Delayed intracranial hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury in patients on oral anticoagulants: is the juice worth the squeeze?

OBJECTIVE: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI) in anticoagulated patients is a common challenge for Emergency Department (ED) Physicians. Anticoagulation is considered a risk factor for developing delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after MTBI. The occurrence of this event in patients on Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) or Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) remains unclear. Primary endpoint: to analyze the role of anticoagulants as risk factors for developing delayed ICH after MTBI and evaluate the indications to repeat a cranial computed tomography (CT) after a period of observation. Secondary endpoint: to assess the difference in the prevalence rate of delayed ICH in patients on VKA versus those on DOACs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated all consecutive patients admitted to our ED for MTBI, which had a control CT for late ICH after a negative CT at admission. We used a propensity score match (PSM) on factors affecting the need for oral anticoagulation to adjust the comparison between anticoagulated vs. non-anticoagulated patients for the baseline clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among 685 patients enrolled, 15 (2.2%) developed ICH at control CT. After PSM, the incidence of ICH, although slightly higher, was not statistically different in anticoagulated patients vs. non-anticoagulated (2.3% vs. 0.6%, p=0.371). Among the 111 patients on VKA, 5 (4.5%) had a late ICH, compared to 4 out of 99 (4.0%) on DOACs; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.868). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing delayed ICH after MTBI in patients on anticoagulation therapy is low. After correction for baseline covariates, the risk does not appear higher compared to non-anticoagulated patients. Thus, a routine control CT scan seems advisable only for patients presenting a clinical deterioration. Larger, prospective trials are required to clarify the safety profile of DOACs vs. VKA in MTBI.

Wellens Syndrome without chest pain, is it possible?

OBJECTIVE: Wellens syndrome is a typical electrocardiographic and clinical pattern that correlates with a severe proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). It is associated with previous angina, no or slightly increased cardiac markers, and two ECG patterns: diphasic T wave in V2-V3 (Type A) or deep negative T waves from V1 to V4 (type B). In this paper, we described two cases with asymptomatic Wellens patterns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe two cases of Wellens syndrome ECG pattern that we observed in our Emergency Department not accompanied by chest pain or angina equivalents. RESULTS: Both patients presented significant stenosis of LAD at the coronary angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic patients presenting with Wellens ECG pattern should perform a coronary arteriography cause of the risk of a severe LAD stenosis. We need further studies to confirm if all "silent" Wellens syndromes deserve angiographic study.