Predicting exercise capacity after lobectomy by single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the prediction of postoperative exercise capacity by employing lung perfusion scintigraphy images obtained with single photon emission computed tomography together with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) versus the common method of counting subsegments (SC method). METHODS: In 18 patients scheduled for lobectomy, predicted postoperative maximum oxygen uptake per kilogram body weight ([Formula: see text]) was calculated by the SPECT/CT and SC methods. Correlations were examined between the [Formula: see text] predicted by SPECT/CT or the SC method, and the actual [Formula: see text] measured at 2 weeks (mean 15.4 ± 1.5 days) and 1 month (mean 29.1 ± 0.75 days) after surgery to determine whether SPECT/CT was more accurate than SC for predicting postoperative exercise capacity. RESULTS: There was a significant positive correlation between the [Formula: see text] predicted by SPECT/CT and the actual value at 2 weeks (r = 0.802, p < 0.0001) or 1 month (r = 0.770, p < 0.0001). There was also a significant positive correlation between the [Formula: see text] predicted by SC and the actual value at 2 weeks (r = 0.785, p < 0.0001) or 1 month (r = 0.784, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that both SPECT/CT and the SC method were useful for predicting postoperative [Formula: see text] in the clinical setting.

[A case of advanced gastric cancer with giant lymph node metastasis responding to S-1/CDDP neoadjuvant chemotherapy].

The patient was a 66-year-old man with advanced gastric cancer and bulky lymph node metastases. Since a radical resection appeared impossible, we tried neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with S-1/CDDP, expecting down staging of the tumor. S-1 (120 mg/body) was orally administered for 21 days and CDDP (40 mg/body) was administered by intravenous drip on day 8, 15 and 22. Partial response (PR) was obtained after 2 courses, and distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed. The histological diagnosis revealed complete disappearance of cancer cells in stomach and a few regional lymph node metastasis (3/30). The patient was administered S-1 for one year after operation, and he is well without recurrence at one year and four months postoperatively. We considered the S-1 and CDDP in combination useful as preoperative chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Second-line combination chemotherapy with docetaxel for cisplatin-pretreated refractory metastatic esophageal cancer: a preliminary report of initial experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with esophageal cancer often develop metastatic disease after esophageal resection and generally receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (DFC) as a second-line chemotherapy were evaluated in patients with postoperative metastatic esophageal cancer refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with metastatic esophageal cancer after esophagectomy refractory to cisplatin-based therapy were included in this study. The DFC regimen consisted of docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) on day 1, 5-FU (500 mg/day) on days 1-5 and cisplatin (10 mg/day) on days 1-5, being repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 49 cycles (median 2, range 1-6) was administered to 20 patients. The median follow-up was 8 months (range 3-24). Of the 20 patients, 1 had a complete response, 6 had a partial response, 6 had stable and 7 had progressive disease. Median time to progression for all patients was 4 months (95% Cl 1.7-5.6). The median overall survival for all patients was 8 months (95% CI 5.7-10.3). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Neutropenia of grade 3 or more occurred in 13 patients (65%), and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 occurred in 1 patient (5%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 1 patient (5%). There was no treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSION: DFC is a feasible and promising regimen as a second-line therapy in metastatic/recurrent esophageal cancer refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

[Chemoradiotherapy of unresectable and recurrent cholangiocarcinoma].

UNLABELLED: This study is for chemoradiotherapy of unresectable and recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CCC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between April 2005 and March 2007, 5 patients were evaluated for unresectable and recurrent CCC. All patients were performed percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and treated with chemoradiotherapy. The radiation method was an external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and remote after loading system (RALS). The chemotherapy was 5-FU and gemcitabine by intravenous injection. RESULTS: Three patients had unresectable and 2 had recurrent CCC. As for the side effects, 4 patients had a slight neutropenia and 1 had an uncontrollable gastric bleeding. No patient had cholangitis. The mean survival time for unresectable and recurrent CCC was 13.7 months and 17 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that chemoradiotherapy had been consistent with efficacy in patients with unresectable and recurrent CCC.

