Neural networks involved in nausea in adult humans: A systematic review.

Nausea is a common clinical symptom, poorly managed with anti-emetic drugs. To identify potential brain regions which may be therapeutic targets we systematically reviewed brain imaging in subjects reporting nausea. The systematic review followed PRISMA statements with methodological quality (MINORS) and risk of bias (ROBINS-I) assessed. Irrespective of the nauseagenic stimulus the common (but not only) cortical structures activated were the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the anterior insula (AIns) with some evidence for lateralization (Left-IFG, Right-AIns, Right-ACC). Basal ganglia structures (e.g., putamen) were also consistently activated. Inactivation was rarely reported but occurred mainly in the cerebellum and occipital lobe. During nausea, functional connectivity increased, mainly between the posterior and mid- cingulate cortex. Limitations include, a paucity of studies and stimuli, subject demographics, inconsistent definition and measurement of nausea. Structures implicated in nausea are discussed in the context of knowledge of central pathways for interoception, emotion and autonomic control. Comparisons are made between nausea and other aversive sensations as multimodal aversive conscious experiences.

Farnesoid X receptor - a molecular predictor of weight loss after vertical sleeve gastrectomy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the expression of the bile acid receptor, farnesoid X (FXR), in human gastric mucosa and investigate correlations between expression and body-mass index (BMI) and in patients with obesity, with changes in weight and BMI following vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG). METHODS: Human gastric mucosa was obtained from normal/overweight individuals (macroscopically-normal tissue following surgery for malignancy) or from patients with obesity (VSG). The expression of FXR and its isoforms (FXRα, FXRß) were examined by quantitative PCR and compared with the G protein-coupled bile acid receptor, GPBA. In patients with obesity, changes in BMI and weight loss were determined following VSG. RESULTS: FXRα was the predominant isoform in normal/overweight individuals. FXR expression was higher in patients with obesity but GPBA receptor expression was unchanged. For those with obesity (n = 19), no correlation was found between FXR expression and change in Body-Mass Index (BMI)/month or weight loss/month, taken 3 ± 1 months after surgery, or in BMI or weight at surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with increased FXR expression in the gastric mucosa. The findings are preliminary but suggest that this increase in FXR expression is a consequence of obesity, rather than its cause.

Regionally dependent neuromuscular functions of motilin and 5-HT4 receptors in human isolated esophageal body and gastric fundus.

BACKGROUND: Motilin agonists promote human gastric motility and cholinergic activity, but excitatory and inhibitory actions are reported in the esophagus. The effect of 5-HT4 agonists in esophagus is also unclear. Perhaps the use of drugs with additional actions explains the variation. The aim, therefore, was to examine how motilin and prucalopride, selective motilin and 5-HT4 receptor agonists, modulate neuromuscular functions in human esophagus and gastric fundus. METHODS: Electrical field stimulation (EFS) evoked nerve-mediated contractions of circular and longitudinal muscle from human esophageal body and circular muscle from gastric fundus. KEY RESULTS: In esophageal circular muscle EFS evoked brief contraction, followed by another contraction on termination of EFS, each prevented by atropine. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition facilitated contraction during EFS and the overall contraction became monophasic. In esophagus longitudinal muscle and gastric fundus, EFS evoked cholinergically mediated, monophasic contractions, attenuated by simultaneous nitrergic activation. Motilin (100-300 nM) reduced esophagus circular muscle contractions during EFS, unaffected by L-NAME or apamin. Motilin 300 nM also reduced EFS-evoked contractions of longitudinal muscle. Similar concentrations of motilin facilitated cholinergic activity in the fundus and increased baseline muscle tension. Prucalopride facilitated EFS-evoked contractions in esophagus (tested at 30 µM) and fundus (0.1-30 µM). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Selective motilin and 5-HT4 agonists have different, region-dependent abilities to modulate human esophageal and stomach neuromuscular activity, exemplified by weak inhibition (motilin) or excitation (5-HT4) in esophageal body and excitation for both in stomach. In different patients with motility dysfunctions, motilin and 5-HT4 agonists may reduce gastro-esophageal reflux in different ways.

Drugs acting at 5-HT4 , D2 , motilin, and ghrelin receptors differ markedly in how they affect neuromuscular functions in human isolated stomach.

