Evaluating the Functional Equivalency of Test Organism Performance in Negative and Solvent Controls During Chronic Sediment Ecotoxicity Studies Based on US Environmental Protection Agency Guidance.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) considers sediment toxicity tests as conditional registration requirements for pesticides with soil Kd ≥50 L/kg-solid, Koc ≥1000 L/kg-organic carbon, or log Kow ≥3. The hydrophobicity of these compounds often necessitates use of solvents to ensure accurate and homogeneous dosing of spiked-sediment studies. For sediment tests, a volatile solvent (e.g., acetone) is generally used as a transient carrier. Due to low water solubility, test material is dissolved in a volatile solvent to create stock solutions. A measured aliquot of stock solution is then mixed with sand substrate, after which the solvent is evaporated. This spiking process results in negligible solvent exposure to organisms. In 2016, USEPA released final ecotoxicity test guidelines for subchronic freshwater (850.1735) and marine (850.1740) sediment test. These methods provide an option for conducting experiments with only a solvent control and no negative control. To adopt this testing strategy, functional equivalency between the negative and solvent control must be demonstrated. These test guidelines describe specific factors that should be considered for evaluating functional equivalency, including (a) the concentration of solvent in the test sediment after evaporation, (b) the levels of solvent that are known to affect organism health, (c) the known impurities in the solvent and their potential impact on organism health, and (d) the historical organism performance of solvent versus negative controls. Our analysis considers these factors and overall supports the elimination of the negative control requirement because this change is unlikely to impact the robustness or interpretability of spiked-sediment toxicity tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;00:1-7. © 2023 CropLife America. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Toward Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for North America.

Anticipating, identifying, and prioritizing strategic needs represent essential activities by research organizations. Decided benefits emerge when these pursuits engage globally important environment and health goals, including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. To this end, horizon scanning efforts can facilitate identification of specific research needs to address grand challenges. We report and discuss 40 priority research questions following engagement of scientists and engineers in North America. These timely questions identify the importance of stimulating innovation and developing new methods, tools, and concepts in environmental chemistry and toxicology to improve assessment and management of chemical contaminants and other diverse environmental stressors. Grand challenges to achieving sustainable management of the environment are becoming increasingly complex and structured by global megatrends, which collectively challenge existing sustainable environmental quality efforts. Transdisciplinary, systems-based approaches will be required to define and avoid adverse biological effects across temporal and spatial gradients. Similarly, coordinated research activities among organizations within and among countries are necessary to address the priority research needs reported here. Acquiring answers to these 40 research questions will not be trivial, but doing so promises to advance sustainable environmental quality in the 21st century. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1606-1624. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.