Assessing the impact of a community-based psychodrama intervention on mental health promotion of adolescents and young adults in Mozambique: A mixed-methods study.

Background: While mental health is an emerging issue in low-income countries, its promotion remains poor, with little context-oriented evidence available. Here we aimed to assess the impact and acceptability/feasibility of a community-based psychodrama intervention involving both adolescents and young adults (AYA) living with HIV (AYALHIV) and without HIV (AYAHIV-). Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach, where the quantitative part was based on pre/post questionnaires and the qualitative one on content analysis of semi-structured interviews. Trained community health care workers delivered psychodrama sessions involving AYAs aged 15-24 years once a week between July and August 2023 in Beira, Mozambique. The baseline assessment involved a sociodemographic and three mental health questionnaires: the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), Community Attitudes toward People with Mental Illness (CAMI27), and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS). We repeated all questionnaires after the intervention and conducted semi-structured interviews. Results: We enrolled 354 AYAs (50.8% female, 45.5% AYALHIV) at baseline; 315 (89.0%) attended the sessions, with a mean participation rate of 94.4%. Overall, 281 (89.2%) completed the post-intervention assessment. MAKS score improved from 44.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 44.0-45.0) to 47.1 (95% CI = 46.4-47.7, P < 0.001). Total CAMI27 score showed no significant variation (P = 0.855). Total TAS score decreased from 57.3 (95% CI = 56.1-58.5) to 54.3 (95% CI = 53.0-55.6, P < 0.001). We found no statistically significant interactions between time and sex, age, or HIV serostatus in all questionnaires. For the qualitative part of the study, we analysed 37 semi-structured interviews (43.2% with females, 40.5% with AYALHIV). We identified four areas of intervention impact: peer-to-peer support (30.3%), social empowerment (24.7%), resilience (23.0%), and emotional skills (21.9%). Regarding acceptability/feasibility, perceived scalability (37.2%) and affective attitude (34.5%) were the sub-areas most frequently retrieved in the SSIs. Conclusions: The community-based psychodrama intervention proved to be an effective tool in AYAs' mental health promotion, increasing knowledge and improving emotional awareness through group experience and interpersonal learning. The intervention also showed good acceptability and feasibility in the context of our study.

Effectiveness of the Hypertension Screening Corner in Enhancing the Cascade of Care at Primary Healthcare Center Level: Evidence from Zambezia, Mozambique.

Background: Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease, whose death burden is dramatically increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. To curb its effects, early diagnosis and effective follow-up are essential. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of a hypertension screening corner on the hypertension care cascade at the primary healthcare level. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 in two PHCCs in Zambezia (Mozambique). The study involved a demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) questionnaire for those screened. Patients with blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg were given a follow-up questionnaire regarding the care cascade. The four cascade steps were: medical visit, diagnosis confirmation, follow-up visit, and recalling the follow-up appointment. The odds ratio (OR) of reaching each step of the cascade was assessed by binomial logistic regression. Results: Patients with BP > 140/90 mmHg were 454, and 370 (86.0%) completed both study phases. Individuals attending the medical visit were 225 (60.8%). Those with low SES had a higher probability of visit attendance than those with middle (OR = 0.46, 0.95CI[0.23-0.88] p = 0.020) and high (OR = 0.21 0.95CI[0.10-0.42], p < 0.001). Hypertension diagnosis was confirmed in 181 (80.4%), with higher probability in the low SES group compared to the middle (OR = 0.24 IC95[0.08-0.66], p = 0.007) and high (OR = 0.23, IC95[0.07-0.74], p = 0.016) groups. The OR to complete step 1 and step 2 were higher for older age groups. A follow-up appointment was received and recalled by 166 (91.7%) and 162 (97.6%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: The hypertension corner proved to be a useful tool for effective screening of hypertension with satisfactory retention in care, especially for people with lower socio-economic status.

The use of 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Ukrainian refugees: translation and validation study of the Ukrainian version.

Following the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the well-being of millions of Ukrainians has been jeopardised. This study aims to translate and test the psychometric features of the Ukrainian version of the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12). The study included Ukrainian refugees housed in Verona (Italy) between November/2022 and February/2023. The Ukrainian translation was obtained through a 'forward-backward' translation. Questionnaire was completed by 141 refugees (females: 78.7%). Median age was 36 years (IQR 23-43). Individuals with a score suggestive of psychological distress were 97 (68.8%). Cronbach's coefficient was 0.84 (0.95CI 0.80-0.88). According to confirmatory factor analysis, both single- (modelB1) and two-factor (model B2) structures with bimodal scoring method fitted the data satisfactorily. The two factors of model B2 had a 0.88 correlation. Pearson coefficient showed a positive significant correlation between the GHQ-12 and International Trauma Questionnaire scores (ρ = 0.53, 0.95CI 0.40-0.64, p < 0.001). The GHQ-12 Ukrainian translation showed good psychometric features being a reliable and valid instrument to assess Ukrainian refugees' general well-being.