BACKGROUND: Progress in identifying safer, effective drugs to increase gastric emptying is impeded by failed clinical trials. One potential reason for failure is lack of translation from animal models to the human condition. To make progress, the actions of existing drugs and new therapeutic candidates need to be understood in human isolated stomach. METHODS: Neuromuscular activities were evoked in human gastric antrum circular muscle by electrical field stimulation (EFS), defined phenotypically using pharmacological tools. KEY RESULTS: EFS evoked cholinergically mediated contractions, attenuated by simultaneous nitrergic activation. The 5-HT4 receptor agonist/D2 antagonist metoclopramide and the selective 5-HT4 agonist prucalopride, facilitated contractions in the absence (respectively, Emax 95 ± 29% and 42 ± 9%, n = 3-6 each concentration) and presence (139 ± 38%, 55 ± 13%, n = 3-5) of the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME, without affecting submaximal contractions to carbachol; the 5-HT4 antagonist SB204070 prevented facilitation by metoclopramide 100 µM (respectively, -5 (range -26 to 34) and 167 (12-1327)% in presence and absence; n = 5-6). The selective motilin receptor agonist camicinal provided considerably greater facilitation (478 (12-2080)% at 30 µM, n = 8). Domperidone (0.001-100 µM; n = 3-6) and acylated or des-acylated ghrelin (1-300 nM; n = 2-4) had no consistent activity, even with protease inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: 5-HT4 receptor agonists show different efficacies. Motilin receptor activation has greater potential to increase gastric emptying, whereas ghrelin and D2 receptor antagonism have no direct activity. Drugs stimulating human gastric motility directly can act regardless of disease mechanisms, whereas drugs without direct activity but an ability to block nausea/vomiting may be effective only if these symptoms exist.

Ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists: time to introduce bias into drug design.

Ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists increase gastric motility and are attractive drug targets. However, 14 years after the receptors were described (18-24 years since ligands became available) the inactivity of the ghrelin agonist TZP-102 in patients with gastroparesis joins the list of unsuccessful motilin agonists. Fundamental questions must be asked. Pustovit et al., have now shown that the ghrelin agonist ulimorelin evokes prolonged increases in rat colorectal propulsion yet responses to other ghrelin agonists fade. Similarly, different motilin agonists induce short- or long-lasting effects in a cell-dependent manner. Together, these and other data create the hypothesis that the receptors can be induced to preferentially signal ('biased agonism') via particular pathways to evoke different responses with therapeutic advantages/disadvantages. Biased agonism has been demonstrated for ghrelin. Are motilin agonists which cause long-lasting facilitation of human stomach cholinergic function (compared with motilin) biased agonists (e.g., camicinal, under development for patients with gastric hypo-motility)? For ghrelin, additional complications exist because the therapeutic aims/mechanisms of action are uncertain, making it difficult to select the best (biased) agonist. Will ghrelin agonists be useful treatments of nausea and/or as suggested by Pustovit et al., chronic constipation? How does ghrelin increase gastric motility? As gastroparesis symptoms poorly correlate with delayed gastric emptying (yet gastro-prokinetic drugs can provide relief: e.g., low-dose erythromycin), would low doses of ghrelin and motilin agonists relieve symptoms simply by restoring neuromuscular rhythm? These questions on design and functions need addressing if ghrelin and motilin agonists are to reach patients as drugs.

Cholinergic interactions between donepezil and prucalopride in human colon: potential to treat severe intestinal dysmotility.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cholinesterase inhibitors such as neostigmine are used for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, but cardio-bronchial side-effects limit use. To minimize side-effects, lower doses could be combined with a 5-HT4 receptor agonist, which also facilitates intestinal cholinergic activity. However, safety concerns, especially in the elderly, require drugs with good selectivity of action. These include the AChE inhibitor donepezil (used for Alzheimer's disease, with reduced cardio-bronchial liability) and prucalopride, the first selective, clinically available 5-HT4 receptor agonist. This study examined their individual and potential synergistic activities in human colon. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Neuronally mediated muscle contractions and relaxations of human colon were evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS) and defined phenotypically as cholinergic, nitrergic or tachykinergic using pharmacological tools; the effects of drugs were determined as changes in 'area under the curve'. KEY RESULTS: Prucalopride increased cholinergically mediated contractions (EC50 855 nM; 33% maximum increase), consistent with its ability to stimulate intestinal motility; donepezil (477%) and neostigmine (2326%) had greater efficacy. Concentrations of donepezil (30-100 nM) found in venous plasma after therapeutic doses had minimal ability to enhance cholinergic activity. However, donepezil (30 nM) together with prucalopride (3, 10 µM) markedly increased EFS-evoked contractions compared with prucalopride alone (P = 0.04). For example, the increases observed with donepezil and prucalopride 10 µM together or alone were, respectively, 105 ± 35%, 4 ± 6% and 35 ± 21% (n = 3-7, each concentration). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Potential synergy between prucalopride and donepezil activity calls for exploration of this combination as a safer, more effective treatment of colonic pseudo-obstruction.

