Descriptive assessment of 54 cases with complex regional pain syndrome in lower limbs / Evaluación descriptiva de 54 casos con síndrome dolo roso regional complejo en miembros inferiores

Abstract Introduction: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also known as Sudeck syndrome, is a chronic painful condition usually affecting the limbs after trauma or surgery. Its presentation is heterogeneous and its physio pathology, diagnosis and treatment remain controversial. The objective of this study was to analyze a group of patients with this rare syndrome, describing in detail the results of the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the response to bisphosphonate treatment. Method: We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients with CRPS, taking into account their demographic features, inciting events and diagnostic tests. As regards treat ment, we analyzed the results and adverse events of the use of bisphosphonates Results: We found a female predominance (74%), with 55 ± 13 years. The most common inciting event was trauma (59%), followed by surgery. The difference in bone mineral density between the affected limb and the healthy one was 12 to 15%. Forty-four patients were treated with bisphosphonates (pamidronate, iban dronate, zoledronic acid) and showed a clinical im provement, mainly in terms of pain intensity. Only six patients presented with adverse events, like pseudoflu syndrome and acute phase symptoms. Conclusion: In our cohort, lower limbs CRPS pre dominantly affects middle aged women. DXA scans are tests used to quantify bone loss and the response to treatment. The use of bisphosphonates is an interest ing therapeutic option to improve clinical symptoms in most patients. Future prospective randomized studies will be needed to confirm our results.

Resumen Introducción: El síndrome doloroso regional complejo (SDRC), también conocido como síndrome de Sudeck, es una enfermedad dolorosa crónica que generalmente afecta a las extremidades luego de un trauma o cirugía. Su presentación es heterogénea y existen controversias sobre su fisiopatología, adecuado diagnóstico y trata miento. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir un grupo de pacientes con SDRC en miembros inferiores, describi endo los resultados de la densitometría mineral ósea (DMO) y la respuesta al tratamiento con bifosfonatos. Método: Analizamos retrospectivamente 54 pacientes con SDRC, teniendo en cuenta características demográ ficas, factores desencadenantes y estudios diagnósticos. En relación al tratamiento, analizamos los resultados y efectos adversos del uso de bifosfonatos. Resultados: Encontramos un predominio femenino (74%), con una edad de 55 ± 13 años. Los factores des encadenantes más comunes fueron los traumatismos (59%) y la cirugía. La diferencia de densidad mineral ósea entre el miembro comprometido y el sano fue 12 a 15%. En los 44 pacientes fueron tratados con bifosfona tos (pamidronato, ibandronato y ácido zoledrónico), su uso se asoció a mejoría clínica, especialmente del dolor. Seis pacientes tuvieron efectos adversos como sindrome pseudogripal y síntomas de fase aguda. Conclusión: En nuestra población, el SDRC de miem bros inferiores predomina en mujeres de edad media. La DMO es un método que permite cuantificar la pérdida ósea y la respuesta al tratamiento. Los bifosfonatos son una buena opción terapéutica para el control de síntomas. Son necesarios futuros estudios de naturaleza prospectiva y aleatorizada para confirmar nuestros resultados.

Descriptive assessment of 54 cases with complex regional pain syndrome in lower limbs.

INTRODUCTION: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also known as Sudeck syndrome, is a chronic painful condition usually affecting the limbs after trauma or surgery. Its presentation is heterogeneous and its physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment remain controversial. The objective of this study was to analyze a group of patients with this rare syndrome, describing in detail the results of the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the response to bisphosphonate treatment. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients with CRPS, taking into account their demographic features, inciting events and diagnostic tests. As regards treatment, we analyzed the results and adverse events of the use of bisphosphonates Results: We found a female predominance (74%), with 55 ± 13 years. The most common inciting event was trauma (59%), followed by surgery. The difference in bone mineral density between the affected limb and the healthy one was 12 to 15%. Forty-four patients were treated with bisphosphonates (pamidronate, ibandronate, zoledronic acid) and showed a clinical improvement, mainly in terms of pain intensity. Only six patients presented with adverse events, like pseudoflu syndrome and acute phase symptoms. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, lower limbs CRPS predominantly affects middle aged women. DXA scans are tests used to quantify bone loss and the response to treatment. The use of bisphosphonates is an interesting therapeutic option to improve clinical symptoms in most patients. Future prospective randomized studies will be needed to confirm our results.

Introducción: El síndrome doloroso regional complejo (SDRC), también conocido como síndrome de Sudeck, es una enfermedad dolorosa crónica que generalmente afecta a las extremidades luego de un trauma o cirugía. Su presentación es heterogénea y existen controversias sobre su fisiopatología, adecuado diagnóstico y tratamiento. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir un grupo de pacientes con SDRC en miembros inferiores, describiendo los resultados de la densitometría mineral ósea (DMO) y la respuesta al tratamiento con bifosfonatos. Método: Analizamos retrospectivamente 54 pacientes con SDRC, teniendo en cuenta características demográficas, factores desencadenantes y estudios diagnósticos. En relación al tratamiento, analizamos los resultados y efectos adversos del uso de bifosfonatos. Resultados: Encontramos un predominio femenino (74%), con una edad de 55 ± 13 años. Los factores desencadenantes más comunes fueron los traumatismos (59%) y la cirugía. La diferencia de densidad mineral ósea entre el miembro comprometido y el sano fue 12 a 15%. En los 44 pacientes fueron tratados con bifosfonatos (pamidronato, ibandronato y ácido zoledrónico), su uso se asoció a mejoría clínica, especialmente del dolor. Seis pacientes tuvieron efectos adversos como sindrome pseudogripal y síntomas de fase aguda. Conclusión: En nuestra población, el SDRC de miembros inferiores predomina en mujeres de edad media. La DMO es un método que permite cuantificar la pérdida ósea y la respuesta al tratamiento. Los bifosfonatos son una buena opción terapéutica para el control de síntomas. Son necesarios futuros estudios de naturaleza prospectiva y aleatorizada para confirmar nuestros resultados.

