Core Needle Biopsy in Lymphoma Diagnosis: The Diagnostic Performance and the Role of the Multidisciplinary Approach in the Optimization of Results.

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies (CNBs) and surgical excisional biopsies (SEBs), samples of lymphoid proliferation from a single institution from 2013 to 2017 (N=476) were divided into groups of CNB (N=218) and SEB (N=258). The diagnostic accuracy of these samples was evaluated as a percentage of conclusive diagnosis, according to the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues . The contribution of clinical data, the assessment of sample adequacy by a pathologist during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, the needle gauge, the ancillary tests, and the type of lymphoid proliferation were also examined. The diagnostic accuracy of SEB was 97.3% and CNB 91.3% ( P =0.010). Additional factors considered essential for establishing the final diagnosis in some cases were: clinical information (20.6% CNB, 7.4% SEB; P <0.001); immunohistochemistry (96.3% CNB, 91.5% SEB; P =0.024); flow cytometry (12% CNB, 6.8% SEB; P =0.165); and other complementary tests (8.2% CNB, 17.3% SEB; P =0.058). Factors that did not influence performance were the evaluation of sample adequacy during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, and the needle gauge. Increased percentage of nondiagnostic CNB was observed in T-cell lymphomas (30%), followed by classic Hodgkin lymphoma (10.6%). The main limitation of CNB was the evaluation of morphologically heterogenous diseases. CNB is useful and safe in lymphoma diagnosis provided it is carried out by a team of experienced professionals. Having an interventional radiology team engaged with pathology is an essential component to achieve adequate rates of specific diagnoses in CNB specimens.

Effect of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether tocilizumab improves clinical outcomes for patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). DESIGN: Randomised, open label trial. SETTING: Nine hospitals in Brazil, 8 May to 17 July 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with confirmed covid-19 who were receiving supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation and had abnormal levels of at least two serum biomarkers (C reactive protein, D dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, or ferritin). The data monitoring committee recommended stopping the trial early, after 129 patients had been enrolled, because of an increased number of deaths at 15 days in the tocilizumab group. INTERVENTIONS: Tocilizumab (single intravenous infusion of 8 mg/kg) plus standard care (n=65) versus standard care alone (n=64). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome, clinical status measured at 15 days using a seven level ordinal scale, was analysed as a composite of death or mechanical ventilation because the assumption of odds proportionality was not met. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were enrolled (mean age 57 (SD 14) years; 68% men) and all completed follow-up. All patients in the tocilizumab group and two in the standard care group received tocilizumab. 18 of 65 (28%) patients in the tocilizumab group and 13 of 64 (20%) in the standard care group were receiving mechanical ventilation or died at day 15 (odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 3.66; P=0.32). Death at 15 days occurred in 11 (17%) patients in the tocilizumab group compared with 2 (3%) in the standard care group (odds ratio 6.42, 95% confidence interval 1.59 to 43.2). Adverse events were reported in 29 of 67 (43%) patients who received tocilizumab and 21 of 62 (34%) who did not receive tocilizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe or critical covid-19, tocilizumab plus standard care was not superior to standard care alone in improving clinical outcomes at 15 days, and it might increase mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04403685.

Whole-Body Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Diagnostic Criteria.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell proliferative disorder characterized by primary infiltration of bone marrow and excessive production of abnormal immunoglobulin. This disease is the second most common hematologic malignancy (after lymphoma), and its spectrum of characteristic features are widely known by the acronym CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal impairment, anemia, and bone lesions). Traditionally, the diagnosis and treatment of MM have been triggered by clear end-organ damage. However, owing to recently introduced treatment options that can extend patient survival and the increasing recognition of biomarkers that can be used to identify patients at high risk of progression to active disease, the diagnostic criteria have been revised. Bone disease is one of the most prominent features of MM, and imaging has an important role in diagnosis and follow-up, with each whole-body imaging modality having different indications in distinct disease situations. Skeletal survey has been the standard imaging procedure used during the past decade, but it should no longer be used unless it is the only option. Whole-body low-dose CT is a reasonable and cost-effective initial imaging approach. Whole-body MRI is the most sensitive technique for detecting bone involvement and assessing painful complications. PET/CT is the best tool for evaluating treatment response. The importance of radiologists has increased in this scenario. Therefore, to properly assist hematologists and improve the care of patients with MM, it is essential that radiologists know the updated diagnostic criteria for MM, indications for and limitations of each imaging option, and recommendations for follow-up. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2019.