Translational neuropharmacology: the use of human isolated gastrointestinal tissues.

Translational sciences increasingly emphasize the measurement of functions in native human tissues. However, such studies must confront variations in patient age, gender, genetic background and disease. Here, these are discussed with reference to neuromuscular and neurosecretory functions of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Tissues are obtained after informed consent, in collaboration with surgeons (surgical techniques help minimize variables) and pathologists. Given the difficulties of directly recording from human myenteric neurones (embedded between muscle layers), enteric motor nerve functions are studied by measuring muscle contractions/relaxations evoked by electrical stimulation of intrinsic nerves; responses are regionally dependent, often involving cholinergic and nitrergic phenotypes. Enteric sensory functions can be studied by evoking the peristaltic reflex, involving enteric sensory and motor nerves, but this has rarely been achieved. As submucosal neurones are more accessible (after removing the mucosa), direct neuronal recordings are possible. Neurosecretory functions are studied by measuring changes in short-circuit current across the mucosa. For all experiments, basic questions must be addressed. Because tissues are from patients, what are the controls and the influence of disease? How long does it take before function fully recovers? What is the impact of age- and gender-related differences? What is the optimal sample size? Addressing these and other questions minimizes variability and raises the scientific credibility of human tissue research. Such studies also reduce animal use. Further, the many differences between animal and human GI functions also means that human tissue research must question the ethical validity of using strains of animals with unproved translational significance.

Motilin: towards a new understanding of the gastrointestinal neuropharmacology and therapeutic use of motilin receptor agonists.

UNLABELLED: The gastrointestinal hormone motilin has been known about for >40 years, but after identification of its receptor and subsequent development of new tools and methods, a reappraisal of its actions is required. Firstly, it is important to note that motilin and ghrelin receptors are members of the same family (similar genomic organization, gastrointestinal distribution and abilities to stimulate gastrointestinal motility), yet each fails to recognize the ligand of the other; and whereas ghrelin and ghrelin receptors are widespread outside the gastrointestinal tract, motilin and its receptors are largely restricted to the gastrointestinal tract. Secondly, although some studies suggest motilin has activity in rodents, most do not, and receptor pseudogenes exist in rodents. Thirdly, motilin preferentially operates by facilitating enteric cholinergic activity rather than directly contracting the muscle, despite the relatively high expression of receptor immunoreactivity in muscle. This activity is ligand-dependent, with short-lasting actions of motilin contrasting with longer-lasting actions of the non-selective and selective motilin receptor agonists erythromycin and GSK962040. Finally, the use of erythromycin (also an antibiotic drug) to treat patients requiring acceleration of gastric emptying has led to concerns over safety and potential exacerbation of antibiotic resistance. Replacement motilin receptor agonists derived from erythromycin (motilides) have been unsuccessful. New, non-motilide, small molecule receptor agonists, designed to minimize self-desensitization, are now entering clinical trials for treating patients undergoing enteral feeding or with diabetic gastroparesis. Thus, for the translational pharmacologist, the study of motilin illustrates the need to avoid overreliance on artificial systems, on structural information and on animal studies. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Neuropeptides. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.170.issue-7.

Effects of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for oesophago-gastric cancer on neuro-muscular gastric function.