Effect of Teriparatide on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Markers in Real-Life: Argentine Experience.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of teriparatide (TPTD) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers under clinical practice conditions. To assess whether the results in real-life match those published in clinical trials. Methods: Cross-sectional study of postmenopausal women treated with TPTD for at least 12 months. Results: 264 patients were included in the study. Main characteristics are as follows: age: 68.7 ± 10.2 years, previous fractures: 57.6%, and previously treated with antiresorptive (AR-prior): 79%. All bone turnover markers studied significantly increased after 6 months. CTX and BGP remained high up to 24 months, but total and bone alkaline phosphatase returned to basal values at month 18. There was a significant increase in lumbar spine (LS) BMD after 6 months (+6.2%), with a maximum peak at 24 months (+13%). Femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) BMD showed a significant increase later than LS (just at month 12), reaching a maximum peak at month 24 (FN + 7.9% and TH + 5.5%). A significant increase in LS BMD was found from month 6 to month 24 compared to basal in both AR-naïve, and AR-prior patients (+16.7% and +10.5%, respectively), without significant differences between the two groups. Comparable results were found in FN and TH BMD. Main conclusions. As reported in real-life clinical studies, treatment of osteoporotic postmenopausal women with TPTD induced a significant increase in bone turnover markers from month 6 onward and an increase in BMD from months 6-12 with continuous gain up to month 24. The real-life results of our study matched the results of randomized clinical trials. In addition, TPTD induced an increase in BMD, regardless of the previous use of AR.

Clinical features, diagnostic evaluation and responses to treatment in Paget's disease of bone in a center specialized in bone metabolism / Características clínicas, evaluación diagnóstica y respuestas al tratamiento de la enfermedad de Paget ósea en un centro especializado en metabolismo óseo

Abstract The epidemiology of Paget's disease of bone (PDB) has changed in the last years but there is no update data on its clinical presentation, diagnosis and management in Latin America. Our aim was to describe its clinical features, diagnostic evaluation and responses to treatment in a group of PDB patients treated between June 2012 and December 2019 in an institution specialized in bone diseases, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The frequency of PDB (180/10 714) was 1.68%. Median age was 67 (range 39-97) years and 59.5% were women. Most patients were asymptomatic (58.6%) and had monostotic disease (54.3%). Favorable responses were obtained in all patients who were treated with zoledronate (n = 36), in 10 out of 14 treated with pamidronate, in 9 out of 10 who received intravenous ibandronate and in 12 out of 13 who received oral bisphosphonates. The response rates were not significantly different when we compared monostotic vs. polyostotic disease. Among the biochemical parameters, mean values of bone specific and total alkaline phosphatase, and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen decreased significantly after treatment with bisphosphonates. It seems that our results reflect the change in PDB epidemiology towards a more indolent disease. In the future, this would probably allow physicians to use lower doses of bisphosphonates than the ones historically recommended for these patients.

Resumen La epidemiología de la en fermedad de Paget ósea (EPO) ha cambiado en los últimos años. Son necesarios datos actualizados sobre su forma de presentación clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento en nuestra región. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características clínicas, evaluación diagnóstica y respuestas al tratamiento de un grupo de pacientes con EPO en un centro especializado en salud ósea de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se evaluaron todos los pacientes que fueron atendidos en nuestra institución por enfermedades óseas entre junio de 2012 y diciembre de 2019. La frecuencia de EPO (180/10 714) fue de 1.68%. La mediana de edad fue de 67 (rango 39-97) años. El 59.5% eran mujeres. La mayoría se encontraba asintomático (58.6%) y tenían enfermedad monostótica (54.3%). Se objetivaron respuestas favorables en todos los que recibieron zoledronato (n = 36), en 10 de 14 pacientes que recibieron pamidronato, en 9 de 10 que utilizaron ibandronato endovenoso y en 12 de 13 con bifosfonatos orales. Los porcentajes de respuesta no variaron significativamente entre pacientes con formas monostóticas y poliostóticas. Entre los parámetros bioquímicos, los valores de fosfatasa alcalina total y ósea y de β cross-laps disminuyeron significativamente luego del tratamiento con bifosfonatos. Nuestros resultados reflejarían un cambio en la epidemiología de la EPO hacia una forma de presentación más indolente. Esto permitiría probablemente el uso de dosis más bajas de bifosfonatos que las históricamente recomendadas para estos pacientes.

Clinical features, diagnostic evaluation and responses to treatment in Paget's disease of bone in a center specialized in bone metabolism.

The epidemiology of Paget's disease of bone (PDB) has changed in the last years but there is no update data on its clinical presentation, diagnosis and management in Latin America. Our aim was to describe its clinical features, diagnostic evaluation and responses to treatment in a group of PDB patients treated between June 2012 and December 2019 in an institution specialized in bone diseases, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The frequency of PDB (180/10 714) was 1.68%. Median age was 67 (range 39-97) years and 59.5% were women. Most patients were asymptomatic (58.6%) and had monostotic disease (54.3%). Favorable responses were obtained in all patients who were treated with zoledronate (n = 36), in 10 out of 14 treated with pamidronate, in 9 out of 10 who received intravenous ibandronate and in 12 out of 13 who received oral bisphosphonates. The response rates were not significantly different when we compared monostotic vs. polyostotic disease. Among the biochemical parameters, mean values of bone specific and total alkaline phosphatase, and C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type I collagen decreased significantly after treatment with bisphosphonates. It seems that our results reflect the change in PDB epidemiology towards a more indolent disease. In the future, this would probably allow physicians to use lower doses of bisphosphonates than the ones historically recommended for these patients.