Recommendations for quality assurance in multiparametric flow cytometry: first consensus of the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry (GBCFLUX) / Recomendações para garantia da qualidade em citometria de fluxo multiparamétrica: primeiro consenso do Grupo Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo (GBCFLUX)

ABSTRACT The Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry (Grupo Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo [GBCFLUX]), founded on April 24, 2010, is composed of experts in flow cytometry (FC) area who have the common objective of contributing to technical and scientific advances in Brazilian clinical and research laboratories. Among GBCFLUX working groups, the Quality Control (QC) subcommittee is responsible for discussing data in the literature and contributes to the quality assurance of the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical process in FC. The QC subcommittee's actions began through meetings and lectures, in which data from the literature were reviewed and discussed with all participating members of the GBCFLUX. In a second step, it was decided to draw up a text of technical and scientific consensus recommendations, informative and educative, for dissemination to all FC working groups in Brazil. To this effect, a questionnaire with objective responses was designed and sent to 35 recognized Brazilian institutions, in order to evaluate the QC profile of these institutions. Thus, the QC technical-scientific recommendations, which will be described in this updating article, are intended to ensure the process quality, technical standardization, and reproducibility of results in FC.

RESUMO O Grupo Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo (GBCFLUX), fundado em 24 de abril de 2010, é composto por especialistas da área de citometria de fluxo (CF) que possuem o objetivo comum de contribuir para avanços técnico-científicos em laboratórios clínicos e de pesquisa brasileiros. Entre os grupos de trabalho do GBCFLUX, o subcomitê de Controle de Qualidade (CQ) é responsável por discutir dados da literatura e contribuir para a garantia da qualidade do processo pré-analítico, analítico e pós-analítico em CF. As ações do subcomitê de CQ iniciaram-se por meio de reuniões e palestras, nas quais dados da literatura foram revisados e discutidos com todos os membros participantes do GBCFLUX. Em uma segunda etapa, definiu-se elaborar um texto de recomendações consensuais técnicocientíficas, informativas e educativas para divulgação a todos os grupos que trabalham com CF no Brasil. Para tanto, foi elaborado um questionário com respostas objetivas, sendo enviado para 35 instituições brasileiras cadastradas, com a finalidade de avaliar o perfil de CQ dessas instituições. Dessa forma, as recomendações técnico-científicas de CQ que serão descritas neste artigo de atualização têm o objetivo de contribuir para a garantia da qualidade do processo, a padronização técnica e a reprodutibilidade dos resultados em CF.

First proposed panels on acute leukemia for four-color immunophenotyping by flow cytometry from the Brazilian group of flow cytometry-GBCFLUX.

Multiparameter flow cytometry is a highly sensitive, fast, and specific diagnostic technology with a wide range of applicability in hematology. Although well-established eight-color immunophenotyping panels are already available, most Brazilian clinical laboratories are equipped with four-color flow cytometer facilities. Based on this fact, the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry (Grupo Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo, GBCFLUX) for standardization of clinical flow cytometry has proposed an antibody panel designed to allow precise diagnosis and characterization of acute leukemia (AL) within resource-restricted areas. Morphological analysis of bone marrow smears, together with the screening panel, is mandatory for the primary identification of AL. The disease-oriented panels proposed here are divided into three levels of recommendations (mandatory, recommendable, and optional) in order to provide an accurate final diagnosis, as well as allow some degree of flexibility based on available local resources and patient-specific needs. The proposed panels will be subsequently validated in an interlaboratory study to evaluate its effectiveness on the diagnosis and classification of AL. (Assoc editor comm. 2).

"First proposed panels on acute leukemia for four-color immunophenotyping by flow cytometry from the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry - GBCFLUX"

Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is a highly sensitive, fast and specific diagnostic technology with a wide range of applicability in hematology. Although well-established eight-color immunophenotyping panels are already available, most Brazilian clinical laboratories are equipped with four-color flow cytometer facilities. Based on this fact, the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry (Grupo Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo, GBCFLUX) for standardization of clinical flow cytometry has proposed an antibody panel designed to allow precise diagnosis and characterization of acute leukemia (AL) within resource-restricted areas. Morphological analysis of bone marrow smears, together with the screening panel, is mandatory for the primary identification of AL. The disease-oriented panels proposed here are divided into three levels of recommendations (mandatory, recommendable and optional) in order to provide an accurate final diagnosis, as well as allow some degree of flexibility based on available local resources and patient-specific needs. The proposed panels will be subsequently validated in an inter-laboratory study to evaluate its effectiveness on the diagnosis and classification of AL. © 2014 Clinical Cytometry Society.