Delayed gastric emptying symptoms are often reported after chemotherapy. This study aims to characterise the effects of chemotherapy on gastric neuro-muscular function. Patients undergoing elective surgery for oesophago-gastric cancer were recruited. Acetylcholinesterase, nNOS, ghrelin receptor and motilin expressions were studied in gastric sections from patients receiving no chemotherapy (n = 3) or oesophageal (n = 2) or gastric (n = 2) chemotherapy. A scoring system quantified staining intensity (0-3; no staining to strong). Stomach sections were separately suspended in tissue baths for electrical field stimulation (EFS) and exposure to erythromycin or carbachol; three patients had no chemotherapy; four completed cisplatin-based chemotherapy within 6 weeks prior to surgery. AChE expression was markedly decreased after chemotherapy (scores 2.3 ± 0.7, 0.5 ± 0.2 and 0 ± 0 in non-chemotherapy, oesophageal- and gastric-chemotherapy groups (p < 0.03 each) respectively. Ghrelin receptor and motilin expression tended to increase (ghrelin: 0.7 ± 0.4 vs 2.0 ± 0.4 and 1.2 ± 0.2 respectively; p = 0.04 and p = 0.2; motilin: 0.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.2 ± 0.5 and 2.0 ± 0.7; p = 0.06 and p = 0.16). Maximal contraction to carbachol was 3.7 ± 0.7 g and 1.9 ± 0.8 g (longitudinal muscle) and 3.4 ± 0.4 g and 1.6 ± 0.6 (circular) in non-chemotherapy and chemotherapy tissues respectively (p < 0.05 each). There were loss of AChE and reduction in contractility to carbachol. The tendency for ghrelin receptors to increase suggests an attempt to upregulate compensating systems. Our study offers a mechanism by which chemotherapy markedly alters neuro-muscular gastric function.

Regional- and agonist-dependent facilitation of human neurogastrointestinal functions by motilin receptor agonists.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delayed gastric emptying is poorly managed. Motilin agonists are potential treatments but inadequate understanding into how enteric nerve functions are stimulated compromises drug/dose selection. Resolution is hampered by extreme species dependency so methods were developed to study human gastrointestinal neuromuscular activities and the neurobiology of motilin. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Protocols to study neuromuscular activities were developed for different regions of human stomach and intestine (71 patients) using circular muscle preparations and electrical field stimulation (EFS) of intrinsic nerves. Other tissues were fixed for immunohistochemistry. KEY RESULTS: EFS evoked contractions and/or relaxations via cholinergic and nitrergic neurons, with additional tachykinergic activity in colon; these were consistent after 154 min (longer if stored overnight). Motilin 1-300 nM and the selective motilin agonist GSK962040 0.1-30 µM acted pre-junctionally to strongly facilitate cholinergic contractions of the antrum (E(max) ≈ 1000% for motilin), with smaller increases in fundus, duodenum and ileum; high concentrations increased baseline muscle tension in fundus and small intestine. There were minimal effects in the colon. In the antrum, cholinergic facilitation by motilin faded irregularly, even with peptidase inhibitors, whereas facilitation by GSK962040 was long lasting. Motilin receptor immunoreactivity was identified in muscle and myenteric plexus predominantly in the upper gut, co-expressed with choline acetyltransferase in neurons. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Motilin and GSK962040 strongly facilitated cholinergic activity in the antrum, with lower activity in fundus and small intestine only. Facilitation by motilin was short lived, consistent with participation in migrating motor complexes. Long-lasting facilitation by GSK962040 suggests different receptor interactions and potential for clinical evaluation.

GSK962040: a small molecule motilin receptor agonist which increases gastrointestinal motility in conscious dogs.

BACKGROUND: GSK962040, a small molecule motilin receptor agonist, was identified to address the need for a safe, efficacious gastric prokinetic agent. However, as laboratory rodents lack a functional motilin system, studies in vivo have been limited to a single dose, which increased defecation in rabbits. Motilin agonists do not usually increase human colonic motility, so gastric prokinetic activity needs to be demonstrated. METHODS: The effect of intravenous GSK962040 on gastro-duodenal motility was assessed in fasted dogs implanted with strain gauges. Activity was correlated with blood plasma concentrations of GSK962040 (measured by HPLC-MS/MS) and potency of GSK962040 at the dog recombinant receptor [using a Fluorometric Imaging Plate Reader (Molecular Devices, Wokingham, UK) after expression in HEK293 cells]. KEY RESULTS: GSK962040 activated the dog motilin receptor (pEC(50) 5.79; intrinsic activity 0.72, compared with [Nle(13) ]-motilin). In vivo, GSK962040 induced phasic contractions, the duration of which was dose-related (48 and 173 min for 3 and 6 mg kg(-1) ), driven by mean plasma concentrations >1.14 µmol L(-1) . After the effects of GSK962040 faded, migrating motor complex (MMC) activity returned. Migrating motor complex restoration was unaffected by 3 mg kg(-1) GSK962040 but at 6 mg kg(-1) , MMCs returned 253 min after dosing, compared with 101 min after saline (n=5 each). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The results are consistent with lower potency for agonists at the dog motilin receptor, compared with humans. They also define the doses of GSK962040 which stimulate gastric motility. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro data in the same species, together with plasma concentrations, guides further studies and translation to other species.