Prospective non-randomized trial comparing esophagectomy-followed-by-chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy-followed-by-esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multimodal treatment is commonly adopted for patients with a T4 esophageal cancer. This trial evaluated which therapy offered a better survival: preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or postoperative CRT. METHODS: Forty-three patients with a T4 esophageal cancer were enrolled in a prospective study in which each patient decided for themselves a treatment arm, CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy or esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT. The CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy Group received 36 Gy radiotherapy and simultaneous chemotherapy using cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) preoperatively, and then 24 Gy radiotherapy and simultaneous chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU postoperatively. The esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT Group received 60 Gy radiotherapy with two cycles of simultaneous chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 26 patients who chose CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy, 15 (58%) underwent esophagectomy, while 7 (27%) refused surgery and 4 (15%) were inoperable. Of 17 patients who chose esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT, 14 (82%) underwent esophagectomy, while 3 (18%) underwent inspection thoracotomy. The CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy Group showed a significantly better 5-year-survival rate than the esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT Group (26% vs. 0%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the response to CRT was prognostic. CONCLUSIONS: This trial concluded that the first choice of treatment for patients with a T4 esophageal cancer was prior CRT rather than prior esophagectomy.

Evaluation of an aortic stent graft for use in surgery on esophageal cancer involving the thoracic aorta: experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate whether aortic stent grafting can be applied to the treatment of an esophageal cancer involving the thoracic aorta. METHODS: The canine thoracic aorta was partially resected without aorta being clamped after emplacement of an endovascular stent graft. Study I; The aortic whole layer of 1 cm in length and 1/4 of the circumference was resected and was covered by a free fascia patch of the abdominal rectal muscle immediately after stent graft placement. Study II; The aortic adventitia and the outer half of the media of the same size was resected on day 3, 7, 14, 21, and on day 28, after the stent graft placement. The resected portion was covered by the free fascia patch in half experimental dogs, and was uncovered in the others. Study III; The aortic adventitia and the outer half of the media of 1 cm in length and 1/2 of the circumference was resected and was uncovered on day 7 after stent graft placement. Histological examinations were performed on day 28 and at one year after aortic resection. RESULTS: The aortic wall could be resected in all cases with no complication, except in resection of 1/2 the circumference where the aorta had become narrow. There was no difference in healing of the resected portion of the aorta between with and without fascia covering. CONCLUSION: An aortic endovascular stent graft could be applied to surgery for an esophageal cancer involving the aorta.

[Preliminary evaluation of chemotherapy with docetaxel, 5-FU, CDDP for recurrent esophageal cancer--a pilot study].

A pilot study has been conducted since January 2002 to investigate whether chemotherapy with docetaxel, 5-FU, CDDP could be an effective regimen for recurrent esophageal cancer. Ten patients with recurrent esophageal cancer were treated with the combination of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 (day 1), CDDP 10 mg/body (days 1-5) and 5-FU 500 mg/body (days 1-5) at intervals of 2-3 weeks. All patients had undergone surgery, had a recurrent tumor and had already been treated with chemo-radiotherapy or chemotherapy with CDDP + 5-FU. Response evaluation in 10 patients with measurable disease: partial response 4 patients, stable disease 2 patients and progressive disease 4 patients. The main NCI-CT grade 3/4 toxicity was leukopenia (8/10). Mild to moderate nausea (> or = grade 2) occurred in 3/10 patients.

[Chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer].

