RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Describe the diagnosis and management of a spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak (sCSF-L) through the facial nerve fallopian canal and determine the role of intracranial hypertension (IH). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case study and systematic review of the literature. METHODS: Reviewed patient characteristics, radiographic findings, and management of the facial nerve canal CSF leak and postoperative IH. Conducted systematic literature review according to the PRISMA guidelines for surgical management and rates of IH. RESULTS: A 50-year-old female with bilateral tegmen defects and temporal encephaloceles underwent left middle cranial fossa (MCF) repair. Intraoperative CSF egressed from the temporal bone tegmen defects. Facial nerve decompression revealed CSF leak from the labyrinthine segment. A nonocclusive temporalis muscle plug was placed in the fallopian canal, and tegmen repair was completed with bone cement. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed for IH. Postoperative facial nerve function and hearing were normal. A total of 20 studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 25 unique patients. Of 13 total adult cases of fallopian canal CSF leak, there is a 46% recurrence rate, and 86% of patients had documented IH when tested. CONCLUSIONS: Fallopian canal CSF leaks are rare and challenging to manage. Assessment of intracranial hypertension and CSF diversion is recommended along with MCF skull base repair to preserve facial nerve function and conductive hearing.
Assuntos
Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano , Hipertensão Intracraniana , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão Intracraniana/cirurgia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/cirurgia , Derivação Ventriculoperitoneal , Encefalocele/cirurgia , Nervo Facial/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anosmia and hyposmia significantly affect patients' quality of life and have many etiologies, including trauma, inflammatory conditions including chronic rhinosinusitis, neoplasm, and viral infections, such as rhinovirus and SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to establish whether a consensus exists regarding optimal management of olfactory dysfunction and to provide insight into the treatment of anosmia in the current climate of increased prevalence secondary to COVID-19. Thus, we aimed to systematically review the literature on the management of non-Chronic-rhinosinusitis- related anosmia/hyposmia. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published since January 1990 using terms combined with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We included articles evaluating management of anosmia and hyposmia written in the English language, with original data, a minimum of 3 months of follow-up except for COVID-related studies, at least 2 patients, and well-defined and measurable outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3013 unique titles were returned upon the initial search. Of these, 297 abstracts were examined, yielding 19 full texts meeting inclusion criteria (8 with level 1 evidence, 3 with level 2, 1 with level 3, and 7 with level 4). The studies included a total of 1522 subjects, with follow up ranging from 3 to 72 months, with an exception for COVID related studies. Endpoints were based on clinically significant improvements of olfactory functions as measured through validated smell tests. Treatments with the most robust data were intranasal corticosteroids and olfactory training. CONCLUSION: The literature on the treatment of anosmia and hyposmia includes randomized trials showing the efficacy of a few modalities. While further research is needed to expand therapeutic options for this debilitating condition, the current literature supports the use of olfactory training and topical corticosteroids.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos do Olfato , Sinusite , Humanos , Anosmia , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Transtornos do Olfato/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Olfato , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: No reported outcome measures have been established to evaluate sensor lead function in the hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS). This study describes the development of novel functional outcome measures for intraoperative sensor electrode function and compares 2-incision and 3-incision outcomes for HNS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent HNS between June 2019 and September 2021. Demographic information, intraoperative findings, and immediate postoperative outcomes were recorded. Structured parameters were developed to compare intraoperative waveforms with six outcome measures utilized: waveform syncing, waveform amplitude, sensory current leakage, shark-fin morphology, cardiac artifact, and overall impression. Two sleep surgeons and two sleep medicine specialists compared all waveforms in a blinded fashion and assigned scores on the Likert Scale. RESULTS: The cohort included 50 three-incision and 50 two-incision patients. Age, gender, average body mass index, comorbidity profiles, and sleep endoscopy findings did not significantly differ between the two groups. No major complications occurred. The interclass-correlation-coefficient was greater than 0.7 for all comparisons (good to very good interrater reliability). There was no difference in waveform amplitude, cardiac artifact, sensory current leakage, or shark-fin morphology between the two groups. Waveform syncing and overall impression were statistically better in the 2-incision cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to define a structured method of HNS sensor electrode outcome measurement and showed consistent measures by surgeons and sleep medicine specialists. This article supports the transition to the 2-incision technique among surgeons for placement of the sensor lead. Consideration should be given to utilizing this novel tool in the clinical/research setting and validating these measures moving forward. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:423-430, 2023.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nervo Hipoglosso/cirurgia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anosmia and hyposmia have many etiologies, including trauma, chronic sinusitis, neoplasms, and respiratory viral infections such as rhinovirus and SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the diagnostic evaluation of anosmia/hyposmia. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published since January 1990 using terms combined with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We included articles evaluating diagnostic modalities for anosmia, written in the English language, used original data, and had two or more patients. RESULTS: A total of 2065 unique titles were returned upon the initial search. Of these, 226 abstracts were examined, yielding 27 full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria (Level of evidence ranging from 1 to 4; most level 2). The studies included a total of 13,577 patients. The most utilized diagnostic tools were orthonasal smell tests (such as the Sniffin' Sticks and the UPSIT, along with validated abridged smell tests). Though various imaging modalities (including MRI and CT) were frequently mentioned in the workup of olfactory dysfunction, routine imaging was not used to primarily diagnose smell loss. CONCLUSION: The literature includes several studies on validity and reliability for various smell tests in diagnosing anosmia. Along with a thorough history and physical, validated orthonasal smell tests should be part of the workup of the patient with suspected olfactory dysfunction. The most widely studied modality was MRI, but criteria for the timing and sequence of imaging modalities was heterogenous.