Optical Coherence Tomography in Inherited Macular Dystrophies: A Review.

Macular dystrophies (MDs) constitute a collection of hereditary retina disorders leading to notable visual impairment, primarily due to progressive macular atrophy. These conditions are distinguished by bilateral and relatively symmetrical abnormalities in the macula that significantly impair central visual function. Recent strides in fundus imaging, especially optical coherence tomography (OCT), have enhanced our comprehension and diagnostic capabilities for MD. OCT enables the identification of neurosensory retinal disorganization patterns and the extent of damage to retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor cells in the dystrophies before visible macular pathology appears on fundus examinations. It not only helps us in diagnostic retinal and choroidal pathologies but also guides us in monitoring the progression of, staging of, and response to treatment. In this review, we summarize the key findings on OCT in some of the most common MD.

Artificial intelligence-based fluid quantification and associated visual outcomes in a real-world, multicentre neovascular age-related macular degeneration national database.

AIM: To explore associations between artificial intelligence (AI)-based fluid compartment quantifications and 12 months visual outcomes in OCT images from a real-world, multicentre, national cohort of naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated eyes. METHODS: Demographics, visual acuity (VA), drug and number of injections data were collected using a validated web-based tool. Fluid compartment quantifications including intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) in the fovea (1 mm), parafovea (3 mm) and perifovea (6 mm) were measured in nanoliters (nL) using a validated AI-tool. RESULTS: 452 naïve nAMD eyes presented a mean VA gain of +5.5 letters with a median of 7 injections over 12 months. Baseline foveal IRF associated poorer baseline (44.7 vs 63.4 letters) and final VA (52.1 vs 69.1), SRF better final VA (67.1 vs 59.0) and greater VA gains (+7.1 vs +1.9), and PED poorer baseline (48.8 vs 57.3) and final VA (55.1 vs 64.1). Predicted VA gains were greater for foveal SRF (+6.2 vs +0.6), parafoveal SRF (+6.9 vs +1.3), perifoveal SRF (+6.2 vs -0.1) and parafoveal IRF (+7.4 vs +3.6, all p<0.05). Fluid dynamics analysis revealed the greatest relative volume reduction for foveal SRF (-16.4 nL, -86.8%), followed by IRF (-17.2 nL, -84.7%) and PED (-19.1 nL, -28.6%). Subgroup analysis showed greater reductions in eyes with higher number of injections. CONCLUSION: This real-world study describes an AI-based analysis of fluid dynamics and defines baseline OCT-based patient profiles that associate 12-month visual outcomes in a large cohort of treated naïve nAMD eyes nationwide.

Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy.

Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Given the recent approval of the first therapy for GA, pegcetacoplan, we critically appraise methodological aspects of the phase 3 clinical trials published so far in this disease in relation to their design, analysis and interpretation. We reviewed some of the key attributes of all phase 3 clinical trials in GA available in the main public registry of clinical trials as of 20 May 2023. The topics discussed included types of endpoints, eligibility criteria, p-value and effect size, study power and sample size, the intention to treat principle, missing data, consistency of results, efficacy-safety balance and application of results. Five phase 3 clinical trials have reported results, either partially or completely: GATHER1, DERBY/OAKS, CHROMA/SPECTRI, SEATTLE and GATE. Although there are many similarities between these trials in terms of endpoints or broad eligibility criteria, they differ in several aspects (metric of the primary endpoint, sample size, type of adverse events, etc.) that can influence the results, which are discussed. Readers should understand key methodological aspects of clinical trials to improve their interpretation. On the other hand, authors should adhere to clinical trial reporting guidelines to communicate what was done and how it was done.

