Indirect Spinal Canal Decompression Using Ligamentotaxis Compared With Direct Posterior Canal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Background: There is still no standard of care to manage thoracolumbar burst fractures. With all the recent advances, posterior approaches are still one of the mainstays of treatment. On the other hand, while spinal canal decompression in neurological impaired patients is an important goal of treatment, its technique remains controversial.This study compared the effects of direct laminectomy decompression against ligamentotaxis/indirect canal decompression on neurological and radiographic improvements. Methods: A prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 thoracolumbar burst-fracture patients meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomized into 2 treatment arms: (1) direct decompression using laminectomy and (2) indirect decompression using ligamentotaxis/distraction. Each patient was observed for 6 months, and their neurological and radiographical data were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was done by the Student t test, Friedman test, Mann Whitney-U test, Wilcoxon ranked test, and 1-way analysis of variance. Results: Among 60 patients enrolled in our study, each treatment arm had an improvement in Frankel scores but there was no difference between the groups at any given time. After 6 months of surgery, local sagittal kyphosis improved in both groups (from 32.2 to 7.43 and 29.93 to 8.77 for the indirect and direct groups, respectively), as well as anterior vertebral height ratio (from 57.73 to 70.7 and 62.17 to 66.27 for the indirect and direct group, respectively) and posterior vertebral height ratio (from 61.17 to 74.87 and 64 to 67.5 for the indirect and direct group, respectively). For between-group comparisons after 6 months, there was a significant difference only for posterior vertebral height ratio (P = 0.040). Conclusion: Posterior approaches with ligamentotaxis have shown to be safe and may present the same outcome as direct decompression techniques using wide laminectomy.

The efficacy of intrathecal methyl-prednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: A pilot study.

Study design: Randomized clinical trial. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intrathecal methyl-prednisolone compared to intravenous methyl-prednisolone in acute spinal cord injuries. Setting: Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Methods: Patients meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study and divided randomly into two treatment arms: intrathecal and intravenous. Standard spinal cord injury care (including surgery) was given to each patient based on our institutional policy. Patients were then assessed for neurological status (based on ASIA scores, Frankel scores) and complications for six months and compared to baseline status after injury. To better understand the biological bases of methyl-prednisolone on spinal cord injuries, we measured two biomarkers for oxidative stress (serum malondialdehyde and total antioxidant capacity) in these patients at arrival and day three after injury. Results: The present study showed no significant difference between the treatment arms in neurological status (sensory scores or motor scores) or complications. However, the within-group analysis showed improvement in neurological status in each treatment arm within six months. Serum malondialdehyde and total antioxidant capacity were analyzed, and no significant difference between the groups was seen. Conclusion: This is the first known clinical trial investigating the effect of intrathecal MP in acute SCI patients. Our finding did not show any significant differences in complication rates and neurological outcomes between the two study arms. Further studies should be conducted to define the positive and negative effects of this somehow novel technique in different populations as well.

Internal carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base pathologies: an institutional incidence, management, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) has become a popular approach to deal with skull base pathologies. The most catastrophic intra-operative complication of EES is internal carotid artery (ICA) injury. We aim to discuss and introduce our institutional experience with ICA injury during EES. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent EES from 2013 to 2022 was performed to determine the incidence and outcomes of intraoperative ICA injuries. RESULTS: There were six patients (0.56%) with intraoperative ICA injury in our institution during the last 10 years. Fortunately, there was no morbidity or mortality in our patients with intraoperative ICA injuries. The sites of injury were equally in paraclival, cavernous sinus, and preclinoidal segments of ICA. CONCLUSION: Primary prevention is the best solution for this condition. Regarding our institutional experience, the best option for primary management just after an injury is packing the surgical site. In cases where packing is not enough for temporary control of bleeding, common carotid artery occlusion should be considered. We have presented our experience and reviewed previous studies regarding different treatments and suggested our intra and post-operative management algorithm.

A case of chronic ossified hematoma presented as a skull lesion: A literature review on two rare conditions, cephalhematoma, and intradiploic hematoma.

Cephalhematoma is a frequent condition in newborn infants due to birth-related trauma, but ossified cephalhematoma (OCH) is a rare condition, especially when it presents as a skull lesion in the older pediatric population. Chronic intradiploic hematoma (CIH) is another rare condition caused by an organized hematoma between the inner and outer tables of the skull. Differentiating CIH from OCH could be difficult for young neurosurgeons. We present an 18-month-old girl with an OCH presented as a skull lesion, which was managed with craniectomy and en-bloc excision of the organized hematoma. This manuscript discusses the differences between OCH and CIH in diagnosis and management.