Functional and in situ hybridization evidence that preganglionic sympathetic vasoconstrictor neurons express ghrelin receptors.

Agonists of ghrelin receptors can lower or elevate blood pressure, and it has been suggested that the increases in blood pressure are caused by actions at receptors in the spinal cord. However, this has not been adequately investigated, and the locations of neurons in the spinal cord that express ghrelin receptors, through which blood pressure increases may be exerted, are not known. We investigated the effects within the spinal cord of two non-peptide ghrelin receptor agonists, GSK894490 and CP464709, and two peptide receptor agonists, ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin, and we used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization to examine ghrelin receptor expression. I.v. application of the non-peptide ghrelin receptor agonists caused biphasic changes in blood pressure, a brief drop followed by a blood pressure increase that lasted several minutes. The blood pressure rise, but not the fall, was antagonized by i.v. hexamethonium. Application of these agonists or ghrelin peptide directly to the spinal cord caused only a blood pressure increase. Des-acyl ghrelin had no significant action. The maximum pressor effects of agonists occurred with application at spinal cord levels T9 to T12. Neither i.v. nor spinal cord application of the agonists had significant effect on heart rate or the electrocardiogram. Ghrelin receptor gene expression was detected by PCR and in situ hybridization. In situ hybridization localized expression to neurons, including autonomic preganglionic neurons of the intermediolateral cell columns at all levels from T3 to S2. The numbers of ghrelin receptor expressing neurons in the intermediolateral cell columns were similar to the numbers of nitric oxide synthase positive neurons, but there was little overlap between these two populations. We conclude that activation of excitatory ghrelin receptors on sympathetic preganglionic neurons increases blood pressure, and that decreases in blood pressure caused by ghrelin agonists are mediated through receptors on blood vessels.

Actions of prolonged ghrelin infusion on gastrointestinal transit and glucose homeostasis in humans.

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin is produced by enteroendocrine cells in the gastric mucosa and stimulates gastric emptying in healthy volunteers and patients with gastroparesis in short-term studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of intravenous ghrelin on gastrointestinal motility and glucose homeostasis during a 6-h infusion in humans. METHODS: Ghrelin (15 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)) or saline was infused intravenously for 360 min after intake of radio-opaque markers, acetaminophen, and lactulose after a standardized breakfast in 12 male volunteers. Gastric emptying, orocecal transit, colonic transit, postprandial plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and peptide YY were assessed. In vitro studies of gastrointestinal muscle contractility were performed. KEY RESULTS: The gastric emptying rate was faster for ghrelin compared to saline (P = 0.002) with a shorter half-emptying time (50.3 +/- 3.9 vs 59.9 +/- 4.4 min, P = 0.004). There was no effect of ghrelin on orocecal or colonic transit. Postprandial elevations of plasma glucose, insulin, and GLP-1 occurred 15 min earlier and were higher with ghrelin. The insulinogenic index did not change during ghrelin infusion. Basal in vitro contractility was unaffected by ghrelin. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The effect of a 6-h ghrelin infusion on gastrointestinal motility is limited to the stomach without affecting orocecal or colonic transit. Plasma glucose, insulin, and GLP-1 are elevated postprandially, probably as a result of the hastened gastric emptying. Changes in glucose homeostasis as a consequence of stimulated gastric emptying and hormone release, need to be taken into account in the use of pharmacological stimulants for the treatment of motility disorders.

Translating 5-HT receptor pharmacology.