Visual disturbances produced after the implantation of 3 EDOF intraocular lenses vs 1 monofocal intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual disturbances experienced by patients receiving 1 of 3 extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) or a monofocal IOL as the control. SETTING: OMIQ-Recerca Center. Spain. DESIGN: Prospective comparative randomized double-blind study. METHODS: 22 patients were included per group. The IOLs evaluated were the AcrySof IQ Vivity (Vivity group), AT LARA 829MO (AT Lara group), or TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 (Symfony group) and the monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF (Monofocal group). The variables analyzed were the light distortion index (LDI), best-fit circle radius (BFC Rad ), and self-reported vision quality with a questionnaire (QoV). Outcomes were evaluated at the 3-month follow-up visit. RESULTS: Under monocular conditions, no differences between groups were detected for the LDI and BFC Rad . Under binocular conditions, significant differences in both variables were produced. The Monofocal group reported better values than Symfony ( P = .025; P = .024) and AT Lara ( P = .002; P = .002) groups. The Vivity group reported better values than Symfony ( P = .015; P = .014) and AT Lara ( P = .001; P = .001) groups. Halos were not reported by 81.8% (18) of patients in the Vivity group, 90.9% (20) of patients in the Monofocal group, 50% (11) of patients in the AT Lara group, and 59% (13) of patients in the Symfony group. CONCLUSIONS: The diffractive EDOF IOL models examined in this study induced similar visual disturbances, which were worse than those produced by the nondiffractive extended-range IOL and the monofocal IOL. The nondiffractive lens and the monofocal lens did not show differences.

Creation of a neovascular age-related macular degeneration national database using a web-based platform: Fight Retinal Blindness Spain. Report 1: Visual outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To study the visual outcomes of neovascular AMD (nAMD) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs at national level. METHODS: Multicenter national database of nAMD eyes treated with anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (ranibizumab, aflibercept, bevacizumab) in fixed bimonthly (FB) or treat-and-extend (TAE) regimens. Demographics, visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) ETDRS letters at baseline and subsequent visits, number of injections and visits data were collected using a validated web-based tool (Fight Retinal Blindness!). RESULTS: 1273 eyes (1014 patients) were included, 971 treatment naïve (TN) and 302 previously treated (PT). Baseline VA (mean ± SD) was 57.5 (±19.5) and 62.2 (±17) (p > 0.001), and 24 months final VA was 60.4 (±21.2) and 58.8 (±21.1) (p = 0.326), respectively. Mean VA change at 12/24 months was +4.2/+2.9 letters in TN eyes and +0.1/-3.4 letters in PT eyes (p < 0.001/p < 0.001). The percentage of ≥15 letters gainers/losers at 24 months was 24.8%/14.5% in TN, and 10.3%/15.7% in PT eyes. The median number of injections/visits at 12 months was 7/9 in TN and 6/8 in PT (p = 0.002/p < 0.001) and at 24 months was 11/16 in TN and 11/14 in PT (p = 0.329/p < 0.001). Study drugs included ranibizumab (39.5%), aflibercept (41.2%) and bevacizumab (19.3%). CONCLUSION: Independent, large-scale national audits are feasible if committed health care professionals are provided with efficient information technology systems to do them. The results described here represent an adequate measurement of the quality of care delivered nationwide and benchmark the clinical management of nAMD at a country level compared to other real-world international cohorts.

Dexamethasone Implant for Diabetic Macular Oedema: 1-Year Treatment Outcomes from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Phase III clinical trials of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for diabetic macular oedema (DMO) have reported significant improvements in visual acuity (VA). Studies evaluating the treatment of DMO in routine clinical practice provide data to identify areas that need improvement. This study evaluated 12-month treatment outcomes of dexamethasone implant for DMO in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of eyes that started dexamethasone implant for DMO from 1 June 2013 to 30 April 2019 in routine clinical practice tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry. RESULTS: Of the 4282 eyes (2518 patients) that started DMO treatment in the specified period, 267 (6%) eyes (204 patients) received 454 dexamethasone implant injections. Two-fifths (106 eyes) had received prior treatment for DMO. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change at 12 months was 1.8 (- 0.5, 4.2) letters from the mean (standard deviation [SD]) VA of 56.5 (19.8) letters at baseline, with 41% eyes achieving at least 20/40. The mean (95% CI) change in central subfield thickness over 1 year was - 79 (- 104, - 54) µm from a mean (SD) of 459 (120) µm at baseline. Eyes that completed 1 year of follow-up received a median (Q1, Q3) of 2 (1, 2) dexamethasone implants. One-tenth of phakic eyes received cataract surgery while 2% had a pressure response requiring anti-glaucoma medications. CONCLUSIONS: One-year treatment outcomes of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for DMO in routine clinical practice were inferior to those in the clinical trials perhaps because of fewer treatments in clinical practice.

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors for predominantly Caucasian myopic choroidal neovascularization: 2-year treatment outcomes in clinical practice: data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.

