Paradigm shift in transfusion practices during early COVID-19 pandemic: A single center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The advent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) unveiled the worst national blood crisis that the United States had witnessed in over a decade. With the pandemic influencing the different stages of the acquisition of blood products outside the hospital setting, we aimed to explore the possible barriers contributing to the shortage of blood products within the medical community. AIM: To assess the adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices for patients in the COVID era and pre-COVID era. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on hospitalized patients distinguishing the pattern of blood transfusion during the COVID and pre-COVID era in a community hospital. Data was tabulated to include the number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and if transfusions met restrictive blood transfusion criteria as per institutional guidelines. Chi-square was applied to test the statistical association between qualitative variables. Unpaired t test and Mann Whitney U test were applied respectively to test the mean difference of quantitative variables. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were included in the study, of which 108 were during COVID era and 100 were during pre-COVID era. The leading reason for admission in both the COVID era and pre-COVID era transfused patients was shortness of breath (53.7% and 36% P = 0.001), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (25.9% and 21% P = 0.001). There was a higher percentage of RBC transfusions in the intensive care unit in the COVID-era group than in the pre-COVID era group (38.9% vs 22%, P = 0.008). The restrictive transfusion criteria were met in 62% vs 79% in the COVID and pre-COVID eras, respectively (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The COVID-era group received RBC transfusions with less stringent adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices in comparison to pre-COVID era group.

A Step towards understanding coronary artery disease: a complication in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a relatively rare disease with increasing incidence trends. Cardiovascular disease is a significant complication in IPF patients due to the role of common proatherogenic immune mediators. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in IPF and the association between these distinct pathologies with overlapping pathophysiology remain less studied. RESEARCH QUESTION: We hypothesised that IPF is an independent risk factor for CAD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study using the national inpatient sample (2017-2019). We included adult hospitalisations with IPF after excluding other interstitial lung diseases and other endpoints of CAD, acute coronary syndrome and old myocardial infarction. We examined their baseline characteristics, such as demographic data, hospital characteristics and socioeconomic status. The prevalence of cardiac risk factors and CAD was also compared between hospitalisations with and without IPF. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was further performed to study the odds of CAD with IPF. The cases of IPF in the study population were propensity-matched, after which generalised linear modelling analysis was performed to validate the findings. RESULTS: A total of 116 010 admissions were hospitalised in 2017-2019 with IPF, of which 55.6% were men with a mean age of 73 years. Adult hospitalisations with IPF were found to have a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (29.3% vs 24.0%; p<0.001), hypertension (35.6% vs 33.8%; p<0.001), hyperlipidaemia (47.7% vs 30.2%; p<0.0001) and tobacco abuse (41.7% vs 20.9%; p<0.001), while they had a lower prevalence of obesity (11.7% vs 15.3%; p<0.0001) compared with hospitalisations without IPF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed 28% higher odds of developing CAD in IPF hospitalisations (OR -1.28; CI 1.22 to 1.33; p<0.001). Postpropensity matching, generalised linear modelling analysis revealed even higher odds of CAD with IPF (OR -1.77; CI 1.54 to 2.02; p<0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a higher prevalence of CAD in IPF hospitalisations and significantly higher odds of CAD among IPF cases. IPF remains a terminal lung disease that portends a poor prognosis, but addressing the cardiovascular risk factors in these patients can help reduce the case fatality rate due to the latter and potentially add to quality-adjusted life years.

Impact of COVID-19 on Acute Myocardial Infarction: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.

COVID-19 has been associated with a higher incidence of acute myocardial infarction and related complications. We sought to assess the impact of COVID-19 diagnosis on hospitalizations with an index admission of AMI. The National inpatient sample 2020 was queried for hospitalizations with an index admission of AMI, further stratified for admissions with and without COVID-19. The 2 groups' mortality, procedure, and complication rates were compared using suitable statistical tests. Multivariate regression analysis was further performed to study the impact of COVID-19 on mortality as the primary outcome and length of stay and total hospital cost as secondary outcomes. A total of 555,540 admissions for AMI were identified, of which 5818 (1.04%) had concomitant COVID-19. Hospitalizations in the COVID-19 cohort of both groups had a lower procedure rate for coronary angiography. Thrombolysis use was higher in the STEMI patients with COVID-19. Most cardiac complications in AMI patients were higher when infected with SARS-CoV-2. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that COVID-19 led to higher odds of mortality and total length of stay in AMI hospitalizations. COVID-19 portends a worse prognosis in hospitalizations with AMI. These admissions have a significantly higher mortality rate and increased complications.

Prediabetes is an incremental risk factor for adverse cardiac events: A nationwide analysis.

Background and aims: Prediabetes is defined as a state of impaired glucose metabolism with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels that precede those of a diabetic state. There is increasing evidence that suggests that hyperglycemic derangement in prediabetes leads to microvascular and macrovascular complications even before progression to overt diabetes mellitus. We aim to identify the association of prediabetes with acute cardiovascular events. Methods: We utilized the National inpatient sample 2018-2020 to identify adult hospitalizations with prediabetes after excluding all hospitalizations with diabetes. Demographics and prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors were compared in hospitalizations with and without prediabetes using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the t-test for continuous variables. Multivariate regression analysis was further performed to study the impact of prediabetes on acute coronary syndrome, acute ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute heart failure. Results: Hospitalizations with prediabetes had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and tobacco abuse. In addition, the adjusted analysis revealed that hospitalizations with prediabetes were associated with higher odds of developing acute coronary syndrome (OR-2.01; C.I:1.94-2.08; P<0.001), acute ischemic stroke (OR-2.21; 2.11-2.31; p<0.001), and acute heart failure (OR-1.41; C.I.: 1.29-1.55; p<0.001) as compared to hospitalizations without prediabetes. Conclusions: Our study suggests that prediabetes is associated with a higher odds of major cardiovascular events. Further prospective studies should be conducted to identify prediabetes as an independent causative factor for these events. In addition, screening and lifestyle modifications for prediabetics should be encouraged to improve patient outcomes.