La epidemiología de la enfermedad de Paget ósea (EPO) ha cambiado en los últimos años. Son necesarios datos actualizados sobre su forma de presentación clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento en nuestra región. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características clínicas, evaluación diagnóstica y respuestas al tratamiento de un grupo de pacientes con EPO en un centro especializado en salud ósea de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se evaluaron todos los pacientes que fueron atendidos en nuestra institución por enfermedades óseas entre junio de 2012 y diciembre de 2019. La frecuencia de EPO (180/10 714) fue de 1.68%. La mediana de edad fue de 67 (rango 39-97) años. El 59.5% eran mujeres. La mayoría se encontraba asintomático (58.6%) y tenían enfermedad monostótica (54.3%). Se objetivaron respuestas favorables en todos los que recibieron zoledronato (n = 36), en 10 de 14 pacientes que recibieron pamidronato, en 9 de 10 que utilizaron ibandronato endovenoso y en 12 de 13 con bifosfonatos orales. Los porcentajes de respuesta no variaron significativamente entre pacientes con formas monostóticas y poliostóticas. Entre los parámetros bioquímicos, los valores de fosfatasa alcalina total y ósea y de Β cross-laps disminuyeron significativamente luego del tratamiento con bifosfonatos. Nuestros resultados reflejarían un cambio en la epidemiología de la EPO hacia una forma de presentación más indolente. Esto permitiría probablemente el uso de dosis más bajas de bifosfonatos que las históricamente recomendadas para estos pacientes.

Which is the best antiresorptive treatment after finishing teriparatide?

Anabolic drugs are the treatment of choice for osteoporotic patients with very high risk of fractures. Post anabolic treatment with an antiresorptive drug maintains the bone mineral density (BMD) gained. The recommendations regarding the ideal antiresorptive drug are not precise. The aim of this paper is to compare the usefulness of zoledronate and denosumab in a group of 28 women with very high risk of fractures. All of them completed at least one year of treatment with teripatide and latter 14 received zolendronate and 14 denosumab for another year. We retrospectively review their biochemical and densitometric changes. Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in bone turnover markers of the same magnitude at the end of the second year. In Lumbar Spine BMD increase of 3.96 ± 8.56% Median (Me) 2.54 p = 0.21 in zolendronate group and 3.55 ± 5.36% (Me 5.14) p = 0.07 in denosumab group. Femoral Neck BMD changed -0.09 ± 6.50% (Me 0.29) p = 0.85 in zolendronate group, and - 3.41 ± 5.08% (Me 5.35) p = 0.59 in denosumab group, with no difference between both groups. In Total Hip BMD an increase of 0.55 ± 4.20% (Me 0.43) p = 0.70 in zoledronate group, and 4.53 ± 5.13% (Me 0.64) p = 0.04 with denosumab. We conclude that both antiresortive treatments have a similar effect in biochemical markers after one year of treatment. BMD increase significantly in total hip and changed with a trend toward in lumbar spine with denosumab, but without differences between both groups of treatment.

Los anabólicos son el tratamiento de elección en la osteoporosis con muy alto riesgo de fracturas. Después del tratamiento anabólico un fármaco antirresortivo mantiene la densidad mineral ósea (DMO) ganada. Las recomendaciones sobre el fármaco antirresortivo ideal no son precisas. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar la utilidad de zoledronato y denosumab en un grupo de 28 mujeres con muy alto riesgo de fracturas. Todas ellas completaron al menos un año de tratamiento con teripatide y luego 14 recibieron zolendronato y 14 denosumab durante un año. Revisamos retrospectivamente sus cambios bioquímicos y densitométricos. Ambos grupos de tratamiento experimentaron una reducción de los marcadores de recambio óseo de la misma magnitud al final del segundo año. En columna lumbar la DMO aumentó 3.96 ± 8.56% Mediana (Me) 2.54, p = 0.21 en el grupo zolendronato y 3.55 ± 5.36% (Me 5.14) p = 0.07 en el grupo denosumab. La DMO del cuello femoral cambió -0.09 ± 6.50% (Me 0.29) p = 0.85 en el grupo zolendronato y - 3.41 ± 5.08% (Me 5.35) p = 0.59 en el grupo de denosumab, sin diferencias entre ambos grupos. En la Cadera Total la DMO aumentó 0.55 ± 4.20% (Me 0.43) p = 0.70 con zoledronato y 4.53 ± 5.13% (Me 0.64) p = 0.04 con denosumab. Concluimos que ambos tratamientos antiresortivos tuvieron un efecto similar en los marcadores bioquímicos después de un año de tratamiento. La DMO aumentó significativamente en la cadera total y mostró una tendencia similar en columna lumbar con denosumab, sin diferencias entre ambos tratamientos.

Which is the best antiresorptive treatment after finishing teriparatide? / ¿Cuál es el mejor tratamiento antirresortivo luego de terminar con teriparatide?

