RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current knowledge of the role of the nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries is based on a few retrospective case series. Hence, consensus on which patients can be treated nonoperatively does not exist. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes after nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: In this study, patients were collected by recruiting all computer tomography-confirmed Lisfranc injuries treated during a 5-year period at a major trauma hospital. Between 2 and 6 years after suffering the injury, patients completed the visual analogue scale foot and ankle questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 55 patients returned adequately completed questionnaires and were included in the study. Of those, 22 patients had avulsion fractures and 33 had simple non-displaced intra-articular fractures. Of these patients, 30 (55%) scored over 90 points in both the pain and function subscales of the VAS-FA, and 35 (64%) scored over 90 points overall. In addition, three (5%) patients scored under 60 points in both the pain and function subscales of the VAS-FA, and four (7%) scored under 60 points overall. Only one patient with avulsion fractures underwent secondary surgery. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative treatment has a role in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries, and the results of our study support the view that avulsion and simple intra-articular fractures with < 2 mm of displacement can be treated nonoperatively with high functional outcomes. The results of nonoperative and operative treatment should be compared in a prospective randomized controlled study setting in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.
Assuntos
Ossos do Pé/lesões , Fraturas Ósseas , Luxações Articulares , Adulto , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Injury of the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint complex, known as Lisfranc injury, covers a wide range of injuries from subtle ligamentous injuries to severely displaced crush injuries. Although it is known that these injuries are commonly missed, the literature on the accuracy of the diagnostics is limited. The diagnostic accuracy of non-weight-bearing radiography (inter- or intraobserver reliability), however, has not previously been assessed among patients with Lisfranc injury. METHODS: One hundred sets of foot radiographs acquired due to acute foot injury were collected and anonymised. The diagnosis of these patients was confirmed with a CT scan. In one-third of the radiographs, there was no Lisfranc injury; in one-third, a nondisplaced (< 2 mm) injury; and in one-third, a displaced injury. The radiographs were assessed independently by three senior orthopaedic surgeons and three orthopaedic surgery residents. RESULTS: Fleiss kappa (κ) coefficient for interobserver reliability resulted in moderate correlation κ = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.45- 0.55) (first evaluation) and κ = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) (second evaluation). After three months, the evaluation was repeated and the Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient for intraobserver reliability showed substantial correlation κ = 0.71 (from 0.64 to 0.85). The mean (range) sensitivity was 76.1% (60.6-92.4) and specificity was 85.3% (52.9-100). The sensitivity of subtle injuries was lower than severe injuries (65.4% vs 87.1% p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of Lisfranc injury based on non-weight-bearing radiographs has moderate agreement between observers and substantial agreement between the same observer in different moments. A substantial number (24%) of injuries are missed if only non-weight-bearing radiographs are used. Nondisplaced injuries were more commonly missed than displaced injuries, and therefore, special caution should be used when the clinical signs are subtle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Assuntos
Traumatismos do Pé/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Humanos , Diagnóstico Ausente , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/normas , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia/normas , Radiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral cartilage deterioration and osteoarthritis are reported to be associated with recurrent patellar dislocation. However, the association between first-time traumatic patellar dislocation and cartilage deterioration is unknown. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess long-term cartilage deterioration in the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint after conservatively treated traumatic lateral patellar dislocation. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Twenty patients (mean age, 25 years) who sustained first-time traumatic lateral patellar dislocation with no previous patellofemoral instability symptoms were initially scanned with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A follow-up 3-T MRI was conducted, on average, 8 years after first-time lateral patellar dislocation. Subjective instability symptoms and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were also assessed. RESULTS: In the primary MRI, patellofemoral cartilage injury was seen in 14 of 20 patients (70%). Most (14/15) of the injuries were seen in the patellar cartilage, especially at the medial facet. On the follow-up MRI, patellofemoral cartilage deterioration was visible for all patients. The central patella ( P = .005) seemed especially prone to cartilage deterioration during the follow-up. Half of the patients (10/20) had grade 3-4 cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint in the follow-up MRI. In the primary MRI, only 1 patient exhibited tibiofemoral joint cartilage lesions, whereas at the time of follow-up, 10 of 20 patients exhibited tibiofemoral cartilage lesions. The majority of these lesions were considered clinically nonsignificant (International Cartilage Repair Society = 1) and were seen in the lateral compartment (6/10, 60%). Of the 14 patients (36%) with injury to the patellar cartilage, 5 reported subsequent instability of the patellofemoral joint, but this was not associated with more significant cartilage deterioration in the follow-up MRI compared with patients without redislocation. CONCLUSION: While recurrent lateral patellar dislocation is known to lead to degenerative process, a single first-time or infrequently recurring traumatic lateral patellar dislocation also seems to be associated with gradual cartilage deterioration. Traumatic lateral patellar dislocation might initiate gradual degeneration of the cartilage in the patellofemoral joint and can lead to the development of generalized knee osteoarthritis. Instability symptoms of the patellofemoral joint, however, were not related to the severity of the deterioration.