PURPOSE: To report the 24-month outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in predominantly Caucasian eyes in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of treatment-naïve eyes starting intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitors of either bevacizumab (1.25 mg) or ranibizumab (0.5 mg) for mCNV from 1 January 2006 to 31 May 2018 that were tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry. RESULTS: We identified 203 eyes (bevacizumab-85 and ranibizumab-118) of 189 patients. The estimated mean (95% CI) change in VA over 24 months for all eyes using longitudinal models was +8 (5, 11) letters with a median (Q1, Q3) of 3 (2, 5) injections given mostly during the first year. The estimated mean change in VA at 24 months was similar between bevacizumab and ranibizumab [+9 (5, 13) letters for bevacizumab versus +9 (6, 13) letters for ranibizumab; p = 0.37]. Both agents were also similar in the mCNV activity outcomes, treatment frequency and visit frequency. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-month treatment outcomes of VEGF inhibitors for mCNV were favourable in this largest series yet reported of predominantly Caucasian eyes in routine clinical practice, with approximately two lines of visual gain and a median of three injections given mostly during the first year. These outcomes are similar to those reported for predominantly Asian eyes. Bevacizumab appeared to be as safe and effective as ranibizumab.

Brolucizumab: A Newly Developed Anti-VEGF Molecule for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs), currently, there is a need for highly effective compounds that can alleviate the burden of managing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). PURPOSE: To review the milestones in the molecular and clinical development of brolucizumab, the first single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) designed specifically for intraocular use in humans. METHODS: In this article, we summarize the preclinical and current clinical evidence of brolucizumab administration with an overview of the other treatment regimens and additional indications under investigation. RESULTS: The unique molecular design of brolucizumab led to a low molecular weight of only 26 kDa, allowing for a concentrated molar dose of 1 intravitreal injection compared with other anti-VEGF agents. Phase I and II clinical trial outcomes validated the efficacy of brolucizumab in the treatment of nAMD with signals of a more durable treatment effect. The pivotal phase III trials, HAWK and HARRIER, which included a total of 1,817 patients, established that brolucizumab can be administered every 3 months while maintaining disease control. CONCLUSIONS: The preclinical and clinical data on brolucizumab provide evidence of sustained disease control with longer injection intervals, thus potentially reducing the treatment burden in patients with nAMD.

Posterior Hyaloid Dissection: Let's Make It Easy with Blue.

PURPOSE: Our aim is to present in this online supplementa ry video (see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000486348) an easy new surgical technique using blue dye to dissect the posterior hyaloid when performing pars plana vitrectomy. PROCEDURES: Dual-Blue stain is injected in vitreous cavity just after central vitrectomy is performed. The distribution of the blue stain will allow us to know if there is a posterior vitreous detachment or not ("blue lake fashion" or "blue jelly fashion," respectively) and as an excellent visualization of the vitreous fibers is accomplished, dissection of the posterior hyaloid can be performed without difficulty. RESULTS: This procedure allows a much more simple, fast, and safe dissection of posterior hyaloid even for an inexperienced vitreoretinal surgeon. The cleavage plane between the retina and the posterior hyaloid is easily differentiated. CONCLUSIONS: A more controlled and easy dissection of posterior hyaloid during vitrectomy is accomplished with this simple technique without adding any extra cost. Message of the paper: An easy technique that allows a much easier dissection of the posterior hyaloid during vitrectomy improving visualization and decreasing risks. No extra cost, nor time is needed.

Single-Chain Antibody Fragment VEGF Inhibitor RTH258 for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of different doses of RTH258 applied as single intravitreal administration compared with ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Six-month, phase 1/2, prospective, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, ascending single-dose, active-controlled, parallel-group study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 194 treatment-naive patients, aged ≥50 years, with primary subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD. METHODS: Patients received a single intravitreal injection of RTH258 0.5 mg (n = 11), 3.0 mg (n = 31), 4.5 mg (n = 47), or 6.0 mg (n = 44), or ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 61). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to month 1 in central subfield thickness (CSFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The secondary efficacy end point was the duration of treatment effect measured as time from the initial injection to receipt of post-baseline therapy (PBT) guided by protocol-defined criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: RTH258 demonstrated noninferiority compared with ranibizumab in mean change in CSFT from baseline to month 1 for the 4.5- and 6.0-mg dose groups (margin: 40 µm, 1-sided alpha 0.05). The difference in CSFT change at month 1 comparison with ranibizumab was 22.86 µm (90% confidence interval [CI], -9.28 to 54.99) and 19.40 µm (95% CI, -9.00 to 47.80) for RTH258 4.5 and 6 mg, respectively. The median time to PBT after baseline therapy was 60 and 75 days for patients in the RTH258 4.5- and 6.0-mg groups, respectively, compared with 45 days for ranibizumab. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity with RTH258 were comparable to those observed with ranibizumab. The most frequent AEs reported for the RTH258 groups were conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, and conjunctival hyperemia; the majority of these events were mild in intensity. CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human study of RTH258 demonstrated noninferiority in the change in CSFT at 1 month for the 4.5- and 6.0-mg doses compared with ranibizumab and an increase of 30 days in the median time to PBT for the 6.0-mg dose. There were no unexpected safety concerns, and the results support the continued development of RTH258 for the treatment of neovascular AMD.

