Natural TCRs targeting KRASG12V display fine specificity and sensitivity to human solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Neoantigens derived from KRASMUT have been described, but the fine antigen specificity of T cell responses directed against these epitopes are poorly understood. Here, we explore KRASMUT immunogenicity and the properties of 4 TCRs specific for KRASG12V restricted to HLA-A3 superfamily of class I alleles. METHODS: A phase I clinical vaccine trial targeting KRASMUT was conducted. TCRs targeting KRASG12V restricted to HLA-A*03:01 or HLA-A*11:01 were isolated from vaccinated patients or healthy individuals. A comprehensive analysis of TCR antigen specificity, affinity, cross-reactivity, and CD8 coreceptor dependence was performed. TCR lytic activity was evaluated, and target antigen density was determined by quantitative immunopeptidomics. RESULTS: Vaccination against KRASMUT resulted in the priming of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses. KRASG12V -specific natural (not affinity-enhanced) TCRs exhibited exquisite specificity to mutated protein with no discernable reactivity against KRASWT. TCR-recognition motifs were determined and used to identify and exclude cross-reactivity to non-cognate peptides derived from the human proteome. Both HLA-A*03:01 and HLA-A*11:01 restricted TCR-redirected CD8+ T cells exhibited potent lytic activity against KRASG12V cancers, while only HLA-A*11:01 restricted TCR-T CD4+ T cells exhibited anti-tumor effector functions consistent with partial co-receptor dependence. All KRASG12V-specific TCRs displayed high sensitivity for antigen as demonstrated by their ability to eliminate tumor cell lines expressing low levels of of peptide/HLA (4.4 to 242) complexes per cell. CONCLUSION: This study identifies KRASG12V-specific TCRs with high therapeutic potential for the development of TCR-T cell therapies. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT03592888. FUNDING: AACR SU2C / Lustgarten Foundation, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and NIH (R01 CA204261, P01 CA217805, P30 CA016520).

Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Women Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Artery Revascularization: From the WIN-DES Collaborative Patient-Level Pooled Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) versus early-generation DES in women undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (CPCI). BACKGROUND: Whether the benefits of new-generation DES are preserved in women undergoing complex percutaneous revascularization is unknown. METHODS: We pooled patient-level data from women enrolled in 26 randomized trials of DES. Study population was categorized according to the presence or absence of CPCI, which was defined as the composite of total stent length >30 mm, ≥2 stents implanted, ≥2 lesions treated, or bifurcation lesion as target vessel. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 10,241 women included in the pooled database, 4,629 (45%) underwent CPCI. Compared with non-CPCI, women who underwent CPCI had a higher 3-year risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45 to 1.83; p < 0.0001). In women who underwent CPCI, use of new-generation DES was associated with significantly lower 3-year risk of MACE (adjusted HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.96), target lesion revascularization (adjusted HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.95), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) (adjusted HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.83). The benefit of new-generation DES on efficacy and safety outcomes was uniform between CPCI and non-CPCI groups, without evidence of interaction. By landmark analysis, new-generation DES were associated with low rates (≤0.4%) of very-late ST irrespective of procedural complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing CPCI remain at higher risk of adverse events. The long-term ischemic benefits of new-generation DES platforms are uniform among complex and non-complex percutaneous revascularization procedures in women.

3.1 Scholarship and the university.

Universities now exist in an environment of increasing accountability for their academic performance, both in teaching and research. Dental schools are expected to meet the academic expectations of their parent university and, in addition, to contribute to the health-care needs of the community. Individual staff members must achieve collectively the performance targets required of their school and individually must develop skills and expertise in their academic and clinical activities to merit tenure and promotion. This discussion examines the issues which impact on current problems of recruitment and retention of academic staff in dental schools internationally. The essential issue is career development in a manner which maintains the values that will ensure the credibility of dentistry as a scientifically based discipline and profession, while balancing the achievable academic needs with the added demands of achieving specialist clinical skills. Central to this balance is recognition that scholarship, which provides the bridge between research and teaching, can be broadly defined and that different individuals can be scholarly in a range of ways. Increasingly, schools are recognizing the importance of providing structured opportunities and guidance for career development of younger staff and of the need for flexibility in their criteria for tenure and promotion, recognizing that a diversity of individual strengths and teamworking are necessary both for the collective performance of the institution and the morale and development of the individual.