RESUMO
Oral health is an essential component of overall health for all individuals. The oral health of children and youth with developmental disabilities (CYDD) involves unique characteristics and needs of which pediatricians and pediatric clinicians can be aware. Risk for oral disease in CYDD is multifactorial and includes underlying medical conditions, medications, and ability to participate in preventive oral health care and treatment, and lack of access to providers is common for this population despite being eligible for Medicaid. Pediatric clinicians are uniquely positioned to support the oral health needs of CYDD and their families through the medical home. This clinical report aims to inform pediatric clinicians about the unique oral health needs of CYDD. It provides guidance on assessing caries risk and periodontal status using structured screening instruments; understanding dental trauma, the role of diet and caries risk, trauma prevention, and malocclusion; and providing anticipatory guidance on oral hygiene that includes tooth brushing, use of fluoridated toothpaste, assessing community water fluoridation, advocating for a dental home by 1 year of age, and transition to adult dental care as part of adolescent health care. It also highlights special considerations for dental treatment rendered under sedation or general anesthesia that CYDD may need. Pediatric clinicians can help reduce risk of CYDD developing dental disease by understanding the unique needs of their patients and their barriers to accessing oral health care in their community, communicating with the child's dental home, and advocating for safe and accessible dental procedures.
Assuntos
Deficiências do Desenvolvimento , Saúde Bucal , Humanos , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Assistência Odontológica para a Pessoa com Deficiência , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças , Cárie Dentária/prevenção & controle , Cárie Dentária/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Children and youth in foster care are considered to have special health care needs, including oral health care needs. This study compares the self-identified oral health care needs and access to oral health care among youth who have and have not experienced foster care. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2019 Minnesota Student Survey, a statewide survey of public school students in the 5th, 8th, 9th, and 11th grades (N = 169,484). Youth with a history of foster care (3%) were compared with youth with no history of foster care for 7 oral health indicators. RESULTS: Youth with a history of foster care reported more oral health problems and less access to oral health care than their peers with no history of foster care. Using logistic regression to control for key covariates, the odds of an oral health problem for youth with a history of foster care were 1.54 higher (95% confidence interval, 1.44 to 1.65) than for their peers. CONCLUSIONS: Youth with a history of foster care report more oral health problems than their peers. Dentists should recognize the oral health concerns of these youth in the context of their special health care needs and be prepared to render appropriate care. Future studies should explore barriers to oral health care among this vulnerable population. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Youth in foster care have self-identified oral health care needs that should be assessed by dental professionals.
Assuntos
Cuidados no Lar de Adoção , Saúde Bucal , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Instituições Acadêmicas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection and is responsible for most anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. Dental care providers can be advocates for vaccine uptake, yet little is known about patients' perceptions of the role of dental care providers in HPV education and prevention. METHODS: Parents of adolescents aged 9 through 17 years were recruited from the Minnesota State Fair to survey their awareness and knowledge of the HPV vaccine. Parents were also surveyed about their attitudes toward and comfort in receiving HPV vaccination recommendations and counseling from oral health care providers. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 208 parents, most of whom felt that dentists were qualified to counsel about HPV (66.4%) and its vaccination (72.6%). A lower proportion felt similarly regarding dental hygienists. Parent age and sex were not correlated with comfort levels, but education levels (P = .021) and child vaccination statuses (P > .001) were. CONCLUSIONS: Parents are comfortable having discussions about HPV and the vaccine in the dental setting, especially with dentists. This may represent an additional setting where strong recommendations increase vaccine uptake. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings emphasize an opportunity for the dental care team to improve the patient perspective on the role of dental care providers in HPV prevention. Continuing dental education can increase providers' knowledge, comfort, and confidence in discussing HPV with parents. Parents perceiving provider comfort and confidence might be more comfortable with HPV conversations. Training in collaborative, patient-focused communication techniques, such as motivational interviewing, can improve both providers' and patients' comfort and confidence in HPV counseling from oral health care providers.