Topical azithromycin or ofloxacin for endophthalmitis prophylaxis after intravitreal injection.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients who have undergone intravitreal injections has increased enormously in recent years, but a consensus is still lacking on prophylaxis for endophthalmitis. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to evaluate the prophylactic effect of azithromycin eye drops versus ofloxacin eye drops. METHODS: The study was conducted in five hospitals in Spain and included all patients undergoing intravitreal injections of triamcinolone, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or pegaptanib over one year. Patients received azithromycin 15 mg/g eye drops (twice daily on the day prior to injection and for another 2 days) or ofloxacin 3 mg/g eye drops (every 6 hours on the day prior to injection and for another 7 days). RESULTS: In the azithromycin group, there were 4045 injections in 972 eyes of 701 patients. In the ofloxacin group, there were 4151 injections in 944 eyes of 682 patients. There were two cases of endophthalmitis (0.049%) in the azithromycin group and five (0.12%) in the ofloxacin group. The odds ratio of presenting with endophthalmitis in the ofloxacin group compared with the azithromycin group was 2.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-3.72, P < 0.001). There were two cases of noninfectious uveitis after triamcinolone injection in the azithromycin group (0.049%) and two (0.048%) in the ofloxacin group; no significant differences were observed (odds ratio 0.902, 95% CI 0.622-1.407, P = 0.407). Conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 12 cases in the azithromycin group and none in the ofloxacin group. CONCLUSION: The risk of endophthalmitis was significantly greater with ofloxacin than with azithromycin. These findings provide a valuable addition to the ever-increasing pool of information on endophthalmitis prophylaxis after intravitreal injection, although further large-scale studies are required to provide definitive conclusions.

Topical anesthesia: possible risk factor for endophthalmitis after cataract extraction.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between the risk for acute endophthalmitis after cataract extraction and whether certain factors, such as surgeon qualification, numerical order, duration of surgery, operating theater, and type of anesthesia (topical or retrobulbar), could be modified to decrease the risk. SETTING: Single-center academic practice. METHODS: Two epidemiological studies were performed: a case-control study and a retrospective cohort study. The surgical records of all patients with clinically diagnosed endophthalmitis within 30 days after cataract surgery performed between February 2002 and September 2003 were reviewed. The endophthalmitis cases were compared with 108 randomly selected controls (4 controls per case). The global incidence of endophthalmitis and the incidence according to type of anesthesia were calculated. RESULTS: Of 5011 cataract extractions performed, 27 cases of endophthalmitis occurred. The incidence was 5.39 per 1000 procedures. An independent statistically significant relationship was found between endophthalmitis and the use of topical anesthesia (odds ratio [OR], 11.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-58.7) and surgery longer than 45 minutes (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 1.7-29.7) but not between the other variables. The incidence of endophthalmitis was 1.8 per 1000 cataract extractions with retrobulbar anesthesia and 6.76 per 1000 with topical anesthesia (relative risk [RR], 3.76; 95% CI, 0.89-15.85). After the start of the study period was extended to May 2001, the incidence of endophthalmitis was 1.3 per 1000 cataract extractions with retrobulbar anesthesia and 8.7 per 1000 with topical anesthesia (RR, 6.72; 95% CI, 1.63-27.63). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that there may be an association between topical anesthesia and endophthalmitis after cataract extraction.