Disparities in access to COVID-19 vaccine in Verona, Italy: a cohort study using local health immunization data.

Introduction: Migrant populations worldwide were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although substantial resources have been invested in scaling COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, globally vaccine rate and uptake remained low among migrants from across many countries. This study aimed to explore the country of birth as a factor influencing access to the COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 receiving at least one dose in the Verona province between 27 December 2020 and 31 December 2021. Time-to-vaccination was estimated as the difference between the actual date of each person's first dose of COVID-19 vaccination and the date in which the local health authorities opened vaccination reservations for the corresponding age group. The birth country was classified based on both the World Health Organization regions and the World Bank country-level economic classification. Results were reported as the average marginal effect (AME) with corresponding 0.95 confidence intervals (CI). Results: During the study period, 7,54,004 first doses were administered and 5,06,734 (F = 2,46,399, 48.6%) were included after applying the exclusion criteria, with a mean age of 51.2 years (SD 19.4). Migrants were 85,989 (17.0%, F = 40,277, 46.8%), with a mean age of 42.4 years (SD 13.3). The mean time-to-vaccination for the whole sample was 46.9 days (SD 45.9), 41.8 days (SD 43.5) in the Italian population, and 71.6 days (SD 49.1) in the migrant one (p < 0.001). The AME of the time-to-vaccination compared to the Italian population was higher by 27.6 [0.95 CI 25.4-29.8], 24.5 [0.95 CI 24.0-24.9], 30.5 [0.95 CI 30.1-31.0] and 7.3 [0.95 CI 6.2-8.3] days for migrants from low-, low-middle-, upper-middle- and high-income countries, respectively. Considering the WHO region, the AME of the time-to-vaccination compared to the Italian group was higher by 31.5 [0.95 CI 30.6-32.5], 31.1 [0.95 CI 30.6-31.5], and 29.2 [0.95 CI 28.5-29.9] days for migrants from African, European, and East-Mediterranean regions, respectively. Overall, time-to-vaccination decreased with increasing age (p < 0.001). Although both migrants and Italians mainly used hub centers (>90%), migrants also used pharmacies and local health units as alternative sites (2.9% and 1.5%, respectively), while Italians (3.3%) and migrants from the European region (4.2%) relied more on family doctors. Conclusion: The birth country of migrants influenced access to COVID-19 vaccine both in terms of time-to-vaccination and vaccination points used, especially for the LIC migrant group. Public health authorities should take socio-cultural and economic factors into consideration for tailored communication to people from migrant communities and for planning a mass vaccination campaign.

Epidemiological factors affecting outpatient department service utilization and hospitalization in patients with diabetes: A time-series analysis from an Ethiopian hospital between 2018 and 2021.

Background: The burden of diabetes-related deaths reached two million in 2019 globally. Accessibility to health care services and adherence to follow-up and therapy are key to improving outcomes for diabetic patients. We aimed to assess outpatient department (OPD) service utilization and diabetes-related hospitalizations over a period of 44 months. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on OPD visits and hospitalizations recorded between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2021, at the St Luke Catholic Hospital (Ethiopia). All diabetic patients were included in the analysis. A linear regression model was used for univariate analysis of OPD visits and hospitalizations and their association with potential predictors. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) method was applied to both the time series of OPD visits and hospitalizations. Potential predictors were sociodemographic factors, COVID-19 cases, mean monthly temperature and precipitations. Results: In the time series analysis, OPD visits increased over time (P < 0.01) while hospitalizations were stable. The time series model was ARIMA (0,1,1) for OPD visits and ARIMA (0,0,0) for hospitalizations. There were 1685 diabetes OPD patients (F = 732, 43%). Females had an average of 16% fewer OPD accesses per month (P < 0.01) and a lower number of hospitalizations per month (P = 0.03). There were 801 patients missing follow-up (48%). The time between follow-up increased with age (P < 0.01). OPD visits decreased differently by geographic area as COVID-19 cases increased (P < 0.01). There were 57 fewer forecast OPD visits per month on average using COVID-19 cases as ARIMA regressor. The odds ratio (OR) of new diagnosis at hospitalization was lower in patients with type 2 diabetes (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.14-0.49, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Despite an increase in OPD visits for diabetic patients over the study period, the number of losses at follow-up and diagnoses at hospitalization remains high. Female sex, older age, and COVID-19 were associated with impaired OPD service accessibility. Primary health care should be implemented to achieve better health coverage and improve diabetes management.