Since metoclopramide was first described (in 1964) there have been several attempts to develop compounds which retained gastrointestinal prokinetic activity (via 5-HT(4) receptor activation) but without the limiting side effects associated with dopamine D(2) receptor antagonism. Early compounds (mosapride, cisapride, renzapride, tegaserod) were identified before several of the 5-HT receptors were even described (including 5-HT(4) and 5-HT(2B)), whereas prucalopride came later. Several compounds were hampered by non-selectivity, introducing cardiac liability (cisapride: activity at human Ether-a-go-go Related Gene) or potentially, a reduced intestinal prokinetic activity caused by activity at a second 5-HT receptor (renzapride: antagonism at the 5-HT(3) receptor; tegaserod: antagonism at the 5-HT(2B) receptor). Poor intrinsic activity at gastrointestinal 5-HT(4) receptors has also been an issue (mosapride, tegaserod). Perhaps prucalopride has now achieved the profile of good selectivity of action and high intrinsic activity at intestinal 5-HT(4) receptors, without clinically-meaningful actions on 5-HT(4) receptors in the heart. The progress of this compound for treatment of chronic constipation, as well as competitor molecules such as ATI-7505 and TD-5108, will now be followed with interest as each attempts to differentiate themselves from each other. Perhaps at last, 5-HT(4) receptor agonists are being given the chance to show what they can do.

GSK962040: a small molecule, selective motilin receptor agonist, effective as a stimulant of human and rabbit gastrointestinal motility.

There is an urgent clinical need for a safe, efficacious stimulant of gastric emptying; current therapies include erythromycin (an antibiotic with additional properties which preclude chronic use) and metoclopramide (a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptor agonist and an antagonist at brain D2 receptors, associated with movement disorders). To move away from the complex motilide structure of erythromycin, a small molecule motilin receptor agonist, GSK962040, was identified and characterized. The compound was evaluated using recombinant human receptors, rabbit and human isolated stomach preparations known to respond to motilin and in vivo, by measuring its ability to increase defecation in conscious rabbits. At the human motilin receptor, the pEC50 (the negative logarithm to base 10 of the EC50 value, the concentration of agonist that produces 50% of the maximal response) values for GSK962040 and erythromycin as agonists were, respectively, 7.9 and 7.3; GSK962040 had no significant activity at a range of other receptors (including ghrelin), ion channels and enzymes. In rabbit gastric antrum, GSK962040 300 nmol L(-1)-10 micromol L(-1) caused a prolonged facilitation of the amplitude of cholinergically mediated contractions, to a maximum of 248 +/- 47% at 3 micromol L(-1). In human-isolated stomach, GSK962040 10 micromol L(-1), erythromycin 10 micromol L(-1) and [Nle13]-motilin 100 nmol L(-1), each caused muscle contraction of similar amplitude. In conscious rabbits, intravenous doses of 5 mg kg(-1) GSK962040 or 10 mg kg(-1) erythromycin significantly increased faecal output over a 2-h period. Together, these data show that GSK962040, a non-motilide structure, selectively activates the motilin receptor. Simplification of the structural requirements to activate this receptor greatly facilitates the design of potentially new medicines for gastroparesis.

Inhibition of colonic motility and defecation by RS-127445 suggests an involvement of the 5-HT2B receptor in rodent large bowel physiology.

BACKGROUND: 5-HT(2B) receptors are localized within the myenteric nervous system, but their functions on motor/sensory neurons are unclear. To explore the role of these receptors, we further characterized the 5-HT(2B) receptor antagonist RS-127445 and studied its effects on peristalsis and defecation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Although reported as a selective 5-HT(2B) receptor antagonist, any interactions of RS-127445 with 5-HT(4) receptors are unknown; this was examined using the recombinant receptor and Biomolecular Interaction Detection technology. Mouse isolated colon was mounted in tissue baths for isometric recording of neuronal contractions evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS), or under an intraluminal pressure gradient to induce peristalsis; the effects of RS-127445 on EFS-induced and on peristaltic contractions were measured. Faecal output of rats in grid-bottom cages was measured over 3 h following i.p. RS-127445 and separately, validation of the effective doses was achieved by determining the free, unbound fraction of RS-127445 in blood and brain. KEY RESULTS: RS-127445 (up to 1 micromol x L(-1)) did not interact with the 5-HT(4) receptor. RS-127445 (0.001-1 micromol x L(-1)) did not affect EFS-induced contractions of the colon, although at 10 micromol x L(-1) the contractions were reduced (to 36 +/- 8% of control, n= 4). RS-127445 (0.1-10 micromol x L(-1)) concentration-dependently reduced peristaltic frequency (n= 4). RS-127445 (1-30 mg x kg(-1)), dose-dependently reduced faecal output, reaching significance at 10 and 30 mg x kg(-1) (n= 6-11). In blood and brain, >98% of RS-127445 was protein-bound. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: High-protein binding of RS-127445 indicates that relatively high doses are required for efficacy. The results suggest that 5-HT(2B) receptors tonically regulate colonic motility.