Vitreoretinal surgery for cystoid macular edema associated with retinitis pigmentosa.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of vitreoretinal surgery in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve consecutive eyes of eight patients with RP and a documented decrease in visual acuity (VA) to 20/60 or worse caused by macular edema refractory to medical therapy. METHODS: Pars plana vitrectomy was performed in the 12 eyes, followed by posterior hyaloid dissection, removal of the posterior inner limiting membrane after staining with indocyanine green, and gas tamponade. Preoperative best-corrected VAs ranged from 20/60 to 20/400 (mean, 20/115). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in VA and foveal thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: The mean preoperative retinal thickness at the fovea was 477 micro m. Optical coherence tomography showed a decrease in macular thickness of >40% in 10 eyes (83.3%), with a mean postoperative foveal thickness of 260 micro m. The mean VA increased from 20/115 to 20/45, with an average of three lines of improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that vitreoretinal surgery may effectively manage macular edema in RP.

Free insulin-like growth factor 1 in the vitreous fluid of diabetic patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a case-control study.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the vitreous levels of free insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). For this, a total of 36 diabetic patients with PDR (group A) and 28 non-diabetic patients (group B) in whom a vitrectomy was performed were compared. Both groups were matched by age, sex and serum-free IGF-1. In a subgroup of diabetic patients (n =21) and non-diabetic patients (n =13), vitreous and serum total IGF-1, IGF-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) and IGFBP-3 were also determined. Serum and vitreous levels of free IGF-1, total IGF-1, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 were measured by immunological methods. Vitreal proteins were assessed by a turbidimetric method and adjusted for vitreous haemoglobin. Vitreous levels of free IGF-1 were elevated in group A (median, 0.16 ng/ml; range 0.06-0.57 ng/ml) in comparison with group B (median, 0.12 ng/ml; range 0.06-0.22 ng/ml; P <0.001); however, after adjusting for vitreal proteins, free IGF-1 levels were significantly lower in group A in comparison with group B [0.05 ng/mg (0.01-0.45 ng/mg) versus 0.15 ng/mg (0.07-0.66 ng/mg); P <0.001]. The relatively lower free IGF-1 level observed in group A could not be attributed to differences in the distribution of intravitreous IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 in relation to total IGF-1. Notably, the contribution of free IGF-1 to total IGF-1 in vitreous fluid was 10% in group A and 42% in group B; these percentages largely exceed that obtained in serum (<1%). Our results suggest that although there is an enhancement of intravitreous free IGF-1 in diabetic patients due to serum diffusion, a deficit in its intraocular production also exists. In addition, these findings support the concept that intraocular-produced free IGF-1 plays a relevant role in retinal homoeostasis.

Deficit of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in the vitreous fluid of diabetic patients: possible role in the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vitreous levels of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 14 diabetic patients with PDR, in whom a vitrectomy was performed, were included in the study. Sixteen nondiabetic patients, with other conditions requiring vitrectomy, served as a control group. Both venous blood and vitreous samples were collected at the time of vitreoretinal surgery. Patients in whom intravitreous hemoglobin was detectable were excluded. In addition, a correction for plasma levels of SLI and intravitreal proteins was performed. SLI was measured by radioimmunoassay and vitreous hemoglobin by spectrophotometry. RESULTS: SLI in the vitreous fluid was significantly lower in diabetic patients than in the control group (68 +/- 18.7 vs. 193.6 +/- 30.8 pg/ml, P < 0.01). The vitreous SLI-to-plasma SLI ratio was strikingly higher in nondiabetic subjects than in diabetic patients with PDR (5.3 [1.2-71.1] vs. 0.6 [0.03-4.1], P < 0.01). After correcting for total vitreous protein concentration, SLI (pg/mg of proteins) remained significantly higher in nondiabetic control subjects than in diabetic patients with PDR (186 [51-463] vs. 7.5 [0.8-82], P < 0.0001). Remarkably, intravitreous levels of SLI were higher than those obtained in plasma in nondiabetic control subjects (193.6 +/- 30.8 vs. 43.5 +/- 10.7 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). Finally, a lack of relationship between plasma and vitreous levels of SLI was observed in both diabetic patients with PDR and nondiabetic control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly higher SLI in the vitreous fluid than in plasma detected in nondiabetic control subjects supports the concept that somatostatin plays a relevant role in retinal homeostasis. In addition, the intravitreous deficit of SLI observed in diabetic patients with PDR suggests that it might contribute to the process of retinal neovascularization.