Abstract Anabolic drugs are the treatment of choice for osteoporotic patients with very high risk of fractures. Post anabolic treatment with an antiresorptive drug maintains the bone mineral density (BMD) gained. The recommendations regarding the ideal antiresorptive drug are not precise. The aim of this paper is to compare the usefulness of zoledronate and denosumab in a group of 28 women with very high risk of fractures. All of them completed at least one year of treatment with teripatide and latter 14 received zolendronate and 14 denosumab for another year. We retrospectively review their biochemical and densitometric changes. Both treat ment groups experienced a reduction in bone turnover markers of the same magnitude at the end of the second year. In Lumbar Spine BMD increase of 3.96 ± 8.56% Median (Me) 2.54 p = 0.21 in zolendronate group and 3.55 ± 5.36% (Me 5.14) p = 0.07 in denosumab group. Femoral Neck BMD changed -0.09 ± 6.50% (Me 0.29) p = 0.85 in zolendronate group, and - 3.41 ± 5.08% (Me 5.35) p = 0.59 in denosumab group, with no difference between both groups. In Total Hip BMD an increase of 0.55 ± 4.20% (Me 0.43) p = 0.70 in zoledronate group, and 4.53 ± 5.13% (Me 0.64) p = 0.04 with denosumab. We conclude that both antiresortive treatments have a similar effect in biochemical markers after one year of treatment. BMD increase significantly in total hip and changed with a trend toward in lumbar spine with denosumab, but without differences between both groups of treatment.

Resumen Los anabólicos son el tratamiento de elección en la osteoporosis con muy alto riesgo de fracturas. Después del tratamiento anabólico un fármaco antirresortivo mantiene la densidad mineral ósea (DMO) ganada. Las reco mendaciones sobre el fármaco antirresortivo ideal no son precisas. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar la utilidad de zoledronato y denosumab en un grupo de 28 mujeres con muy alto riesgo de fracturas. Todas ellas completaron al menos un año de tratamiento con teripatide y luego 14 recibieron zolendronato y 14 denosumab durante un año. Revisamos retrospectivamente sus cambios bioquímicos y densitométricos. Ambos grupos de tratamiento experimentaron una reducción de los marcadores de recambio óseo de la misma magnitud al final del segundo año. En columna lumbar la DMO aumentó 3.96 ± 8.56% Mediana (Me) 2.54, p = 0.21 en el grupo zolendronato y 3.55 ± 5.36% (Me 5.14) p = 0.07 en el grupo denosumab. La DMO del cuello femoral cambió -0.09 ± 6.50% (Me 0.29) p = 0.85 en el grupo zolendronato y - 3.41 ± 5.08% (Me 5.35) p = 0.59 en el grupo de denosumab, sin diferencias entre ambos grupos. En la Cadera Total la DMO aumentó 0.55 ± 4.20% (Me 0.43) p = 0.70 con zoledronato y 4.53 ± 5.13% (Me 0.64) p = 0.04 con denosumab. Concluimos que ambos tratamien tos antiresortivos tuvieron un efecto similar en los marcadores bioquímicos después de un año de tratamiento. La DMO aumentó significativamente en la cadera total y mostró una tendencia similar en columna lumbar con denosumab, sin diferencias entre ambos tratamientos.

Severe Bone Microarchitecture Impairment in Women With Pregnancy and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis.

CONTEXT: Pregnancy- and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare condition characterized by fragility fractures, mostly vertebral, during the third trimester of pregnancy or the early postpartum period. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate bone microarchitecture in women with PLO to better understand the pathophysiology of this disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included women with PLO referred to our bone center between November 2007 and July 2012. We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bone turnover markers, and bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Results were compared with a control group of healthy lactating women. RESULTS: Of the 7 primiparous patients with PLO, 6 suffered vertebral fractures and 1 developed a hip fracture during the seventh month of gestation. Fractures occurred within the eighth month of pregnancy and the fourth month post partum; vertebral fractures were multiple in 85.7%. Major or minor risk factors for osteoporosis were present in 86% of our patients. Trabecular density, number, and thickness were 34%, 20% and 22% lower than controls (P < .01, P = .01, and P = .01, respectively). Cortical parameters were also deteriorated but to a lesser extent. CONCLUSION: In comparison with healthy lactating women, patients with PLO presented severe deterioration of bone trabecular and cortical microarchitecture. This significant compromise may explain the occurrence of multiple fractures in these otherwise healthy young women. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether bone microarchitecture might be able to be restored in the future.

Evaluación de la respuesta densitométrica en pacientes con osteoporosis posmenopáusica tratadas con ranelato de estroncio o denosumab / Densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with strontium ranelate or denosumab

Tanto el ranelato de estroncio (RSr) como el denosumab (Dmab) son eficaces en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis (OP) posmenopáusica (PM). El efecto de cada fármaco por separado sobre la densidad mineral ósea (DMO) ha sido estudiado recientemente. Con ambas drogas se observó, al año de tratamiento, un aumento significativo de la DMO en columna lumbar (CL), cuello femoral (CF) y cadera total (CT). En este trabajo comparamos la respuesta densitométrica al año de tratamiento con una y otra droga. Utilizamos los registros de 425 pacientes PMOP tratadas con Dmab y 441 tratadas con RSr. En cada paciente analizamos el porcentaje de cambio; se clasificaron como respondedoras aquellas que mostraron un cambio ≥3%. Adicionalmente se comparó la respuesta en pacientes no previamente tratadas con bifosfonatos (BF-naïve) en comparación con pacientes que habían recibido previamente un BF. Al analizar el grupo completo para Dmab, el porcentaje de pacientes respondedoras fue de 68,4% en CL, 63,3% en CF y 49,3% en CT. Por otro lado, en el grupo de pacientes tratadas con RSr, el porcentaje de respondedoras (53,8% en CL, 40,0% en CF y 35,6% en CT) fue estadísticamente menor. Cuando comparamos la respuesta entre las pacientes BF-naïve que recibieron RSr o Dmab, el Dmab indujo mayor respuesta en CL y CF que el grupo RSr, sin diferencias en CT. Cuando se analizaron los subgrupos BF-previo, las tratadas con Dmab mostraron mayor respuesta en todas las regiones. Conclusión: en pacientes con OP-PM, el tratamiento con Dmab produjo mayores incrementos densitométricos que el RSr, siendo el porcentaje de pacientes respondedoras mayor con Dmab que con RSr. (AU)