CD200 has an important role in the differential diagnosis of mature B-cell neoplasms by multiparameter flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Multiparameter flow cytometry is a useful tool for the diagnostic evaluation of mature B-cell neoplasms (MBN). Recently, it has been shown that CD200 may improve the distinction between chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; CD200+) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; CD200-), but the role of CD200 expression in atypical CLL and other MBN remains to be established. METHODS: To address this issue, we investigated the expression of CD200 in 159 consecutive cases of MBN. RESULTS: CD200 was strongly expressed in CLL and was revealed to be an excellent marker to distinguish CLL from MCL, even in cases of atypical CLL. However, lack of CD200 was not an exclusive finding of MCL, being also observed in other MBNs. Furthermore, CD200 was highly expressed in hairy cell leukemia, being useful in the differential diagnosis of lymphomas with villous lymphocytes. Herein, we propose an algorithm to classify CD5+ MBNs based on the expression of CD200, CD11c, heavy chain immunoglobulins, and Matutes score. CONCLUSIONS: These results expand the understanding of the CD200 expression in MBNs, giving further support for the inclusion of this marker in the routine investigation by flow cytometry.

CD200 has an important role in the differential diagnosis of mature B-cell neoplasms by multiparameter flow cytometry.

Background: Multiparameter flow cytometry is a useful tool for the diagnostic evaluation of mature B-cell neoplasms (MBN). Recently, it has been shown that CD200 may improve the distinction between chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; CD200+) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; CD200-), but the role of CD200 expression in atypical CLL and other MBN remains to be established. Methods: To address this issue, we investigated the expression of CD200 in 159 consecutive cases of MBN. Results: CD200 was strongly expressed in CLL and was revealed to be an excellent marker to distinguish CLL from MCL, even in cases of atypical CLL. However, lack of CD200 was not an exclusive finding of MCL, being also observed in other MBNs. Furthermore, CD200 was highly expressed in hairy cell leukemia, being useful in the differential diagnosis of lymphomas with villous lymphocytes. Herein, we propose an algorithm to classify CD5+ MBNs based on the expression of CD200, CD11c, heavy chain immunoglobulins and Matutes score. Conclusions: These results expand the understanding of the CD200 expression in MBNs, giving further support for the inclusion of this marker in the routine investigation by flow cytometry. © 2013 Clinical Cytometry Society.

Combined flow cytometric assessment of CD45, HLA-DR, CD34, and CD117 expression is a useful approach for reliable quantification of blast cells in myelodysplastic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of bone marrow (BM) blasts by cytomorphology is essential for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Owing to its subjectivity and the potential impact of dysplastic features on accurate identification of blast cells, more objective approaches are required, multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) being a particularly promising approach in this regard. However, no consensus exists about the optimal combination of markers and strategy to be used. METHODS: BM blast counts from 74 MDS patients were evaluated by morphology versus four different MFC phenotypic criteria: "CD34⁺", "CD34⁺ and/or CD117⁺", "CD34⁺, and/or CD117⁺ HLA-DR⁺", and "CD34⁺ and CD117⁺ HLA-DR⁺ plus CD64⁺ CD14(-/lo) " cells. For each criterium, the percentage of blasts was calculated using either all BM nucleated cells or non-erythroid CD45⁺ cells as denominator. RESULTS.: The number of "CD34⁺ and/or CD117⁺ HLA-DR⁺"cells showed the highest correlation and agreement with morphological counts, only a minor proportion of cases being misclassified by MFC vs. morphology for the >5% and >10% classification thresholds. In turn, a CD34⁺ phenotype was insufficient to correctly identify and quantify blasts. Conversely, usage of non-erythroid BM cells as denominator, or inclusion of "CD34⁺ and/or CD117⁺ HLA-DR⁺ plus CD64⁺ CD14(-lo") cells were both associated with overestimated blast counts. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of "CD34⁺ and/or CD117⁺ HLA-DR⁺" cells (from all nucleated BM cells) by MFC is an efficient method for the enumeration of blasts in MDS. However, caution should be taken with replacing morphology by MFC blast counts; its combined use may rather provide complementary information increasing the accuracy and reproducibility of BM blast cell counts in these patients.