Since mucosal (T1a) esophageal cancer is well controlled by endoscopic treatment, chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) is not indicated. However, for a submucosal (T1b, N0) esophageal cancer, CRTx may be the first line of treatment, since it can provide a good response rate, with an excellent survival rate comparable to that after esophagectomy. Definitive CRTx is also in the first line of treatment for a T4 esophageal cancer, because there was no difference in the survival rate between CRTx with surgery and CRTx without surgery in our trial. Esophagectomy is indicated only for non-responders or recurrence-salvage surgery. For patients with a potentially-resectable (T2-T3) esophageal cancer, esophagectomy offered a longer survival rate than CRTx did, in our series. However, there remains controversy over the efficacy of CRTx for a T2-T3 esophageal cancer. It has been reported by the National Cancer Center Hospital East Group that definitive CRTx provided the same survival rate as esophagectomy. A prospective trial comparing the survival rate after esophagectomy and that after CRTx for a T2-T3 esophageal cancer is needed.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection of squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus: who benefits? A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A definitive combined modality therapy superior to surgery alone has not yet been found for esophageal cancer. This retrospective study investigated the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who underwent curative (R0) esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred and eleven patients with a squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus who underwent transthoracic curative (R0) esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy, such as 3-field lymphadenectomy or total 2-field lymphadenectomy, between 1988 and 2000, were retrospectively reviewed. Ninety-four patients received postoperative chemotherapy - 2 courses of cisplatin (CDDP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) or vindesine (VDS) - while the other 117 patients received surgery alone. The overall survival rate was compared between the two groups after being stratified by the numbers of the metastasis- positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: Only in the subgroup of patients with 8 or more lymph nodes metastasis- positive, the surgery-with-postoperative-chemotherapy group had a significantly better survival than the surgery-alone group. No significant difference was found in survival between the two groups in any other stratified subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following curative (R0) esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy such as 3-field lymphadenectomy or total 2-field lymphadenectomy provided a benefit only in patients having metastasis in a large number - 8 or more - lymph nodes.

Optimal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus: comparing the short- and long-term outcome among the four types of lymphadenectomy.

Controversy continues over the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy (regional versus three-field) for a potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus. In the Consensus Conference of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus (ISDE), held in Munich in 1994, the types of lymphadenectomy were classified as standard, extended, total, or three-field lymphadenectomy. The objective of the present study was to determine the optimal procedure among these four types of lymphadenectomy. The mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, and survival rates were compared among 302 patients who underwent curative (R0) transthoracic esophagectomy with one of these four types of lymphadenectomy at Kurume University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, from 1986 to 1998. Three-field lymphadenectomy resulted in better survival than any other type of lymphadenectomy for patients with positive lymph node metastasis from a cancer in the upper or middle thoracic esophagus. A postoperative complication, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, and tracheal ischemic lesion, was significantly more common after three-field lymphadenectomy. However, the mortality rate was the same among the four procedures. Three-field lymphadenectomy was optimal for an upper or middle thoracic esophageal cancer with metastasis in the lymph node(s) based on improved long-term survival, whereas there was not a large difference in short-term and long-term outcomes after the four types of lymphadenectomy for a lower thoracic esophageal cancer.

Locoregional adoptive immunotherapy resulted in regression in distant metastases of a recurrent esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases. However, postoperative recurrences are still resistant to currently available radiochemotherapy. We recently reported a study on the initial clinical efficacy of locoregional adoptive immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. We report here our clinical experience of remarked responses in distant metastatic lesions in a patient with recurrent cancer after receiving this immunotherapy. A male patient underwent curative surgery, and presented with multiple recurrent metastases in the supraclavicular lymph nodes (LNs), liver, and abdominal aortic LNs. Autologous tumor-activated lymphocytes (AuTLs) generated ex vivo were regionally injected into supraclavicular LNs every 2 weeks 13 times. Mean numbers of the administrated cells were 0.8 x 10(9) cells/injection. AuTLs established from peripheral blood lymphocytes stimulated by autologous tumor cells with interleukin-2 were tested for their cytotoxicity before every treatment. During immunotherapy, Grade 2 diarrhea and fever were observed. The clinical partial responses were obtained in all lesions and were sustained for 11 months. Because clinical toxicity was tolerable, this immunotherapy might be useful for patients with far-advanced esophageal cancers.