Both strontium ranelate (SrR) and denosumab (Dmab) are effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP). The effect of each drug on bone mineral density (BMD) has been studied separately by us. With both treatments, there was a significant increase after one year of treatment at the lumbar spine (LS) and hip. In this paper we compared the densitometric response after one year of treatment with both drugs used separately. We used the clinical records of 425 PM patients treated with Dmab and 441 treated with SrR. For each patient we analyzed the percentage of change; those who showed a change ≥3% were classified as responders. Additionally, the response was compared in patients not previously treated with bisphosphonates (BP-naïve) compared to patients who had previously received a BP. When analyzing the complete group for Dmab, the percentage of "responders" was 65.2% at the LS, 62.9% at the femoral neck (FN) and 47.4% at the total hip (TH). On the other hand, in the group of patients treated with SrR the percentage of responders (53.8% at the LS, 40.0% at the FN and 35.6% at the TH) was statistically lower. When comparing the response between in BF-naïve patients receiving RSr or Dmab, Dmab induced a greater response at the LS and FN than the RSr group, with no statistical differences at the TH. When the subgroups with prior BP treatment were analyzed, those treated with Dmab showed greater response in all regions. Conclusion: in patients with PMOP treatment with Dmab produced greater densitometric increments than SrR, and the percentage of responders was higher with Dmab than with SrR. (AU)

Utilidad del tratamiento secuencial con teriparatide y denosumab en la osteoporosis de alto riesgo: nuestra experiencia asistencial / Benefits of sequential treatment of high risk osteoporosis with teripartide and denosumab: our experience

El tratamiento de las formas graves de osteoporosis representa un desafío en la práctica asistencial. Reportamos tres pacientes con formas graves de osteoporosis tratadas en el Instituto de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Metabólicas con un esquema secuencial de teriparatide 20 µg/día durante 18 meses, seguidos de 12 meses de denosumab 60 mg semestral. Luego de 18 meses de tratamiento con teriparatide la densidad mineral ósea en columna aumentó 5,86±1,01% y en cuello femoral 1,92±3,10%; al finalizar los doce meses de tratamiento con denosumab se constató un aumento total en columna de 10,45±1,70% y en cuello femoral 9,28±3,86%. El tratamiento con teriparatide se acompañó de un aumento en los niveles plasmáticos de telopéptidos del colágeno óseo (CTX) y en el período de tratamiento con denosumab dichos valores disminuyeron de manera significativa, mostrando el impacto de estos fármacos sobre el remodelado óseo. Concluimos que el tratamiento secuencial con teriparatide y denosumab en dosis convencionales resultó beneficioso en las tres pacientes tratadas. Sería de utilidad ampliar esta experiencia en un trabajo prospectivo. (AU)

High risk osteoporosis treatment is a challenge in daily medical practice. We report three patients that attended our institution with severe osteoporosis who received sequentially teriparatide (20 ug daily) for eighteen months followed by denosumab (60 mg every six months) for twelve months. After teriparatide treatment bone mineral density increased 5.86±1.01% at lumbar spine and 1.92±3.10 % at femoral neck, while after denosumab it continued increasing to reach a total of 10.45±1.70% at lumbar spine and 9.28±3.86% at femoral neck. Teriparatide treatment increased bone resorption evidenced by high serum CTX while after denosumab it fell abruptly, showing the impact of these two drugs on bone turnover. We conclude that sequential treatment with teriparatide and denosumab in approved doses was beneficial for these three patients. Prospective studies are needed. (AU)

Strontium ranelate effect on bone mineral density is modified by previous bisphosphonate treatment.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of strontium ranelate (SrR) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers after 1 year of treatment. Additionally, the effect of SrR in bisphosphonate-naïve patients (BP-naïve) compared to patients previously treated with bisphosphonates (BP-prior) was analyzed. This retrospective study included 482 postmenopausal women treated with SrR (2 g/day) for 1 year in ten Argentine centers; 41 patients were excluded due to insufficient data, while 441 were included. Participants were divided according to previous bisphosphonate treatment in two groups: BP-naïve (n = 87) and BP-prior (n = 350). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. After 1 year of treatment with SrR the bone formation markers total alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin were increased (p < 0.0001), while the bone resorption marker s-CTX was decreased (p = 0.0579). Also increases in BMD at the lumbar spine (LS, 3.73%), femoral neck (FN, 2.00%) and total hip (TH, 1.54%) [p < 0.0001] were observed. These increments were significant (p < 0.0001) both among BP-naïve and BP-prior patients. Interestingly, the change in BMD after 1 year of SrR treatment was higher in BP-naïve patients: LS: BP-naïve = 4.58 ± 0.62%; BP-prior = 3.45 ± 0.28% (p = 0.078). FN: BP-naïve = 2.79 ± 0.56%; BP-prior = 2.13 ± 0.29% (p = 0.161). TH: BP-naïve = 3.01 ± 0.55%; BP-prior = 1.22 ± 0.27% (p = 0.0006). SrR treatment increased BMD and bone formation markers and decreased a bone resorption marker in the whole group, with better response in BP-naïve patients.

