Comparison of Conventional Versus Right Angled Fixation Technique in Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: The treatment of mandibular angle fractures ranges from observation to closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation to open reduction and internal fixation. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different techniques (transoral, transbuccal, and right-angled fixation technique) for single adaptational monocortical upper border plating in mandibular angle fracture. METHODS: The study conducted at our center was a prospective randomized study. The study duration was from November 2019 to August 2021. The three groups included in our study were transoral, transbuccal, and transoral approach using the right-angled drill. Patients who required open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fracture were included in the study. Computer-generated randomization method was used to assign the participants among the 3 groups, ie, transoral, transbuccal, or right-angled fixation technique. The primary outcome clinical variables were mouth opening (MO), occlusion stability, scar or laceration, facial nerve weakness, infection, and the radiological variables were gap between the fracture segments and displacement of the fracture segment. The secondary outcome of our study is a comparison of the perioperative complications including plate exposure during the entire fracture healing period. The covariates of the study were age, sex, etiology, and tooth in line of fracture. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, and Pearson χ2 test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in our study. According to randomization, each group was allotted 16 patients. In the study, 66.7% of the study population were male and 33.3% were female; 75% of the study population were victims of road traffic accidents, and 25% were injured due to assault. The mean and standard deviation for MO at 1 month were 31.3 ± 2.9 for the transoral group, 35.8 ± 1.7 for the transbuccal group, and 35.5 ± 1.3 for the right-angled fixation group. On intergroup comparison, statistically significant results were seen at the 1-month postoperative MO clinical parameter. The P value here was 0.02 which was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The comparison of the right-angled fixation technique to transoral and transbuccal fixation methods have not been documented. Our study is the first of its kind to compare the right-angled fixation technique to various other approaches. Our study showed that the MO was better postoperatively with the transbuccal approach. The other variables showed no difference among the three techniques.

Association between shape of the mandibular condylar head and the occurrence of unilateral condylar fracture - A retrospective computed tomographic study.

This retrospective study aims to evaluate the correlation between the shape of the mandibular condylar head and the incidence of unilateral condylar fracture using computed tomography. Medical records of patients diagnosed with unilateral condylar fractures from the year 2012-2019 were reviewed. The shape of the condylar head on the non - fractured side was analysed using a Radiant Dicom Viewer. The analysis was done using both visual and analytical methods. In the analytical method, a horizontal line was drawn at the base of the curvature of the condylar head. The highest peak point of the head was marked, and a perpendicular line was drawn connecting the highest point to the horizontal line. The shape was categorized into four types as convex, flat, angled, and round based on these lines. 201 CT scans were examined, of which 69 were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The remaining 132 were included in our study. On examining the shape, flat-shaped condyle was seen in 57 scans (43.2%), followed by convex in 31 scans (23.4%), angled in 30 (22.7%) and round in 14 scans (10.6%). The relationship between the shape of the mandibular condylar head and the incidence of unilateral condylar fracture was analysed using a chi-square test, which showed high statistical significance (p value 0.0001). The flat-shaped condylar head was more prone to fracture, and the round-shaped condylar head was least prone to fracture. In conclusion, the shape of the mandibular condylar head had a statistically significant association with the incidence of unilateral condylar fracture. The assessment of the shape of the condylar head can be taken as a guide to suspect condylar fractures and other associated mandibular fractures.

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Relating to Vertigo among Newly Diagnosed Patients: Findings of a Prospective, Observational Registry in India.

OBJECTIVE: Vertigo is a common complaint in clinical practice, with multi-causative etiology, substantially impacting individual's overall lifestyle and behavior. However, so far no much data is available to understand the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) about vertigo in newly diagnosed Indian patients. Hence, the objective of this prospective, non-interventional, observational registry was to evaluate KAP towards vertigo and assessment of their awareness through a questionnaire-based survey. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with vertigo (aged ≥18 years), visiting the physicians, were provided with a self-administered validated questionnaire with domains namely knowledge (18 questions), attitude (7 questions), and practices (8 questions). Primary objective was to analyze the percentage of patients with high, average and low level of knowledge; percentage of patients who were little, quiet and extremely concerned about vertigo and its treatment; percentage of patients taking high, moderate and poor level of precaution towards vertigo. All variables were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 1167 (76.8%) patients completed the KAP questionnaire (women: 52.9%; men: 47.1%). A total of 17.3% patients had low level of knowledge, 73.9% had average and 8.74% patients had high level of knowledge regarding vertigo. Attitude domain revealed that majority of the patients (86.20%) had little concerned attitude towards vertigo; 9.85% patients were extremely concerned and 3.94% patients were not concerned regarding vertigo. Practice domain revealed that none of the patients took high level of precautions, 79.8% patients took moderate precautions and 20.2% took less precaution for disease prevention. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the knowledge, attitude and practice patterns amongst Indian vertigo patients are inadequate, highlighting the need for awareness and scientific education amongst these patients in India. Moreover, health care providers should be trained to provide counseling to these patients effectively.

Autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in acute spinal cord injury--an Indian pilot study.

STUDY DESIGN: Phase- I/II, prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled pilot study. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and feasibility of autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) via two routes of transplantation as compared with controls. SETTING: Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects with acute, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A (complete), traumatic SCI with neurological level T1-T12, were recruited and randomized into three groups of seven subjects each. Two groups underwent cell transplantation through the intrathecal or intralesional route, whereas the third served as control. Participants were assessed at baseline and followed up at 6 months and 12-months post enrollment. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring for any adverse events. Efficacy was assessed through neurological, functional and psychological evaluation, as well as through electrophysiological studies and urodynamics. RESULTS: Surgery was tolerated well by all participants. There were no significant adverse events attributable to the procedure. There was no significant improvement in the neurological, electrophysiological or urodynamic efficacy variables. A statistically significant improvement in functional scores as evaluated by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure and International Spinal Cord Injury Scale was observed in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure is safe and feasible in AIS A participants with thoracic-level injuries at 12-months follow-up. No efficacy could be demonstrated that could be attributed to the procedure.