5-hydroxyindalpine, an agonist at the putative 5-HT receptor, has no activity on human recombinant monoamine receptors but accelerates distension-induced peristalsis in mouse isolated colon.

Although the putative 5-HT(1P) receptor has been implicated to have a role in peristalsis, experiments which suggest this function are preliminary or have measured only components of the reflex. We have, therefore, further characterized a reported agonist at this receptor (5-hydroxyindalpine; 5-OHIP) and investigated the effects of 5-OHIP and 5-hydroxytrytophan-dipeptide (5-HTP-DP), a reported 5-HT(1P) receptor antagonist, on distension-induced peristalsis in mouse colon. The effects of 5-OHIP on intracellular calcium, cyclic adenosine monophosphate concentrations or GTPgammaS binding were measured in cell lines expressing human recombinant 5-HT(1A, 1B, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3, 4, 6, 7) and alpha(1A), alpha(1B), D(1), D(2), D(3), H(1), H(3) receptors. The effects of 5-OHIP and 5-HTP-DP on peristalsis were assessed by measuring changes in frequency and times to reach threshold of peristaltic contractions, as well as the threshold and maximum pressures of each peristaltic stroke. 5-hydroxyindalpine (1 nmol L(-1)-10 micromol L(-1)) had no significant activity at any of the receptors studied. However, 5-OHIP (0.1 nmol L(-1)-1 micromol L(-1)) concentration-dependently increased the frequency of peristalsis (EC(50) = 4.4 nmol L(-1)) and reduced the time taken to reach threshold and threshold pressure, without altering maximum pressures. The maximum effect of 5-OHIP was at 1 micromol L(-1) (68.0 +/- 14.5% increase in frequency); 10 micromol L(-1) decreased peristalsis. 5-hydroxytrytophan-dipeptide (1-300 nmol L(-1)) also increased the frequency of peristalsis and prevented the actions of 5-OHIP. The higher concentration (1 micromol L(-1)) transiently inhibited peristalsis and after recovery, prevented the actions of 5-OHIP but not the excitatory activity of the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine. In summary, the present data demonstrate an interaction of '5-HT(1P)-ligands' with the peristaltic reflex. However, the absence of an effect of 5-OHIP on a range of different monoamine receptors continues to highlight the need to investigate the identity of the putative 5-HT(1P) receptor.

Increased plasma ghrelin following infliximab in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin, a potent orexigenic peptide produced by the stomach, may be affected by circulating inflammatory mediators. AIM: To assess the effect of an anti-TNFα antibody on ghrelin in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Fifteen patients with Crohn's receiving infliximab were studied before and 1 week after infusion. Following an overnight fast, blood was sampled before a meal and then every 20 min for 2 h. Total ghrelin and CRP were measured using ELISA. Acylated ghrelin and TNFα, IFNγ, IL-1ß and IL-6 were measured with bioplex. Harvey Bradshaw Activity Index was assessed. RESULTS: Median (95% CI) 2-h integrated plasma total ghrelin increased from 162 (99-311) before infliximab to 200 (128-387) pg/mL h, (P = 0.02) after. Following infliximab, 20 min postmeal, median acylated ghrelin decreased from 50.3 (24-64) to 38.6 (26-82) pg/mL, (P = 0.04) thus reverting to a traditional meal related ghrelin curve. Median (range) disease activity decreased from 5 (2-28) before to 3 (0-22), (P = 0.0001) and Median (95% CI) TNFα decreased from 2.8 (1.89-4.48) to 1.31 (0.73-2.06) pg/mL (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab increases circulating total ghrelin by 25% in CD and restores the postprandial response of acylated ghrelin to food intake. Acylated and de-sacyl ghrelin remain unchanged, suggesting that an alternate isoform could be affected by infliximab.