Altered immunophenotypic features of peripheral blood platelets in myelodysplastic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Multiparameter flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow and peripheral blood cells has proven to be of help in the diagnostic workup of myelodysplastic syndromes. However, the usefulness of flow cytometry for the detection of megakaryocytic and platelet dysplasia has not yet been investigated. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate by flow cytometry the diagnostic and prognostic value of platelet dysplasia in myelodysplastic syndromes. DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated the pattern of expression of distinct surface glycoproteins on peripheral blood platelets from a series of 44 myelodysplastic syndrome patients, 20 healthy subjects and 19 patients with platelet alterations associated to disease conditions other than myelodysplastic syndromes. Quantitative expression of CD31, CD34, CD36, CD41a, CD41b, CD42a, CD42b and CD61 glycoproteins together with the PAC-1, CD62-P, fibrinogen and CD63 platelet activation-associated markers and platelet light scatter properties were systematically evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, flow cytometry identified multiple immunophenotypic abnormalities on platelets of myelodysplastic syndrome patients, including altered light scatter characteristics, over-and under expression of specific platelet glycoproteins and asynchronous expression of CD34; decreased expression of CD36 (n = 5), CD42a (n = 1) and CD61 (n = 2), together with reactivity for CD34 (n = 1) were only observed among myelodysplastic syndrome cases, while other alterations were also found in other platelet disorders. Based on the overall platelet alterations detected for each patient, an immunophenotypic score was built which identified a subgroup of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with a high rate of moderate to severe alterations (score>1.5; n = 16) who more frequently showed thrombocytopenia, megakaryocytic dysplasia and high-risk disease, together with a shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the presence of altered phenotypes by flow cytometry on platelets from around half of the myelodysplastic syndrome patients studied. If confirmed in larger series of patients, these findings may help refine the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of this group of disorders.

Leucemia eosinofílica crônica com expressão do rearranjo FIPILI-PDGFRa-realto ce caso e revisão da literatura / Chronic easinophilic leukemia with a FIPILI-PDGFRa fuison - case report and literature review

A eosinofilia no sangue e em tecidos está habitualmente associada a condições alérgicas, infecciosas, inflamatórias, neoplásicas, endocrinológicas, uso de medicamentos e exposição a agentes tóxicos. No entanto, pode ocorrer proliferação eosinofílica primária, sem causa aparente ou por expansão clonal da célula-tronco hematopoética. As neoplasias mielo ou linfoproliferativas associadas a rearranjos gênicos como PDGFRα, PDGFRβ e FGFR1 constituem condições raras nas quais ocorre mieloproliferação crônica, alterações no sangue periférico e na medula óssea e lesão tecidual de diferentes órgãos, a partir da liberação de citocinas e fatores humorais pelos grânulos eosinofílicos. A presença do rearranjo PDGFRα relaciona-se comumente à leucemia eosinofílica crônica, com envolvimento de mastócitos e neutrófilos e, mais raramente, à leucemia mielóide aguda ou ao linfoma linfoblástico T, com eosinofilia. O rearranjo PDGFRα mais comum é aquele resultante da deleção intersticial no braço longo do cromossomo 4, que permite a formação de um neogene a partir da fusão dos genes FIP1L1 e PDGFRα. Este codifica uma tirosino-quinase constitutivamente ativa que é inibida pelo mesilato de imatinibe. Em 2002 foi relatado o uso bem sucedido de mesilato de imatinibe em baixas doses em um paciente com síndrome hipereosinofilica e, desde então, vem-se utilizando esta droga com respostas clínicas rápidas, completas e duradouras. Descrevemos um caso de LEC com expressão do rearranjo FIP1L1-PDGFRα.

Chronic eosinophilia is habitually associated with allergic, infectious, inflammatory, neoplastic and endocrine conditions and exposure to certain drugs and toxic agents. However, eosinophilic proliferation may be primary, without identifiable causes, or provoked by clonal hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Gene fusions involving PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, and FGFR1 predispose patients to rare conditions with chronic myeloproliferation or lymphoproliferation, alterations in peripheral blood and bone marrow and diffuse tissue injury due to the release of cytokines and humoral factors from eosinophilic granules. The presence of the PDGFR-α rearrangement is commonly related to chronic eosinophilic leukemia, with alterations in peripheral mastocytes and neutrophils, and rarely to acute myeloid leukemia or T lymphoblastic lymphoma with eosinophilia. The most prevalent PDGFR-α rearrangement is one resulting from an interstitial deletion in the long arm of chromosome 4, that allows the formation of a neogene from the fusion of the FIP1L1 and PDGFRα genes. This codes a constitutively active tyrosine kinase, which can be inhibited by imatinib mesylate. In 2002, the successful treatment of a patient using imatinib to treat hypereosinophilic syndrome was reported. Since then, this drug has been utilized with fast, complete and lasting clinical responses. Here we describe a case of chronic eosinophilic syndrome with expression of the FIP1L1-PDGFR-α rearrangement.