Assuntos
Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Criança , Assistência Odontológica , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Minnesota , Pais , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the use of a dosing scalar for association with the success of procedural sedation in pediatric dentistry. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective study assessed healthy two- to 12-year-olds who received an elixir of midazolam (0.3 mg/kg), meperidine (1.5 mg/kg), and hydroxyzine (1.0 mg/kg). The scaled body weight (SBW) for each patient was determined using the 50th percentile weight-for-age from the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth chart. Children under the 50th percentile were dosed at their actual weight. Children weighing over the 50th percentile received a dose that was reduced to the 50th percentile weight-for-age. Statistical analysis evaluated sedation success, measured by the Houpt scale. Lean body weight (LBW) and ideal body weight (IBW) were calculated to compare SBW with other available dosing scalars. Results: The sample consisted of 427 children. The success was 73.8 percent. There was no significant difference in sedation success by dose delivered. The calculated LBW and IBW were significantly greater than the SBW (P<.001, P<.001). Conclusions: Sedation success was not affected by use of a scalar that reduced dosing weight to the 2000 CDC growth chart's 50th percentile weight-for-age.
Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Peso Corporal , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Hidroxizina/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Meperidina/administração & dosagem , Midazolam/administração & dosagem , Obesidade Infantil/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The literature conflicts regarding dental caries risk in cystic fibrosis (CF) relative to controls. METHODS: Prospective, observational study of age-related heterogeneity in caries rates and potential risk factors in individuals with CF ages 6-20 at a single clinic in Washington state (N=85). Caries rates for enrolled CF participants and historical controls from NHANES were compared using cubic spline regression models. Generalized linear regression models identified correlates of age and caries in CF. RESULTS: Children ages 6-9 with CF had significantly lower caries than controls (Holm's P<0.05). There was no difference for ages 10-20 by CF status (Holm's P>0.05). Various biological/intraoral, medical, and behavioral factors were associated with caries and age in CF. CONCLUSIONS: Younger children with CF may be protected from caries, but there is apparent loss of protection in early adolescence associated with multiple risk factors. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística/epidemiologia , Cárie Dentária , Adolescente , Saúde do Adolescente/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Cárie Dentária/diagnóstico , Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Pediatric dentists are the primary providers of dental homes for children with life-threatening and complex chronic conditions. These children are increasingly living at home and seeking health care in community-based settings, including dental offices. Pediatric dentists may feel ill prepared to assume the roles and responsibilities of a pediatric palliative care provider due to limited education and training during dental school and residency; however, they should be sensitive to the palliative care needs of children and families. The purpose of this clinical article was to highlight palliative care scenarios in pediatric dentistry and provide actionable resources to empower pediatric dentists to gather health care information, make informed ethical decisions, promote patient- and family-centered care, and prepare dentists and their dental teams for episodes of death and bereavement when providing a dental home to patients with life-threatening and complex chronic conditions.
Assuntos
Assistência Odontológica , Odontólogos , Cuidados Paliativos , Papel do Médico , Adolescente , Criança , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Masculino , Odontopediatria/educaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Despite a multitude of risk factors, children with cystic fibrosis (CF) have lower reported dental caries prevalence. A potential explanation is preventive dental care use, but no studies to date have examined dental use for children with CF. METHODOLOGY: Iowa Medicaid data were analyzed for children age 3 to 17 years (N = 156,268). Poisson regression models were used to compare utilization rates for any dental care and also for specific categories of dental care, by CF status. RESULTS: Children with CF were significantly less likely to use any dental care than children without CF (incident rate ratio: 0.819, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.84, p < .001). There were no significant differences in use across specific categories of dental care. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid-enrolled children with CF are less likely to use dental care than children without CF. These findings suggest that use of dental care use is an unlikely explanation for lower purported caries rates among children with CF.