Experimental study showed that adding fortifier and extra-hydrolysed proteins to preterm infant mothers' milk increased osmolality.

AIM: Measuring milk osmolality after adjustable fortification is clinically relevant, as values exceeding recommended safety thresholds might result in gastrointestinal consequences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of four fortification levels and storage time on the osmolality of human milk. METHODS: This was an experimental study using 71 spare samples of fresh breastmilk collected from 31 mothers of preterm infants. Osmolality was measured before and after adding commercial human milk fortifier containing dextrinomaltose and hydrolysed proteins at four different concentrations. Measurements were performed at various points during the 23 hours after fortification. RESULTS: The mean basal osmolality of the 71 human milk samples was 296 ± 14 milliosmoles (mOsm)/kg, and these remained stable over a period of 23 hours. Just after fortification, the four fortified formulas showed higher osmolalities than the nonfortified human milk, ranging between 384 ± 14 and 486 ± 15 mOsm/kg, respectively (p < 0.01). This osmolality increased significantly from 20 minutes to 23 hours after fortification (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adding fortifier and extra-hydrolysed proteins to human preterm milk increased osmolality, and these osmolality levels also increased with time. We recommend evaluating the risk of hyperosmolality when a higher fortification level is needed, to avoid gastrointestinal problems.

Comparison of BNP and NT-proBNP assays in the approach to the emergency diagnosis of acute dyspnea.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and BNP measurement could have a significant role in differentiating dyspnea between cardiac or pulmonary origin in the emergency room. The development of new and different commercial assays for these B-type natriuretic peptides offers the possibility of improving and simplifying their measurements but this could be defaulted due to the differences in methodology and the lack of assay standardization. We compared four available methods of measuring NT-proBNP and BNP and evaluated their usefulness in diagnosing the causes of breathlessness in the emergency room. The correlation of BNP with different assays was strong with r>0.98 (P<0.0001). Comparison studies between NT-proBNP and BNP procedures were in good agreement with r>0.87. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) for BNP or NT-proBNP for detecting any cardiac dysfunction was higher than 0.96 (95% CI). A BNP value of 116 pg/mL measurement with the Access BNP assay (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA), a BNP value of 79 pg/mL with Advia Centaur BNP assay (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY), and an NT-proBNP level of 817 pg/mL in Elecsys NT-proBNP assay (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany), showed both high sensitivity (>92%) and high specificity (>93%). We have found that NT-proBNP and BNP present similar diagnostic accuracies for the differential diagnosis of dyspnea.

[Comparison of high-resolution liquid chromatography versus microparticle enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of sirolimus levels in renal transplantation]. / Comparación de la cromatografía líquida de alta resolución frente al enzimoinmunoensayo de micropartículas para la determinación de sirolimus en trasplante renal.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sirolimus levels measured in whole blood using two analytical techniques: high-resolution liquid chromatography and microparticle enzyme immunoassay, and to evaluate whether hemoglobin, hematocrit, and time from kidney transplantation influence results obtained using the immune-enzymatic technique. METHOD: A retrospective, observational study in which all transplanted patients with at least one measurement of sirolimus levels using high-resolution liquid chromatography or microparticle enzyme immunoassay from October 2004 to May 2005 were consecutively included. For statistical comparisons simple linear regression, ANCOVA, intra-class correlation coefficient, and the method of agreement limits were all used. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were assessed for a total of 307 measurements (median: 2, inter-quartile range: 1-4, range: 1-15) of sirolimus levels. The straight-line equation using the linear regression analysis was as follows: MEIA = 0.70 (95% CI: 0.39-1.01) + 1.14 (95% CI: 1.10-1.17) x HPLC/UV. The intra-class correlation coefficient between both measurements was 0.955 (95% CI 0.944-0.964). Mean overestimation using enzyme immunoassay was 24.8% +/- 19.4%. Difference in means between both measurements was 1.9 +/- 1.3 ng/mL. Agreement limits were established between -0.8 ng/mL (95% CI: -1.05; -0.55) and +4.6 ng/mL (95% CI: 4.35; 4.85). Factors such as post-transplant time, hemoglobin, and hematocrit did not influence overestimates obtained using enzyme immunoassays. These results were not influenced by non-independence in measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Despite enzyme immunoassay overestimates in establishing sirolimus levels in whole blood, its correlation with chromatography is acceptable. Added to its benefits versus chromatographic techniques, this renders enzyme immunoassay a good alternative for the measurement of sirolimus levels in whole blood.

MRI and CT of ankylosing spondylitis with vertebral scalloping.

Three cases of cauda equina syndrome in long-standing ankylosing spondylitis are reported. In all, vertebral scalloping and dural ectasia were confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. MRI showed widening of the dural sac with signal intensity corresponding to cerebrospinal fluid. CT demonstrated asymmetrical lesions of the posterior elements of the lumbar spine. Myelography was not felt necessary to confirm the findings.