Outcomes of toric intraocular lens realignment surgery done using slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method.

Purpose: To compare the slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method based on outcomes of toric realignment surgeries. Settings: Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: This study included all eyes undergoing toric intraocular lens (TIOL) realignment surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 for which TIOL axis assessment by slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method was available. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and we documented demographics, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit-lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods on postoperative day 1 and day 14. In patients with misalignment, TIOL was realigned to the original position in group 1 (27 patients) and to an axis based on calculations provided by wavefront aberrometer in group 2 (25 patients). Post-realignment surgery, UCVA, subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit-lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods were assessed and analyzed. Results: We analyzed 52 eyes and found that the mean preoperative misalignment with the slit-lamp method (44.9° ±20.0°) and wavefront aberrometry (47.1° ±19.5°) was similar. The corresponding degrees of misalignment post-TIOL repositioning surgeries were 5.2° ±5.2° (slit-lamp method) and 4.7° ±5.1° (wavefront aberrometry) (P = 0.615). Both groups showed significant improvement in median log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UCVA and reduction in median refractive cylinder. Conclusions: Slit-lamp method is as good as wavefront aberrometer method to assess TIOL axis. Toric realignment surgery is found to be safe, and realigning TIOL based on either slit-lamp method or wavefront aberrometer method equally improved UCVA and decreased residual refractive cylinder.

Outcomes of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in eyes with corneal opacity.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in eyes with corneal opacity. SETTING: Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: This retrospective study included 286 eyes of 286 patients having cataract with a pre-existing corneal opacity who underwent manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) at a tertiary eye institute between January 2020 and January 2022. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and we documented demographics, history, detailed anterior and posterior segment examination, cataract grading, pre- and post-operative vision, intra-operative complications and its management, and post-operative course. All these parameters were recorded at the baseline visit, day 1 and at 1 month post-operatively. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six eyes having cataract with a pre-existing corneal opacity which underwent MSICS were evaluated. Corneal opacity was graded as nebular, nebulo-macular, macular and leucomatous types; nebular opacity being the most common. Trauma was the most common cause of opacity followed by infective keratitis. Intra-operative complication rate was 4.89%; which included-7 posterior capsular rent with vitreous disturbance, 2 zonular dialysis, 2 iridodialysis, 2 eyes with aphakia and 1 with Descemet membrane detachment. On follow-up, 6 patients had decentered intraocular lens and 10 had residual cortex. Median logMAR vision improved significantly (p < 0.001) from 1.08 (5/60) pre-operatively to 0.3 (6/12) post-operatively. CONCLUSION: MSCIS is efficient in providing favorable visual outcomes in patients where corneal opacity makes it difficult for the surgeon to perform a phacoemulsification surgery.

Outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection in a developing country.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Setting Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital DESIGN: Retrospective study METHODS: This study included all eyes of patients with known HIV infection undergoing cataract surgery with a minimum follow-up of 6 months between January 2017 and December 2020. Patients who underwent combined surgeries and pediatric patients were excluded from analysis. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records and we documented demographics, history, detailed anterior and posterior segment examination, pre-operative grade and type of cataract, type of surgery done, its complication and post-operative course. All these parameters were recorded at the baseline visit and at 1 month and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty nine eyes of 107 HIV infected patients that underwent cataract surgery were evaluated. Mature cataract was seen in 31% of the eyes. Features of HIV related uveitis/retinitis were seen in 21 (16.2%) eyes. Phacoemulsification was performed in 44 (34.1%) eyes while manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) was done in 85 (65.9%) eyes. Intra-operative complications were encountered in 4 (3.1%) eyes. At the final follow-up, there was a significant improvement in median corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) from LogMAR 1.08 (5/60) at baseline to LogMAR 0 (6/6) at 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients with HIV infection usually present early and with advanced cataracts. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery are generally good but affected by presence of prior HIV related uveitis or retinitis.

An objective evaluation of simulated surgical outcomes among surgical trainees using manual small-incision cataract surgery virtual reality simulator.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trainee performance across six modules of a virtual reality (VR) simulator. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 10 manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) trainees who practiced cataract surgery on an MSICS VR simulator for one month. They were assessed in six major steps which included scleral groove, tunnel dissection, keratome entry, capsulorhexis, nucleus delivery, and intraocular lens (IOL) insertion under a trainer's supervision. The information included in their score metrics was collected, and their overall performance was evaluated. Results: Thirty attempts were evaluated for scleral groove, tunnel dissection, and capsulorhexis and 15 attempts for keratome entry. Candidates had varied results in the dimensional aspects and their rates of complications with a mean satisfactory score of 3.1 ± 4.17, 6.8 ± 5.75, 5.8 ± 7.74, and 1.8 ± 2.57, respectively. Nucleus delivery (n = 5) had more of iris pull and IOL insertion (n = 5) had more of lost IOL as complications but both had a higher satisfactory outcome. Conclusion: A VR simulator is a useful tool for training surgeons before their entry into live surgery. It is an effective method for evaluating objectively the structural characteristics of each phase in MSICS and their associated complications, helping them anticipate it earlier during live surgery by giving them a near real world experience.

Morphological variations influencing the outcomes in posterior polar cataract.