[Severe osteoporosis treatment with teriparatide]. / Tratamiento de la osteoporosis grave con teriparatide.

The primary objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the treatment of severe osteoporosis with teriparatide (PTH) and to compare our results with those published in the literature. We included 46 patients, 42 women and four men, mean age: 69.15 ± 9.43 years. Six patients were treatment naive and forty previously treated with bisphosphonates. Thirty-two patients had had 93 fractures of which 86 vertebral. Forty-six received PTH for 6 months, twenty-nine for 12 months and twenty completed the 18 months suggested. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine increased significantly at the first control performed at six months of treatment (p < 0.0001), and the femoral neck BMD reached a significant increase at the end of treatment (p = 0.002). Serum osteocalcin values significantly increased from the first month of treatment, followed by Β crosslaps (beta-CTx, serum test) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, returning all the markers of bone turnover to baseline levels at 18 months. Serum and urinary calcium did not change significantly at any time, but 8 (17.9%) patients developed mild hypercalcemia and 3 (6.5%) asymptomatic hypercalciuria. The treatment was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events requiring discontinuation. In conclusion, PTH is a safe and useful alternative for the treatment of primary severe osteoporosis. Our results agree with those previously reported in the literature.

Tratamiento de la osteoporosis grave con teriparatide / Severe osteoporosis treatment with teriparatide

El objetivo de este trabajo retrospectivo fue evaluar el tratamiento de la osteoporosis grave con teriparatide (PTH) y comparar nuestros resultados con los publicados en la literatura médica. Se incluyeron cuarenta y seis pacientes, cuarenta y dos mujeres y cuatro varones, edad: 69.15 ± 9.43 años. Seis eran vírgenes de tratamiento y cuarenta tratados previamente con bisfosfonatos. Treinta y dos pacientes habían tenido 93 fracturas de las cuales 86 vertebrales. Cuarenta y seis recibieron PTH 6 meses, 29 pacientes durante 12 meses y 20 completaron los 18 meses sugeridos. La densidad mineral ósea (DMO) de columna lumbar aumentó significativamente desde el primer control a los 6 meses (p < 0.0001). La DMO de cuello de fémur alcanzó un incremento significativo al final del tratamiento (p = 0.002). La osteocalcina aumentó significativamente al mes, seguido por el ß crosslaps (beta-CTx, prueba en suero) al tercer mes y la fosfatasa alcalina ósea, regresando los marcadores de recambio óseo a niveles basales a los 18 meses. Las calcemias y las calciurias no se modificaron significativamente, pero 8 pacientes tuvieron hipercalcemias leves y tres hipercalciurias asintomáticas. El tratamiento fue bien tolerado y no se registraron efectos adversos graves que requirieran suspender el tratamiento. En conclusión, la PTH es una alternativa útil y segura para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis grave. Nuestros resultados concuerdan con los previamente publicados en la literatura médica.

The primary objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the treatment of severe osteoporosis with teriparatide (PTH) and to compare our results with those published in the literature. We included 46 patients, 42 women and four men, mean age: 69.15 ± 9.43 years. Six patients were treatment naive and forty previously treated with bisphosphonates. Thirty-two patients had had 93 fractures of which 86 vertebral. Forty-six received PTH for 6 months, twenty-nine for 12 months and twenty completed the 18 months suggested. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine increased significantly at the first control performed at six months of treatment (p < 0.0001), and the femoral neck BMD reached a significant increase at the end of treatment (p = 0.002). Serum osteocalcin values significantly increased from the first month of treatment, followed by ß crosslaps (beta-CTx, serum test) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, returning all the markers of bone turnover to baseline levels at 18 months. Serum and urinary calcium did not change significantly at any time, but 8 (17.9%) patients developed mild hypercalcemia and 3 (6.5%) asymptomatic hypercalciuria. The treatment was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events requiring discontinuation. In conclusion, PTH is a safe and useful alternative for the treatment of primary severe osteoporosis. Our results agree with those previously reported in the literature.

[Systemic mastocytosis: bone impact]. / Mastocitosois sistémica: Repercusión ósea.

Systemic mastocytosis is a disease characterized by accumulation of mast cells in various organs of which the most affected is the skin. The bone impact of this disease is very rare and generally associated with the development of secondary osteoporosis with or without fractures. We present three cases of patients with skin mastocytosis lesions and different bone manifestations; the first case was a 51 year old woman in whom we observed a rare sclerosing variant with a normal-high bone density and increased density presented in several vertebrae x-rays. An iliac crest biopsy confirmed bone involvement of the underlying disease. The second case was a 57 year old woman who had characteristic signs of systemic mastocytosis with diarrhea, gastritis, flushes and specific cutaneous reactions to exposure to allergens. She also presented severe decrease in bone mineral density in both lumbar spine and femoral neck, with biochemical parameters of increased bone resorption, so had to be treated with bisphosphonates. The third patient, a 67-year-old woman, had several vertebral fractures, with slightly decreased bone densitometry. This last patient showed a hiperplaquetosis with histological diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia, a picture usually associated with systemic mastocytosis. In conclution, we present and discuss three different bone variants of systemic mastocytosis.

