Treatment adherence of cancer patients to orally administered chemotherapy: insights from a Greek study using a self-reported questionnaire.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective observational study was to investigate the patterns of treatment adherence to orally administered chemotherapy of patients being treated for cancer. METHODS: Patients were asked to participate in the survey during their visits to the study centers' pharmacists or doctors to obtain their oral medication from April 2008 until May 2009. The data were collected using a self-reported anonymous 7-page long questionnaire, which contained questions about their demographic profile, disease and treatment characteristics, and side-effects and adherence information, both intentional and nonintentional. RESULTS: 99 Patients completed the questionnaire. Missing values ranged from 1% to 8%. Unintended nonadherence to therapy was reported by 19 patients. The most important factor correlating with unintended nonadherence was the patient's belief regarding treatment effectiveness since only 16.7% of the patients believing that their treatment is effective reported nonadherence as opposed to 62.5% for those that did not believe that treatment is effective (p=0.03). Intentional nonadherence was reported by 14 patients The most important factor correlating to intentional nonadherence was time since disease diagnosis, as nonadherence was reported by 33.3% of the patients having the disease less than 6 months, compared to 16.7% for those between 6 and 24 months and 8.3% for those between 2 and 5 years (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Greek patients seem to have similar nonadherence pattern as in other countries. Confidence in treatment efficacy appeared as a significant adherence determinant.

Comparison of HER2 detection methods between central and regional laboratories in Greece.

PURPOSE: HER2 gene amplification and overexpression is associated with aggressive breast cancer and poor prognosis. Accurate HER2 testing of patients with breast cancer before treatment is important to ensure that as many patients with HER2-positive breast cancer as possible receive the most appropriate treatment and that women with HER2-negative disease avoid a potentially toxic therapy. This study compares immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) HER2 testing at central and regional laboratories in Greece. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The HER2 status of 458 breast cancer samples was determined by IHC in central and regional laboratories using commercially available anti-HER2 antibodies. FISH analysis, scored as number of signals or a ratio, was subsequently performed by the central laboratory on most samples. Various statistical analyses were used to examine concordance between test center results. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry HER2 testing was successfully performed on 445 samples in the central laboratory and 381 samples in regional laboratories, with good concordance between central and regional laboratories. After FISH analyses of a large proportion of these samples, good correlation was observed between FISH HER2 status and IHC results from the central laboratory but not from regional laboratories. These data suggest that HER2 status determined by IHC in a central laboratory is generally more accurate than that determined by a regional laboratory. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of accurate HER2 testing and the need to continually check the reproducibility and reliability of the test.