Purpose: To study the intraoperative complications and postoperative clinical outcomes in different types of posterior polar cataract (PPC) following phacoemulsification, based on morphological classification. Methods: All consecutive patients with PPC who underwent phacoemulsification during the study period from 2016 to 2019 were included and sub-grouped based on the morphological characteristics according to Daljit Singh's classification. Intraoperative complications such as posterior capsular rupture (PCR), vitreous loss, nucleus drop, and Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at day 1 and day 30 were documented. Results: A total of 388 eyes of 380 patients were included. Eighty nine (22.9%) eyes belonged to type 1, 135 (34.8%) belonged to type 2, 8 (2.1%) belonged to type 3, and 156 (40.2%) belonged to type 4. Thirty-five (9.3%) eyes had intraoperative PCR, with vitreous loss in 21 (60%) eyes, and nucleus/cortex drop in 5 (1.3%) eyes. Six (75%) eyes of type 3, 14 (10.04%) eyes of type 2, 12 (17.7%) eyes of type 4, and 3 (3.4%) eyes of type 1 PPC had PCR. PCR occurred more during the emulsification of the nucleus (18 cases, 51.4%). A significant correlation was seen between intraoperative PCR and type of PPC with a higher incidence in type 3 (P < 0.001). BCVA was found to be significantly worse on day 1 among patients with PCR compared to those who did not and improved well by day 30. Conclusion: PPC morphology is significantly co-related with the occurrence of PCR, emphasizing the need for careful grading of posterior polar cataracts in predicting the risk of intraoperative complications.

Cataract surgery risk stratification in phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery in a teaching hospital.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a system that objectively assesses the risk of cataract surgery complications performed with phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) techniques. METHODS: The study was a retrospective comparative interventional case series. Electronic medical records of consecutive eyes that underwent cataract surgery from January 2019 to December 2019 were evaluated. Patient's demographic data and preoperative risk factors were identified, and cataract was categorized as per Lens Opacities Classification System (III). Cataract eyes were grouped into normal cataract cases (G1) and complex cataract cases (G2 and G3), based on the risk factors. The rate of complications in each group and the rate of each complication were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The overall rate of anyone complication was 2.2% with 2.3% in G1, 1.0% in G2 and 3.9% in G3 (p < 0.001). MSICS technique, mostly used for complex cases (54.2%), reported a higher complication rate than the phacoemulsification technique (2.9% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001). However, the complication rates among the normal and complex cases were similar (2.3% vs 2.2%, p = 0.376). The total posterior capsular tear rate was 1.1% with no vitreous loss in nearly 1 in eight eyes. CONCLUSION: A preoperative risk stratification system is crucial for obtaining informed consent and better allocation of cases to surgeons based on their expertise to minimize intraoperative complications.

Retrospective analysis of visual outcomes in retropupillary iris-suture-fixated rigid intraocular lens in a tertiary eye center in southern India.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes of retropupillary iris-suture-fixated rigid intraocular lens (IFIOL) SETTING: Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital DESIGN: Retrospective study METHODS: This study included all eyes undergoing IFIOL with a minimum follow-up of 6 months between April 2017 and January 2019. Patients with preexisting anterior or posterior segment pathologies causing defective vision, uveitis or history of previous intraocular surgeries with exception of cataract surgery were excluded from the study. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and we documented demographics, history, position of cataractous lens or IOL, primary/secondary surgery and its complications. Postoperative visual acuity, pupillary response, diplopia, centration of IOL, inflammation were also recorded at the baseline visit and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: One hundred and ten eyes of 110 patients that underwent IFIOL were evaluated. Twenty-two patients (20%) underwent primary IFIOL, whereas 67 (60.9%) patients had secondary IFIOL. In 18 patients (16.36%), IFIOL was done to reposition decentered/dislocated IOLs. At the final follow-up, there was a significant improvement in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) with 87 patients (79.09%) achieving CDVA of 6/12 or better. IFIOL was stable and centered in 101 eyes (91.81%). Two patients (1.81%) had intraoperative complications. Postoperative iritis was seen in 7 patients (6.36%), and 4 patients (3.63%) had rise in IOP. CONCLUSION: This is a safe, reliable, reproducible technique for aphakia rehabilitation and decentered IOL stabilization with good clinical outcome, especially in a limited resource setting.

Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictability and accuracy of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) online calculator with the Haigis-L formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in post myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileuses (LASIK) eyes undergoing cataract surgery and also to analyze the postoperative refractive outcome among the ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on post myopic LASIK eyes which underwent cataract surgery between June 2017 and December 2019. IOL power was calculated using both Haigis-L & ASCRS methods. Implanted IOL power was based on the ASCRS method. The expected postoperative refraction for IOL power based on the Haigis-L formula was calculated and compared with the Spherical Equivalent (SE) obtained from the patient's actual refraction. Prediction error (PE) & Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was calculated. Intragroup analysis of ASCRS values was done. RESULTS: Among the 41 eyes analyzed, pre-operative and post-operative mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.58 ± 0.21 and 0.15 ± 0.26 logMAR, respectively. In the ASCRS method, 36 (87.8%) and 40 (97.6%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively, whereas, in the Haigis-L method, 29 (70.7%) eyes, and 38 (92.7%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively. Among the ASCRS subgroups, ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values had 83%, 80.6%, and 48.8% eyes with SE within ± 0.5D, respectively. CONCLUSION: ASCRS method can be considered as an equally efficient method of IOL power calculation as the Haigis-L method in eyes which have undergone post myopic LASIK refractive surgery. ASCRS maximum & average values gave better emmetropic results.