Mastocitosis sistémica: repercusión ósea / Systemic mastocytosis: bone impact

La mastocitosis sistémica es una enfermedad caracterizada por acumulación de mastocitos en varios órganos, de los cuales el más afectado es la piel. La repercusión ósea de esta enfermedad es poco frecuente y en general se la asocia al desarrollo de osteoporosis secundaria con o sin fracturas óseas. Se presentan tres pacientes con lesiones características en piel de mastocitosis y diferentes manifestaciones óseas; el primer caso es una mujer de 51 años en la que se observó una variante esclerosante muy poco frecuente, con densitometría ósea en valores normales-altos y aumento de la densidad ósea observada en varias vértebras por radiografías. Una punción-biopsia de cresta ilíaca confirmó el compromiso óseo de su enfermedad de base. El segundo caso fue una mujer de 57 años que mostró signos característicos de mastocitosis sistémica con diarreas, gastritis, flushes y reacciones cutáneas particulares ante exposición a alérgenos. Se observó además grave disminución de la densidad mineral ósea tanto en columna lumbar como en cuello de fémur con parámetros bioquímicos de aumento de la resorción ósea, por lo que fue necesario tratarla con bisfosfonatos. La tercera paciente, de 67 años de edad, presentó varias fracturas vertebrales, con densitometría ósea levemente disminuida. En esta última paciente se constató una hiperplaquetosis con diagnóstico histológico de trombocitemia esencial, cuadro que suele asociarse a la mastocitosis sistémica. En definitiva, se presentan y discuten tres variantes óseas diferentes de mastocitosis sistémica.

Systemic mastocytosis is a disease characterized by accumulation of mast cells in various organs of which the most affected is the skin. The bone impact of this disease is very rare and generally associated with the development of secondary osteoporosis with or without fractures. We present three cases of patients with skin mastocytosis lesions and different bone manifestations; the first case was a 51 year old woman in whom we observed a rare sclerosing variant with a normal-high bone density and increased density presented in several vertebrae x-rays. An iliac crest biopsy confirmed bone involvement of the underlying disease. The second case was a 57 year old woman who had characteristic signs of systemic mastocytosis with diarrhea, gastritis, flushes and specific cutaneous reactions to exposure to allergens. She also presented severe decrease in bone mineral density in both lumbar spine and femoral neck, with biochemical parameters of increased bone resorption, so had to be treated with bisphosphonates. The third patient, a 67-year-old woman, had several vertebral fractures, with slightly decreased bone densitometry. This last patient showed a hiperplaquetosis with histological diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia, a picture usually associated with systemic mastocytosis. In conclution, we present and discuss three different bone variants of systemic mastocytosis.

Tratamiento con bisfosfonatos y fracturas atípicas / Treatment with bisphosphonates and atypical fractures

En los últimos veinticinco años los aminobisfosfonatos se han convertido en las drogas de elección para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis. Son potentes inhibidores de la actividad osteoclástica y reducen la incidencia de nuevas fracturas en pacientes con osteoporosis establecida, pero su prolongada vida media y sus efectos crónicos sobre la fisiología ósea son motivos de preocupación. Teóricamente, una prolongada inhibición del remodelado óseo podría traer aparejada graves efectos adversos, tales como la acumulación de microfracturas y, paradójicamente, la ocurrencia de nuevas fracturas atípicas. Pocos casos de estas infrecuentes fracturas han sido hasta ahora publicados en la literatura mundial. Todas ellas comparten algunas características comunes, además del tratamiento crónico con bisfosfonatos por osteoporosis. La más frecuente es la localización atípica de las mismas. La mayoría ocurren en una o ambas diáfisis femorales, pero también otros huesos pueden estar afectados, entre ellos sacro, isquión, costillas y rama pubiana. Las fracturas son atraumáticas o ante mínimos traumatismos, y en algunos casos fueron precedidas por un dolor prodrómico en la zona de la fractura. Todos los casos tuvieron evidencias bioquímicas o histomorfométricas de bajo recambio óseo. El objetivo de este trabajo es informar sobre tres nuevos casos de pacientes que cumplen con todos los criterios diagnósticos de esta nueva entidad, dos de ellos con fracturas de diáfisis femorales y el restante con fractura de pelvis.

In the last twenty five years aminobisphosphonates have became the drugs of choice for the treatment of osteoporosis. They strongly inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption and reduce the incidence of new fractures in patients with established osteoporosis, but their long half-life and their chronic effects on bone physiology are a matter of concern. Theoretically a harmful consequence of a prolonged inhibition of bone remodeling could be the microdamage accumulation, and paradoxically the occurrence of new and atypical fractures. Until now, few cases of these unusual fractures have been reported in the international literature. All these patients shared some common characteristics, apart from the chronic use of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis. The more frequent is the atypical location of the fractures. Since the majority happened in one or both femoral shafts, others bones such as sacrum, ischium, ribs and pubic rami could be affected. The fractures were atraumatic or caused by minimal trauma and, in some cases, it was preceded by a prodromal pain in the affected area. All cases had biochemical or histomorphometric evidence of low bone turnover. The aim of this paper is to report three new cases of patients that fulfill with the diagnostic criteria of this new entity, two of them with femoral shaft fractures and the remainder with a pelvis one.

[Treatment with bisphosphonates and atypical fractures]. / Tratamiento con bisfosfonatos y fracturas atípicas.

In the last twenty five years aminobisphosphonates have became the drugs of choice for the treatment of osteoporosis. They strongly inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption and reduce the incidence of new fractures in patients with established osteoporosis, but their long half-life and their chronic effects on bone physiology are a matter of concern. Theoretically a harmful consequence of a prolonged inhibition of bone remodeling could be the microdamage accumulation, and paradoxically the occurrence of new and atypical fractures. Until now, few cases of these unusual fractures have been reported in the international literature. All these patients shared some common characteristics, apart from the chronic use of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis. The more frequent is the atypical location of the fractures. Since the majority happened in one or both femoral shafts, others bones such as sacrum, ischium, ribs and pubic rami could be affected. The fractures were atraumatic or caused by minimal trauma and, in some cases, it was preceded by a prodromal pain in the affected area. All cases had biochemical or histomorphometric evidence of low bone turnover. The aim of this paper is to report three new cases of patients that fulfill with the diagnostic criteria of this new entity, two of them with femoral shaft fractures and the remainder with a pelvis one.

