67 months (95% CI 49.8-83.1 months) and 72.1 months (95% CI 57.5-86.7 months). The 1, 2, 3, 5-year OS was 88%, 75%, 51%, 46%, respectively. Post-operative morbidity was 22%, mortality was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients with advanced rectal cancer are often "unfit" for long-term neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A SCRT may be considered a valid option for this group of patients. Once radiotherapy is completed, patients can be re-evaluated for surgery. If feasible, SCRT and delayed surgery is the best option for frail patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Fragilidade/complicações , Protectomia/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Abscesso/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor do Câncer/etiologia , Dor do Câncer/fisiopatologia , Colectomia , Fístula do Sistema Digestório/epidemiologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/complicações , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida
4.
Anim Reprod Sci ; 219: 106509, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828395

RESUMO

The capacity for microscopic evaluation of sperm is useful for assisted reproductive technologies (ART), because this can allow for specific selection of sperm cells for in vitro fertilization (IVF). The objective of this study was to analyze the same sperm samples using two high-resolution methods: spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to determine if with one method there was more timely and different information obtained than the other. To address this objective, there was evaluation of sperm populations from boars and stallions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported comparison when using AFM and high-sensitivity interferometric microscopy (such as SLIM) to evaluate spermatozoa. Results indicate that with the use of SLIM microscopy there is similar nanoscale sensitivity as with use of AFM while there is approximately 1,000 times greater throughput with use of SLIM. With SLIM, there is also allowace for the measurement of the dry mass (non-aqueous content) of spermatozoa, which may be a new label-free marker for sperm viability. In the second part of this study, there was analysis of two sperm populations. There were interesting correlations between the different compartments of the sperm and the dry mass in both boars and stallions. Furthermore, there was a correlation between the dry mass of the sperm head and the length and width of the acrosome in both boars and stallions. This correlation is positive in boars while it is negative in stallions.


Assuntos
Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala , Cavalos , Microscopia , Análise do Sêmen , Suínos , Animais , Forma Celular , Fertilização in vitro/veterinária , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/métodos , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/veterinária , Masculino , Microscopia/métodos , Microscopia/veterinária , Análise do Sêmen/métodos , Análise do Sêmen/veterinária , Especificidade da Espécie , Cabeça do Espermatozoide/ultraestrutura , Espermatozoides/citologia , Espermatozoides/ultraestrutura , Coloração e Rotulagem/métodos , Coloração e Rotulagem/veterinária
5.
Oncology ; 96(1): 8-13, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30212829

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (N/L) on non-human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: N/L was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of N/L and other clinical factors on survival outcomes. High/low N/L groups were defined as > 4.7 and ≤4.7, respectively. RESULTS: Data of 57 consecutive patients with non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer were analyzed. The 3-year disease-free survival was 79 versus 36.9% in favor of the low N/L group (p = 0.04). The 5-year overall survival was 71.6 versus 53.3% in the low N/L and high N/L group, respectively (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: N/L could play an important role in non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer progression and indicate prognosis.


Assuntos
Contagem de Leucócitos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/sangue , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/mortalidade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/etiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Ann Hematol ; 97(12): 2411-2416, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094511

RESUMO

To report the clinical results after definitive radiotherapy (RT) for indolent primary cutaneous B cell lymphoma (pcBCL). The data concerning all patients treated for indolent pcBCL with RT with a curative intent between 1992 and 2012 were reviewed. All cases were (re)classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. A total of 42 patients with biopsy-proven primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (pcFCL) and primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (pcMZL) were included. The median follow-up is 9.5 years. Treatment with RT resulted in complete response (CR) in all patients. Eight patients showed one or multiple relapses confined to the skin. No in-field recurrences were observed. For the entire cohort, the 10-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 71.1% and 87.1%, respectively. Univariate (UA) and multivariate (MA) analysis revealed extra-trunk primary lesion (MA) and multiple lesions (UA) as unfavorable prognostic factors. The 5-year RFS rate for patients with trunk lesion was 89.4% versus 66.9% for those with other location (p = 0.02). The 5-year RFS rates were 83.5 and 57.1% in case of single and multiple lesions (p = 0.04). An excellent survival can be achieved with definitive RT in indolent pcBCL. Patients with multiple and extra-trunk primary cutaneous lesions probably warrants intensification of therapy. Prospective studies are mandatory.


Assuntos
Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/radioterapia , Linfoma Folicular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/mortalidade , Linfoma Folicular/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida
8.
Radiol Med ; 121(6): 515-20, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26706454

RESUMO

The increasing growth of population with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as Pacemaker (PM) and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICD), requires particular attention in management of patients needing radiation treatment. This paper updates and summarizes some recommendations from different international guidelines. Ionizing radiation and/or electromagnetic interferences could cause device failure. Current approaches to treatment in patients who have these devices vary among radiation oncology centres. We refer to the German Society of Radiation Oncology and Cardiology guidelines (ed. 2015); to the Society of Cardiology Australia and New Zealand Statement (ed. 2015); to the guidelines in force in the Netherlands (ed. 2012) and to the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology recommendations (ed. 2013) as reported in the guidelines for the treatment of breast cancer in patients with CIED. Although there is not a clear cut-off point, risk of device failure increases with increasing doses. Cumulative dose and pacing dependency have been combined to categorize patients into low-, medium- and high-risk groups. Measures to secure patient safety are described for each category. The use of energy ≤6MV is preferable and it's strongly recommended not to exceed a total dose of 2 Gy to the PM and 1 Gy for ICD. Given the dangers of device malfunction, radiation oncology departments should adopt all the measures designed to minimize the risk to patients. For this reason, a close collaboration between cardiologist, radiotherapist and physicist is necessary.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Fenômenos Eletromagnéticos , Falha de Equipamento , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos
9.
Curr Opin Investig Drugs ; 10(12): 1334-45, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19943205

RESUMO

Angiogenesis is a complex, multistep process that is involved in the progression and prognosis of several types of cancer. In particular, it has been demonstrated that angiogenesis plays a central role in the progression of breast cancer. This review evaluates results from clinical trials in which the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutic agents was compared with that of novel antiangiogenic compounds for the treatment of breast cancer, and provides a summary of trials that were ongoing at the time of publication in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neovascularização Patológica/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Prognóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA