Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam CT for Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to synthesize evidence in the literature to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hemorrhage types, including intraparenchymal (IPH), subarachnoid (SAH), and intraventricular (IVH). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO-CRD42021261915). Systematic searches were last performed on April 30, 2024 in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Studies reporting diagnostic metrics of CBCT for ICH; (2) Studies using a reference standard to determine ICH. Exclusion criteria were: (1) Case reports, abstracts, reviews; (2) Studies without patient-level data. Pooled-estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for diagnostic Odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity using random-effects and common-effects models. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate risk-of-bias. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis yielding 466 patients. Mean/median age ranged from 54-75 years. Females represented 51.4% (222/432) in reported studies. Multidetector-CT was the reference standard in all studies. DOR, pooled-sensitivity, and pooled-specificity for ICH were 5.28 (95%CI:4.11-6.46), 0.88 (95%CI:0.79-0.97), and 0.99 (95%CI:0.98-1.0). Pooled-sensitivity for IPH, SAH, and IVH were 0.98 (95%CI:0.95-1.0), 0.82 (95%CI:0.57-1.0), and 0.78 (95%CI:0.55-1.0). Pooled-specificity for IPH, SAH, and IVH were 0.99 (95%CI:0.98-1.0), 0.99 (95%CI:0.97-1.0), and 1.0 (95%CI:0.98-1.0). DISCUSSION: CBCT had moderate DOR and high pooled-specificity for ICH and hemorrhage types. However, pooled-sensitivity varied by hemorrhage type, with the highest sensitivity for IPH, followed by SAH and IVH.

Ten-year trends, disparities, and clinical impact of stroke thrombectomy and thrombolysis: A single center experience 2012-2021.

OBJECTIVES: As indications for acute ischemic stroke treatment expand, it is unclear whether disparities in treatment utilization and outcome still exist. The main objective of this study was to investigate disparities in acute ischemic stroke treatment and determine impact on outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive ischemic stroke admissions to a comprehensive stroke center from 2012-2021 was performed. Primary exposure was intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular thrombectomy. Primary end points were discharge modified Rankin Scale, home disposition, and expired/hospice. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to elucidate disparities in treatment utilization and determine impact on outcome. RESULTS: Of 517,615 inpatient visits, there were 7,540 (1.46 %) ischemic stroke admissions, increasing from 1.14 % to 1.79 % from 2012-2021. Intravenous thrombolysis significantly decreased from 14.4 % to 9.8 % while endovascular thrombectomy significantly increased from 0.8 % to 10.5 %. Both intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy increased odds of discharge home and modified Rankin Scale 0-2, and thrombectomy decreased odds of expired/hospice. After adjusting for covariates, decreased odds of thrombectomy was associated with Medicaid insurance (Odds Ratio [95 % Confidence Interval] 0.55 [0.32-0.93]), age 80+ (0.49 [0.35-0.69]), prior stroke (0.49 [0.31-0.77]), and diabetes mellitus (0.55 [0.39-0.79]), while low median household income (<$80,000/year) increased odds of no acute treatment (1.34 [1.16-1.56]). No sex or racial disparities were observed. Medicaid and low-income were not associated with worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Less endovascular thrombectomy occurred in Medicaid, older, prior stroke, and diabetic patients, while low-income was associated with no treatment. The observed socioeconomic disparities did not impact discharge outcome.

Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) of direct-to-angiography pathway for acute ischemic stroke patients with suspected large vessel occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: Direct-to-angiography (DTA) is a novel care pathway for endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) that has been shown to reduce time-to-treatment and improve clinical outcomes for EVT-eligible patients. The institutional costs of adopting the DTA pathway and the many factors affecting costs have not been studied. In this study, we assess the costs and main cost drivers associated with the DTA pathway compared to the conventional CT pathway for patients presenting with AIS and suspected LVO in the anterior circulation. METHODS: Time driven activity based costing (TDABC) model was used to compare costs of DTA and conventional pathways from the healthcare institution perspective. Process mapping was used to outline all activities and resources (personnel, equipment, materials) needed for each step in both pathways. The cost model was developed using our institutional patient database and average New York state wages for personnel costs. Total, incremental and proportional costs were calculated based on institutional and patient factors affecting the pathways. RESULTS: DTA pathway accrued additional $82,583.61 (9%) in total costs compared to the conventional approach for all AIS patients. For EVT-ineligible patients, the DTA pathway incurred additional $82,964.37 (76%) in total costs compared to the CT pathway. For EVT eligible patients, the total and per-patient costs were greater in the CT pathway by $380.76 (0.04%) and $5.60 (0.04%) respectively. CONCLUSION: As the DTA pathway incurred additional $82,964.37 for EVT-ineligible patients, appropriate patient selection criteria are needed to avoid transferring EVT-ineligible patients to the angiography suite.

Acute ischemic stroke outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the impact on stroke outcomes remains uncertain. AIMS: To determine the clinical outcomes of patients with AIS and COVID-19 (AIS-COVID+). METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020211977). Systematic searches were last performed on June 3, 2021 in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL Databases. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) studies reporting outcomes on AIS-COVID+; (2) original articles published in 2020 or later; (3) study participants aged ≥18 years. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) case reports with <5 patients, abstracts, review articles; (2) studies analyzing novel interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Random-effects models estimated the pooled OR and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for mortality, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of the 43 selected studies, 46.5% (20/43) reported patients with AIS without COVID-19 (AIS-COVID-) for comparison. Random-effects model included 7294 AIS-COVID+ and 158 401 AIS-COVID-. Compared with AIS-COVID-, AIS-COVID+ patients had higher in-hospital mortality (OR=3.87 (95% CI 2.75 to 5.45), P<0.001), less mRS scores 0-2 (OR=0.53 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.62), P<0.001), longer LOS (mean difference=4.21 days (95% CI 1.96 to 6.47), P<0.001), and less home discharge (OR=0.31 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.47), P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AIS-COVID had worse outcomes, with almost fourfold increased mortality, half the odds of mRS scores 0-2, and one-third the odds of home discharge. These findings confirm the significant impact of COVID-19 on early stroke outcomes.

Gender-Based Disparity in Acute Stroke Imaging Utilization and the Impact on Treatment and Outcomes: 2012 to 2021.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have revealed significant socio-economic disparities in neuro-imaging and treatment utilization for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In this study, we sought to evaluate whether a sex-based disparity exists in neuro-imaging and to determine its etiology and association with acute treatment and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with AIS admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between 2012 and 2021. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, neuro-imaging, acute treatment, and early clinical outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical records. Trend analysis, bivariate analysis of patient characteristics by sex, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 7,540 AIS episodes registered from 2012 to 2021, 47.9% were female patients. After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and temporal factors, significantly higher utilization of CTA was found for male patients (odds ratio = 1.20 [95% confidence interval 1.07-1.34]), particularly from socio-economically advantaged groups, and in years 2015 and 2019, representing the years endovascular thrombectomy recommendations changed. Despite this, male patients had significantly lower intravenous thrombolysis utilization (odds ratio = 0.83 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.96]) and similar endovascular thrombectomy rates as female patients. There were no significant sex differences in early clinical outcomes, and no relevant clinical or demographic factors explained the CT angiography utilization disparity. CONCLUSION: Despite higher CT angiography utilization in socio-economically advantaged male patients with AIS, likely overutilization due to implicit biases following guideline updates, the rates of acute treatment, and early clinical outcomes were unaffected.

Senescent mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in pre-metastatic bone marrow of untreated advanced breast cancer patients.

Breast cancer is the predominant form of carcinoma among women worldwide, with 70% of advanced patients developing bone metastases, with a high mortality rate. In this sense, the bone marrow (BM) mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are critical for BM/bone homeostasis, and failures in their functionality, transform the BM into a pre-metastatic niche (PMN). We previously found that BM-MSCs from advanced breast cancer patients (BCPs, infiltrative ductal carcinoma, stage III-B) have an abnormal profile. This work aims to study some of the metabolic and molecular mechanisms underlying MSCs shift from a normal to an abnormal profile in this group of patients. A comparative analysis was undertaken, which included self-renewal capacity, morphology, proliferation capacity, cell cycle, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and senescence-associated ß­galactosidase (SA­ß­gal) staining of BM-derived MSCs isolated from 14 BCPs and 9 healthy volunteers (HVs). Additionally, the expression and activity of the telomerase subunit TERT, as well as telomere length, were measured. Expression levels of pluripotency, osteogenic, and osteoclastogenic genes (OCT-4, SOX-2, M-CAM, RUNX-2, BMP-2, CCL-2, M-CSF, and IL-6) were also determined. The results showed that MSCs from BCPs had reduced ,self-renewal and proliferation capacity. These cells also exhibited inhibited cell cycle progression and phenotypic changes, such as an enlarged and flattened appearance. Additionally, there was an increase in ROS and senescence levels and a decrease in the functional capacity of TERT to preserve telomere length. We also found an increase in pro-inflammatory/pro-osteoclastogenic gene expression and a decrease in pluripotency gene expression. We conclude that these changes could be responsible for the abnormal functional profile that MSCs show in this group of patients.

Cost-effectiveness of remote robotic mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment are highly time sensitive. Remote robotic (RR)-EVT systems may be capable of mitigating time delays in patient transfer from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive/thrombectomy-capable stroke center. However, health economic evidence is needed to assess the costs and benefits of an RR-EVT system. Therefore, the authors of this study aimed to determine whether performing RR-EVT in suspected AIS patients at a PSC as opposed to standard of care might translate to cost-effectiveness over a lifetime. METHODS: An economic evaluation study was performed from a US healthcare perspective, combining decision analysis and Markov modeling methods over a lifetime horizon to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RR-EVT in suspected AIS patients at a PSC compared to the standard-of-care approach. Total expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated. RESULTS: In the cost-effectiveness analysis, RR-EVT yielded greater effectiveness per patient (4.05 vs 3.88 QALYs) and lower costs (US$321,269 vs US$321,397) than the standard-of-care approach. Owing to these lower costs and greater health benefits, RR-EVT was the dominant cost-effective strategy. After initiation of an RR-EVT system, the average costs per year were similar (or slightly reduced), according to this simulation. Sensitivity analyses revealed that RR-EVT remains cost-effective in a wide variety of time delays and cost assumptions. In a one-way sensitivity analysis, RR-EVT remained the most cost-effective strategy when time delays were greater than 2.5 minutes, its complication rate did not exceed 37%, and costs were lower than $54,081. When the cost of the RR-EVT strategy ranged from $19,340 to $54,081 and its complication rate varied from 15% to 37%, the RR-EVT strategy remained the most cost-effective throughout the two ranges. RR-EVT was also the most cost-effective strategy even when its cost doubled (to approximately $40,000) and time delays exceeded 20 minutes. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RR-EVT was the long-term cost-effective strategy in 89.8% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that RR-EVT as an innovative solution to expedite EVT is cost-effective. An RR-EVT system could potentially extend access to care in underserved communities and rural areas, as well as improve care for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations affected by health inequities.

Drivers of Ischemic Stroke Hospital Cost Trends Among Older Adults in the United States.

PURPOSE: The increased use of neuroimaging and innovations in ischemic stroke (IS) treatment have improved outcomes, but the impact on median hospital costs is not well understood. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using Medicare 5% claims data for 75,525 consecutive index IS hospitalizations for patients aged ≥65 years from 2012 to 2019 (values in 2019 dollars). IS episode cost was calculated in each year for trend analysis and stratified by cost components, including neuroimaging (CT angiography [CTA], CT perfusion [CTP], MRI, and MR angiography [MRA]), treatment (endovascular thrombectomy [EVT] and/or intravenous thrombolysis), and patient sociodemographic factors. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the drivers of high-cost episodes and median regression to assess drivers of median costs. RESULTS: The median IS episode cost increased by 4.9% from $9,509 in 2012 to $9,973 in 2019 (P = .0021). Treatment with EVT resulted in the greatest odds of having a high-cost (>$20,000) hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 71.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 54.62-94.55), as did intravenous thrombolysis treatment (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.90-3.52). Controlling for other factors, neuroimaging with CTA (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.58-1.87), CTP (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.52), and/or MRA (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38) had greater odds of having high-cost episodes than those without CTA, CTP, and MRA. Length of stay > 4 days (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 3.99-4.72) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.63-2.10) were also associated with high-cost episodes. CONCLUSIONS: From 2012 to 2019, the median IS episode cost increased by 4.9%, with EVT as the main cost driver. However, the increasing treatment cost trends have been partially offset by decreases in median length of stay and in-hospital mortality.

Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with large ischemic core.

BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) treatment improves clinical outcomes. Yet, its benefit remains uncertain in patients with large established infarcts as defined by ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) <6. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of EVT, compared with standard care (SC), in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with ASPECTS 3-5. METHODS: An economic evaluation study was performed combining a decision tree and Markov model to estimate lifetime costs (2021 US$) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of AIS patients with ASPECTS 3-5. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), net monetary benefits (NMBs), and deterministic one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed to evaluate the robustness of our model. RESULTS: Compared with SC, the cost-effectiveness analyses revealed that EVT yields higher lifetime benefits (2.20 QALYs vs 1.41 QALYs) with higher lifetime healthcare cost per patient ($285 861 vs $272 954). The difference in health benefits between EVT and SC was 0.79 QALYs, equivalent to 288 additional days of healthy life per patient. Even though EVT is more costly than SC alone, it is still cost-effective given better outcomes with ICER of $16 239/QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that EVT was the most cost-effective strategy in 98.8% (9882 of 10 000) of iterations at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that EVT is cost-effective in AIS patients with a large ischemic core (ASPECTS 3-5), compared with SC alone over the patient's lifetime.

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury in acute ischemic stroke patients following multi-dose iodinated contrast.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: lthough intravenous contrast in neuroimaging has become increasingly important in selecting patients for stroke treatment, clinical concerns remain regarding contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). Given the increasing utilization of CT angiography and/or perfusion coupled with cerebral angiography, the purpose of this study was to assess the association of CA-AKI and multi-dose iodinated contrast in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: etrospective review of AIS patients at a comprehensive stroke center was performed from January 2018 to December 2019. Data collection included patient demographics, stroke risk factors, stroke severity, discharge disposition, modified Rankin Scale, contrast type/volume, and creatinine levels (baseline, 48-72 h). CA-AKI was defined as creatinine increase ≥ 25 % from baseline. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were implemented to compare AIS patients with multi-dose and single-dose contrast. RESULTS: Of 440 AIS patients, 215 (48.9 %) were exposed to a single-dose contrast, and 225 (51.1 %) received multi-dose. In single-dose patients, CA-AKI at 48/72 h was 9.7 %/10.2 % compared to 8.0 %/8.9 % in multi-dose patients. Multi-dose patients were significantly more likely to receive a higher volume of contrast (mean 142.1 mL versus 80.8 mL; p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in their creatinine levels or CA-AKI. NIHSS score (OR=1.08, 95 % CI=[1.04,1.13]), and patient transfer from another hospital (OR=3.84, 95 % CI=[1.94,7.62]) were significantly associated with multi-dose contrast. CONCLUSIONS: No significant association between multi-dose iodinated contrast and CA-AKI was seen in AIS patients. Concerns of CA-AKI should not deter physicians from pursuing timely and appropriate contrast-enhanced neuroimaging that may optimize treatment outcomes in AIS patients.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Biological Carriers for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy.

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, with 10.0 million cancer deaths in 2020. Despite advances in targeted therapies, some pharmacological drawbacks associated with anticancer chemo and immunotherapeutic agents include high toxicities, low bioavailability, and drug resistance. In recent years, extracellular vesicles emerged as a new promising platform for drug delivery, with the advantage of their inherent biocompatibility and specific targeting compared to artificial nanocarriers, such as liposomes. Particularly, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells were proposed as a source of extracellular vesicles for cancer therapy because of their intrinsic properties: high in vitro self-renewal and proliferation, regenerative and immunomodulatory capacities, and secretion of extracellular vesicles that mediate most of their paracrine functions. Moreover, extracellular vesicles are static and safer in comparison with mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, which can undergo genetic/epigenetic or phenotypic changes after their administration to patients. In this review, we summarize currently reported information regarding mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles, their proper isolation and purification techniques - from either naive or engineered mesenchymal stem/stromal cells - for their application in cancer therapy, as well as available downstream modification methods to improve their therapeutic properties. Additionally, we discuss the challenges associated with extracellular vesicles for cancer therapy, and we review some preclinical and clinical data available in the literature.

Trends in buprenorphine-waivered providers in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states by their public listing status.

Background: The federal government has made several efforts to increase access to buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). However, patients continue to face challenges in access to treatment for OUD. Objectives: This study seeks to examine the trends in the prevalence of buprenorphine-waivered practitioners who opt to be publicly listed on the Buprenorphine Treatment Practitioner Locator tool maintained by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and how this varies between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Methods: Administrative records of all the DATA-waivered providers collected by SAMHSA were utilized to identify the trends in the number of waivered practitioners by their public listing status from 2002-2017. We further examine how that trend varied between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Results: The total number of waivered providers increased steadily from 300 in 2002 to 41,960 in 2017. In 2015, the number of waivered providers began to increase rapidly, with the number in Medicaid expansion states increasing faster than in non-expansion states from 2014-2017 (136% vs. 59%). Even though a greater proportion of waivered providers listed their names publicly in non-expansion states than in expansion states from 2014-2017, the rate of public listing of names increased more rapidly in Medicaid expansion states than in non-expansion states (170% vs. 85%) during the same period. Conclusions: This finding suggests that even though there has been an increase in waivered providers to prescribe buprenorphine in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states, barriers to access treatment still persist. Policy initiatives that seek to expand access to substance-use treatment are warranted.

Mesenchymal stem cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts as a therapeutic strategy for breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the leading cause of death among women. Recent evidence suggests that mesenchymal stromal/stem cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) have an essential role in cancer progression, invasion and therapy resistance. Therefore, they are considered as highly promising future therapeutic targets against breast cancer. The intrinsic tumour tropism and immunomodulatory capacities of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells are of special relevance for developing mesenchymal stromal/stem cells-based anti-tumour therapies that suppress primary tumour growth and metastasis. In addition, the utilization of therapies that target the stromal components of the tumour microenvironment in combination with standard drugs is an innovative tool that could improve patients' response to therapies and their survival. In this review, we discuss the currently available information regarding the possible use of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells-derived anti-tumour therapies, as well as the utilization of therapies that target CAFs in breast cancer microenvironment. Finally, these data can serve as a guide map for future research in this field, ultimately aiding the effective transition of these results into the clinic.

Cardiovascular disease and mortality in people with schizophrenia or antipsychotic treatment: A cohort study in primary care.

People with schizophrenia (SZ) or under treatment with antipsychotic drugs (TAD) are considered to be at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, but the reasons are not fully understood. In addition, no longitudinal studies in the setting of primary care in Spain have been performed. We aimed at analysing the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CV mortality in the population with SZ and in the population without SZ but under TAD (NS-TAD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in primary care in Spain, based on data from computerized medical records and mortality recorded in the National Statistics Institute. Three groups were generated: SZ, NS-TAD and control group, with a 4-year follow-up period (2008 to 2011). RESULTS: In an adjusted model, SZ was established as an independent risk factor for CV mortality although not with non-fatal CVD incidence. The NS-TAD group was an independent risk factor for mortality of any cause and CVD, but not CV mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between SZ and NS-TAD support that SZ has an increased risk of CVD independently of TAD. Further studies to evaluate the origin and management are needed. The detection of CVD and the consequent secondary CV prevention in these high-risk populations should be prioritized. Herein, a greater interaction between primary care and mental health services is eagerly needed.

Geolocation of Maryland Medical Marijuana Dispensaries by Community Income and Racial Characteristics: An Ecological Design.

Background: Prior investigations have documented disparities in the supply side of Maryland's Medical Marijuana program. Initially a disproportionate share of licenses to cultivate and distribute medical marijuana were awarded to Non-Hispanic White owned businesses. The state has implemented measures to ameliorate the inequity by prioritizing license awards to qualified minority owned businesses. Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine the racial and income characteristics of communities where licensed dispensaries are located. We quantify the racial and income characteristics of communities where Maryland medical cannabis dispensaries are located and explore whether Maryland medical marijuana dispensaries disproportionately locate in high-income, majority-White zip codes. Method: Using data from the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission and the American Communities Survey, we create geocodes for each of the operating dispensaries as of December 2019. We examine the distribution of medical cannabis dispensaries by zip code level household income and zip code level racial distribution. The data set encompasses 85 operating cannabis dispensaries in Maryland and 6.1 million Marylanders distributed across 468 zip codes in 2018-2019. Results: The analysis indicates that dispensaries are concentrated in zip codes whose residents are racially diverse, and with higher concentrations of retail establishments. Conclusion: Community level racial or income disparities in access to medical cannabis were not observed in Maryland. Access to medical cannabis, based on ability to pay out of pocket for the product, may be uneven.

Technology Use: Too Much of a Good Thing?

There is growing evidence of risks associated with excessive technology use, especially among teens and young adults. However, little is known about the characteristics of those who are at elevated risk of being problematic users. Using data from the 2012 Current Population Survey Internet Use Supplement and Educational Supplement for teens and young adults, this study developed a conceptual framework for modeling technology use. A three-part categorization of use was posited for utilitarian, social and entertainment purposes, which fit observed data well in confirmatory factor analysis. Seemingly unrelated regression was used to examine the demographic characteristics associated with each of the three categories of use. Exploratory factor analysis uncovered five distinct types of users, including one user type that was hypothesized to likely be at elevated risk of problematic use. Regression results indicated that females in their twenties who are in school and have greater access to technology were most likely to fall into this higher-risk category. Young people who live with both parents were less likely to belong to this category. This study highlighted the importance of constructing models that facilitate identification of patterns of use that may characterize a subset of users at high risk of problematic use. The findings can be applied to other contexts to inform policies related to technology and society as well. Supplementary Information: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11293-020-09683-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Association Between State-Level Criminal Justice-Focused Prenatal Substance Use Policies in the US and Substance Use-Related Foster Care Admissions and Family Reunification.

Importance: States have enacted criminal justice-related substance use policies to address prenatal substance use and protect infants from adverse health effects of parental substance use. However, little is known about the consequences of these policies for permanency outcomes among infants in the foster care system in the United States. Objectives: To evaluate the consequences of criminal justice-related prenatal substance use policies for family reunification and to examine differences in parental reunification by racial/ethnic group. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study using data from the 2005 to 2017 Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, 13 cohorts of infants who entered the foster care system were followed up. States with criminal justice-related prenatal substance use policies were compared with states without such policies before and after their enactment using a discrete-time hazard model adjusted for individual covariates, state, and cohort fixed effects. The sample consisted of 350 604 infants 1 year or younger who had been removed from their home because of parental drug or alcohol use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Length of time from entering the child welfare system to first reunification with a parent and hazard rates (HRs). Results: Of the 350 604 infants 1 year or younger, 182 314 (52%) were boys, 251 572 (72%) were non-Hispanic white children, and 160 927 (46%) lived in US states with a criminal justice-focused prenatal substance use policy. Among those who were reunified, 36% of the reunifications occurred during the first year and 45% in the second year. Foster care infants who were removed from their homes because of parental substance use who live in states that have adopted criminal justice-oriented policies had a lower chance of reunification with a parent compared with states that have not adopted those policies (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.96). Specifically, non-Hispanic black children who live in a state that has adopted criminal justice-oriented policies had a lower chance of reunification with a parent than non-Hispanic black children who live in a state that has not adopted those policies (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94). Conclusions and Relevance: Given the child welfare system's legal mandate to make every effort toward parental reunification, a more comprehensive treatment and supportive policy approach toward parental substance use might be warranted.

Racial Disparities in Payment Source of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment among Non-Incarcerated Justice-Involved Adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Research has documented a low rate of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment utilization among individuals involved in the criminal justice system. However, racial disparities in sources of payment for OUD treatment have not been examined in the existing literature. AIM OF THE STUDY: Although substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is relatively rare for all criminal justice system involved racial-groups, previous research has indicated that, among individuals with SUD, members of racial minority groups receive treatment at lower rates than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Given the alarming rise of OUD in the US and the association between source of payment and utilization of health care services, this study seeks to quantify racial disparities in sources of payment for OUD treatment among individuals with criminal justice involvement. METHOD: Using data from the 2008-2016 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), this study analyzes data on non-incarcerated individuals with OUD who have had any criminal justice involvement in the previous 12 months. An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method for non-linear models is implemented to determine the extent that differences in OUD treatment utilization across non-Hispanic Blacks and non-Hispanic Whites are explained by observed and measurable characteristics and/or unobserved factors. RESULTS: Results indicate that non-Hispanic Whites are more likely to have their OUD treatment paid by a court (10%) relative to non-Hispanic Blacks (4.0%). Black-White differences in measurable factors explain 87% of the disparity, while the rest is attributed to unobserved factors. Non-Hispanic Blacks are more likely to have their OUD treatment paid by public insurance (77% vs 36%) than non-Hispanic Whites and only 72% of this disparity can be explained by observed characteristics. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE: Our findings indicate racial disparities in sources of payment for OUD treatment among the criminal justice-involved population. Expansion of health insurance coverage and access to substance use disorder treatments would be beneficial for reducing health care disparities. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Equitable treatment options in the criminal justice system that incentivize OUD treatment availability may help address racial disparities in sources of payment among the criminal justice-involved population with OUD. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Future research should focus on understanding the main factors driving the court's treatment decisions among the criminal justice system involved individuals.