Tolerability of intravenous pamidronate for the treatment of osteoporosis and other metabolic osteopathies: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous disodium pamidronate has been described in the treatment of several osteopathies. Although tolerability has been found to be good in clinical trials, some mild to serious adverse events (AEs) have been reported. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to analyze the toelrability of IV pamidronate in patients being treated for osteoporosis and other metabolic osteopathies and to describe particular patients with relative contraindications, because such cases are not commonly seen in daily clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with different osteopathies who were administered IV infusions of pamidronate at doses ranging from 15 to 90 mg/infusion and 15 to 900 mg/year. The study was conducted in patients who had received treatment at the Institute of Metabolic Investigations, University of Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina, between January 1995 and December 2003. To rule out dose-related AEs, a comparison was made between patients who received fewer IV infusions and had cumulative doses of 120 to 180 mg/y (less frequent administration [LFA] group) and those patients who received regular infusions and had cumulative doses of >180 mg/year (frequent administration [FA] group). To confirm data obtained from medical records and to assess the occurrence of AEs, attempts were made to interview all patients by phone. The following information was verified for each patient included in the study: the reason for treatment, documented evidence of current diagnostic criteria, and whether the dose administered was adequate to treat the patient's condition. RESULTS: Six hundred eight patients (464 [76.3%]women, 144 [23.7%]men; mean [SD] age, 69 [10] years) with various osteopathies (osteoporosis, 367 [60.4%] of the patients; Paget's disease, 172 [28.3%]; Sudeck's disease, 63 [10.4%]; multiple myeloma, 3 [0.5%]; and bone metastases, 3 [0.5%]) were administered a total of 2933 IV infusions of pamidronate during the study period. We were able to confirm the clinical records of 69.4% (422/608) of the patients by telephone survey; 29.9% (124/415) of those patients experienced extraskeletal AEs (most commonly fever and flu-like symptoms [eg, headache, malaise, fatigue, chills, and asthenia]). The percentage of patients reporting AEs was significantly higher for the LFA group than that of the FA group (91.2 vs 19.5; P < 0.001), although factors other than the frequency of treatment might have had a bearing on this finding. All AEs were mild and transient in both groups of patients, and there were no reports of jaw osteonecrosis in either group. It should be noted that although LFA patients received lower doses of pamidronate per infusion than the FA group, they had higher cumulative doses/year. Biochemical variables for the entire study population were compared with baseline measurements, and no significant changes in mean values were observed. Both serum calcium and 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels remained within normal ranges. On the other hand, there was a transient decrease in white blood cell count (WBCC) in 73 (12.0%) patients, and leukopenia was observed in 8 (1.3%) patients. However, 5 of the 6 patients who were leukopenic at the beginning of treatment had normal WBCCs during follow-up. Platelet count decreased significantly in 20 (3.3%) patients, and 5 (0.8%) patients developed thrombocytopenia. Serum creatinine (sCreat) levels increased significantly in 91 (15.0%) patients. This increase was transient and within normal limits (0.6-1.2 mg/dL) in 79 (86.8%) of those patients but persistent in the other 12 (13.2%), all of whom received higher doses of pamidronate or had other risk factors for renal failure such as advanced age, diabetes, multiple myeloma, or an obstructor disease. Baseline sCreat level for 7 of these 12 patients was >1.20 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Pamidronate administered IV was well tolerated when used for treating osteoporosis or other metabolic osteopathies in our study population. The clinical AEs observed with IV pamidronate administration were not serious and hematologic changes were mild, transient, and not associated with dose, time of treatment, or any particular underlying disease. An increase in sCreat level was the most frequent biochemical complication and was found in patients with additional risk factors for renal failure and particular diseases. Whether certain patients with risk factors for osteoporosis may require even fewer IV administrations of the drug is an issue that remains to be elucidated.

[Osteoporosis during pregnancy and lactation. Report of eight cases]. / Osteoporosis del embarazo y la lactancia. Estudio de 8 casos.

Both generalized and regional osteoporosis exceptionally occur during pregnancy and lactation. The aim of this paper is to show our experience in the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases. From 1984 to 2004 six lactating women with osteoporosis and two with regional osteoporosis consulted us. In the former group, three patients had vertebral fractures and the others experienced substantial demineralization detected by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In all cases, symptoms began during the third trimester of pregnancy or immediately after delivery. Five of them were primiparous and one was multiparous with a long period of lactation. Risk factors were: low calcium intake, low weight, family history of osteoporosis, amenorrhea, cigarette consumption and corticosteroid therapy. Laboratory tests evidenced increased bone turnover. DXA scan showed substantial demineralization, particularly in axial skeleton. Lactation was interrupted in all women and four received anti-resorptive drugs, one estrogen and only calcium plus vitamin D the remaining. All of them, but one, evolved successfully. The women affected by regional osteoporosis complained of unilateral pain and progressive functional limitation of right foot and left hip respectively. Reduced bone mineral density at symptomatic sites was seen by DXA. Diagnosis was confirmed by typical magnetic resonance imaging pattern. Both patients cured with rest and bisphosfonates treatment.